Cover not available
Article published In:
Stance, resonance and the power of engagement
Edited by Bracha Nir and Elisabeth Zima
[Functions of Language 24:1] 2017
► pp. 65–93

Stance management in oral narrative

The role of discourse marker well and resonance

| Doshisha University

This paper investigates how actively the speaker engages in taking stance at various levels in oral narrative. By using Du Bois’ (2007) stance theory, it shows that the meta-stance marker well, a discourse marker that performs the management of stance relations in conversational interaction (Sakita 2013a), plays a significant role in oral narrative as well. Well marks two central modes of stance-taking in a narrative. First, well manages the changes of local-spectrum stance-taking that occur among the utterances of/about characters or of the speakers who speak in their immediate, locally shared consciousness. Second, well typically manages the narrator’s broad-spectrum stance-taking with respect to the narrative event as a coherent whole. The latter corresponds to the use of well that is claimed to be unique for the context of the narrative (Norrick 2001). However, this paper shows that well in both local- and broad-spectrum scope functions as a meta-stance marker by managing stance relations. The paper demonstrates that stance is often embedded and effectively highlighted in resonance (Du Bois 2014), both in dialogic and monologic contexts.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Well as a discourse marker, meta-stance marker, and narrative boundary marker
  • 3.Data and method
  • 4.Various levels of stance relation in narrative discourse and organization
    • 4.1Local-spectrum stance-taking in narrative discourse
      • 4.1.1Stance marking at the para-narrative level
      • 4.1.2Stance marking in reported speech
      • 4.1.3Stance marking for concession
      • 4.1.4Stance marking in the extended sequence of a narrative
    • 4.2Broad-spectrum stance-taking at an orientation shift in narrative organization
    • 4.3Distribution of well in oral narrative
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 September 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.24.1.04sak
References
Almeida, Michael J.
1995 Time in narratives. In Judith F. Duchan, Gail A. Bruder & Lynne E. Hewitt (eds.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective, 159–189. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1981 The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999 The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1994 Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Sandra A. Thompson
2000 Concessive patterns in conversation. In Bernd Kortmann & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Cause, condition, concession, and contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives, 381–410. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
2007 The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), 139–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2014 Towards a Dialogic Syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 359–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Englebretson, Robert
(ed.) 2007 Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finell, Anne
1989  Well now and then. Journal of Pragmatics 13(4). 653–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
1998 Validating semantic analyses of discourse particles. Journal of Pragmatics 291. 111–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fludernik, Monika
2009 Conversational narration: Oral narration. In Peter Hühn, John Pier, Wolf Schmid & Jörg Schönert (eds.), Handbook of narratology, 63–73. Hamburg: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
González, Montserrat
2004 Pragmatic markers in oral narrative: The case of English and Catalan. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greasley, Peter
1994 An investigation into the use of the particle well: Commentaries on a game of snooker. Journal of Pragmatics 221. 477–494. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, Allen R.
1983 ‘Well’ in reporting clauses: Meaning and form of a ‘lexical filler’. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 81. 33–40.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H.
1993 The discourse marker well: A relevance-theoretical account. Journal of Pragmatics 191. 435–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 The role of I guess in conversational stancetaking. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), 183–219.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1972 Language in the inner city. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William & Joshua Waletzky
1967 Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In June Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts, 12–44. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1973 Questionable answers and answerable questions. In Braj Kachru, Robert B. Lees, Yakov Malkiel, Angelina Pietrangeli & Sol Soporta (eds.), Issues in Linguistics: Papers in honor of Henry and Renee Kahane, 453–467. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Mayes, Patricia
1990 Quotation in spoken English. Studies in Language 14(2). 325–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, David
1992 Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Simone
2005 Discourse markers in native and non-native English discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal R.
2001 Discourse markers in oral narrative. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 849–878. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola
1981 ‘You know’: A discourse-functional study. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Owen, Marion
1981 Conversational units and the use of ‘well …’. In Paul Werth (ed.), Conversation and discourse: Structure and interpretation, 99–116. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Sakita, Tomoko I.
2002 Reporting discourse, tense, and cognition. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Sakita, Tomoko I. 2013a Discourse markers as stance markers: Well in stance alignment in conversational interaction. Pragmatics and Cognition 21(1). 81–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b Survey of the discourse marker well in quoted speech in spoken American English. Doshisha Studies in Language and Culture 15(4). 331–357.Google Scholar
2013c Interactional management in conversational concession with the stance marker well . Doshisha Global and Regional Studies Review 11. 59–87.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scholes, Robert & Robert Kellogg
1966 The nature of narrative. New York, NY: OUP.Google Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence
1985 Common discourse particles in English conversation. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
2001 Rethinking well . Journal of Pragmatics 331. 1025–1060. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, James L.
2006 Narrative: Sociolinguistics research. In J.L. Mey (ed.), Concise encyclopedia of pragmatics, 657–660. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan
1980  Well in conversation. In Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey N. Leech & Jan Svartvik (eds.), Studies in English linguistics for Randolph Quirk, 167–177. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1989 Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Trester, Anna Marie
2009 Discourse marker ‘oh’ as a means for realizing the identity potential of constructed dialogue in interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13(2). 147–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yule, George
1993 Vera Hayden’s dilemma: Or, the indirection in direct speech. In Mushira Eid & Gregory K. Iverson (eds.), Principles and prediction: The analysis of natural language. Papers in honor of Gerald Sanders, 233–242. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Ghaderi, Soleiman
2021. The functions and evolution of xob ‘well’ in Persian: A thetical analysis. Lingua 262 ► pp. 103129 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.