Article published In:
Traduire, écrire, réécrire dans un monde en mutation / Writing and Translating as changing Practices: Volume II
Edited by Fayza El Qasem and Freddie Plassard
[FORUM 16:1] 2018
► pp. 103121
References (22)
Références bibliographiques
Bériot, Dominique. 2006. Manager par l’approche systémique. Paris: Eyrolles.Google Scholar
Bertalanffy (Von), Ludwig. 1993. Théorie Générale des Systèmes. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Cleary, Yvonne, Flammia, Madelyn, Minacori, Patricia and Slattery, Darina. 2015. “Global virtual teams create and translate technical documentation: Communication strategies, challenges and recommendations,” 2015 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cleary Yvonne, Flammia, Madelyn, Minacori, Patricia and Slattery, Darina. 2017. “Experiential learning in a cross-disciplinary global virtual team project: Collaboration among student writers and translators,” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.(under review).Google Scholar
Johnson-Eilola, Johndan, and Selber, Stuart, eds. 2012. Solving problems in technical communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cleary, Yvonne, Closs, Sisi, Drazek, Zygmunt, Engberg, Jan, Ghenghea, Voichita, Karreman, Joyce, Meex, Birgitta, Minacori, Patricia, Neytchev, Anke and Straub, Daniela. 2016. “TecCOMFrame: Developing a common academic qualification and competence framework”. Proceedings of the European Academic Colloquium on Technical Communication 2016, 111–124.Google Scholar
Maylath, Bruce, Vandepitte, Sonia, Minacori, Patricia, Suivi Isohella, Brithe Mousten and John Humbley. 2013. “Managing Complexity: A Technical Communication/Translation Case Study in Multilateral International Collaboration”, Technical Communication Quarterly Special Issue New Developments in Inter/transcultural Professional Communication 221: 67–84.Google Scholar
Le Moigne, Jean-Louis. 2002. Le Constructivisme – Tome 1 : les enracinements. Paris: Ed L’harmattan.Google Scholar
Minacori, Patricia, 2016. “Traduction pragmatique et complexité”, Translation and Innovation, Bridging The Sciences and the Humanities, Phillips-Batoma, P., Zheng, F. (Eds), Dalkey Archive Press, McLean, Illinois: 373–392.Google Scholar
Minacori, Patricia, and Veisblat, Lucy. 2010. “Translation and Technical Communication: Chicken or Egg?Meta, 55 (4): 752–768. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morin, Edgar. 2005. Introduction à la pensée complexe. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
. 1999. Les Idées. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
. 1994. La complexité humaine. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
. 1990. Science avec conscience. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
. 1986. La Connaissance de la connaissance. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
. 1977. La Nature de la nature. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
O’Hara, Frederick M., Jr. 2001. “A Brief History of Technical Communication”. Society of Technical Communication’s 48th Annual Conference Proceedings: 500–504.Google Scholar
Spilka, Rachel (Ed.). 2009. Digital literacy for technical communication: 21st century theory and practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weaver, Warren. “Science and Complexity.” American Scientist, 36, 1948: 536–544.
Weaver, Warren and Shannon, Claude. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Wiener, Norbert. 1971. Cybernétique et société. Paris: 10/181.Google Scholar
Yeats, Dave, & Thompson, Isabelle. 2010. “Mapping technical and professional communication: A summary and survey of academic locations for programs”. Technical Communication Quarterly 19 (3): 225–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar