Cover not available
Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 29:3 (2022) ► pp.300–327

Self-denigration in academic discourse

The case of the Iranian doctoral defense

| Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
| Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
Using the methodology of Grounded Theory, this study aims to identify and analyze the perceptions and functions of self-denigration in dissertation defenses. The data comprises transcripts of two focus group discussions and the disputation sections of a corpus of 53 applied linguistics doctoral defense sessions gathered from 14 Iranian state universities between 2019 and 2021. The findings suggest that self-denigration depends to a great extent on the role of the participants in a disputation, and it is used before or after a criticism or a response to criticism. The analysis of the data revealed that self-denigration as a sign of respectfulness and modesty in a defense contributes to social decorum, diffidence, coercive self-deprecation, contrived modesty, or flamboyance. This study highlights the importance of self-denigration in the oral academic discourse of EFL defense sessions and has pedagogical implications for oral academic literacy practices.
Keywords: Academic discourse, Politeness, Self-denigration, Grounded theory, Doctoral defense, EFL
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Politeness & face at defenses
  • 3.What is denigration?
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1Data and participants
    • 4.2Analytical procedures
  • 5.Analysis of doctoral defense sessions
    • 5.1Examiners’ talk-in-interaction
    • 5.2Supervisors’ talk-in-interaction
    • 5.3Doctoral candidates’ talk-in-interaction
  • 6.Participants’ perceptions of self-denigration
    • 6.1Social decorum
    • 6.2Diffidence
    • 6.3Coercive self-deprecation
    • 6.4Contrived modesty
    • 6.5Flamboyance
  • 7.Discussion
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 1 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22021.may
References (68)
References
Arundale, Robert B. 2006. Face as relational and interactional: a communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture 2(2). 193–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birks, Melanie & Jane Mills. 2015. Grounded theory: A practical guide, 2nd edn. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Blickle, Gerhard, Corinna Diekmann, Paula B. Schneider, Yvonne Kalthöfer & James K. Summers. 2012. When modesty wins: Impression management through modesty, political skill, and career success – a two-study investigation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 21(6). 899–922. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Robyn. 2019. Self-defeating vs. self-deprecating humor: A case of being laughed at vs. laughed with? Melbourne: Swinburne University of Technology.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1978. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. New York: CUP.Google Scholar
Charmaz, Kathy. 2014. Constructing grounded theory, 2nd edn. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Chen, Rong. 1993. Responding to compliments: A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Pragmatics 20(1). 49–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creswell, John W. 2012. Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, 4th edn. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
Daneshvar, Maryam, Ali Asghar Kargar & Arash Zareian. 2017. A pragmatic analysis of the interactions in MA TEFL students’ defense sessions. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research 4(7). 217–235.Google Scholar
Dendenne, Boudjemaa. 2021. Compliments, self-praise, and self-denigration among nonnative English users in an online setting. TESL-EJ 25(1). 1–24.Google Scholar
Dayter, Daria. 2014. Self-praise in microblogging. Journal of Pragmatics 611. 91–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Self-praise online and offline: The hallmark speech act of social media? Internet Pragmatics 1(1). 184–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Dealing with interactionally risky speech acts in simultaneous interpreting: The case of self-praise. Journal of Pragmatics 1741. 28–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobson, Stephen. 2018. Assessing the viva in higher education: chasing moments of truth. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Don, Zuraidah Mohd & Ahmad Izadi. 2011. Relational connection and separation in Iranian dissertation defenses. Journal of Pragmatics 43(15). 3782–3792. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Interactionally achieving face in criticism criticism-response exchanges. Language Communication 33(3). 221–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drisko, James & Tina Maschi. 2015. Content analysis. New York: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Barney. 1992. Basics of Grounded Theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1955. On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry 18(3). 213–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gu, Yueguo. 1990. Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 14(2). 237–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hadley, Gregory. 2017. Grounded theory in applied linguistics research: A practical guide. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Beverly, Sachiko Ide, Shoko Ikuta, Akiko Kawasaki & Tsunao Ogino. 1986. Universals of linguistics politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics 101. 347–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izadi, Ahmad. 2013. Politeness in spoken review genre: Viva voce context. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 21(4). 1327–1346.Google Scholar
. 2016. Over-politeness in Persian professional interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 1021. 13–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. Mixed messages in criticisms in Iranian PhD dissertation defenses. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 11(3). 270–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017c. Turn-taking, preference, and face in criticism responses. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics 8(1). 72–88.Google Scholar
Izadi, Ahmad & Alireza Jalilifar. 2010. Politeness in LAP assessment: Dissertation defense sessions in focus. Iranian Journal of TEFLL 2(2). 71–90.Google Scholar
Jalilifar, Alireza & Nadia Mayahi. 2022. Referral for resubmission: Scholarly expectations of EFL applied linguistics doctoral defense sessions. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Ronald M., Lars Hansen, Valentina Moskvina, David Kingdon & Douglas Turkington. 2010. The relationship between self-esteem and psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia: A longitudinal study. Psychosis 2(3). 218–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 2009. Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory: The case of compliments. Journal of Pragmatics 41(8). 1611–1635. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., Gerold Schneider, Irma Taavitsainen & Barb Breustedt. 2008. Fishing for compliments: Precision and recall in corpus-linguistic compliment research. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176), 273–294. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z. 2013. Relational rituals and communication: Ritual interaction in groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. Politeness and impoliteness in Chinese discourse. In Chris Shei (ed.), The Routledge handbook of Chinese discourse analysis, 203–215. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z. & Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding politeness. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z. & Ling Zhou. 2021. Self-denigration in 21st century Chinese. Journal of Politeness Research 17(2). 265–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Myung-Hee. 2014. Why self-deprecating? Achieving ‘oneness’ in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 691. 82–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krueger, Richard A. & Mary Anne Casey. 2015. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research, 5th edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach. 1990. Talking power: The politics of language in our lives. Glasgow: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2007. Politeness: Is there an East-West divide? Journal of Politeness Research 3(2). 167–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. The pragmatics of politeness. New York: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. 2008. Relational work, politeness and identity construction. In Gerd Antos, Eija Ventola & Tilo Weber (eds.), Handbooks of Applied Linguistics: Interpersonal Communication, 509–540. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. & Richard J. Watts. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1). 9–33.Google Scholar
Mayahi, Nadia & Alireza Jalilifar. 2022. Self-denigration in doctoral defense sessions: Scale development and validation. ESP Today 10(1). 2–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mežek, Špela & John M. Swales. 2016. PhD defences and vivas. In Ken Hyland & Philip Shaw (eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes, 361–375. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Murray, Rowena. 2003. Students’ questions and their implications for the viva. Quality Assurance in Education 11(2). 109–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohashi, Jun. 2013. Thanking and politeness in Japanese: Balancing acts in interaction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Owens, Timothy J., & Adam B. King. 2001. Measuring self-esteem: Race, ethnicity, and gender considered. In Timothy J. Owens, Sheldon Stryker & Norman Goodman (eds.), Extending self-esteem theory and research: Sociological and psychological currents, 56–84. New York: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, Ruth. 2019. Self-denigration and the mixed messages of ‘ugly’ selfies in Instagram. Internet Pragmatics 2(2). 173–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Preuss, Gregory S. & Mark D. Alicke. 2017. My worst faults and misdeeds: Self-criticism and self-enhancement can co-exist. Self and Identity 16(6). 645–663. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recski, Leonardo. 2005. Interpersonal engagement in academic spoken discourse: A functional account of dissertation defenses. English for Specific Purposes 24(1). 5–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reichertz, Jo. 2019. Abduction: The logic of discovery in Grounded Theory – An updated review. In Antony Bryant & Kathy Charmaz (eds.), The Sage handbook of current developments in Grounded Theory, 259–281. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sharifian, Farzad. 2003. On cultural conceptualization. Journal of Cognition and Culture 3(3). 187–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Cultural schemes in L1 and L2 compliment responses: A study of Persian-speaking learners of English. Journal of Politeness Research 4(1). 55–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Cultural linguistics: Cultural conceptualizations and language. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speer, Susan A. 2019. Reconsidering self-deprecation as communication practice. British Journal of Social Psychology 58(4). 806–828. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2002. Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations. Journal of Pragmatics 341. 529–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2008. Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2008. (Im)politeness and rapport. In Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed.), 11–47.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, Patrick Ng & Li Dong. 2008. British and Chinese reactions to compliment responses. In Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed.), 95–117.Google Scholar
Suh, Kyung-Hee. 2010. A contrastive study of compliment responses of Korean, Chinese and English speakers. Yengmiyenkwu (English and American Studies) 221. 131–162.Google Scholar
Swales, John. 2004. Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, Chen-Hsin & Grace Qiao Zhang. 2009. A contrastive study of compliment responses among Australian English and Mandarin Chinese speakers. Journal of Pragmatics 411. 325–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tie, Ylona Chun, Melanie Birks & Karen Francis. 2019. Grounded Theory: A design framework for novice researchers. Sage Open Medicine 71. 1–8.Google Scholar
Walkinshaw, Ian, Nathaniel Mitchell & Sophiaan Subhan. 2019. Self-denigration as a relational strategy in lingua franca talk: Asian English Speaker. Journal of Pragmatics 1391. 40–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, Changrong. 2013. Two interactional functions of self-mockery in everyday English conversations: A multimodal analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 50(1). 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zare, Javad. 2016. Self-mockery: A study of Persian multi-party interactions. Text & Talk 36 (6). 789–812. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Mayahi, Nadia & Alireza Jalilifar
2023. The in-group ritual of self-denigration in Iranian doctoral defense sessions: applied linguists’ attitudes, functions and perceptions in focus. Journal of Politeness Research 0:0 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.