Cover not available
Review published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 23:3 (2016) ► pp.400–409
Book review

Evelien Keizer. A Functional Discourse Grammar of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. xviii + 336 pp. ISBN 978-0-19957187-1(Pbk) 978-0-19-957186-4(Hbk)

Reviewed by
| University of Santiago de Compostela
Published online: 16 February 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.23.3.07gom
References (27)
References
Alturo, Nuria, Evelien Keizer & Lluís Payrató (eds.). 2014. The interaction between context and grammar in Functional Discourse Grammar. Special issue of Pragmatics 24(2).Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S. 2003. Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Interpersonal meaning in the noun phrase. In Jan Rijkhoff & Daniel Garcia Velasco (eds.), 221–261.Google Scholar
Connolly, John H. 2004. The question of discourse representation in Functional Discourse Grammar. In J. Lachlan Mackenzie & María de los Ángeles Gómez-González (eds.), A New Architecture for Functional Grammar, 89–116. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Alfa: Revista de Lingüistica 51(2). 11–33.Google Scholar
2014. The Contextual Component within a dynamic implementation of the FDG model: Structure and interaction. In Alturo, et al. (eds.), 229–248.Google Scholar
Cornish, Francis. 2009. Text and discourse as context: Discourse anaphora and the FDG Contextual Component. In Evelien Keizer & Gerry Wanders (eds.), Web Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar, The London Papers 11, 97–115.Google Scholar
Garcia Velasco, Daniel. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar and extraction from complex noun phrases. In Jan Rijkhoff & Daniel Garcia Velasco (eds.), 321–363.Google Scholar
Garcia Velasco, Daniel & Evelien Keizer (eds.). 2014. Derivational morphology in Functional Discourse Grammar. In María de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, & Franciso Gonzalvez Garcia (eds.), Theory and practice in functional-cognitive space (Functional Grammar Series 251), 151–177. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Garcia Velasco, Daniel & Gerry Wanders (eds.). 2012. The morphosyntactic level in Functional Discourse Grammar. Special Issue of Language Sciences 34(4).Google Scholar
Garcia Velasco, Daniel & Kees Hengeveld. 2002. Do we need predicate frames? In Ricardo Mairal & María Jesüs Pérez Quintero (eds.), New perspectives on argument structure in Functional Grammar (Functional Grammar Series 251), 95–123. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hannay, Mike & Elena Martínez Caro. 2008. Last things first: A FDG approach to clause final focus constituents in Spanish and English. In María de los Ángeles Gómez González, J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Elsa González Álvarez (eds.), Languages and cultures in contrast: New directions in contrastive linguistics, 33–68. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hannay, Mike & Evelien Keizer. 2005. A discourse treatment of non-restrictive apposition in an FDG of English. In María de los Ángeles Gómez González & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds.), Studies in Functional Discourse Grammar (Linguistic Insights 261), 159–194. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hannay, Mike & Kees Hengeveld. 2009. Functional Discourse Grammar: Pragmatic aspects. In Frank Brisard, Jan-Öla Östmann & Jef Verschueren (eds.), Grammar, meaning and pragmatics (Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights 51), 91–116. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 2013. A new approach to clausal constituent order. In J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Hella Olbertz (eds.), Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar, 15–38. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Evelien Keizer. 2011. Non-straightforward communication. Journal of Pragmatics 431. 1962–1976. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Niels Smit. 2009. Dynamic formulation in Functional Discourse Grammar. Lingua 119(8). 1118–1130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keizer, Evelien. 2008a. English prepositions in Functional Discourse Grammar. Functions of Grammar 15(2). 216–256.Google Scholar
. 2008b. Reference and Ascription in F(D)G: An inventory of problem and some possible solutions. In Jan Rijkhoff & Daniel Garcia Velasco (eds.), 181–220.Google Scholar
. 2014. Context and cognition in Functional Discourse Grammar: What, where and why? In Nuria Alturo, et al. (eds.), 399–423.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Gareth. 2014. Humming, whistling, singing, and yelling in Piraha: Context and channels of communication in FDG. In Nuria Alturo, et al. (eds.), 349–375.Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 2008. Layers, levels and contexts in Functional Discourse Grammar. In Daniel Garcia Velasco & Jan Rijkhoff (eds.), 63–115.Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan & Daniel Garcia Velasco (eds.). 2008. The noun phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar (Trends in Linguistics). Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Seinhorst, Klaas. 2013. Phonetics in Functional Discourse Grammar. Web papers in Functional Discourse Grammar 871. Available online at [URL]
Staden, Miriam van & Evelien Keizer (eds.). 2009. Interpersonal Grammar: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Special Issue of Linguistics 47(4).Google Scholar