Dynel, Marta
2024.
Say what you want: Evaluation and engagement with YouTube broadcasts on ChatGPT.
Journalism ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Strukowska, Marta E.
2024.
“Mapping and projecting otherness in media discourse of the Russia–Ukraine war”.
Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 60:1
► pp. 77 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Cheng, Shi
2023.
A review of interpersonal metafunction studies in systemic functional linguistics (2012–2022).
Journal of World Languages 0:0
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Dong, Jihua, Ye Liu & Xiaofei Lu
2023.
A discourse dynamics analysis of academic voice construction: Disciplinary variation, trajectories, and dynamic interaction patterns.
System 119
► pp. 103181 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Herbst, Patricio G. & Daniel Chazan
2023.
Keeping Theorizing in Touch with Practice: Practical Rationality as a Middle Range Theory of Mathematics Teaching. In
Theorizing Teaching,
► pp. 189 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Hovhannisyan, Anahit
2023.
ENGLISH IDIOMS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF MODAL MEANING.
Armenian Folia Anglistika 19:1 (27)
► pp. 013 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Peldová, Petra
2023.
Emotion and opinion in online tabloids and broadsheets.
Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 140:2
► pp. 121 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Rezaee, Abbas Ali & Mohammad Mozaffari
2023.
“Where got I that truth?” An analysis of external sources in English and Persian news reports on Syria.
Discourse and Interaction 16:1
► pp. 118 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Sun, Jing & Zhenqian Liu
2023.
Evaluation Mechanism of Political Discourse: A Holistic Approach.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:6
► pp. 2143 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Yu, Yang & Gang Zeng
2023.
Lesser relevance markers in Chinese academic spoken English corpus: a cross-disciplinary study on pragmatic features.
Frontiers in Psychology 14
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Etaywe, Awni & Michele Zappavigna
Granato, Luisa & María Leticia Móccero
Sun, Shuyi & Peter Crosthwaite
2022.
“Establish a niche” vianegation: A corpus-based study ofnegationwithin the Move 2 sections of PhD thesis introductions.
Open Linguistics 8:1
► pp. 189 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Kolumbán, Kinga
2021.
Saying ‘No’ to Immigration Quota: An Analysis of Evaluative Language in Hungarian and Romanian Political Discourse.
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica 13:2
► pp. 161 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Song, Jiannan
2021.
Appraising with Metaphors: A Case Study of the Strategic Ritual for Invoking Journalistic Emotions in News Reporting of the China–US Trade Disputes.
Critical Arts 35:5-6
► pp. 179 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Talib, Nadira
2023.
Rethinking ethics in AI policy: a method for synthesising Graham’s critical discourse analysis approaches and the philosophical study of valuation.
Critical Discourse Studies ► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Kaltenböck, Gunther, María José López-Couso & Belén Méndez-Naya
2020.
The dynamics of stance constructions.
Language Sciences 82
► pp. 101330 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Chen, Yuping
2019.
Theoretical Foundations. In
Translating Film Subtitles into Chinese,
► pp. 13 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Damholdt, Malene Flensborg, Vestergaard Christina, Anna Kryvous, Catharina Vesterager Smedegaard & Johanna Seibt
2019.
What is in three words? Exploring a three-word methodology for assessing impressions of a social robot encounter online and in real life.
Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics 10:1
► pp. 438 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Graham, Phil & Briony Luttrell
2019.
A rhetoric of style: Eleanor Rigby and the reordering of popular music.
Social Semiotics 29:2
► pp. 222 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
He, Qingshun
2019.
A Systemic Functional Approach to Clause Combining in English. In
A Corpus-Based Approach to Clause Combining in English from the Systemic Functional Perspective [
The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series, ],
► pp. 11 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
He, Qingshun
2022.
A Corpus‐based Study of Textual Metaphor in English Academic Writing.
Studia Linguistica 76:2
► pp. 381 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Rheindorf, Markus
2019.
Working with Different Types of Data: Methodological Plurality Within and Beyond the Linguistic. In
Revisiting the Toolbox of Discourse Studies,
► pp. 87 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Yang, Bingjun
2019.
Interpersonal metaphor revisited: identification, categorization, and syndrome.
Social Semiotics 29:2
► pp. 186 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Dong, Jihua & Louisa Buckingham
2018.
The collocation networks of stance phrases.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 36
► pp. 119 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Huan, Changpeng
2018.
Linguistic Modelling of Journalistic Stance. In
Journalistic Stance in Chinese and Australian Hard News,
► pp. 9 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Thabet, Rawy A.
2018.
A Cross-Cultural Corpus Study of the Use of Hedging Markers and Dogmatism in Postgraduate Writing of Native and Non-native Speakers of English. In
Intelligent Natural Language Processing: Trends and Applications [
Studies in Computational Intelligence, 740],
► pp. 677 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Wu, Xiaoping
2018.
Framing, reframing and the transformation of stance in news translation: a case study of the translation of news on the China–Japan dispute.
Language and Intercultural Communication 18:2
► pp. 257 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Buzato, Marcelo El Khouri
2017.
Towards a theoretical mashup for studying posthuman/postsocial ethics.
Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 15:01
► pp. 74 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
González, Gloriana & Jennifer A. Eli
2017.
Prospective and in-service teachers’ perspectives about launching a problem.
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 20:2
► pp. 159 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Nádraská, Zuzana
2017.
The functions of external voices in hard news Appraisal: A dialogic perspective.
Topics in Linguistics 18:2
► pp. 63 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Don, Alexanne
2016.
“It is hard to mesh all this”: Invoking attitude, persona and argument organisation.
Functional Linguistics 3:1
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Menard, Rusten
2016.
Analysing Social Values in Identification; A Framework for Research on the Representation and Implementation of Values.
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 46:2
► pp. 122 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Su, Hang
2016.
How products are evaluated? Evaluation in customer review texts.
Language Resources and Evaluation 50:3
► pp. 475 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Villanueva, Mary Grace F.
2016.
Using Multimodal Representations to Develop Scientific Literacy in South African Classrooms. In
Using Multimodal Representations to Support Learning in the Science Classroom,
► pp. 77 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Deroey, K. L. B.
2015.
Marking Importance in Lectures: Interactive and Textual Orientation.
Applied Linguistics 36:1
► pp. 51 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Karagevrekis, Mersini
2015.
A Multimodal Analysis of Genres of Economics Representation in EAP/ESP. In
Meaning Making in Text,
► pp. 197 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lee, Sook Hee
2015.
Evaluative Stances in Persuasive Essays by Undergraduate Students: Focusing on Appreciation Resources.
Text & Talk 35:1
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Millar, Neil & Susan Hunston
Pounds, Gabrina
2015.
Evaluative Language. In
The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction,
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Talib, Nadira & Richard Fitzgerald
2015.
INEQUALITY AS MERITOCRACY.
Critical Discourse Studies 12:4
► pp. 445 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Talib, Nadira & Richard Fitzgerald
2016.
Micro–meso–macro movements; a multi-level critical discourse analysis framework to examine metaphors and the value of truth in policy texts.
Critical Discourse Studies 13:5
► pp. 531 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Talib, Nadira & Richard Fitzgerald
2018.
Putting philosophy back to work in Critical Discourse Analysis.
Critical Discourse Studies 15:2
► pp. 123 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Talib, Nadira & Richard Fitzgerald
2022.
The art of illusion as government policy. Analysing political economies of surrealism.
Critical Discourse Studies 19:1
► pp. 19 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Barton, Georgina & Peter Freebody
2014.
Literacy and Knowledge: Classroom Practice in the Arts. In
Literacy in the Arts,
► pp. 93 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Bolin, Mary K.
2014.
The Language of Academic Librarianship: The Discourse of Promotion and Tenure. In
Advances in Library Administration and Organization [
Advances in Library Administration and Organization, 32],
► pp. 213 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Bolin, Mary K.
2023.
Discourse analysis model and data. In
Refocusing Academic Libraries Through Learning and Discourse,
► pp. 27 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Gómez González, María de los Ángeles, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco Gonzálvez García & Angela Downing
Herbst, Patricio & Karl W. Kosko
2014.
Using representations of practice to elicit mathematics teachers’ tacit knowledge of practice: a comparison of responses to animations and videos.
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 17:6
► pp. 515 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Macken-Horarik, Mary & Anne R. Isaac
Moreno Ortiz, Antonio & Chantal Perez Hernandez
Pascual, Mariana
2014.
La asociación de recursos de valoración: el caso de las organizaciones de derechos humanos en la prensa escrita argentina.
Onomázein Revista de lingüística filología y traducción :1
► pp. 99 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Van linden, An & Freek Van de Velde
2014.
(Semi-)autonomous subordination in Dutch: Structures and semantic–pragmatic values.
Journal of Pragmatics 60
► pp. 226 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
de Jong, Ilona K.E. & Christian Burgers
2013.
Do consumer critics write differently from professional critics? A genre analysis of online film reviews.
Discourse, Context & Media 2:2
► pp. 75 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Ghavamnia, Maedeh & Hossein Vahid Dastjerdi
2013.
Evaluation in Media Discourse: Contrasts among Journalists in Reporting an Event.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 70
► pp. 447 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lindgren, Eva & Marie Stevenson
2013.
Interactional resources in the letters of young writers in Swedish and English.
Journal of Second Language Writing 22:4
► pp. 390 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lipovsky, Caroline
2013.
Negotiating one’s expertise through appraisal in CVs.
Linguistics and the Human Sciences 8:3
► pp. 307 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lipovsky, Caroline
2014.
The CV as a multimodal text.
Visual Communication 13:4
► pp. 429 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Christodoulou, Michael & Pandelis Kiprianos
2012.
Moral subjects, healthy adolescents: Analyzing the discourse of health education in Greek secondary education.
Social Theory & Health 10:4
► pp. 309 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
DeCoursey, C.A.
2012.
Trialing cartoons: Teachers’ attitudes towards animation as an ELT instructional tool.
Computers & Education 59:2
► pp. 436 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Deroey, Katrien L.B. & Miriam Taverniers
2012.
‘Ignore that 'cause it's totally irrelevant’: Marking lesser relevance in lectures.
Journal of Pragmatics 44:14
► pp. 2085 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Heyd-Metzuyanim, Einat & Anna Sfard
2012.
Identity struggles in the mathematics classroom: On learning mathematics as an interplay of mathematizing and identifying.
International Journal of Educational Research 51-52
► pp. 128 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Kosko, Karl W. & Patricio Herbst
2012.
A deeper look at how teachers say what they say: A quantitative modality analysis of teacher-to-teacher talk.
Teaching and Teacher Education 28:4
► pp. 589 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Burgers, Christian, Margot van Mulken & Peter Jan Schellens
2011.
Finding Irony: An Introduction of the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP).
Metaphor and Symbol 26:3
► pp. 186 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Chang, Peichin & Mary Schleppegrell
2011.
Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10:3
► pp. 140 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Chieu, Vu Minh, Patricio Herbst & Michael Weiss
2011.
Effect of an Animated Classroom Story Embedded in Online Discussion on Helping Mathematics Teachers Learn to Notice.
Journal of the Learning Sciences 20:4
► pp. 589 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Mulderrig, Jane
2011.
The grammar of governance.
Critical Discourse Studies 8:1
► pp. 45 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Mulderrig, Jane
2012.
The hegemony of inclusion: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of deixis in education policy.
Discourse & Society 23:6
► pp. 701 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Mulderrig, Jane
2018.
Multimodal strategies of emotional governance: a critical analysis of ‘nudge’ tactics in health policy.
Critical Discourse Studies 15:1
► pp. 39 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Ohana, Bruno, Brendan Tierney & Sarah-Jane Delany
2011.
2011 IEEE Workshops of International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications,
► pp. 632 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Van linden, An & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2011.
Revisiting deontic modality and related categories: A conceptual map based on the study of English modal adjectives.
Journal of Pragmatics 43:1
► pp. 150 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Bednarek, Monika
2010.
Polyphony in Appraisal.
Linguistics and the Human Sciences 3:2
► pp. 107 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Bednarek, Monika
2016.
Voices and values in the news: News media talk, news values and attribution.
Discourse, Context & Media 11
► pp. 27 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Weber, Ian
2010.
Commodifying digital television in China: a socio-linguistic analysis of media discourse, technology deployment and control.
New Media & Society 12:2
► pp. 289 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Ethelston, Graham
2009.
Appraisal in evangelical sermons: the projection and functions of misguided voices.
Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 29:6
► pp. 683 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Sunderland, Naomi, Tara Catalano & Elizabeth Kendall
2009.
Missing discourses: concepts of joy and happiness in disability.
Disability & Society 24:6
► pp. 703 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Herbst, Patricio & Takeshi Miyakawa
2008.
When, how, and why prove theorems? A methodology for studying the perspective of geometry teachers.
ZDM 40:3
► pp. 469 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Hood, Susan & Gail Forey
2008.
The interpersonal dynamics of call-centre interactions: co-constructing the rise and fall of emotion.
Discourse & Communication 2:4
► pp. 389 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Kong, Kenneth C.C.
2008.
A filial son or a loving mother?.
Journal of Pragmatics 40:3
► pp. 431 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lischinsky, Alon
2008.
Examples as persuasive argument in popular management literature.
Discourse & Communication 2:3
► pp. 243 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Mazid, Bahaa-Eddin M.
2008.
Cowboy and misanthrope: a critical (discourse) analysis of Bush and bin Laden cartoons.
Discourse & Communication 2:4
► pp. 433 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Thompson, Geoff
2008.
Appraising glances: evaluating Martin's model of APPRAISAL.
<i>WORD</i> 59:1-2
► pp. 169 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Bednarek, Monika A.
2006.
Chapter 7: Evaluation and cognition: Inscribing, evoking and provoking opinion. In
Language and Memory,
► pp. 187 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Hood, Susan
2006.
The persuasive power of prosodies: Radiating values in academic writing.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5:1
► pp. 37 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Hood, Susan
2019.
Appraisal. In
The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics,
► pp. 382 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Roan, Amanda & David Rooney
2006.
Shadowing Experiences and the Extension of Communities of Practice: A Case Study of Women Education Managers.
Management Learning 37:4
► pp. 433 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Thompson, G. & S. Hunston
2006.
Evaluation in Text. In
Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics,
► pp. 305 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Burn, Andrew & Rebekah Willett
2005.
“What exactly is a paedophile?” Children talking about Internet risk. In
Jahrbuch Medien-Pädagogik,
► pp. 237 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Melrose, Robin
2005.
Text semantics and the ideological patterning of texts.
Critical Discourse Studies 2:1
► pp. 71 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Rooney, David
2005.
Knowledge, economy, technology and society: The politics of discourse.
Telematics and Informatics 22:4
► pp. 405 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Bannon *, Fiona
2004.
Towards creative practice in research in dance education.
Research in Dance Education 5:1
► pp. 25 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Martin, J. R.
2004.
Mourning: How We Get Aligned.
Discourse & Society 15:2-3
► pp. 321 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Martin, J.R.
2008.
What kind of structure?—interpersonal meaning and prosodic realization across strata.
<i>WORD</i> 59:1-2
► pp. 111 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Graham, Philip & Allan Luke
2003.
Militarizing the Body Politic: New Mediations as Weapons of Mass Instruction.
Body & Society 9:4
► pp. 149 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
MACKEN-HORARIK, MARY
2003.
Envoi: Intractable issues in appraisal analysis?.
Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 23:2
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Graham, Phil
2002.
Hypercapitalism: language, new media and social perceptions of value.
Discourse & Society 13:2
► pp. 227 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Graham, Phil
2003.
Critical Discourse Analysis and Evaluative Meaning: Interdisciplinarity as a Critical Turn. In
Critical Discourse Analysis,
► pp. 110 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Graham, Phil
2003.
Critical Discourse Analysis and Evaluative Meaning: Interdisciplinarity as a Critical Turn. In
Critical Discourse Analysis,
► pp. 110 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Graham, Phil
2018.
Ethics in critical discourse analysis.
Critical Discourse Studies 15:2
► pp. 186 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
GRAHAM, PHIL & NEIL PAULSEN
2002.
Third-sector discourses and the future of (un)employment: Skilled labor, new technologies, and the meaning of work.
Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 22:3
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
WEBER, IAN & VANESSA EVANS
2002.
Constructing the Meaning of Digital Television in Britain, the United States and Australia.
New Media & Society 4:4
► pp. 435 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Eason, Simon
2001.
Stating the obvious: modal adjuncts in NATO press briefings.
ASp :31-33
► pp. 39 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Graham, Philip & David Rooney
2001.
A sociolinguistic approach to applied epistemology: Examining technocratic values in global 'knowledge' policy.
Social Epistemology 15:3
► pp. 155 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Downes, William
2000.
The language of felt experience: emotional, evaluative and intuitive.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 9:2
► pp. 99 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
GRAHAM, PHILIP
1999.
Critical Systems Theory.
Communication Research 26:4
► pp. 482 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
GRAHAM, PHILIP
2000.
Hypercapitalism.
New Media & Society 2:2
► pp. 131 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
GRAHAM, PHILIP
2001.
Space: Irrealis Objects in Technology Policy and their Role in a New Political Economy.
Discourse & Society 12:6
► pp. 761 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
GRAHAM, PHILIP
2002.
Predication and propagation: A method for analyzing evaluative meanings in technology policy.
Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 22:2
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lemke, J. L.
1999.
Typological and topological meaning in diagnostic discourse.
Discourse Processes 27:2
► pp. 173 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
LEMKE, JAY L.
1999.
Discourse and Organizational Dynamics: Website Communication and Institutional Change.
Discourse & Society 10:1
► pp. 21 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lemke, Jay L.
2000.
Across the Scales of Time: Artifacts, Activities, and Meanings in Ecosocial Systems.
Mind, Culture, and Activity 7:4
► pp. 273 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lemke, Jay L.
2002.
Travels in hypermodality.
Visual Communication 1:3
► pp. 299 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lemke, Jay L.
2012.
Analyzing Verbal Data: Principles, Methods, and Problems. In
Second International Handbook of Science Education,
► pp. 1471 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lemke, Jay L.
2012.
Thinking About Feeling:. In
Identity, Community, and Learning Lives in the Digital Age,
► pp. 57 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Thibault, Paul J.
1999.
Communicating and interpreting relevance through discourse negotiation: An alternative to relevance theory — A reply to Franken.
Journal of Pragmatics 31:4
► pp. 557 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Wortham, Stanton & Michael Locher
1999.
Embedded metapragmatics and lying politicians.
Language & Communication 19:2
► pp. 109 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lemke, Jay
1998.
Multimedia Literacy Demands of the Scientific Curriculum.
Linguistics and Education 10:3
► pp. 247 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lemke, Jay
2015.
Feeling and Meaning: A Unitary Bio-Semiotic Account. In
International Handbook of Semiotics,
► pp. 589 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
[no author supplied]
2011.
Legitimacy Crisis. In
Police Reform in China [
Advances in Police Theory and Practice, 20113627],
► pp. 131 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
[no author supplied]
2014.
Multimodality. In
Professional Discourse,
► pp. 242 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
[no author supplied]
2014.
Intertextuality. In
Professional Discourse,
► pp. 167 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
[no author supplied]
2018.
References. In
The 21st Century Academic Library,
► pp. 141 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
[no author supplied]
2023.
References. In
Refocusing Academic Libraries Through Learning and Discourse,
► pp. 119 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.