Article published in:
Functions of Language
Vol. 22:2 (2015) ► pp. 192231
References
Bybee, Joan & William Pagliuca
1987The evolution of future meaning. In Anna Ramat, Onofrio Carruba, & Giuliano Beraini (eds.), Papers from the 7th International conference on historical linguistics, 109–122. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1995The semantic development of past tense modals in English. In Joan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, 503–517. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coates, Jennifer
1983The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter
2009Modals and quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coorevits, Laura
2012“I would sooner die than do it”: A corpus-based analysis of (would/had/’d) sooner/rather in Late Modern and Present-Day English. Leuven: University of Leuven BA thesis.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark
2010– The corpus of historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. Available online at http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coha/.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
1991A comprehensive grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Denison, David
1993English historical syntax: Verbal constructions. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1998Syntax. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 4, 1776–1997, 92–329. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Denison, David & Alison Cort
2010 Better as a verb. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 349–383. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dollinger, Stefan
2008New dialect formation in Canada. Evidence from the English modal auxiliaries. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elmer, Willy
1981Diachronic grammar: The history of Old and Middle English subjectless constructions (Linguistische Arbeiten 97). Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Facchinetti, Roberta, Frank Palmer & Manfred Krug
(eds.) 2003Modality in contemporary English. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga & Anette Rosenbach
2000Introduction. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change. Grammaticalization in English, 1–38. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franz, Wilhelm
1900Shakespeare-Grammatik. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Goossens, Louis
1985The auxiliarization of the English modals. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, Institute for general linguistics.Google Scholar
Hall, Fitzedward
1881On the origin of ‘had rather go’ and analogous or apparently analogous locutions. American Journal of Philology 2(7). 281–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1993Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. New York, NY: OUP.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney
1988English grammar. An outline. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsson, Bengt
1980On the syntax and semantics of the modal auxiliary had better . Studia Neophilologica 521. 47–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1894Progress in language, with special reference to English. London: Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Klinge, Alex
1993The English modal auxiliaries. From lexical semantics to utterance interpretation. Journal of Linguistics 29(2). 315–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klippenstein, Rachel
2012The Behavior-before-Coding Principle in morphosyntactic change: Evidence from verbal rather . Extended abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. URL http://​elanguage​.net​/journals​/lsameeting​/article​/view​/2868.
Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor
2000Penn-Helsinki parsed corpus of Middle English. 2nd edn. http://​www​.ling​.upenn​.edu​/hist​-corpora​/PPCME2​-RELEASE​-2/.
Krug, Manfred
2000Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
2003Modality on the move: The English modal auxiliaries 19611992. In Roberta Facchinetti, Frank Palmer, & Manfred Krug (eds.), 225–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair & Nicholas Smith
2009Change in contemporary English. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1995 [1982]Thoughts on grammaticalization: A programmatic sketch, 2nd rev. edn. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía
2010Verbonominal constructions of necessity with þearf n. and need n.: Competition and grammaticalization from OE to eModE. English Language and Linguistics 141. 373–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Keith
2003 Had better and might as well: On the margins of modality. In Roberta Facchinetti, Frank Palmer, & Manfred Krug (eds.), 131–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary
Palmer, Frank R
1974The English verb, 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1979Modality and the English modals, 1st edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1990Modality and the English modals, 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Perkins, Michael R
1983Modal expressions in English. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans
1984The modals story retold. Studies in Language 81. 305–364. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Stoffel, C
1887On had rather and analogous phrases. Taalstudie 81.Google Scholar
Storm, Johan
1892–1896Englische Philologie, 2nd edn., 2 Vols1. Leipzig: Reisland.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Frank Beths
2003The York-Toronto-Helsinki parsed corpus of Old English Prose. University of York. http://​www​-users​.york​.ac​.uk​/~lang22​/YCOE​/YcoeHome​.htm.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard B. Dasher
2002Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Van der Auwera, Johan & Astrid De Wit
2010The English comparative modals. A pilot study. In Bert Cappelle & Naoaki Wada (eds.), Distinctions in English grammar, offered to Renaat Declerck, 127–147. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Van der Auwera, Johan, Dirk Noël & An Van linden
2013 Had better, ’d better and better: Diachronic and transatlantic variation. In Juana I. Marin-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality, 119–154 (TiEL 75). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van der Gaaf, Willem
1904Transition from the impersonal to the personal construction in Middle English. Heibelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
1912The origin of would rather and some of its analogues. Englische Studien 451. 381–396.Google Scholar
Van linden, An
2012Modal adjectives: English deontic and evaluative constructions in diachrony and synchrony (TiEL 75). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Visser, Frederikus Th
1969–1973An historical syntax of the English language. 3 Vols1. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Westney, Paul
1995Modals and periphrastics in English: An investigation into the semantic correspondence between certain English modal verbs and their periphrastic equivalents. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Jim
2013Parasitic participles in the syntax of verbal rather . Lingua 1371. 59–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Fanego, Teresa
2020. Review of Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria, Emma Moore, Linda Van Bergen and Willem B. Hollmann eds. 2019. Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-1-108-41956-7. htps:// doi.org/10.1017/9781108303576. Research in Corpus Linguistics 8:2  pp. 159 ff. Crossref logo
Rohdenburg, Günter
2021. Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen and Willem B. Hollmann (eds.). 2019. Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax. Studies in English Language. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, xix + 403 pp., 38 figures, 45 tables, £ 95.00.. Anglia 139:2  pp. 419 ff. Crossref logo
WANG, JIAWEI
2021.  Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda Van Bergen & Willem B. Hollmann (eds.), Categories, constructions, and change in English syntax (Studies in English Language 63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2019. Pp. xx + 404.. Journal of Linguistics 57:4  pp. 915 ff. Crossref logo
Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen & Willem B. Hollmann
2019.  In Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax, Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.