Cover not available
Article published In:
FORUM
Vol. 19:1 (2021) ► pp.24–48

Market demand for conference interpreting

Key factors affecting recruiting decisions in South Korea

| Ewha Womans University
This study explored market demand for conference interpreting in South Korea, focusing on clients’ views on the key factors that affect their recruiting decisions. The study conducted a semi-structured interview using fictitious resumes with 14 participants who are clients of conference interpreting services. The study’s results indicate that: (1) participants place high importance on interpreting quality, particularly emphasizing quality items such as content accuracy and terminology awareness; (2) domain-specific interpreting experience, academic background, and price serve as important quality signals in their recruiting decision-making; and (3) price-quality association is present. Furthermore, the interview results suggest that a collaborative approach from clients is necessary to create an enabling environment for quality interpreting services. Ultimately, this study presents noteworthy information regarding clients’ rationales for their recruitment criteria. This information is expected to widen our understanding of the interpreting market in South Korea.
Keywords: market demand, signal, conference interpreting, qualification, recruitment criteria
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
  • 3.Study design
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Preference ranking
    • 4.2Qualitative data analysis
      • 4.2.1Quality
      • 4.2.2Qualifications
      • 4.2.3Price
      • 4.2.4Sourcing method
      • 4.2.5Collaboration
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 11 June 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.20010.huh
References (26)
References
AUSIT. 2002. “ AUSIT Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct .” Accessed March 3, 2020. [URL]
Bansal, Harvir S., and Peter A. Voyer. 2000. “Word-of-mouth Processes within a Services Purchase Decision Context.” Journal of Service Research 3 (2): 166–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, Kenneth. R. 2004. The Signaling Power of Occupational Certification in the Automobile Service and Information Technology Industries. St. Paul, MN: National Research Center for Career and Technical Education.Google Scholar
Berry, Leonard. L. 1980. “Services Marketing is Different.” Business 30 (3): 24–29.Google Scholar
Bühler, Hildegund. 1986. “Linguistic (Semantic) and Extra-linguistic (Pragmatic) Criteria for the Evaluation of Conference Interpretation and Interpreters.” Multilingua 5 (4): 231–235.Google Scholar
Chan, Andy Lung Jan. 2005. “Why are Most Translators Underpaid?” Translation Journal 9 (2): 3–12.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Effectiveness of Translator Certification as a Signaling Device: Views from the Translator Recruiters.” Translation and Interpreting Studies 4 (2): 155–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Signal Jamming in the Translation Market and the Complementary Roles of Certification and Diplomas in Developing Multilateral Signaling Mechanisms.” Translation & Interpreting 5 (1): 211–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Nancy. 2020. “Translating for Bong Joon Ho at the Oscars: Aspiring director Sharon Choi. New York Times, February 10, 2020. [URL]
E-Nara. Accessed February 4, 2020. [URL]
Huh, Jiun. 2021. “Market Demand for Conference Interpreting in South Korea: Sifting through the Signals.” Translation & Interpreting 13 (1): 71–100.Google Scholar
Hwang, Yun Jae, Brian E. Roe, and Mario F. Teisl. 2006. “Does Price Signal Quality? Strategic Implications of Price as a Signal of Quality for the Case of Genetically Modified Food.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 91: 93–114.Google Scholar
Jones, Philip, and John Hudson. 1996. “Signalling Product Quality: When is Price Relevant?” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organisation 301: 257–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirmani, Amna, and Akshay R. Rao. 2000. “No Pain, No Gain: A Critical Review of the Literature on Signaling Unobservable Product Quality.” Journal of Marketing 64 (2): 66–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopczynski, Andrzej. 1994. “Quality in Conference Interpreting: Some Pragmatic Problems.” In Bridging the gap: Empirical research in simultaneous interpretation, ed. By Sylvie Lambert, and Barbara Moser-Mercer, 87–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurz, Ingrid. 1993. “Conference Interpretation: Expectations of Different User Groups.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter 51: 13–21.Google Scholar
Marrone, Stefano. 1993. “Quality: A Shared Objective.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter 51: 35–41.Google Scholar
Moser, Peter. 1996. “Expectations of Users of Conference Interpretation.” Interpreting 1 (2): 145–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Hwa In. 2014. Sŏbisŭ kogaegŭi simniwa haengdong [Service Customer’s Psychology & Behavior]. Seoul: Kimoonsa.Google Scholar
Lovelock, Christopher, and Evert Gummesson. 2004. “Whither Services Marketing? In Search of a New Paradigm and Fresh Perspectives.” Journal of Service Research 7 (1): 20–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Ji-young. 2016. “Inhausŭ t’ongbŏnyŏksaŭi koyong hyŏnhwanggwa chingmu punsŏk -t’ongbŏnyŏk pijŏn’gongjarŭl chungsimŭro [Employment and Job Analysis of In-house Translators & Interpreters – Focusing on Translators & Interpreters without Professional Training].” The Journal of Translation Studies 17 (5): 127–152.Google Scholar
Pollak, Robert. A. 1977. “Price Dependent Preferences.” The American Economic Review 67 (2): 64–75.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony, David Orrego-Carmona, and Esther Torres-Simón. 2016. “Status and Technology in the Professionalization of Translators. Market Disorder and the Return of Hierarchy.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 25 (1): 33–53.Google Scholar
Shostack, G. Lynn. 1977. “Breaking Free from Product Marketing.” Journal of Marketing 41 (2): 73–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spence, Michael. 1973. “Job Market Signaling.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 87 (3): 355–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeithaml, Valarie A., Ananthanarayanan Parasuraman, and Leonard L. Berry. 1985. Problems and Strategies in Services Marketing.” Journal of ㅡMarketing 49 (2): 33–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar