Cover not available
Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 29:3 (2022) ► pp.253–273

Exchange Structure: Refinements to the model through a study of multiparty discourse of 4 to 5 year-old children

| University of Nottingham
ORCID logo | The Open University

This paper proposes a number of refinements to the original theory of Exchange Structure as first conceived. It first offers a summary of the early ideas and considers challenges made by others. The study responds to these challenges through new analysis of multiparty discourse. The paper discusses revisions to the model based on these challenges drawing on the iterative analysis conducted and considers other points relevant to multiparty discourse. The data is drawn from transcribed video recordings of small groups of 4 to 5 year-old children’s peer-led dialogic interactions as they engage in role-play. In addition to the development of Exchange Structure theory, this new analysis sheds light on the nature of negotiation within multiparty discourse and the dynamics of negotiation by young children in this playful context.

Keywords: Knowledge negotiating, Action negotiating, Exchange Structure, children’s language, multiparty discourse, role-play
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A metafunctional model of the exchange
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Challenges and refinements to the model
    • 4.1The problem of relations between action negotiating exchanges and knowledge exchanges
    • 4.2The problem of delimiting exchanges
    • 4.3The problem of what units carry the various forms of negotiation: Exchanges and transactions
    • 4.4The problem of what units carry the various forms of negotiation: Moves and acts
    • 4.5The problem of how to analyse when an action is the responsibility of more than one of the interactants
  • 5.Summary
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22016.ber
References (22)
Berry, Margaret
1981a Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: a multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In Malcolm Coulthard & Martin Montgomery (eds.), Studies in Discourse Analysis, 120–145. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1981b Towards layers of exchange structure for directive exchanges. Network 21. 23–32.Google Scholar
2016a On describing contexts of situation. In Wendy L. Bowcher & Jennifer Yameng Liang (eds.), Society in Language, Language in Society: Essays in Honour of Ruqaiya Hasan, 184–205. Basingstoke: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016b Dynamism in exchange structure. English Text Construction 9(1). 33–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Challenging moves and supporting moves in discourse. In Stella Neumann, Rebekah Wegener, Jennifer Fest, Paula Niemietz & Nicola Hützen (eds.), Challenging Boundaries in Linguistics: Systemic Functional Perspectives, 255–280. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2021 Inequalities in status: how do they show in discourse and what can be done about them? Lingua. 2611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne & Diane Slade
1997 Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1961 Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17(3). 241–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & C. M. I. M. Matthiessen
2014 Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimps, Ditte, Kristin Davidse & Gerard O’Grady
2019 English tag questions eliciting knowledge or action: a comparison of the speech function and exchange structure models. Functions of Language, 26(1). 86–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. & David Rose
2007 Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause, 2nd edn. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., Michele Zappavigna & Paul Dwyer
2009 Negotiating shame: exchange and genre structure in youth justice conferencing. In Mahboob Ahmar & Caroline Lipovsky (eds.), Studies in Applied Linguistics and Language Learning, 41–72. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Sarah Jane
2016a Children’s meaning making in classroom role-play at 4–5 years: A Systemic Functional Linguistic investigation. Milton Keynes: Open University PhD thesis.
2016b Recordings collected in connection with Mukherjee (2016a).Google Scholar
Muntigl, Peter
2004 Narrative Counselling: Social and Linguistic Processes of Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Michael
1990 A dynamic model of exchange, Word 411. 293–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, David
2014 Analysing pedagogic discourse: an approach from genre and register. Functional Linguistics 1(11). 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John McH. & Malcolm R. Coulthard
1975 Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Ventola, Eija
1987 The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele & J. R. Martin
2018 Discourse and Diversionary Justice: An Analysis of Youth Justice Conferencing. Basingstoke: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by 1 other publications

Zhang, Dongbing, Jiajia Wang & Chengfang Song
2024. Scaffolding instruction in an EFL drama lesson: a systemic functional analysis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.