Article published In:
The Functions of Evidentiality
Edited by Eric Mélac and Pascale Leclercq
[Functions of Language 31:1] 2024
► pp. 90108
References (33)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan. 2000. Some aspects of the acquisition of evidentials in Turkish. In Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds.), 15–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. The interface of evidentials and epistemics in Turkish: Perspectives from acquisition. In Mine Güven, Didar Akar, Balkız Öztürk & Meltem Kelepir (eds.), Exploring the Turkish linguistic landscape: Essays in honor of Eser Erguvanlı-Taylan, 143–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan & Dan I. Slobin. 1986. A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In Wallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), 159–167.Google Scholar
Arslan, Seçkin. 2020. When the owner of information is unsure: Epistemic uncertainty influences evidentiality processing in Turkish. Lingua 2471. e102989. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arslan, Seçkin, Dörte de Kok & Roelien Bastiaanse. 2017. Processing grammatical evidentiality and time reference in Turkish heritage and monolingual speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 201. 457–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arslan, Seçkin, Semra Selvi-Balo, İlknur Maviş & Fanny Meunier. 2021. Event witnessability and evidentiality: A preliminary study on healthy aging Turkish adults. Paper presented at L’Evidentialité et la Modalité: Au Croisement de la Grammaire et du Lexique , Montpellier, 10–11 June 2021.
Aydin, Çağla & Stephen J. Ceci. 2009. Evidentiality and suggestibility: A new research venue. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 1251. 79–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Douglas J. Davidson & Douglas Bates. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 591. 390–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Benjamin M. Bolker & Steven C. Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 671. 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. & Johanna Nichols (eds.). 1986. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Speech Acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauch, Valerie, Iris Blandón-Gitlin, Jaume Masip & Siegfried L. Sporer. 2015. Are computers effective lie detectors? A meta-analysis of linguistic cues to deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review 191. 307–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johanson, Lars. 2000. Turkic indirectives. In Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds.), 61–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Evidentiality in Turkic. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, 273–290. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johanson, Lars & Bo Utas (eds.). 2000. Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and neighbouring languages. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karaca, Figen. 2018. Comprehension of evidentiality in spoken Turkish: Comparing monolingual and bilingual speakers. Edmonton: University of Alberta Master of Science thesis.
Karaslaan, Hatice, Annette Hohenberger, Hilmi Demir, Simon Hall & Mike Oaksford. 2018. Cross-cultural differences in informal argumentation: norms, inductive biases and evidentiality. Journal of Cognition and Culture 181. 358–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levine, Timothy R., Hee S. Park, & Steven A. McCornack. 1999. Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the ‘veracity effect’. Communication Monographs 661. 125–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Geoffrey L. 1967. Turkish grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Logačev, Pavel & Sharavan Vasishth. 2013. em2: A package for computing reading time measures for psycholinguistics [Computer software manual] (R package version 0.9). Available online at [URL]
Meibauer, Jörg. 2018. The linguistics of lying. Annual Review of Linguistics 41. 357–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 383–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ozturk, Ozge & Anna Papafragou. 2016. The acquisition of evidentiality and source monitoring. Language Learning and Development 121. 199–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2001. The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 349–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Porter, Stephen & Leanne ten Brinke. 2010. The truth about lies: What works in detecting high-stakes deception? Legal and Criminological Psychology 151. 57–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. See [URL]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Sezer, Taner & Bengü Sever Sezer. 2013. TS corpus: Herkes için Türkçe Derlem ([URL]) Proceedings of the 27th National Linguistics Conference, 217–225. Antalya: Hacettepe University.
Slobin, Dan I. & Ayhan A. Aksu. 1982. Tense, aspect and modality in the use of the Turkish evidential. In Paul J. Hopper (ed.), Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics, 185–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tosun, Sümeyra & Jyotsna Vaid. 2018. Source vs. stance: on the relationship between evidential and modal expressions. Dialogue & Discourse 91. 128–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willett, Thomas. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 121. 51–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar