Article published in:
Stance, resonance and the power of engagement
Edited by Bracha Nir and Elisabeth Zima
[Functions of Language 24:1] 2017
► pp. 3–15

The power of engagement

Stance-taking, dialogic resonance and the construction of intersubjectivity

| University of Haifa
| University of Freiburg
Article outline
  • 1.Engagement in interaction and in language
  • 2.What more can we learn about stance-taking and resonance?
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 04 September 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.24.1.01nir
References
Anward, Jan
2003 Lexemes recycled. How categories emerge from interaction. Logos and Language 21. 31–46.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1984 Problems of Dostoevsky’s poeticsEdited and translated by Caryl Emerson. Introduction by Wayne C. Booth. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. (Theory and History of Literature 8). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth A.
2005 Introduction: Developing discourse stance in different text types and languages. Journal of Pragmatics 37(2). 105–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brône, Geert & Elisabeth Zima
2014 Towards a dialogic construction grammar: A corpus-based approach to ad hoc routines and resonance activation. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 457–495. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1993 Mechanisms for the creation of grammar. In Eve V. Clark (ed.), The proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual child language research forum, 16–21. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca 1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, Il: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
1998 Discourse and grammar. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (Vol. 21), 47–87. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2007 The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Co-opting intersubjectivity: Dialogic rhetoric of the self. In Christian Meyer & Felix Girke (eds.), The rhetorical emergence of culture, 52–83. Oxford, NY: Berghahn.Google Scholar
2014 Towards a Dialogic Syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 359–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
In prep. Reasons to resonate: Motivating Dialogic Syntax.
Du Bois, John W. & Rachel Giora
2014 From cognitive-functional linguistics to dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 351–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Englebretson, Robert
(ed.) 2007 Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia, Barbara Fox & Sandra Thompson
(eds.) 2002 The language of turns and sequences. New York, NY: OUP.Google Scholar
Goutsos, Dionysis
1997 Modeling discourse topic: Sequential relations and strategies in expository text. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Haddington, Pentti
2006 The organization of gaze and assessments as resources for stance-taking. Text & Talk 26(3). 281–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Positioning and alignment as activities of stance taking in news interviews. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: The intersubjectivity of interaction, 283–317. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hermans, Hubert J. M. & Thorsten Gieser
2012 History, main tenets and core concepts of Dialogical Self theory. In Hubert Hermans & Thorsten Gieser (eds.), Handbook of Dialogical Self theory, 1–22. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hobson, R. Peter, Jessica Hobson, Rosa García-Pérez & John W. Du Bois
2012 Dialogic linkage and resonance in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 42(12). 2718–2728. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holquist, Michael
1983 Answering as authoring: Mikhail Bakhtin’s trans–linguistics. Critical Inquiry 10(2). 307–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1987 Emergent grammar. Proceedings of the thirteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 139–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise
2006 Epistemic stance in English conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Marková, Ivana
2003 Constitution of the self: Intersubjectivity and dialogicality. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Newsletter, IEEE 9(3). 249–259.Google Scholar
Maschler, Yael
2009 Metalanguage in interaction: Hebrew discourse markers. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael & Bracha Nir
2014 Complementation in linear and dialogic syntax: The case of Hebrew divergently aligned discourse. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 523–557. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice
2002[1945] Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nir, Bracha, Gonen Dori-Hacohen & Yael Maschler 2014 Formulations on Israeli political talk radio: From actions and sequences to stance via dialogic resonance. Discourse Studies 16(4). 534–571. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal
2001 Discourse markers in oral narrative. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 849–878. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oropeza-Escobar, Minerva
2011 Represented discourse, resonance and stance in joking interaction in Mexican Spanish. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sakita, Tomoko
2006 Parallelism in conversation: Resonance, schematization, and extension from the perspective of dialogic syntax and cognitive linguistics. Pragmatics & Cognition 14(3). 467–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Discourse markers as stance markers. Pragmatics & Cognition 21(1). 81–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse markers. Language in Society 21(4). 683–687.Google Scholar
Siromaa, Maarit
2012 Resonance in conversational second stories: A dialogic resource for stance taking. Text & Talk 32(4). 525–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zima, Elisabeth
2013a Kognition in der Interaktion: Eine kognitiv-linguistische und gesprächsanalytische Studie dialogischer Resonanz in österreichischen Parlamentsdebatten. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
2013b Cognitive Grammar and Dialogic Syntax: Exploring potential synergies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 11(1). 36–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zima, Elisabeth, Geert Brône, Kurt Feyaerts & Paul Sambre
2009 “Ce n’est pas très beau ce que vous avez dit”. Resonance activation in French parliamentary debates. Discours 41. Available online at http://​discours​.revues​.org/.
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Kaltenböck, Gunther, María José López-Couso & Belén Méndez-Naya
2020. The dynamics of stance constructions. Language Sciences 82 ► pp. 101330 ff. Crossref logo
Myskow, Gordon
2018. A framework for analyzing evaluative language in historical discourse. Functions of Language 25:3 ► pp. 335 ff. Crossref logo
PÕLDVERE, NELE, VICTORIA JOHANSSON & CARITA PARADIS
2021. Resonance in dialogue: the interplay between intersubjective motivations and cognitive facilitation. Language and Cognition 13:4 ► pp. 643 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.