Article published In:
Functions of LanguageVol. 5:1 (1998) ► pp.33–56
Resources for attitudinal meaning
Evaluative orientations in text semantics
Lexicogrammatical resources enable us to construct attitudinal stances not only toward interlocutors and audiences but also toward the ideational content of propositions and proposals. Seven semantic dimensions of evaluative orientations to propositions are identified and compared to those for clause modality. A sample corpus of newspaper editorials is used to illustrate the resources which realize these evaluative meanings in connected running text. Examples are also given of several interesting text-semantic phenomena that arise from the prosodic realization of attitudinal-orientational meanings in connected text, including attitudinal cohesion and syntactic, projective, and extended prospective and retrospective propagation of evaluative meanings. It is proposed that evaluative meanings should play a significant role in discourse analysis of social heteroglossia and individual and collective identity.
Cited by
Cited by 121 other publications
Bannon *, Fiona
2004. Towards creative practice in research in dance education. Research in Dance Education 5:1 ► pp. 25 ff. 
Barton, Georgina & Peter Freebody
2014. Literacy and Knowledge: Classroom Practice in the Arts. In Literacy in the Arts, ► pp. 93 ff.
Bednarek, Monika
2010. Polyphony in Appraisal. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 3:2 ► pp. 107 ff.
Bednarek, Monika
2016. Voices and values in the news: News media talk, news values and attribution. Discourse, Context & Media 11 ► pp. 27 ff.
Bednarek, Monika A.
2006. Chapter 7: Evaluation and cognition: Inscribing, evoking and provoking opinion. In Language and Memory,
Bolin, Mary K.
2014. The Language of Academic Librarianship: The Discourse of Promotion and Tenure. In Advances in Library Administration and Organization [Advances in Library Administration and Organization, 32], ► pp. 213 ff.
Bolin, Mary K.
2023. Discourse analysis model and data. In Refocusing Academic Libraries Through Learning and Discourse, ► pp. 27 ff.
Burgers, Christian, Margot van Mulken & Peter Jan Schellens
2011. Finding Irony: An Introduction of the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP). Metaphor and Symbol 26:3 ► pp. 186 ff.
Burn, Andrew & Rebekah Willett
2005. “What exactly is a paedophile?” Children talking about Internet risk. In Jahrbuch Medien-Pädagogik, ► pp. 237 ff.
Buzato, Marcelo El Khouri
2017. Towards a theoretical mashup for studying posthuman/postsocial ethics. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 15:01 ► pp. 74 ff.
Carr, Georgia
Chang, Peichin & Mary Schleppegrell
2011. Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10:3 ► pp. 140 ff.
Chen, Yuping
2019. Theoretical Foundations. In Translating Film Subtitles into Chinese, ► pp. 13 ff.
Chieu, Vu Minh, Patricio Herbst & Michael Weiss
2011. Effect of an Animated Classroom Story Embedded in Online Discussion on Helping Mathematics Teachers Learn to Notice. Journal of the Learning Sciences 20:4 ► pp. 589 ff.
Christodoulou, Michael & Pandelis Kiprianos
2012. Moral subjects, healthy adolescents: Analyzing the discourse of health education in Greek secondary education. Social Theory & Health 10:4 ► pp. 309 ff.
Damholdt, Malene Flensborg, Vestergaard Christina, Anna Kryvous, Catharina Vesterager Smedegaard & Johanna Seibt
2019. What is in three words? Exploring a three-word methodology for assessing impressions of a social robot encounter online and in real life. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics 10:1 ► pp. 438 ff.
de Jong, Ilona K.E. & Christian Burgers
2013. Do consumer critics write differently from professional critics? A genre analysis of online film reviews. Discourse, Context & Media 2:2 ► pp. 75 ff.
DeCoursey, C.A.
2012. Trialing cartoons: Teachers’ attitudes towards animation as an ELT instructional tool. Computers & Education 59:2 ► pp. 436 ff.
Deroey, K. L. B.
2015. Marking Importance in Lectures: Interactive and Textual Orientation. Applied Linguistics 36:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Deroey, Katrien L.B. & Miriam Taverniers
2012. ‘Ignore that 'cause it's totally irrelevant’: Marking lesser relevance in lectures. Journal of Pragmatics 44:14 ► pp. 2085 ff.
Dolón, Rosana
2022. The evaluation of status in Boris Johnson’s political speeches. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 35:1 ► pp. 332 ff.
Don, Alexanne
2016. “It is hard to mesh all this”: Invoking attitude, persona and argument organisation. Functional Linguistics 3:1
Dong, Jihua & Louisa Buckingham
2018. The collocation networks of stance phrases. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 36 ► pp. 119 ff.
Downes, William
2000. The language of felt experience: emotional, evaluative and intuitive. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 9:2 ► pp. 99 ff.
Eason, Simon
2001. Stating the obvious: modal adjuncts in NATO press briefings. ASp :31-33 ► pp. 39 ff.
Etaywe, Awni & Michele Zappavigna
2022. Identity, ideology and threatening communication. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:2 ► pp. 315 ff.
Ethelston, Graham
2009. Appraisal in evangelical sermons: the projection and functions of misguided voices. Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 29:6 ► pp. 683 ff.
Ghavamnia, Maedeh & Hossein Vahid Dastjerdi
2013. Evaluation in Media Discourse: Contrasts among Journalists in Reporting an Event. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 70 ► pp. 447 ff.
González, Gloriana & Jennifer A. Eli
2017. Prospective and in-service teachers’ perspectives about launching a problem. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 20:2 ► pp. 159 ff.
Graham, Phil
2002. Hypercapitalism: language, new media and social perceptions of value. Discourse & Society 13:2 ► pp. 227 ff.
Graham, Phil
2003. Critical Discourse Analysis and Evaluative Meaning: Interdisciplinarity as a Critical Turn. In Critical Discourse Analysis, ► pp. 110 ff.
Graham, Phil
2003. Critical Discourse Analysis and Evaluative Meaning: Interdisciplinarity as a Critical Turn. In Critical Discourse Analysis, ► pp. 110 ff.
Graham, Phil
2018. Ethics in critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies 15:2 ► pp. 186 ff.
Graham, Phil
2019. Negative Discourse Analysis and utopias of the political. Journal of Language and Politics 18:3 ► pp. 323 ff.
Graham, Phil & Briony Luttrell
2019. A rhetoric of style: Eleanor Rigby and the reordering of popular music. Social Semiotics 29:2 ► pp. 222 ff.
GRAHAM, PHIL & NEIL PAULSEN
2002. Third-sector discourses and the future of (un)employment: Skilled labor, new technologies, and the meaning of work. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 22:3
GRAHAM, PHILIP
1999. Critical Systems Theory. Communication Research 26:4 ► pp. 482 ff.
GRAHAM, PHILIP
2000. Hypercapitalism. New Media & Society 2:2 ► pp. 131 ff.
GRAHAM, PHILIP
2001. Space: Irrealis Objects in Technology Policy and their Role in a New Political Economy. Discourse & Society 12:6 ► pp. 761 ff.
GRAHAM, PHILIP
2002. Predication and propagation: A method for analyzing evaluative meanings in technology policy. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 22:2
Graham, Philip & Allan Luke
2003. Militarizing the Body Politic: New Mediations as Weapons of Mass Instruction. Body & Society 9:4 ► pp. 149 ff.
Graham, Philip & David Rooney
2001. A sociolinguistic approach to applied epistemology: Examining technocratic values in global 'knowledge' policy. Social Epistemology 15:3 ► pp. 155 ff.
Granato, Luisa & María Leticia Móccero
Gómez González, María de los Ángeles, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco Gonzálvez García & Angela Downing
2014. On the relatedness of functionalism and pragmatics. In The Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 247], ► pp. 1 ff.
Haupt, Jaromír
2014. Contrastive relations, evaluation, and generic structure in science news. In The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 254], ► pp. 53 ff.
He, Qingshun
2019. A Systemic Functional Approach to Clause Combining in English. In A Corpus-Based Approach to Clause Combining in English from the Systemic Functional Perspective [The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series, ], ► pp. 11 ff.
He, Qingshun
2022. A Corpus‐based Study of Textual Metaphor in English Academic Writing. Studia Linguistica 76:2 ► pp. 381 ff.
Herbst, Patricio & Karl W. Kosko
2014. Using representations of practice to elicit mathematics teachers’ tacit knowledge of practice: a comparison of responses to animations and videos. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 17:6 ► pp. 515 ff.
Herbst, Patricio & Takeshi Miyakawa
2008. When, how, and why prove theorems? A methodology for studying the perspective of geometry teachers. ZDM 40:3 ► pp. 469 ff.
Herbst, Patricio G. & Daniel Chazan
2023. Keeping Theorizing in Touch with Practice: Practical Rationality as a Middle Range Theory of Mathematics Teaching. In Theorizing Teaching, ► pp. 189 ff.
Heyd-Metzuyanim, Einat & Anna Sfard
2012. Identity struggles in the mathematics classroom: On learning mathematics as an interplay of mathematizing and identifying. International Journal of Educational Research 51-52 ► pp. 128 ff.
Hood, Susan
2006. The persuasive power of prosodies: Radiating values in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Hood, Susan
2019. Appraisal. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, ► pp. 382 ff.
Hood, Susan & Gail Forey
2008. The interpersonal dynamics of call-centre interactions: co-constructing the rise and fall of emotion. Discourse & Communication 2:4 ► pp. 389 ff.
Huan, Changpeng
2018. Linguistic Modelling of Journalistic Stance. In Journalistic Stance in Chinese and Australian Hard News, ► pp. 9 ff.
Kaltenböck, Gunther, María José López-Couso & Belén Méndez-Naya
2020. The dynamics of stance constructions. Language Sciences 82 ► pp. 101330 ff.
Karagevrekis, Mersini
2015. A Multimodal Analysis of Genres of Economics Representation in EAP/ESP. In Meaning Making in Text, ► pp. 197 ff.
Kolumbán, Kinga
2021. Saying ‘No’ to Immigration Quota: An Analysis of Evaluative Language in Hungarian and Romanian Political Discourse. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica 13:2 ► pp. 161 ff.
Kong, Kenneth C.C.
2008. A filial son or a loving mother?. Journal of Pragmatics 40:3 ► pp. 431 ff.
Kosko, Karl W. & Patricio Herbst
2012. A deeper look at how teachers say what they say: A quantitative modality analysis of teacher-to-teacher talk. Teaching and Teacher Education 28:4 ► pp. 589 ff.
Lee, Sook Hee
2015. Evaluative Stances in Persuasive Essays by Undergraduate Students: Focusing on Appreciation Resources. Text & Talk 35:1
Lemke, J. L.
1999. Typological and topological meaning in diagnostic discourse. Discourse Processes 27:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Lemke, Jay
1998. Multimedia Literacy Demands of the Scientific Curriculum. Linguistics and Education 10:3 ► pp. 247 ff.
Lemke, Jay
2015. Feeling and Meaning: A Unitary Bio-Semiotic Account. In International Handbook of Semiotics, ► pp. 589 ff.
LEMKE, JAY L.
1999. Discourse and Organizational Dynamics: Website Communication and Institutional Change. Discourse & Society 10:1 ► pp. 21 ff.
Lemke, Jay L.
2000. Across the Scales of Time: Artifacts, Activities, and Meanings in Ecosocial Systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity 7:4 ► pp. 273 ff.
Lemke, Jay L.
2002. Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication 1:3 ► pp. 299 ff.
Lemke, Jay L.
2012. Analyzing Verbal Data: Principles, Methods, and Problems. In Second International Handbook of Science Education, ► pp. 1471 ff.
Lemke, Jay L.
2012. Thinking About Feeling:. In Identity, Community, and Learning Lives in the Digital Age, ► pp. 57 ff.
Lindgren, Eva & Marie Stevenson
2013. Interactional resources in the letters of young writers in Swedish and English. Journal of Second Language Writing 22:4 ► pp. 390 ff.
Lipovsky, Caroline
2013. Negotiating one’s expertise through appraisal in CVs. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 8:3 ► pp. 307 ff.
Lipovsky, Caroline
2014. The CV as a multimodal text. Visual Communication 13:4 ► pp. 429 ff.
Lischinsky, Alon
2008. Examples as persuasive argument in popular management literature. Discourse & Communication 2:3 ► pp. 243 ff.
MACKEN-HORARIK, MARY
2003. Envoi: Intractable issues in appraisal analysis?. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 23:2
Macken-Horarik, Mary & Anne R. Isaac
2014. Appraising Appraisal. In Evaluation in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 242], ► pp. 67 ff.
Martin, J. R.
2004. Mourning: How We Get Aligned. Discourse & Society 15:2-3 ► pp. 321 ff.
Martin, J.R.
2008. What kind of structure?—interpersonal meaning and prosodic realization across strata. <i>WORD</i> 59:1-2 ► pp. 111 ff.
Mazid, Bahaa-Eddin M.
2008. Cowboy and misanthrope: a critical (discourse) analysis of Bush and bin Laden cartoons. Discourse & Communication 2:4 ► pp. 433 ff.
Melrose, Robin
2005. Text semantics and the ideological patterning of texts. Critical Discourse Studies 2:1 ► pp. 71 ff.
Menard, Rusten
2016. Analysing Social Values in Identification; A Framework for Research on the Representation and Implementation of Values. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 46:2 ► pp. 122 ff.
Millar, Neil & Susan Hunston
2015. Adjectives, communities, and taxonomies of evaluative meaning. Functions of Language 22:3 ► pp. 297 ff.
Moreno Ortiz, Antonio & Chantal Perez Hernandez
2014. Form and function in evaluative language: The use of corpora to identify context valence shifters in a linguistically-motivated sentiment analysis system. In The Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 247], ► pp. 87 ff.
Mulderrig, Jane
2011. The grammar of governance. Critical Discourse Studies 8:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
Mulderrig, Jane
2012. The hegemony of inclusion: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of deixis in education policy. Discourse & Society 23:6 ► pp. 701 ff.
Mulderrig, Jane
2018. Multimodal strategies of emotional governance: a critical analysis of ‘nudge’ tactics in health policy. Critical Discourse Studies 15:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Nádraská, Zuzana
2017. The functions of external voices in hard news Appraisal: A dialogic perspective. Topics in Linguistics 18:2 ► pp. 63 ff.
Ohana, Bruno, Brendan Tierney & Sarah-Jane Delany
2011. 2011 IEEE Workshops of International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, ► pp. 632 ff.
Pascual, Mariana
2014. La asociación de recursos de valoración: el caso de las organizaciones de derechos humanos en la prensa escrita argentina. Onomázein Revista de lingüística filología y traducción :1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Pounds, Gabrina
2015. Evaluative Language. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ► pp. 1 ff.
Pounds, Gabrina
2021. Presupposed evaluation in environmental argumentative discourse. Functions of Language 28:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Pounds, Gabrina
2022. Writer’s argumentative attitude. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 49 ff.
Rheindorf, Markus
2019. Working with Different Types of Data: Methodological Plurality Within and Beyond the Linguistic. In Revisiting the Toolbox of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 87 ff.
Roan, Amanda & David Rooney
2006. Shadowing Experiences and the Extension of Communities of Practice: A Case Study of Women Education Managers. Management Learning 37:4 ► pp. 433 ff.
Rooney, David
2005. Knowledge, economy, technology and society: The politics of discourse. Telematics and Informatics 22:4 ► pp. 405 ff.
Song, Jiannan
2021. Appraising with Metaphors: A Case Study of the Strategic Ritual for Invoking Journalistic Emotions in News Reporting of the China–US Trade Disputes. Critical Arts 35:5-6 ► pp. 179 ff.
Su, Hang
2016. How products are evaluated? Evaluation in customer review texts. Language Resources and Evaluation 50:3 ► pp. 475 ff.
Sun, Shuyi & Peter Crosthwaite
2022. “Establish a niche” via negation: A corpus-based study of negation within the Move 2 sections of PhD thesis introductions. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 189 ff.
Sunderland, Naomi, Tara Catalano & Elizabeth Kendall
2009. Missing discourses: concepts of joy and happiness in disability. Disability & Society 24:6 ► pp. 703 ff.
Talib, Nadira
2021. How is structural inequality made fair in a meritocratic education system?. Journal of Language and Politics 20:3 ► pp. 383 ff.
Talib, Nadira & Richard Fitzgerald
2015. INEQUALITY AS MERITOCRACY. Critical Discourse Studies 12:4 ► pp. 445 ff.
Talib, Nadira & Richard Fitzgerald
2016. Micro–meso–macro movements; a multi-level critical discourse analysis framework to examine metaphors and the value of truth in policy texts. Critical Discourse Studies 13:5 ► pp. 531 ff.
Talib, Nadira & Richard Fitzgerald
2018. Putting philosophy back to work in Critical Discourse Analysis. Critical Discourse Studies 15:2 ► pp. 123 ff.
Talib, Nadira & Richard Fitzgerald
2022. The art of illusion as government policy. Analysing political economies of surrealism. Critical Discourse Studies 19:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
Thabet, Rawy A.
2018. A Cross-Cultural Corpus Study of the Use of Hedging Markers and Dogmatism in Postgraduate Writing of Native and Non-native Speakers of English. In Intelligent Natural Language Processing: Trends and Applications [Studies in Computational Intelligence, 740], ► pp. 677 ff.
Thibault, Paul J.
1999. Communicating and interpreting relevance through discourse negotiation: An alternative to relevance theory — A reply to Franken. Journal of Pragmatics 31:4 ► pp. 557 ff.
Thompson, G. & S. Hunston
2006. Evaluation in Text. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 305 ff.
Thompson, Geoff
2008. Appraising glances: evaluating Martin's model of APPRAISAL. <i>WORD</i> 59:1-2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Thompson, Geoff
2014. AFFECT and emotion, target-value mismatches, and Russian dolls: refining the APPRAISAL model. In Evaluation in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 242], ► pp. 47 ff.
Van linden, An & Freek Van de Velde
2014. (Semi-)autonomous subordination in Dutch: Structures and semantic–pragmatic values. Journal of Pragmatics 60 ► pp. 226 ff.
Van linden, An & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2011. Revisiting deontic modality and related categories: A conceptual map based on the study of English modal adjectives. Journal of Pragmatics 43:1 ► pp. 150 ff.
Villanueva, Mary Grace F.
2016. Using Multimodal Representations to Develop Scientific Literacy in South African Classrooms. In Using Multimodal Representations to Support Learning in the Science Classroom, ► pp. 77 ff.
Weber, Ian
2010. Commodifying digital television in China: a socio-linguistic analysis of media discourse, technology deployment and control. New Media & Society 12:2 ► pp. 289 ff.
WEBER, IAN & VANESSA EVANS
2002. Constructing the Meaning of Digital Television in Britain, the United States and Australia. New Media & Society 4:4 ► pp. 435 ff.
Wortham, Stanton & Michael Locher
1999. Embedded metapragmatics and lying politicians. Language & Communication 19:2 ► pp. 109 ff.
Wu, Xiaoping
2018. Framing, reframing and the transformation of stance in news translation: a case study of the translation of news on the China–Japan dispute. Language and Intercultural Communication 18:2 ► pp. 257 ff.
Yang, Bingjun
2019. Interpersonal metaphor revisited: identification, categorization, and syndrome. Social Semiotics 29:2 ► pp. 186 ff.
[no author supplied]
2011. Legitimacy Crisis. In Police Reform in China [Advances in Police Theory and Practice, 20113627], ► pp. 131 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Multimodality. In Professional Discourse, ► pp. 242 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Intertextuality. In Professional Discourse, ► pp. 167 ff.
[no author supplied]
2018. References. In The 21st Century Academic Library, ► pp. 141 ff.
[no author supplied]
2023. References. In Refocusing Academic Libraries Through Learning and Discourse, ► pp. 119 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.