Article published in:Sensory Perceptions in Language and Cognition
Edited by Rosario Caballero and Carita Paradis
[Functions of Language 22:1] 2015
► pp. 44–68
Exploring the grammar of perception
A case study using data from Russian
In this paper, I pursue the distributional hypothesis that the meaning of a word is derived from the linguistic contexts in which it occurs and apply it to verbs of perception. Differently from NLP implementations of the distributional hypothesis, I explicitly limit the range of variables to the grammatical domain and chart the way in which verbs of Vision, Hearing and Touch are used, morphologically and syntactically, in a representative sample of corpus data. Some aspects of experience are so central and pervasive that reference to them has grammaticalized (Divjak 2010; see also Janda & Lyashevskaya 2011; Newman 2008). The aim is, firstly, to determine to which extent a verb’s grammatical context alone allows us to classify utterances according to the perception type, and, secondly, to chart the similarities and differences in the verbs’ preference for morphological markers and syntactic constructions. If contexts are highly specialized, language structure, as it is witnessed in use, could assist sensory impaired speakers in building up viable representations of concepts, even if sensory experience is lacking. If, in addition, similarities between certain sensory perception verbs are high, sensory impaired speakers could use these similarities to perform analogical mapping across senses and ground concepts relating to the impaired sense in a cognate sensory experience. The findings are relevant for concept acquisition and representation in general and for concept acquisition and representation in sensory impaired populations, such as the blind, in particular.
Published online: 01 May 2015
Cited by 5 other publications
Divjak, Dagmar & Petar Milin
Staniewski, Przemysław & Adam Gołębiowski
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Apresjan, Jurij D.
Divjak, Dagmar & Stefan Th. Gries
1999 Probabilistic latent semantic analysis. Proceedings of the fifteenth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI’99).
Janda, Laura Alexis & Ol’ga Lyashevskaya
Janda, Laura Alexis & Valery Solovyev
Landau, Barbara & Lila Gleitman
Landauer, Thomas K., Peter W. Foltz & Darrell Laham
Li, Jianguo & Chris Brew
2008 Which are the best features for automatic verb classification? In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT. 434–442.
Louwerse, Max M.
Louwerse, Max M. & Patrick Jeuniaux
Nesset, Tore, Laura A. Janda, Julia Kuznetsova, Ol’ga Lyashevskaya, Anastasia Makarova & Svetlana Sokolova
2008 Aiming low in linguistics: Low-level generalizations in corpus-based research. Downloaded from http://www.johnnewm.org/downloads/; page last accessed on 07.06.2013
The Oxford Russian-English Dictionary
Paradis Carita & Mats Eeg-Olofsson
. Национальный корпус русского языка. [http://ruscorpora.ru/en/index.html. Data extracted July 2012].
Riordan, Brian & Michael N. Jones
Vigliocco, Gabriella, Lotte Meteyard, Mark Andrews & Stavroula Kousta
Wnuk, Ewelina & Asifa Majid
2012 Olfaction in a hunter-gatherer society: Insights from language and culture. In Naomi Miyake, David Peebles & Richard P. Cooper (eds.), CogSci 2012: Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 1155–1160. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.