Article published In:
Continuative and contrastive discourse relations across discourse domains: Cognitive and cross-linguistic approaches
Edited by Matthias Klumm, Anita Fetzer and Evelien Keizer
[Functions of Language 30:1] 2023
► pp. 110135
Arunachalam, Sudha
2013Experimental methods for linguists. Language and Linguistics Compass 7(4). 221–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asr, Fatemeh & Vera Demberg
2012Measuring the strength of linguistic cues for discourse relations. In Eva Hajičová, Lucie Poláková & Jiří Mírovský (eds.), Proceedings of the COLING Workshop on Advances in Discourse Analysis and its Computational Aspects (ADACA), 33–42. Mumbai, India: The COLING 2012 Organizing Committee.Google Scholar
Baayen, Rolf, Douglas Davidson & Douglas Bates
2008Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subject and items. Journal of Memory and Language 591. 390–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
2015Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beaver, David & Henk Zeevat
2007Accommodation. In Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 503–541. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1987Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1989Denial and contrast: A relevance theoretic analysis of but . Linguistics and Philosophy 12(1). 15–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992Understanding Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2002Relevance and linguistic meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Divisions of labour: The analysis of parentheticals. Lingua 1161. 1670–1687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briz, Antonio, Salvador Pons & José Portolés
2008Diccionario de partículas discursivas del español. ([URL]; last access: 12/08/2022).
Canestrelli, Anneloes, Willem Mak & Ted Sanders
2013Causal connectives in discourse processing: How differences in subjectivity are reflected in eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes 28(9). 1394–1413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carrol, Garrit & Kathy Conklin
2004Eye-tracking multi-word units: Some methodological questions. Journal of Eye Movement Research 7(5). 1–11.Google Scholar
Conklin, Kathy, Ana Pellicer-Sánchez & Gareth Carrol
2018Eye-tracking. A guide for applied linguistic research. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuello, Carlos
2022Psycholinguistic correlates of grammaticalization of discourse markers: Analysis of a consecutive subparadigm through eye-tracking. Heidelberg/Valencia: Universität Heidelberg/Universitat de València PhD Thesis.
Cunnings, Ian
2012An overview of mixed-effects statistical models for second language researchers. Second Language Research 28(3). 369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curcó, Carmen
2011On the status of procedural meaning in natural language. In María Victoria Escandell-Vidal, Manuel Leonetti, & Aoife Ahern (eds.), 33–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Vega, Manuel
2005El procesamiento de oraciones con conectores adversativos y causales. Cognitiva 171. 85–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Ted Sanders
2002The impact of relational markers on expository text comprehension in L1 and L2. Reading and Writing 15(7–8). 739–757. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth
1998On classifying connectives and coherence relations. In Manfred Stede, Leo Wanner & Eduard Hovy (eds.), Proceedings of the COLING-ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers, 29–35. Montréal: Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, María Victoria & Manuel Leonetti
2011On the rigidity of procedural meaning. In María Victoria Escandell-Vidal, Manuel Leonetti & Aoife Ahern (eds.), 81–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, María Victoria, Manuel Leonetti, & Aoife Ahern
(eds.) 2011Procedural meaning: Problems and perspectives. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, María Victoria
2017Notes for a restrictive theory of procedural meaning. In Rachel Giora & Michael Haugh (eds.), Doing pragmatics interculturally: Cognitive, philosophical, and sociopragmatic perspectives, 79–95. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, María Victoria, José Amenós & Aoife Ahern
2020Pragmática. Madrid: AKAL.Google Scholar
Fahrmeier, Ludwig, Thomas Kneib, Stefan Lang & Brian Marx
2013Regression. models, methods and applications. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
(ed.) 2006Approaches to discourse particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
2006Towards a theory of discourse markers. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to discourse particles, 189–204. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Garrido, Joaquín
2007Relaciones de discurso. Pandora: Revue d’Etudes Hispaniques 71. 305–332.Google Scholar
Guillén, Diego
2021Experimental analysis of the processing schemas of counter-argumentation and anaphoric substitution signaled by the Spanish connective a pesar de ello . Heidelberg: Heidelberg University PhD Thesis.
Haberlandt, Karl
1982Reader expectations in text comprehension. In Jean-Francois Le Ny & Walter Kintsch (eds.), Language and comprehension, 239–250. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoek, Jet & Sandrine Zufferey
2015Factors influencing the implicitation of discourse relations across languages. In Harry Bunt (ed.), Proceedings of the 11th Joint ACL-ISO Workshop on Interoperable Semantic Annotation (ISA-11), 39–45. London: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Holmqvist, Kenneth, Marcus Nyström, Richard Andersson, Richard Dewhurst, Halszka Jarodzka & Joost van de Weijer
2011Eye-tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1991On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, 17–35. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleijn, Suzanne, Henk Pander Maat & Ted Sanders
2019Comprehension effects of connectives across texts, readers, and coherence relations. Discourse Processes 56(5–6). 447–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köhne, Judith & Vera Demberg
2013The time-course of processing discourse connectives. In Markus Knauff, Michael Pauen, Natalie Sebanz & Ipke Wachsmuth (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2760–2765. Berlin: the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per Brockhoff & Rune Christensen
2016lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0–32. ([URL]; last access: 12/08/2022).
Leonetti, Manuel & María Victoria Escandell-Vidal
2004Conceptual semantics/procedural semantics. In Milka Villayandre Llamazares (ed.), Actas del V Congreso de Lingüística General: León 5–8 March 2002, 1727–1738. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
2012El significado procedimental: Rutas hacia una idea. In José Luis Mendívil Giró & María del Carmen Horno Chéliz (eds.), La sabiduría de Mnemósine. Ensayos de historia de la lingüística ofrecidos a José Francisco Val Álvaro, 157–167. Zaragoza: Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Loureda, Óscar & Esperanza Acín Villa
(eds.) 2010Los estudios sobre marcadores del discurso en español, hoy. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Loureda, Óscar, Adriana Cruz, Inés Recio & Martha Rudka
2021Comunicación, partículas discursivas y pragmática experimental. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Martín Zorraquino, María Antonia & José Portolés
1999Los marcadores del discurso. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. III1, 4051–4213. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
McNamara, Danielle, Eileen Kintsch, Nancy Songer & Walter Kintsch
1996Are good texts always better? Text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction 141. 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Millis, Keith & Marcel Just
1994The influence of connectives on sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 33(1). 128–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moncada, Fernando
2018Interaction between connectives and previous knowledge in the processing of causal coherence. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 761. 179–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montolío, Estrella
2001Conectores de la lengua escrita. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt
2006A dynamic polysemy approach to the lexical semantics of discourse markers (with an exemplary analysis of French toujours). In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to discourse particles, 21–41. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Murillo, Silvia
2010Los marcadores del discurso y su semántica. In Óscar Loureda & Esperanza Acín (eds.), Los estudios sobre marcadores del discurso en español, hoy, 241–280. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Murray, John
1997Connectives and narrative text: The role of continuity. Memory & Cognition 25(2). 227–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nadal, Laurai
2019Lingüística experimental y contraargumentación: Un estudio del conector del español sin embargo. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narváez, Elisa
2019Causality and its processing paths: An experimental study of Spanish por tanto . Heidelberg: Universität Heidelberg PhD Thesis.
Nicolle, Steve
2015Diachronic change in procedural semantic content. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française 321. 133–148.Google Scholar
Noordman, Leo & Wietske Vonk
1998Discourse comprehension. In Angela Friederici (ed.), Language comprehension: A biological perspective, 229–262. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pander Maat, Henk & Liesbeth Degand
2001Scaling causal relations and connectives in terms of speaker involvement. Cognitive Linguistics 12(3). 211–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin & Matthew Traxler
2009Parsing and incremental understanding during reading. In Matthew Crocker, Martin Pickering, & Charles Clifton (eds.), Architectures and mechanisms for language processing, 238–258. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Pickering, Martin, Matthew Traxler & Matthew Crocker
2000Ambiguity resolution in sentence processing: Evidence against frequency-based accounts. Journal of Memory and Language 43(3). 447–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador
1998Conexión y conectores: Estudio de su relación en el registro informal de la lengua. Valencia: Universitat de València PhD Thesis.
Portolés, José, Eugenia Sáinz & Silvia Murillo
2020Partículas discursivas e instrucciones de procesamiento. In María Victoria Escandell-Vidal, José Amenós & Aoife Ahern (eds.), 284–303.Google Scholar
Portolés, José
2001[1998]Marcadores del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
R Core Team
2018R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Wien: R Foundation for Statistical Computing ([URL]).
Rayner, Keith
1998Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124(3). 372–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62(8). 1457–1506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recio Fernández, Inés
2020The impact of procedural meaning in L2-processing: A study on connectives. Heidelberg: Universität Heidelberg PhD Thesis.
Reichle, Erik, Keith Rayner & Alexander Pollatsek
2003The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Science 26(4). 445–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romero, Esther & Belén Soria
2020The conceptual adjustment of lexical meaning. In María Victoria Escandell-Vidal, José Amenós & Aoife Ahern (eds.), 125–145.Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted J. M.
2005Coherence, causality and cognitive complexity in discourse. In Michel Aurnague, Myriam Bras, Anne Le Draoulec & Laure Vieu (eds.), Proceedings/Actes SEM-05: First International Symposium on the Exploration and Modelling of Meaning, 105–114. Toulouse: Université de Toulouse-le-Mirail.Google Scholar
Segal, Erwin, Duchan, Judith & Paula J. Scott
1991The role of interclausal connectives in narrative structuring: Evidence from adults’ interpretations of simple stories. Discourse Processes 141, 27–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thome, Sarah
2018Additive Konnektoren mit argumentativer Funktion. Eine experimentelle Studie zu sp. además und it. inoltre. Heidelberg: Universität Heidelberg master thesis.
Traxler, Matthew, Michael Bybee & Martin Pickering
1997Influence of connectives on language comprehension: Eye-tracking evidence for incremental interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50(3). 481–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Silfhout, Gerdineke, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul & Ted Sanders
2015Connectives as processing signals: How students benefit in processing narrative and expository texts. Discourse Processes 52(1). 47–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasishth, Shravan, Daniela Mertzen, Lena Jäger & Andrew Gelman
2018The statistical significance filter leads to overoptimistic expectations of replicability. Journal of Memory and Language 1031. 151–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber
1993Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 901. 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, Simon
2017Generalized additive models: An introduction with R. University of Bristol: Chapman and Hall/CRC. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiang, Ming & Gina Kuperberg
2015Reversing expectations during discourse comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30(6). 648–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu, Xiaodong, Qingrong Chen, Klaus-Uwe Panther & Yicheng Wu
2017Influence of concessive and causal conjunctions on pragmatic processing: Online measures from eye movements and self-paced reading. Discourse Processes 55(4). 387–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zunino, Gabriela, Valeria Abusamra & Alejandro Raiter
2012Causalidad: Relación entre conocimiento del mundo y conocimiento lingüístico. Pragmalingüística 201. 200–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zunino, Gabriela
2014Cognitive perspectives on discourse processing: Causality and counter-causality. Signos Lingüísticos 101. 154–171.Google Scholar
2016Comprensión y producción de causalidad y contracausalidad: Distinciones en función del proceso subyacente y efectos de la escolarización formal. Onomázein 341. 132–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar