Article published in:
Sensory Perceptions in Language and Cognition
Edited by Rosario Caballero and Carita Paradis
[Functions of Language 22:1] 2015
► pp. 4468
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Divjak, Dagmar & Petar Milin
2020. Exploring and Exploiting Uncertainty: Statistical Learning Ability Affects How We Learn to Process Language Along Multiple Dimensions of Experience. Cognitive Science 44:5 Crossref logo
Kiose, Maria
2020. The Interplay of Syntactic and Lexical Salience and its Effect on Default Figurative Responses. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 61:1  pp. 69 ff. Crossref logo
Nesset, Tore
2016. “Cyclic” time in the history of Russian. Studies in Language 40:3  pp. 591 ff. Crossref logo
Proos, Mariann
2019.  In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 19],  pp. 231 ff. Crossref logo
Staniewski, Przemysław & Adam Gołębiowski
2021.  In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131],  pp. 403 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Apresjan, Jurij D.
1967Экспериментальное исследование семантики русского глагола [Eksperimental’noe issledovanie semantiki russkogo glagola]. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Divjak, Dagmar
2003On trying in Russian: A tentative network model for near(er) synonyms. Belgian Contributions to the 13th international congress of Slavicists, Ljubljana, 15–21 August 2003. Slavica Gandensia 30. 25–58.Google Scholar
2006Ways of intending: Delineating and structuring near-synonyms. In Stefan Th. Gries & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics. Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis, 19–56. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
2010Structuring the lexicon: A clustered model for near-synonymy. Berlin: Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Divjak, Dagmar & Stefan Th. Gries
2006Ways of trying in Russian. Clustering behavioral profiles. Journal of Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2(1). 23–60.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig
1954Distributional structure. Word 10(23). 146–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, Thomas
1999Probabilistic latent semantic analysis. Proceedings of the fifteenth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI’99).
Janda, Laura Alexis & Ol’ga Lyashevskaya
2011Grammatical profiles and the interaction of the lexicon with aspect, tense and mood in Russian. Cognitive Linguistics 22(4). 719–763. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janda, Laura Alexis & Valery Solovyev
2009What constructional profiles reveal about synonymy: A case study of Russian words for sadness and happiness. Cognitive Linguistics 20(2). 367–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, Fred
1986Frequency considerations in morphology. Zeitschrift fur Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 39. 19–28.Google Scholar
Landau, Barbara & Lila Gleitman
1985Language and experience. Evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Landauer, Thomas K., Peter W. Foltz & Darrell Laham
1998Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25. 259–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Li, Jianguo & Chris Brew
2008Which are the best features for automatic verb classification? In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT. 434–442.
Louwerse, Max M.
2011Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. TopiCS in Cognitive Science 3. 273–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, Max M. & Patrick Jeuniaux
2010The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition 114. 96–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, P.H.
2007The concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics (2nd edition). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Nesset, Tore, Laura A. Janda, Julia Kuznetsova, Ol’ga Lyashevskaya, Anastasia Makarova & Svetlana Sokolova
2008Why poslushat’, but uslyshat’? Poljarnyj Vestnik 11. 38–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newman, John
2008Aiming low in linguistics: Low-level generalizations in corpus-based research. Downloaded from http://​www​.johnnewm​.org​/downloads/; page last accessed on 07.06.2013
The Oxford Russian-English Dictionary
; 2nd Revised edition 1993Paul Falla, Marcus Wheeler & Boris Unbegaun (eds.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Paradis Carita & Mats Eeg-Olofsson
2013Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews. In Rosario Caballero (guest ed.), Metaphor in and across genres. Thematic issue of Metaphor and Symbol 28(1). 22–40.Google Scholar
RNC
. Национальный корпус русского языка. [http://​ruscorpora​.ru​/en​/index​.html. Data extracted July 2012].
Riordan, Brian & Michael N. Jones
2011Redundancy in perceptual and linguistic experience: Comparing feature-based and distributional models of semantic representation. TopiCS in Cognitive Science 3. 303–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sahlgren, Magnus
2008The distributional hypothesis. Rivista di Linguistica 20(1). 33–53.Google Scholar
Šteinfeldt, Evi
1970Russian word count. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
Vigliocco, Gabriella, Lotte Meteyard, Mark Andrews & Stavroula Kousta
2009Toward a theory of semantic representation. Language and Cognition 1(2). 219–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Margaret
2002Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9(4). 625–636. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wnuk, Ewelina & Asifa Majid
2012Olfaction in a hunter-gatherer society: Insights from language and culture. In Naomi Miyake, David Peebles & Richard P. Cooper (eds.), CogSci 2012: Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 1155–1160. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.