Article published In:
Functions of LanguageVol. 5:1 (1998) ► pp.1–32
On the grammar of pain
The lexicogrammar of every natural language is (among other things) a theory of human experience, a resource whereby experience is transformed into meaning. One of the most challenging areas of human experience is that of pain. If we investigate the grammar of pain in modern English, using evidence from a corpus, a short text, and paradigms of typical expressions in everyday speech, we find that pain is categorized in varying ways, as process, quality and thing, and construed as various different kinds of process. This variation constructs pain as a uniquely complex domain of experience, one that cannot be located within any simply defined region of semantic space.
Cited by
Cited by 34 other publications
Aarseth, Guri, Bård Natvig, Eivind Engebretsen, Eva Maagerø & Anne Helene Kveim Lie
2016. Writing the patient down and out: the construal of the patient in medical certificates of disability. Sociology of Health & Illness 38:8 ► pp. 1379 ff. 
Abraham, Werner
2020. Introduction . In Thetics and Categoricals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 262], ► pp. 2 ff.
Agbaglo, Ebenezer
2022. “My heartfelt gratitude goes to …”: The construal of gratitude in master’s dissertation acknowledgements. International Journal of Research Studies in Education 11:6
Anafo, Comfort & Richmond S. Ngula
2020. On the grammar of scam: transitivity, manipulation and deception in scam emails. <i>WORD</i> 66:1 ► pp. 16 ff.
Barofsky, Ivan
2012. Symptoms and HRQOL Assessment. In Quality, ► pp. 199 ff.
Borg, Emma, Nathaniel Hansen & Tim Salomons
2019. The Meaning of Pain Expressions and Pain Communication. In Meanings of Pain, ► pp. 261 ff.
Bullo, Stella, Mariana Pascual & Dalia Magaña
2022. Agency in endometriosis pain communication in English and Spanish. Communication and Medicine 18:1
Crichton, Jonathan
2007. Doing battle with a noun. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 19.1 ff.
Crichton, Jonathan
2007. Doing battle with a noun. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 19.1 ff.
De Leiuen, Cherrie
2015. Discourse Through the Looking Glass: Gender in the Language of Archaeological Journals. Archaeologies 11:3 ► pp. 417 ff.
Disney, Stephen J.
2020. Figurative Language in Describing Pain and Lifestyle Impact. English Studies 101:8 ► pp. 1009 ff.
García Marrugo, Alexandra
2017. ‘On the grammar of death’: the construal of death and killing in Colombian newspapers. Functional Linguistics 4:1
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Foong Ha Yap
2015. Stance-marking and stance-taking in Asian languages. Journal of Pragmatics 83 ► pp. 1 ff.
Jaworska, Sylvia & Kath Ryan
2018. Gender and the language of pain in chronic and terminal illness: A corpus-based discourse analysis of patients' narratives. Social Science & Medicine 215 ► pp. 107 ff.
Lascaratou, Chryssoula & Sophia Marmaridou
2005. Metaphor in Greek pain-constructions: Cognitive and functional perspectives. In Reviewing Linguistic Thought,
Liu, Michelle
2023. The polysemy view of pain. Mind & Language 38:1 ► pp. 198 ff.
Maciel, Tamyres Fernanda Silva & Adail Sebastião Rodrigues-Júnior
2017. ESTUDO COMPARATIVO DAS ATITUDES AVALIATIVAS DE OSCAR WILDE NA CARTA DE PROFUNDIS E SUA TRADUÇÃO PARA O PORTUGUÊS BRASILEIRO. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada 56:3 ► pp. 935 ff.
Manfredi, Stefano
2022. Pain Constructions in modern Arabic dialects: a typological overview. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 75:4 ► pp. 501 ff.
Marmaridou, Sophia
2006. On the conceptual, cultural and discursive motivation of Greek pain lexicalizations. Cognitive Linguistics 17:3
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M.
2014. Extending the description of process type within the system of transitivity in delicacy based on Levinian verb classes. Functions of Language 21:2 ► pp. 139 ff.
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. & Enhua Guo
2020. Matthiessen’s thoughts on some key issues in systemic functional linguistics. <i>WORD</i> 66:2 ► pp. 130 ff.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., Bo Wang & Yuanyi Ma
2019. Matthiessen on Halliday. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 1:2 ► pp. 366 ff.
Nunes, Diogo A. P., Joana Ferreira-Gomes, Fani Neto & David Martins de Matos
2023. Modeling Chronic Pain Experiences from Online Reports Using the Reddit Reports of Chronic Pain Dataset. Information 14:4 ► pp. 237 ff.
Plastina, Anna Franca
2016. Putting the plain into pain language in English for Medical Purposes: Learner inquiry into patients’ online descriptive accounts. Language Learning in Higher Education 6:1
Power, Stephanie, Fiona E. Bogossian, Roland Sussex & Jenny Strong
2017. A critical and interpretive literature review of birthing women’s non-elicited pain language. Women and Birth 30:5 ► pp. e227 ff.
Segalowitz, Norman & Eva Kehayia
2011. Exploring the Determinants of Language Barriers in Health Care (LBHC): Toward a Research Agenda for the Language Sciences. The Canadian Modern Language Review 67:4 ► pp. 480 ff.
Semino, Elena
2010. Descriptions of Pain, Metaphor, and Embodied Simulation. Metaphor and Symbol 25:4 ► pp. 205 ff.
Slade, Diana, Hermine Scheeres, Marie Manidis, Rick Iedema, Roger Dunston, Jane Stein-Parbury, Christian Matthiessen, Maria Herke & Jeannette McGregor
2008. Emergency communication: the discursive challenges facing emergency clinicians and patients in hospital emergency departments. Discourse & Communication 2:3 ► pp. 271 ff.
Stanford, Elizabeth A., Christine T. Chambers & Kenneth D. Craig
2005. A normative analysis of the development of pain-related vocabulary in children. Pain 114:1 ► pp. 278 ff.
Sussex, Roland
2009. Review of (2007)Review article of Chryssoula Lascaratou’s the language of pain. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 32:1 ► pp. 6.1 ff.
Sussex, Roland
2009.
Review article of Chryssoula Lascaratou’s the language of pain
. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 32:1 ► pp. 6.1 ff.
SUSSEX, Roland
2018. Intercultural Communication About Pain. In Intercultural Communication in Asia: Education, Language and Values [Multilingual Education, 24], ► pp. 181 ff.
Xiao, Yi & Hang Su
2014. Why Are We Angry? A Corpus-linguistic Investigation of the Emotion Anger. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4:12
[no author supplied]
2005. Part III: Drawing on different theories. In Reviewing Linguistic Thought,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.