Cover not available
Article published In:
The Structure of the English NP: Synchronic and diachronic explorations
Edited by Kristin Davidse
[Functions of Language 23:1] 2016
► pp. 40–59

Multiple shifts

New views on pathways and mechanisms of grammaticalization in the English noun phrase

| University of Manchester
| University of Leuven

In this paper we report on a historical corpus study of English multiple, an adjective which underwent a process of grammaticalization starting from lexical uses with the meaning ‘composite’, e.g. HR 3617 is a multiple star, to grammaticalized uses as individualizer, paraphrasable as ‘different’, e.g. She has to perform multiple tasks at the same time, and as quantifier ‘several’, e.g. I have multiple friends in high society. Multiple is just one of several adjectives going down this path of grammaticalization. However, as we show in this paper, the trajectory of each adjective includes different micro-processes of change. New diachronic case studies on the grammaticalization of individual items thus remain crucial to further advancing our understanding of the potential environments and changes underlying grammaticalization processes. The case of multiple shows that, firstly, not only attributes, but also classifiers can serve as input for grammaticalization, and that, secondly, grammaticalization and lexicalization processes can have non-adjacent functions in the noun phrase as their input and output.

Published online: 16 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.23.1.03bre
References (31)
COCA: Davies, Mark
2008 The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–present. [URL] (last accessed 12-10-2015)Google Scholar
COHA: Davies, Mark
2010- Corpus of historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. [URL] (last accessed 26-09-2015)Google Scholar
COW: Collins Wordbanks
Online. HarperCollins. [URL]
EEBO
Early English Books Online. [URL] (last accessed 22-10-2014)
PPCMBE: Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini & Ariel Diertani
2010 Penn parsed corpus of modern British English (PPCMBE). [URL]Google Scholar
Adamson, Sylvia
2000  A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English, 39–66. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bache, Carl
2000 Essentials of mastering English: A concise grammar. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breban, Tine
2008 The grammaticalization and subjectification of English adjectives expressing difference into plurality/distributivity markers and quantifiers. Folia Linguistica 42(2). 259–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 English adjectives of comparison: Lexical and grammaticalized uses. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Beyond mere syntactic change: Exploring micro-processes of change. In Marianne Hundt (ed.), Late Modern English in context, 113–132. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte
2011 Layering of size and type noun constructions in English. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Tine Breban & An Van linden
2008a The development of secondary deictic meanings by adjectives in the English NP. English Language and Linguistics 12(3). 475–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Lieselotte Brems & Liesbeth Desmedt
2008b Type noun uses in the English NP: A case of right to left layering. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(2). 139–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denison, David
2002 History of the sort of construction family. Paper presented at ICCG2 (Second International Conference on Construction Grammar), Helsinki, 7 September 2002. Available online at [URL] (accessed 24–11–2014).
2006 Category change and gradience in the determiner system. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 279–304. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Category change in English with and without structural change. In Graeme Trousdale & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), Gradualness, gradience, and grammaticalization, 105–128. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2002 A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), 103–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentens, Caroline
2012 Multiple shifts: Left- and rightward movement in the English noun phrase. Leuven: University of Leuven term paper.Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke
2009 From determining to emphasizing meanings: The adjectives of specificity. Folia Linguistica 43(2). 311–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 The directionality of (inter)subjectification in the English noun phrase: Pathways of change. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
1994 [1985] An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edn. [1st edn.]. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002 On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), 83–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P
2004 Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keizer, Evelien
2007 The English noun phrase: The nature of linguistic categorization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margerie, Hélène
2010 On the rise of (inter)subjective meaning in the grammaticalization of kind of/kinda . In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 315–346. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carita
2000 Reinforcing adjectives: A cognitive semantic perspective on grammaticalisation. In Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero, David Denison, Richard M. Hogg & Christopher McCully (eds.), Generative theory and corpus studies: A dialogue from 10 ICEHL, 233–258. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2008 The grammaticalization of NP of NP patterns. In Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and language change, 23–45. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Ekkehard König
1991 The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization: Vol. I1, 189–218. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandewinkel, Sigi & Kristin Davidse
2008 The interlocking paths of development towards emphasizer adjective pure . Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9(2). 255–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wischer, Ilse & Gabriele Diewald
(eds.) 2002 New reflections on grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by 4 other publications

Lorenz, David
2023. Could Be it’s Grammaticalization: Usage Patterns of the Epistemic Phrases(it) Could/Might Be. Journal of English Linguistics 51:2 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Davidse, Kristin
2022. Refining and re-defining secondary determiners in relation to primary determiners. In English Noun Phrases from a Functional-Cognitive Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 221], ► pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Louagie, Dana & Uta Reinöhl
2022. Typologizing nominal expressions: the noun phrase and beyond. Linguistics 60:3 ► pp. 659 ff. DOI logo
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2019. Is there a pluralia tantum subcategory of nominal gerunds? Developing Gaeta's notion of morphological differentiation. Language Sciences 73 ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.