Article published in:
Functions of Language
Vol. 24:2 (2017) ► pp. 166195


Patterns of (inter)subjectivity


Aijmer, Karin
2002English Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Understanding pragmatic markers: A variational pragmatic approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Aitken, Adam J.
1979Scottish speech: A historical view, with special reference to the Standard English of Scotland. In Adam J. Aitken & Tom McArthur (eds.), Languages of Scotland, 85–118. Edinburgh: Chambers.Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt
1986Contrastive linking in spoken and written English. In Gunnel Tottie & Ingegerd Bäcklund (eds.), English in speech and writing: A symposium (Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 60), 13–40. Uppsala: Academiae Ubsaliensis.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira
2008Pragmatics and grammar. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2002On the development of Final though: A case of grammaticalization? In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on Grammaticalization, 345–361. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate
2007A politeness-theoretic approach to pragmatico-semantic change. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(1). 69–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Procatalepsis and the etymology of hedging and boosting particles. In Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds.), Current trends in diachronic semantics and pragmatics, 81–105. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate & Ulrich Detges
(eds.) 2014Discourse functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change. Brill: Leiden. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, Émile
1966Problèmes de linguistíque générale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1987Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
[ p. 190 ]
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Suzanne Fleischmann
1995Modality in grammar and discourse: An introductory essay. In Joan L. Bybee & Suzanne Fleischmann (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, 1–14. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Sandra A. Thompson
2000Concessive patterns in conversation. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause, condition, concession, contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives, 381–410. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth
2014 So very fast very fast then: Discourse markers at left and right periphery in spoken French. In Kate Beeching & Ulrich Detges (eds.), 151–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Benjamin Fagard
2011 Alors between discourse and grammar: The role of syntactic position. Functions of Language 18(1). 29–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Detges, Ulrich & Richard Waltereit
2011 Moi, je ne sais pas. Je ne sais pas, moi: French tonic pronouns in the left vs. right periphery. Paper presented at IPra, Manchester. (July, 2011.)
Dik, Simon
1997The Theory of Functional Grammar, 2 vols.. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
El Zarka, Dina
2013Egyptian Arabic independent pronouns in the left and right periphery: Reference point and repair constructions with subjective and intersubjective meanings. Paper presented at IPra, New Delhi. (September, 2013.)
Fetzer, Anita
2004Recontextualizing context: Grammaticality meets appropriateness. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 I think , I mean and I believe in political discourse: Collocates, functions and distribution. Functions of Language 21(1). 67–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin & Maria Alm
2013A radical construction grammar perspective on the modal particle-discourse particle distinction. In Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie & Paola Pietrandrea (eds.), Discourse markers and modal particles: categorization and description, 47–88. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fritz, Clemens W. A.
2007From English in Australia to Australian English: 1788–1900. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1982Discourse strategies. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992Contextualization and understanding. In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, 229–252. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Moosegard
1998The function of discourse particles: A study with special reference to spoken Standard French. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005From prepositional phrase to hesitation marker: The semantic and pragmatic evolution of French enfin . Journal of Historical Pragmatics 6(1). 37–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2012Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the negotiation of common ground in spoken discourse: Final particles in English. Language and Communication 32(3). 182–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47(2). 375–424. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 191 ]
Izutsu, Mitsuko N. & Katsunobu Izutsu
2014Truncation and backshift: Two pathways to sentence-final coordinating conjunctions. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15(1). 62–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Yael Ziv
1998Introduction. In Andreas H. Jucker & Jael Ziv (eds.), Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory, 1–12. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2009English comment clauses: Position, prosody, and scope. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 34(1). 49–75.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine & Tanja Kuteva
2011On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4). 852–897. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, Aino
2012Discourse patterns for turn-final conjunctions. Journal of Pragmatics 44(10). 1254–1272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krug, Manfred G.
2015Maltese English. In Edgar Schneider, Daniel Schreier, Peter Trudgill & Jeffrey P. Williams (eds.), Further studies in the lesser-known varieties of English, 11–50. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1985Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, 109–150. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lenk, Uta
1998Discourse markers and global coherence in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 30(2). 245–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López-Couso, María José
2010Subjectification and intersubjectification. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical pragmatics, 127–164. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White
2005The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Bruce
2008Speaking our language: The story of Australian English. South Melbourne, Vic.: OUP.Google Scholar
Mulder, Jean & Sandra A. Thompson
2006The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Keith Allen (ed.), Selected Papers from the 2005 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. http://​www​.als​.asn​.au​/proceedings​/als2005​/mulder​-thompson​.pdf.
2008The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Ritva Laury (ed.), Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining, 179–204. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Jean, Sandra A. Thompson & Cara Penry Williams
2009Final but in Australian English conversation. In Pam Peters, Peter Collins & Adam Smith (eds.), Comparative studies in Australian and New Zealand English, 337–358. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2012Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal R.
2001Discourse markers in oral narrative. Journal of Pragmatics 33(6). 849–878. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Conjunctions in final position in everyday talk. In Bruce Fraser, Ken Turner & Jacob Mey (eds.), Language in life and a life in language: Jacob Mey – a festschrift, 319–328. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
2001Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3). 383–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 192 ]
2012Notions of (inter)subjectivity. English Text Construction 5(1). 53–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O.
2004Japanese Discourse Markers. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Interplay of (inter)subjectivity and social norm. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(2). 239–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, John F.
2001Mood and modality, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pichler, Heike
2013aDiscourse function and clause periphery, innit? Paper presented at IPra, New Delhi. (September, 2013.)
2013bThe structure of discourse-pragmatic variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, Livia & Remko Scha
1983On the recursive structure of discourse. In Konrad Ehlich & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), On connectedness in sentence, discourse and text: Proceedings of the Tilburg conference held on 25 and 26 January 1982, 141–178. Tilburg: Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Ian Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse markers. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shinzato, Rumiko
2006Subjectivity, intersubjectivity, and grammaticalization. In Satoko Suzuki (ed.), Emotive communication in Japanese, 15–33. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007(Inter)subjectification, Japanese syntax and syntactic scope increase. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(2). 171–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane
2011–2014Fine phonetic variation and sound change: A real-time study of Glaswegian. Research grant RPG-142 funded by the Leverhulme Trust. http://​soundsofthecity​.arts​.gla​.ac​.uk/.
Tottie, Gunnel & Sebastian Hoffmann
2006Tag questions in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics 34(4). 283–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–142. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010(Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–74. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Intersubjectification and clause periphery. English Text Construction 5(1). 7–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2002Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1986Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Van der Wouden, Ton & Ad Foolen
2011Dutch particles in the right periphery. http://​www​.tonvanderwouden​.nl​/index​_files​/papers​/fipa​-2011​-05b​.pdf. (April 16 2013.)
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Cuenca, Maria Josep
2020. Defective Connective Constructions: Some Cases in Catalan and Spanish. Corpus Pragmatics Crossref logo
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2020.  American and Irish English speakers’ perceptions of the final particles so and but . World Englishes Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.