Cover not available
Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 30:3 (2023) ► pp.320–348

Cardinal direction judgment based on the integration of spatial reference frames in different languages

| Inner Mongolia Normal University | Yulin University
| Inner Mongolia Normal University | Hulunbuir University
| Inner Mongolia Art College
| Inner Mongolia Normal University
| Inner Mongolia Normal University
| Inner Mongolia Normal University | Inner Mongolia Minzu University

This study investigates how integrated egocentric and environmental reference frames influence direction determination and cardinal direction judgments in L1 speakers of Mongolian and Mandarin. The results show that in direction determination, Mandarin participants’ integrated frame of reference is “front-north, back-south, left-west, and right-east.” By contrast, Mongolian participants use two modes of integrated spatial representation: “front-south, back-north, left-east, and right-west” and “front-north, back-south, left-west, and right-east”. This behavior points to influences from the participants’ dominant and non-dominant languages. Mongolian and Mandarin participants showed a north advantage in cardinal direction judgment tasks with a “front-north” response configuration. Whereas Mandarin participants consistently showed a north advantage effect, Mongolian participants showed a south advantage effect in the “front-south” configuration. This suggests that in addition to the long-recognized difference in north-south/east-west axis preference, a north-south axis specification where south was the normative direction instead of north can result from cultural and linguistic influence. The results corroborate the idea that language affects the integration of spatial reference frames, lending support to linguistic relativism.

Keywords: egocentric frame of reference, environmental frame of reference, language, cardinal direction judgments
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Experiment 1: The linguistic impact on direction determination
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Material
    • 2.3Procedure
    • 2.4Results
    • 2.5Discussion
  • 3.Experiment 2: The linguistic impact on a CDJ task
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Material
    • 3.3Procedure
    • 3.4Results
    • 3.5Discussion
  • 4.General discussion
    • 4.1Impact of language on reference frames
    • 4.2Impact of language on the varied advantage effect in CDJ tasks
    • 4.3Impact of bilingualism
  • Declarations of Interest
  • Ethics statements
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22038.xu
References (60)
Abarbanell, Linda
2007 Linguistic flexibility in frame of reference use among adult Tseltal (Mayan) speakers. Paper presented at the 81st Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America , Anaheim, CA, 4–7 January 2007.
Bateer, Cao D.
2014 Mongolian spatial topological relations. Minority Language of China 31. 55–67.Google Scholar
Bochynskaa, Agata, Mila Vulchanovaa, Valentin Vulchanova & Barbara Landauc
2000 Spatial language difficulties reflect the structure of intact spatial representation: Evidence from high-functioning autism. Cognitive Psychology 1161. e101249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Stephen C. Levinson
2011 Framing whorf: A response to Li et al. (2011). Unpublished manuscript. Buffalo, NY: University at Buffalo. Available online at [URL] (accessed 31–10–2023).
Boroditsky, Lera
2001 Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 43(1). 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
1993a Linguistic and nonlinguistic coding of spatial arrays: Explorations in Mayan cognition. Nijmegen Working Papers of the Cognitive Anthropology Research Group 241. 1–60. Available online at [URL] (accessed 31–10–2023).
1993b ‘Uphill’ and ‘Downhill’ in Tzeltal. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 31. 46–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brunyé, Tad T., Caroline R. Mahoney, Aaron L. Gardony & Holly A. Taylor
2010 North is up(hill): Route planning heuristics in real-world environments. Memory & Cognition 38(6). 700–712. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel
1991 Consciousness explained. Boston, MA: Brown.Google Scholar
Emreözgen, Emre & Lan R. L. Davies
2002 Acquisition of categorical color perception: A perceptual learning approach to the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 131(4). 477–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A.
1975 The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Nancy & Barbara Tversky
1990 Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 119(1). 63–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, Dedre, Asli Özyürek, Ozge Gürcanli & Susan Goldin-Meadow
2013 Spatial language facilitates spatial cognition: evidence from children who lack language input. Cognition 1271. 318–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, Dedre & Susan Goldin-Meadow
(eds.) 2003 Language in mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton A. & Micheal P. Kaschak
2003 Neuroimaging studies of language production and comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology 54(1). 91–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, Lila & Anna Papafragou
2005 Language and thought. In Keith J. Holyoak & Robert G. Morrison (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning, 633–661. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter
2004 Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science 306(5695). 496–499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gravetter, Frederick J. & Larry B. Wallnau
2016 Statistics for the behavioral sciences, 10th edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Gugerty, Leo & Johnell Brooks
2001 Seeing where you are heading: Integrating environmental and egocentric reference frames in cardinal direction judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 7(3). 251–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Reference-frame misalignment and cardinal direction judgments: Group differences and strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 10(2). 75–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. & Stephen C. Levinson
1996 Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Haun, Daniel B. M., Christian J. Rapold, Gabriele Janzen & Stephen C. Levinson
2011 Plasticity of human spatial cognition: Spatial language and cognition covary across cultures. Cognition 1191. 70–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haun, Daniel B. M., Christian J. Rapold, Josep Call, Gabriele Janzen & Stephen C. Levinson
2006 Cognitive cladistics and cultural override in hominid spatial cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(46). 17568–17573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haun, Daniel B. M. & Christian J. Rapold
2009 Variation in memory for body movements across cultures. Current Biology 19(23). 1068–1069. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Daniel C., Nathan Winkler-Rhoades, Sang-Ah Lee, Veronique Izard, Kevin A. Shapiro & Elizabeth S. Spelke
2011 Spatial and numerical abilities without a complete natural language. Neuropsychologia 491. 924–936. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2003 Space in language and cognition: Explorations in linguistic diversity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Studying spatial conceptualization across cultures: Anthropology and cognitive science. Ethos 26(1). 7–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. & David Wilkins
(eds.) 2006 Grammars of space. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C., Sotaro Kita, Daniel B. M. Haun & Björn H. Rasch
2002 Returning the tables: Language affects spatial reasoning. Cognition 84(2). 155–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1996 Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Cross-linguistic evidence. In Paul Bloom, Mary A. Peterson, Lynn Nadel & Merrill F. Garrett (eds.), Language and space, 109–169. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Peggy & Lila Gleitman
2002 Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition 83(3). 265–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Peggy, Linda Abarbanell & Anna Papafragou
2005 Spatial Reasoning Skills in Tenejapan Mayans. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society , Stresa, 21–23 July 2005. DOI logo
Li, Peggy & Linda Abarbanell
2019 Alternative spin on phylogenetically inherited spatial reference frames. Cognition 1911. e103983. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Lihong, Jijia Zhang & Huiping Wang
2005 The effect of spatial language habits on people’s spatial cognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica 37(4). 469–475. [URL]
Logan, Gordon D. & Daniel Sadler
1996 A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations: Language, speech, and communication. In Stephen C. Levinson (ed.), Explorations in linguistic diversity, 375–395. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lucy, John
1992 Language diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Melissa Bowerman, Sotaro Kita, Daniel B. M. Haun & Stephen C. Levinson
2004 Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(3). 108–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marghetis, Tyler, Melanie McComsey & Kensy Cooperrider
2020 Space in hand and mind: Gesture and spatial frames of reference in bilingual Mexico. Cognitive Science 44(12). e12920. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mishra, Ramesh C. & Pierre R. Dasen
2005 Spatial language and cognitive development in India: An urban/rural comparison. In Wolfgang Friedlmeier, Pradeep Chakkarath & Beate Schwarz (eds.), Culture and human development: The importance of cross-cultural research to the social sciences, 153–179. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
McNamara, Timothy P., Björn Rump & Steffen Werner
2003 Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10(3). 589–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mou, Weimin, Kan Zhang & Timothy P. McNamara
2004 Frames of reference in spatial memories acquired from language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 301. 171–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pica, Pierre, Cathy Lemer, Véronique Izard & Stanislas Dehaene
2004 Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigenous group. Science 306(5695). 499–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven
1994 The language instinct. New York, NY: Morrow. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pederson, Eric, Eve Danziger, David Wilkins, Stephen Levinson, Sotaro Kita & Gunter Senft
1998 Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language 74(3). 557–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pyers, Jennie, Anna Shusterman, Ann Senghas, Elizabeth S. Spelke & Karen Emmorey
2010 Evidence from an emerging sign language reveals that language supports spatial cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107(27). 12116–12120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberson, Debi, Ian R. L. Davies & Jules Davidoff
2000 Colour categories are not universal: Replications and new evidence from a stone-age culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology General 1291. 369–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921 Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York, NY: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Shapero, Joshua A.
2017 Does environmental experience spatial cognition? Frames of reference among Ancash Quechua speakers (Peru). Cognitive Science 41(5). 1274–1298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shusterman, Anna & Peggy Li
2016 A framework for work on frames of reference. In David Barner & Andrew S. Baron (eds.), Core knowledge and conceptual change, 191–208. New York, NY: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tian, Feng & Yurong Jin
2009 Cultural connotation of Mongolian locational words. Journal of Inner Mongolia national university (Social Sciences edition) 61. 37–39.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev
1962 Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wassmann, Jurg & Pierre R. Dasen
1998 Balinese spatial orientation: Some empirical evidence for moderate linguistic relativity. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4(1). 689–711. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wickens, Christopher D., Chia-Chin Liang & Tyler Prevett
1996 Electronic maps for terminal area navigation: Effects of frame of reference and dimensionality. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 6(3). 241–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wickens, Christopher D. & Justin G. Hollands
2000 Engineering psychology and human performance, 3rd edn. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin L.
1956 Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Kan, Weimin Mou & Sumei Guo
2000 Experiment proof of two-stage model in searching imagined space. Acta Psychologica Sinica 32(1). 40–44. [URL]
Zhang, Jijia & Lihong Liu
2007 More on the effects of habit spatial terms on spatial cognition. Journal of Psychological Science 21. 359–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Ronggang & Kan Zhang
2004 Visuospatial relations judgment based on clue. Acta Psychologica Sinica 36(2). 127–132. [URL]
2005 The cardinal direction judgments in integrating environmental and egocentric reference frames. Acta Psychologica Sinica 37(3). 298–307. [URL]
2008 How information presentation affect absolute direction judgments based on spatial reference frames. Acta Psychologica Sinica 40(11). 1137–1148. [URL]