Article published In:
Continuative and contrastive discourse relations across discourse domains: Cognitive and cross-linguistic approaches
Edited by Matthias Klumm, Anita Fetzer and Evelien Keizer
[Functions of Language 30:1] 2023
► pp. 1640
References (38)
References
Asher, Nicholas & Alex Lascarides. 2003. Logics of conversation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Asr, Fatemeh Torabi & Vera Demberg. 2012. Implicitness of discourse relations. In Martin Kay & Christian Boitet (eds.), Proceedings of COLING 2012: Technical papers, 2669–2684. Mumbai, India: The COLING 2012 Organizing Committee.Google Scholar
Bellos, David. 2013. The solitary monoglots. The Guardian, 19 August 2013, p. 23.Google Scholar
Benamara Zitoune, Farah & Maite Taboada. 2015. Mapping different rhetorical relation annotations: A proposal. In Martha Palmer, Gemma Boleda & Paolo Rosso (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (SEM 2015), 147–152. Denver, CO: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram & Uta Lenk. 1999. Disturbed coherence: ‘Fill me in’. In Wolfram Bublitz, Uta Lenk & Eija Ventola (eds.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse: How to create it and how to describe it. Selected papers from the International Workshop on Coherence, Augsburg, 24–27 April 1997, 153–174. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Billy. 2013. Relevance Theory. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crible, Ludivine & Vera Demberg. 2020. When do we leave discourse relations underspecified? The effect of formality and relation type. Discours 261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dale, Robert. 1991. Exploring the role of punctuation in the signalling of discourse structure. Proceedings of the Workshop on Text Representation and Domain Modelling: Ideas from Linguistics and AI, 110–120. Berlin: Technical University of Berlin.Google Scholar
Das, Debopam & Markus Egg. 2023. Continuity in discourse relations. Functions of Language 30(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Das, Debopam & Maite Taboada. 2018. Signalling of coherence relations in discourse, beyond discourse markers. Discourse Processes 55(8). 743–770. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Multiple signals of coherence relations. Discours 241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demberg, Vera, Merel C. J. Scholman & Fatemeh Torabi Asr. 2019. How compatible are our discourse annotation frameworks? Insights from mapping RST-DT and PDTB annotations. Dialogue & Discourse 10(1). 87–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2010. Small stories in political discourse: The public self goes private. In Christian R. Hoffmann (ed.), Narrative revisited: Telling a story in the age of new media, 163–184. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Contrastive discourse relations in context: Evidence from monologic and dialogic editing tasks. In Rachel Giora & Michael Haugh (eds.), Doing pragmatics interculturally: Cognitive, philosophical, and sociopragmatic perspectives, 269–292. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018a. The encoding and signalling of discourse relations in argumentative discourse: Evidence across production formats. In María de los Ángeles Gómez González & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds.), The construction of discourse as verbal interaction, 13–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018b. Discourse pragmatics: Communicative action meets discourse analysis. In Cornelia Ilie & Neal R. Norrick (eds.), Pragmatics and its interfaces, 33–57. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita & Augustin Speyer. 2019. Discourse relations across genres and contexts: A contrastive analysis of English and German discourse. Languages in Contrast 19(2). 205–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giomi, Riccardo & Evelien Keizer. 2020. Extra-clausal constituents in Functional Discourse Grammar: Function and form. Revista da Abralin 19(3). 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.. 1993. English grammar: A function-based introduction (21 vols.). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Barbara J. & Candace L. Sidner. 1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12(3). 175–204.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1996. The linguistic and cultural relativity of inference. In John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 374–406. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofmockel, Carolin, Anita Fetzer & Robert M. Maier. 2017. Discourse relations: Genre-specific degrees of overtness in argumentative and narrative discourse. Argument & Computation 8(2). 131–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2018. Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Klumm, Matthias. 2022. The signaling of continuative and contrastive discourse relations in English argumentative discourse: Corpus-based and experimental perspectives. Discours 301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maier, Robert M., Carolin Hofmockel & Anita Fetzer. 2016. The negotiation of discourse relations in context: Co-constructing degrees of overtness. Intercultural Pragmatics 13(1). 71–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mann, William & Sandra Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3). 243–281.Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted J. M. 2005. Coherence, causality and cognitive complexity in discourse. In Michel Aurnague, Myriam Bras, Anne Le Draoulec & Laure Vieu (eds.), Proceedings/Actes SEM-05: First International Symposium on the Exploration and Modelling of Meaning, 105–114. Toulouse: Université de Toulouse-le-Mirail.Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted J. M., Vera Demberg, Jet Hoek, Merel C. J. Scholman, Fatemeh Torabi Asr, Sandrine Zufferey & Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul. 2021. Unifying dimensions in coherence relations: How various annotation frameworks are related. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17(1). 1–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite. 2009. Implicit and explicit coherence relations. In Jan Renkema (ed.), Discourse, of course: An overview of research in discourse studies, 127–140. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibault, Paul J. 2003. Contextualization and social meaning-making practices. In Susan L. Eerdmans, Carlo L. Prevignano & Paul J. Thibault (eds.), Language and interaction: Discussions with John J. Gumperz, 41–62. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vande Kopple, William J. 1985. Exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication 36(1). 82–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda & Anita Fetzer. 2021. The discursive construction of accountability for communicative action to citizens: A contrastive analysis across Israeli and British media discourse. Intercultural Pragmatics 18(5). 605–632. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Berthe, Florine, Anita Fetzer & Isabelle Gaudy-Campbell
2024. ‘What we found is’. Functions of Language DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.