Cover not available
Article published In:
The Structure of the English NP: Synchronic and diachronic explorations
Edited by Kristin Davidse
[Functions of Language 23:1] 2016
► pp. 60–83

From nominal to verbal gerunds

A referential typology

| University of Leuven

This paper provides a detailed comparison of the referential behaviour of noun phrases and nominal and verbal gerunds from Middle to Late Modern English. It will be shown that in earlier stages of English, nominal and verbal gerunds to a large extent resemble prototypical noun phrases in their referential functioning, but also exhibit ‘non-nominal’ uses that depend on clausal rather than nominal grounding strategies. It is argued that the study of (diachronic changes in) the semantic and functional behaviour of nominal and verbal gerunds in Middle and Modern English should take into account that these are functionally hybrid constructions, showing referential traits of both prototypical noun phrases and clauses. This functional hybridity, then, was gradually sorted out, with nominal gerunds specializing to nominal reference and verbal gerunds continuing to adhere to the functional apparatus associated with subordinate clauses.

Published online: 16 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.23.1.04fon
References
CLMET3.0
The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, version 3.0 (CLMET3.0). For details, see Diller et al. (2011).
PPCME
Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, 2nd ed. For details, see Kroch & Taylor (2000).
PPCEME
Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English. For details, see Kroch et al. (2004).
PPCMBE
Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English. For details, see Kroch et al. (2010).
Ackles, Nancy
1997 Historical syntax of the English articles in relation to the count/non-count distinction. Seattle, WA: University of Washington PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Barker, Chris
2005 Possessive weak definites. In Ji-yung Kim, Yury Lander & Barbara H. Partee (eds.), Possessives and beyond: Semantics and syntax, 89–113. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Behrens, Leila
2005 Genericity from a cross-linguistic perspective. Linguistics 43(2). 275–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhat, D.N. Shankara
1994 The adjectival category. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel
1998 Aspectuality and countability: A cross-categorial analogy. English Language and Linguistics 2(1). 37–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin
1999 The semantics of cardinal versus enumerative existential constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 10(3). 203–250.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2008 Functional motivations in the development of nominal and verbal gerunds in Middle and Early Modern English. English Language and Linguistics 121. 55–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Diller, Hans-Jürgen, Hendrik De Smet & Jukka Tyrkkö
2011 A European database of descriptors of English electronic texts. The European English Messenger 191. 21–35.Google Scholar
Donner, Morton
1986 The gerund in Middle English. English Studies 67(5). 394–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W
1980 Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse. In Wallace Chafe (ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production, 203–274. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Duffley, Patrick
2014 Reclaiming control as a semantic and pragmatic phenomenon. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E
1973 The derived nominals, gerunds, and participles in Chaucer’s English. In Braj B. Kachru & Robert B. Lees (eds.), Issues in linguistics: Papers in honor of Henry and Renée Kahane, 185–189. Urbana, Il.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Fanego, Teresa
1996a The development of gerunds as objects of subject-control verbs in English. Diachronica 13(1). 29–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996b On the historical development of English retrospective verbs. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 97(1). 71–79.Google Scholar
1998 Developments in argument linking in early Modern English gerund phrases. English Language and Linguistics 2(1). 87–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 The role of language standardization in the loss of hybrid gerunds in Modern English. In Leiv Egil Breivik, Sandra Halverson & Kari Haugland (eds.), ‘These things write I vnto thee...’: Essays in honour of Bjorg Bækken, 93–110. Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar
2007 Drift and the development of sentential complements in British and American English from 1700 to the present day. In Javier Pérez-Guerra, Dolores González-Álvarez, Jorge L. Bueno-Alonso & Esperanza Rama-Martínez (eds.), ‘Of varying language and opposing creed’: New insights into Late Modern English, 161–235. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1985 Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga
1992 Syntactic change and borrowing: The case of the accusative-and-infinitive construction in English. In Marinel Gerritsen & Dieter Stein (eds.), Internal and external factors in syntactic change, 17–89. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fonteyn, Lauren, Hendrik De Smet & Liesbet Heyvaert
2015a What it means to verbalize: The changing discourse functions of the English gerund. Journal of English Linguistics 43(1). 36–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fonteyn, Lauren, Liesbet Heyvaert & Charlotte Maekelberghe
2015b How do gerunds conceptualize events? A diachronic study. Cognitive Linguistics 26(4). 583–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1990 Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Vol. II1. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K
1985 An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1997 Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A
1978 Definiteness and indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London: Helm.Google Scholar
Heyvaert, Liesbet
2008 On the constructional semantics of gerundive nominalizations. Folia Linguistica 42(1). 39–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson
1985 The iconicity of the universal categories ‘noun’ and ‘verb’. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, 151–186. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Houston, Ann
1989 The English gerund: Syntactic change and discourse function. In Ralph W. Fasold & Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), Language change and variation, 173–196. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002 The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jack, George B
1988 The origins of the English gerund. Nowele 121. 15–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1940 A Modern English grammar on historical principles. Vol. 51. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kranich, Svenja
2006 The origin of English gerundial constructions: A case of French influence?. In Andrew J. Johnston, Ferdinand von Mengden & Stefan Thim (eds.), Language and text: Current perspectives on English and German historical linguistics and philology, 179–195. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor
2000 Penn-Helsinki parsed corpus of middle English, 2nd ed. [URL].Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini & Lauren Delfs
2004 Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English. [URL].Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini & Ariel Diertani
2010 Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English. [URL].Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
1991 Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 21. Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2009 Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1999 Definiteness. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maekelberghe, Charlotte & Liesbet Heyvaert
Forthcoming. Indefinite nominal gerunds, or the particularization of a reified event. English Studies.
Malchukov, Andrej L
2004 Nominalization, verbalization: Constraining a typology of transcategorial operations. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2006 Constraining nominalization: function/form competition. Linguistics 44(5). 973–1009. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mari, Alda, Claire Beyssade & Fabio Del Prete
2013 Genericity. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Martin, James Robert
1992 English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Gary D
2002 Nonfinite structures in theory and change. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno Frans
1960 A Middle English syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul Martin
1970 On coreferential complement subject deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 1(4). 439–500.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F
1992 The ZPG letter subjects: Definiteness and information status. In Sandra Thompson & William Mann (eds.), Discourse description diverse analyses of a fundraising text, 295–325. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard V.O
1960 Word and object. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph S., Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena
1991 The noun phrase in early sixteenth-century English: A study based on Sir Thomas Moore’s writing. Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 50. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti
1999 Syntax. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, Vol. III, Early Modern English 1476–1776, 187–331. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul
1976 A nontransformational account of gerundive nominals in English. Linguistic Inquiry 7(2). 205–241.Google Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte
2011 Old English se from demonstrative to article: A usage-based study of nominal determination and category emergence. Vienna: University of Vienna PhD thesis.Google Scholar
2012 Investigating article development in Old English: About categorization, gradualness and constructions. Folia Linguistica Historica 331. 175–213.Google Scholar
Tabor, Whitney & Elisabeth Closs Traugott
1998 Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. In Anna Giacolone Ramat & Paul John Hopper (eds.), The limits of grammaticalization, 229–272. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tajima, Matsuji
1999 The compound gerund in Early Modern English. In Sheila Embleton, John E. Joseph & Hans-Josef Niederehe (eds.), The emergence of the modern language sciences: Studies on the transition from historical-comparative to structural linguistics in honour of E. F. K. Koerner, 265–276. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek
2010 The emergence of the determiner in the Dutch NP. Linguistics 48(2). 263–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visser, Frederick Theodor
1963–1973 An historical syntax of the English language. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Von Heusinger, Klaus
2002 Specificity and definiteness in sentence and discourse structure. Jounral of Semantics 191. 245–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willemse, Peter
2005 Nominal reference-point constructions: Possessive and esphoric NPs in English. Leuven: University of Leuven PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Wurff, van der Wim
1993 Gerunds and their objects in the Modern English period. In Jaap Van Marle (ed.), Historical linguistics 1991, 363–375. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Fonteyn, Lauren & Liesbet Heyvaert
2018. Chapter 6. Category change in the English gerund. In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20], ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Fonteyn, Lauren & Charlotte Maekelberghe
2018. Competing motivations in the diachronic nominalization of English gerunds. Diachronica 35:4 ► pp. 487 ff. DOI logo
He, Qingshun
2020. A Corpus-based Study of Transfers in English Gerunds. In Corpus-based Approaches to Grammar, Media and Health Discourses [The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series, ], ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2019. Is there a pluralia tantum subcategory of nominal gerunds? Developing Gaeta's notion of morphological differentiation. Language Sciences 73 ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
Maekelberghe, Charlotte
2018. Present-day English gerunds: A multilayered referential model. Folia Linguistica 52:1 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Sommerer, Lotte
2019. Van Goethem, Kristel, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé & Gudrun Vanderbauwhede (eds.). (2018).Category Change from a Constructional Perspective. Constructions and Frames 11:2 ► pp. 317 ff. DOI logo
van Praet, Wout
2023. Referential accessibility as an index of the discourse functions of predicative and specificational clauses. Text & Talk 43:1 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 august 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.