Cover not available
Article published In:
Sensory Perceptions in Language and Cognition
Edited by Rosario Caballero and Carita Paradis
[Functions of Language 22:1] 2015
► pp. 96–131

Sensation, perception and cognition

Swedish in a typological-contrastive perspective

| Uppsala University

This paper presents an analysis of the field of perception verbs in Swedish within a typological and contrastive framework. Earlier work has to a great extent focused on the concepts see and hear. This article focuses on the more ‘raw’ form of perception represented by sensations and on the combination of meanings referring to perception and cognition in Swedish känna ‘feel, know’. The polysemy of känna turns out to be very language-specific even in relation to the most closely related Germanic languages. The polysemy of känna is interesting also because this verb can refer to internal (bodily) perception and has an extension that covers blended spaces combining cognitive elements with emotional and bodily feelings (cf. feel remorse, feel convinced). Special attention is paid also to sensory verbs describing sensations of light and sound (cf. English glitter, glimmer, rattle, creak, etc.) and of bodily sensations and pain (cf. ache, itch, etc.) Sensations are interesting because — similar to sensory adjectives — evaluation and intensity are central components of their meaning in addition to the fine-grained description of sensory qualia. There are great differences across languages in the degree of elaboration of sensory verbs referring to sensations. Recent typological work has demonstrated great elaborations of taste verbs in some languages, whereas other languages have elaborated odor verbs. Swedish (similar to many other European languages) has a rich repertoire of sound verbs.

Published online: 1 May 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22.1.05vib
References
Abelin, Åsa
1999 Studies in sound symbolism (Gothenburg monographs in Linguistics vol. 171). Gothenburg: Dept. of Linguistics, Gothenburg University.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Anne Storch
2013 Linguistic expression of perception and cognition: A typological glimpse. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds.), 1–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds.) 2013 Perception and cognition in language and culture. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt & Karin Aijmer
2000 The English-Swedish parallel corpus: A resource for contrastive research and translation studies. In Christian Mair & Marianne Hundt (eds.), Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory, 15–33. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo
1976 Meaning and structure of Finnish descriptive vocabulary. In Robert T. Harms & Frances Karttunen (eds.), Papers from the transatlantic Finnish conference, 1–12. Austin, TX: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent & Paul Kay
1969 Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999 Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Brenzinger, Matthias & Anne-Maria Fehn
2013 From body to knowledge: Perception and cognition in Khwe-ǁAni and Ts’ixa. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds.), 161–191.Google Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling
1949 A dictionary of selected synonyms in the principal Indo-European languages. A contribution to the history of ideas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas & Asifa Majid
2011 Olfaction in Aslian ideology and language. Senses & Society 6(1). 19–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colman, Andrew
(ed.) 1994 Companion encyclopedia of psychology. Vol.11. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Enghels, Renata & Marlies Jansegers
2013 On the crosslinguistic equivalence of sentir(e) in Romance languages: A contrastive study in semantics. Linguistics 51(5). 957–991. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas M. & David Wilkins
2000 In the mind’s ear: The semantic extension of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76(3). 546–592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardin, C.L. & Louisa Maffi
(eds.) 1997 Color categories in thought and language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellquist, Elof
1898 Om nordiska verb på suffixalt -k, -l, -r, -s och -t samt af dem bildade nomina. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 141. 136–194.Google Scholar
Hinton, Leanne, Johanna Nichols & John Ohala
1994 Introduction: Sound-symbolic processes. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 1–12. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hummelstedt, Eskil
1939 Östsvenska verbstudier. Helsingfors: Centraltryckeriet.Google Scholar
Huumo, Tuomas
2010 Is perception a directional relationship? On directionality and its motivation in Finnish expressions of sensory perception. Linguistics 48(1). 49–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich
2011/1883) Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. 25th edn. revised by Elmar Seebold. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lascaratou, Chryssoula
2007 The language of pain: Expression or description. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993 English verb classes and alternations. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Majid, Masifa & Stephen C. Levinson
(eds.) 2011 The senses in language and culture. Special issue of Senses & Society 6(1).Google Scholar
Malt, Barbara C. & Phillip Wolff
(eds.) 2010 Words and the mind. How words capture human experience. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maslova, Elena
2004 A universal constraint on the sensory lexicon, or when hear can mean ‘see’? In Alexandr P. Volodin (ed.), Tipologičeskie obosnovanija v grammatike: k 70-letiju professora Xrakovskogo V.S., 300–312. Moscow: Znak. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Mather, George
2006 Foundations of perception. Hove & New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Hirosi
2012 The importance of taste verbs in some Khoe languages. Linguistics 50(3). 395–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carita & Mats Eeg-Olofsson
2013 Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews. In Rosario Caballero (guest ed.), Metaphor in and across genres. Thematic issue of Metaphor and Symbol 28(1). 22–40.Google Scholar
Plümacher, Martina & Petyer Holz
(eds.) 2007 Speaking of colors and odors. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ralph, Bo
1991 Strömningar inom ordforskningen. Svenskans beskrivning 181. 9–28. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Regier, Terry, Paul Kay, Aubrey L. Gilbert & Richard B Ivry
2010 Language and thought: Which side are you on, anyway? In Barbara C. Malt & Phillip Wolff (eds.), 165–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reznikova, Tatiana, Ekaterina Rakhilina & Anastasia Bonch-Osmolovskaya
2012 Towards a typology of pain predicates. Linguistics 50(3). 421–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberson, Debi & J. Richard Hanley
2010 Relatively speaking: An account of the relationship between language and thought in the color domain. In Barbara C. Malt & Phillip Wolff (eds.), 165–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, Elena
2010 Descriptions of pain, metaphor, and embodied simulation. Metaphor and Symbol 251. 205–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snell-Hornby, Mary
1983 Verb-descriptivity in German and English. A contrastive study in semantic fields. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Storch, Anne
2013 Knowing, smelling and telling tales in Luwo. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds.), 47–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strik Lievers, Francesca
2007 Italian perception verbs. A corpus-based study. In Sansò, Andrea (ed.), Language resources and linguistic theory, 167–179. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990 From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanhove, Martine
2008 Semantic associations between sensory modalities, prehension and mental perceptions: A crosslinguistic perspective. In Martine Vanhove (ed.), From polysemy to semantic change. Towards a typology of lexical semantic associations, 341–370. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viberg, Åke
1980 Tre semantiska fält i svenskan och andra språk. SSM Report 7. Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University. Available at: [URL].
1983 Studier i kontrastiv lexikologi: Perceptionsverb. SSM Report 8. Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University. Available at: [URL]
1984 The verbs of perception: a typological study. Linguistics 21(1). 123–162.Google Scholar
1999 Polysemy and differentiation in the lexicon. Verbs of physical contact in Swedish. In Jens Allwood & Peter Gärdenfors (eds.), Cognitive semantics. Meaning and cognition, 87–129. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 The verbs of perception. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals. An international handbook, 1294–1309. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
2005 The lexical typological profile of Swedish mental verbs. Languages in Contrast 5(1). 121–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Towards a lexical profile of the Swedish verb lexicon. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 59(1). 103–129.Google Scholar
2008 Swedish verbs of perception from a typological and contrastive perspective. In María de los Ángeles Gómez González, J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Elsa M. González-Álvarez (eds.), Languages and cultures in contrast and comparison, 123–172. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 The meaning patterns of Swedish låta ‘sound’; ‘let’. A corpus-based contrastive study. In Petra Bernardini, Verner Egerland & Jonas Granfeldt (eds.), Mélanges plurilingues offerts à Suzanne Schlyter à l’occasion de son 65ème anniversaire. [Études romanes de Lund 85], 455–480. Lund: University of Lund.Google Scholar
2010 Swedish impersonal constructions from a crosslinguistic perspective. An exploratory corpus-based study. Orientalia Suecana 591. 122–158. Available at: [URL]Google Scholar
2012 Language-specific meanings in contrast: A corpus-based contrastive study of Swedish få ‘get’. In Alexandra Lenz & Gudrun Rawoens (guest eds.), The art of getting: Get verbs in European languages from a synchronic and diachronic point of view. Thematic issue of Linguistics 50(6). 1413–1461.Google Scholar
2013 Seeing the lexical profile of Swedish through multilingual corpora. The case of Swedish åka and other vehicle verbs. In Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds.), Advances in corpus-based contrastive linguistics. Studies in honour of Stig Johansson, 25–56. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 19 other publications

Backhouse, Anthony E.
2021. How to talk about smell in Japanese. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Bellamy, Kate
2021. Let me count the ways it stinks. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
CABALLERO, ROSARIO & CARITA PARADIS
2020. Soundscapes in English and Spanish: a corpus investigation of verb constructions. Language and Cognition 12:4 ► pp. 705 ff. DOI logo
Hartman, Jenny & Carita Paradis
2023. The language of sound: events and meaning multitasking of words. Cognitive Linguistics 34:3-4 ► pp. 445 ff. DOI logo
Hellerstedt, Maria & Rea Peltola
2020. Le chemin de l’audible : la structuration dynamique de la perception par les verbes höras (suédois) et kuulua (finnois) « être audible ». Syntaxe & Sémantique N° 20:1 ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Jędrzejowski, Łukasz & Przemysław Staniewski
2021. Rendering what the nose perceives. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Peltola, Rea
2018. Being perceptible: Animacy, existentiality and intersubjectivity in constructions with the Finnish verbkuulua‘to be perceptible (through hearing)’. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 41:1 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Peltola, Rea
2023. Verbalizing animal inner speech. Journal of Pragmatics 217 ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Poulton, Thomas
2022. Jędrzejowski, Łukasz and Przemysław Staniewski: The linguistics of olfaction: Typological and diachronic approaches to synchronic diversity . Linguistic Typology 26:3 ► pp. 693 ff. DOI logo
PROOS, MARIANN
2020. Feeling your neighbour: an experimental approach to the polysemy oftundma‘to feel’ in Estonian. Language and Cognition 12:2 ► pp. 282 ff. DOI logo
SEÇKİN, Kuban
2022. DERLEME SÖZLÜĞÜ’NE GÖRE TÜRKİYE TÜRKÇESİ AĞIZLARINDA “DÜŞÜN-” FİİLİ. Motif Akademi Halk Bilimi Dergisi DOI logo
Staniewski, Przemysław & Adam Gołębiowski
2021. To what extent can source-based olfactory verbs be classified as copulas? The case of German and Polish. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 403 ff. DOI logo
Steinbach-Eicke, Elisabeth
2019. Chapter 8. Taste metaphors in Hieroglyphic Egyptian. In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 19], ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Strik Lievers, Francesca
2021. Smelling over time. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
van de Weijer, Joost, Ivana Bianchi & Carita Paradis
2024. Sensory modality profiles of antonyms. Language and Cognition 16:1 ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Viberg, Åke
2020. Phenomenon-Based Perception Verbs in Swedish from a Typological and Contrastive Perspective. Syntaxe & Sémantique N° 20:1 ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Viberg, Åke
2021. Why is smell special? A case study of a European language: Swedish. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Shuqiong & Yue Ou
2023.  A quantitative study of the polysemy of Mandarin Chinese perception verb kàn ‘look/see’ . Australian Journal of Linguistics 43:3 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. From Pseudo-relatives to Causative Constructions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 278], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.