An Van linden | University of Leuven & FWO — Research Foundation Flanders
This article examines modal expressions with the comparative adverbs better, rather and sooner in American English, and assesses to what extent they have grammaticalized. The corpus data offer evidence that the three comparative modal groups exhibit considerable phonetic reduction in the 1810–2009 period studied. Analysis of several aspects of the constructions, such as subject types, temporal reference and comparative meaning, reveals which conditions promoted this erosion. However, the data also indicate that the three groups are semantically and constructionally quite heterogeneous. In fact, this article proposes a grammaticalization scenario for the rather and sooner structures that is different from the one posited for the better structures.
Bybee, Joan & William Pagliuca. 1987. The evolution of future meaning. In Anna Ramat, Onofrio Carruba, & Giuliano Beraini (eds.), Papers from the 7th International conference on historical linguistics, 109–122. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
Collins, Peter. 2009. Modals and quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Coorevits, Laura. 2012. “I would sooner die than do it”: A corpus-based analysis of (would/had/’d) sooner/rather in Late Modern and Present-Day English. Leuven: University of Leuven BA thesis.
Davies, Mark. 2010–. The corpus of historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. Available online at [URL].
Declerck, Renaat. 1991. A comprehensive grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Denison, David. 1993. English historical syntax: Verbal constructions. London: Longman.
Denison, David. 1998. Syntax. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 4, 1776–1997, 92–329. Cambridge: CUP.
Denison, David & Alison Cort. 2010. Better as a verb. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 349–383. Berlin: Mouton.
Elmer, Willy. 1981. Diachronic grammar: The history of Old and Middle English subjectless constructions (Linguistische Arbeiten 97). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Facchinetti, Roberta, Frank Palmer & Manfred Krug (eds.). 2003. Modality in contemporary English. Berlin: Mouton.
Fischer, Olga & Anette Rosenbach. 2000. Introduction. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change. Grammaticalization in English, 1–38. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Goossens, Louis. 1985. The auxiliarization of the English modals. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, Institute for general linguistics.
Hall, Fitzedward. 1881. On the origin of ‘had rather go’ and analogous or apparently analogous locutions. American Journal of Philology 2(7). 281–322.
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. New York, NY: OUP.
Huddleston, Rodney. 1988. English grammar. An outline. Cambridge: CUP.
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP.
Jacobsson, Bengt. 1980. On the syntax and semantics of the modal auxiliary had better. Studia Neophilologica 521. 47–53.
Jespersen, Otto. 1894. Progress in language, with special reference to English. London: Sonnenschein.
Klinge, Alex. 1993. The English modal auxiliaries. From lexical semantics to utterance interpretation. Journal of Linguistics 29(2). 315–357.
Klippenstein, Rachel. 2012. The Behavior-before-Coding Principle in morphosyntactic change: Evidence from verbal rather. Extended abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. URL [URL].
Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor. 2000. Penn-Helsinki parsed corpus of Middle English. 2nd edn. [URL].
Krug, Manfred. 2000. Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton.
Leech, Geoffrey. 2003. Modality on the move: The English modal auxiliaries 1961–1992. In Roberta Facchinetti, Frank Palmer, & Manfred Krug (eds.), 225–240.
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair & Nicholas Smith2009. Change in contemporary English. Cambridge: CUP.
Lehmann, Christian. 1995 [1982]. Thoughts on grammaticalization: A programmatic sketch, 2nd rev. edn. Munich: Lincom.
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía. 2010. Verbonominal constructions of necessity with þearf n. and need n.: Competition and grammaticalization from OE to eModE. English Language and Linguistics 141. 373–397.
Taylor, Ann, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Frank Beths. 2003. The York-Toronto-Helsinki parsed corpus of Old English Prose. University of York. [URL].
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: CUP.
Van der Auwera, Johan & Astrid De Wit. 2010. The English comparative modals. A pilot study. In Bert Cappelle & Naoaki Wada (eds.), Distinctions in English grammar, offered to Renaat Declerck, 127–147. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Van der Auwera, Johan, Dirk Noël & An Van linden. 2013. Had better, ’d better and better: Diachronic and transatlantic variation. In Juana I. Marin-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality, 119–154 (TiEL 75). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Van der Gaaf, Willem. 1904. Transition from the impersonal to the personal construction in Middle English. Heibelberg: Winter.
Van der Gaaf, Willem. 1912. The origin of would rather and some of its analogues. Englische Studien 451. 381–396.
Van linden, An. 2012. Modal adjectives: English deontic and evaluative constructions in diachrony and synchrony (TiEL 75). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Visser, Frederikus Th. 1969–1973. An historical syntax of the English language. 3 Vols1. Leiden: Brill.
Westney, Paul. 1995. Modals and periphrastics in English: An investigation into the semantic correspondence between certain English modal verbs and their periphrastic equivalents. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Wood, Jim. 2013. Parasitic participles in the syntax of verbal rather. Lingua 1371. 59–87.
2021. Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen and Willem B. Hollmann (eds.). 2019.Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax.Studies in English Language. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, xix + 403 pp., 38 figures, 45 tables, £ 95.00.. Anglia 139:2 ► pp. 419 ff.
WANG, JIAWEI
2021.
Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda Van Bergen & Willem B. Hollmann (eds.), Categories, constructions, and change in English syntax (Studies in English Language 63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2019. Pp. xx + 404.. Journal of Linguistics 57:4 ► pp. 915 ff.
Fanego, Teresa
2020. Review of Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria, Emma Moore, Linda Van Bergen and Willem B. Hollmann eds. 2019. Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-1-108-41956-7. htps:// doi.org/10.1017/9781108303576. Research in Corpus Linguistics 8:2 ► pp. 159 ff.
Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen & Willem B. Hollmann
2019. Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.