Cover not available
Article published In:
The Structure of the English NP: Synchronic and diachronic explorations
Edited by Kristin Davidse
[Functions of Language 23:1] 2016
► pp. 40–59

Multiple shifts

New views on pathways and mechanisms of grammaticalization in the English noun phrase

 | University of Manchester
 | University of Leuven
In this paper we report on a historical corpus study of English multiple, an adjective which underwent a process of grammaticalization starting from lexical uses with the meaning ‘composite’, e.g. HR 3617 is a multiple star, to grammaticalized uses as individualizer, paraphrasable as ‘different’, e.g. She has to perform multiple tasks at the same time, and as quantifier ‘several’, e.g. I have multiple friends in high society. Multiple is just one of several adjectives going down this path of grammaticalization. However, as we show in this paper, the trajectory of each adjective includes different micro-processes of change. New diachronic case studies on the grammaticalization of individual items thus remain crucial to further advancing our understanding of the potential environments and changes underlying grammaticalization processes. The case of multiple shows that, firstly, not only attributes, but also classifiers can serve as input for grammaticalization, and that, secondly, grammaticalization and lexicalization processes can have non-adjacent functions in the noun phrase as their input and output.
Published online: 16 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.23.1.03bre
References (31)
COCA: Davies, Mark. 2008. The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–present. [URL] (last accessed 12-10-2015)Google Scholar
COHA: Davies, Mark. 2010-. Corpus of historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. [URL] (last accessed 26-09-2015)Google Scholar
COW: Collins Wordbanks Online. HarperCollins. [URL]
EEBO: Early English Books Online. [URL] (last accessed 22-10-2014)
PPCMBE: Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini & Ariel Diertani. 2010. Penn parsed corpus of modern British English (PPCMBE). [URL]Google Scholar
Adamson, Sylvia. 2000. A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English, 39–66. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bache, Carl. 2000. Essentials of mastering English: A concise grammar. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breban, Tine. 2008. The grammaticalization and subjectification of English adjectives expressing difference into plurality/distributivity markers and quantifiers. Folia Linguistica 42(2). 259–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. English adjectives of comparison: Lexical and grammaticalized uses. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Beyond mere syntactic change: Exploring micro-processes of change. In Marianne Hundt (ed.), Late Modern English in context, 113–132. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte. 2011. Layering of size and type noun constructions in English. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Tine Breban & An Van linden. 2008a. The development of secondary deictic meanings by adjectives in the English NP. English Language and Linguistics 12(3). 475–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Lieselotte Brems & Liesbeth Desmedt. 2008b. Type noun uses in the English NP: A case of right to left layering. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(2). 139–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denison, David. 2002. History of the sort of construction family. Paper presented at ICCG2 (Second International Conference on Construction Grammar), Helsinki, 7 September 2002. Available online at [URL] (accessed 24–11–2014).
. 2006. Category change and gradience in the determiner system. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 279–304. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Category change in English with and without structural change. In Graeme Trousdale & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), Gradualness, gradience, and grammaticalization, 105–128. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2002. A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), 103–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentens, Caroline. 2012. Multiple shifts: Left- and rightward movement in the English noun phrase. Leuven: University of Leuven term paper.Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke. 2009. From determining to emphasizing meanings: The adjectives of specificity. Folia Linguistica 43(2). 311–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. The directionality of (inter)subjectification in the English noun phrase: Pathways of change. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 1994 [1985]. An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edn. [1st edn.]. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), 83–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keizer, Evelien. 2007. The English noun phrase: The nature of linguistic categorization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margerie, Hélène. 2010. On the rise of (inter)subjective meaning in the grammaticalization of kind of/kinda . In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 315–346. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 2000. Reinforcing adjectives: A cognitive semantic perspective on grammaticalisation. In Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero, David Denison, Richard M. Hogg & Christopher McCully (eds.), Generative theory and corpus studies: A dialogue from 10 ICEHL, 233–258. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2008. The grammaticalization of NP of NP patterns. In Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and language change, 23–45. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Ekkehard König. 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization: Vol. I1, 189–218. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandewinkel, Sigi & Kristin Davidse. 2008. The interlocking paths of development towards emphasizer adjective pure . Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9(2). 255–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wischer, Ilse & Gabriele Diewald (eds.). 2002. New reflections on grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Lorenz, David
2023. Could Be it’s Grammaticalization: Usage Patterns of the Epistemic Phrases (it) Could/Might Be. Journal of English Linguistics 51:2 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Davidse, Kristin
2022. Refining and re-defining secondary determiners in relation to primary determiners. In English Noun Phrases from a Functional-Cognitive Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 221], ► pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Louagie, Dana & Uta Reinöhl
2022. Typologizing nominal expressions: the noun phrase and beyond. Linguistics 60:3 ► pp. 659 ff. DOI logo
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2019. Is there a pluralia tantum subcategory of nominal gerunds? Developing Gaeta's notion of morphological differentiation. Language Sciences 73 ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.