In this paper, I pursue the distributional hypothesis that the meaning of a word is derived from the linguistic contexts in which it occurs and apply it to verbs of perception. Differently from NLP implementations of the distributional hypothesis, I explicitly limit the range of variables to the grammatical domain and chart the way in which verbs of Vision, Hearing and Touch are used, morphologically and syntactically, in a representative sample of corpus data. Some aspects of experience are so central and pervasive that reference to them has grammaticalized (Divjak 2010; see also Janda & Lyashevskaya 2011; Newman 2008). The aim is, firstly, to determine to which extent a verb’s grammatical context alone allows us to classify utterances according to the perception type, and, secondly, to chart the similarities and differences in the verbs’ preference for morphological markers and syntactic constructions. If contexts are highly specialized, language structure, as it is witnessed in use, could assist sensory impaired speakers in building up viable representations of concepts, even if sensory experience is lacking. If, in addition, similarities between certain sensory perception verbs are high, sensory impaired speakers could use these similarities to perform analogical mapping across senses and ground concepts relating to the impaired sense in a cognate sensory experience. The findings are relevant for concept acquisition and representation in general and for concept acquisition and representation in sensory impaired populations, such as the blind, in particular.
Apresjan, Jurij D. 1967. Экспериментальное исследование семантики русского глагола [Eksperimental’noe issledovanie semantiki russkogo glagola]. Moskva: Nauka.
Divjak, Dagmar. 2003. On trying in Russian: A tentative network model for near(er) synonyms. Belgian Contributions to the 13th international congress of Slavicists, Ljubljana, 15–21 August 2003. Slavica Gandensia 301. 25–58.
Divjak, Dagmar. 2006. Ways of intending: Delineating and structuring near-synonyms. In Stefan Th. Gries & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics. Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis, 19–56. Berlin: Mouton.
Divjak, Dagmar. 2010. Structuring the lexicon: A clustered model for near-synonymy. Berlin: Mouton.
Divjak, Dagmar & Stefan Th. Gries. 2006. Ways of trying in Russian. Clustering behavioral profiles. Journal of Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2(1). 23–60.
Harris, Zellig. 1954. Distributional structure. Word 10(23). 146–162.
Hofmann, Thomas. 1999. Probabilistic latent semantic analysis. Proceedings of the fifteenth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI’99).
Janda, Laura Alexis & Ol’ga Lyashevskaya. 2011. Grammatical profiles and the interaction of the lexicon with aspect, tense and mood in Russian. Cognitive Linguistics 22(4). 719–763.
Janda, Laura Alexis & Valery Solovyev. 2009. What constructional profiles reveal about synonymy: A case study of Russian words for sadness and happiness. Cognitive Linguistics 20(2). 367–393.
Karlsson, Fred. 1986. Frequency considerations in morphology. Zeitschrift fur Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 391. 19–28.
Landau, Barbara & Lila Gleitman. 1985. Language and experience. Evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Landauer, Thomas K., Peter W. Foltz & Darrell Laham. 1998. Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 251. 259–284.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Li, Jianguo & Chris Brew. 2008. Which are the best features for automatic verb classification? In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT. 434–442.
Louwerse, Max M. 2011. Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. TopiCS in Cognitive Science 31. 273–302.
Louwerse, Max M. & Patrick Jeuniaux. 2010. The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition 1141. 96–104.
Matthews, P.H. 2007. The concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics (2nd edition). Oxford: OUP.
Nesset, Tore, Laura A. Janda, Julia Kuznetsova, Ol’ga Lyashevskaya, Anastasia Makarova & Svetlana Sokolova. 2008. Why poslushat’, but uslyshat’?Poljarnyj Vestnik 111. 38–46.
Newman, John. 2008. Aiming low in linguistics: Low-level generalizations in corpus-based research. Downloaded from [URL]; page last accessed on 07.06.2013
The Oxford Russian-English Dictionary; 2nd Revised edition. 1993. Paul Falla, Marcus Wheeler & Boris Unbegaun (eds.). Oxford: OUP.
Paradis Carita & Mats Eeg-Olofsson. 2013. Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews. In Rosario Caballero (guest ed.), Metaphor in and across genres. Thematic issue of Metaphor and Symbol 28(1). 22–40.
RNC. Национальный корпус русского языка. [[URL]. Data extracted July2012].
Riordan, Brian & Michael N. Jones. 2011. Redundancy in perceptual and linguistic experience: Comparing feature-based and distributional models of semantic representation. TopiCS in Cognitive Science 31. 303–345.
Sahlgren, Magnus. 2008. The distributional hypothesis. Rivista di Linguistica 20(1). 33–53.
Šteinfeldt, Evi. 1970. Russian word count. Moscow: Progress.
Vigliocco, Gabriella, Lotte Meteyard, Mark Andrews & Stavroula Kousta. 2009. Toward a theory of semantic representation. Language and Cognition 1(2). 219–247.
Wilson, Margaret. 2002. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9(4). 625–636.
Wnuk, Ewelina & Asifa Majid. 2012. Olfaction in a hunter-gatherer society: Insights from language and culture. In Naomi Miyake, David Peebles & Richard P. Cooper (eds.),
CogSci 2012: Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society
, 1155–1160. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Dai, Ying & Yicheng Wu
2024. The colexification of vision and cognition in Mandarin: controlled activity surpasses uncontrolled experience. Cognitive Linguistics 35:3 ► pp. 345 ff.
2020. Exploring and Exploiting Uncertainty: Statistical Learning Ability Affects How We Learn to Process Language Along Multiple Dimensions of Experience. Cognitive Science 44:5
Kiose, Maria
2020. The Interplay of Syntactic and Lexical Salience and its Effect on Default Figurative Responses. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 61:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Jansegers, Marlies, Clara Vanderschueren & Renata Enghels
2015. The polysemy of the Spanish verb sentir: A behavioral profile analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 26:3 ► pp. 381 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.