Article published In:
FORUMVol. 19:1 (2021) ► pp.83–103
Reconceptualising the interpreter’s role
A perspective from social identity theories
The interpreter’s role and performance in interpreting-facilitated interactions have attracted considerable scholarly attention since the 1970s. Seminal field research on interpreting in courtrooms, in hospitals, and in war zones describe interpreters as active participants. Nevertheless, Hale (2006) and Pöchhacker (2006) critique that much data-driven research in the area suffers from a lack of theoretical conceptualisations, and is short of diversified sociocultural and linguistic contexts for investigation. To strengthen the theoretical background to research on the interpreters’ role, this study draws on social psychology theories of social identity and optimal distinctiveness, and the sociolinguistic notion of face, to develop an interdisciplinary framework for conceptualising how identity claims may influence interpreters’ choice of linguistic strategies in delivery. The English-Mandarin political press conference interpreting context is examined to illustrate how the proposed framework may shed light on our understanding of interpreters’ behaviour in action.
Keywords: social identity, optimal distinctiveness, face, interpreter’s role
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Social identity, optimal distinctiveness and interpreters’ role
- 3.Political press conference interpreting as a case study
- 3.1Interpretation for Chinese journalists
- 3.2Interpretation for non-Chinese journalists
- 3.3Interpretation for the Premier
- 4.Discussions and conclusions
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
-
References
References (54)
Alexieva, B.
1997 A typology of interpreter-mediated events. The Translator 3 (2), 153–174. 
Angelelli, C. V.
2004 Medical interpreting and cross-cultural communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Angermeyer, P. S.
2005 Who is “you”? Polite forms of address and ambiguous participant roles in court interpreting. Target 17 (2), 203–226.
Baker, M.
1997 Non-cognitive constraints and interpreter strategies in political interviews. In K. Simms (Ed.), Translating sensitive texts: Linguistic aspects (pp.111–129). Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.
2006 Translation and conflict: A narrative account. London: Routledge.
Barsky, R. F.
1996 The interpreter as intercultural agent in Convention refugee hearings. The Translator 2 (1), 45–63.
Berk-Seligson, S.
1990 The bilingual courtroom: Court interpreters in the judicial process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bolden, G.
2000 Toward understanding practices of medical interpreting: Interpreters’ involvement in history taking. Discourse Studies 2 (4), 387–419.
Bourdieu, P.
1990 The logic of practice (Trans. Richard Nice). London: Polity Press.
Brewer, M. B.
1991 The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 171, 475–482.
Brewer, M. B., & Silver, M. D.
2000 Group distinctiveness, social identification, and collective mobilization. In S. Stryker, T. J. Owens, & R. W. White (Eds.), Social movements, protest, and contention (pp. 153–171). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C.
1987 Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Originally published as Universals in language usage: politeness phenomenon. In E. N. Goody (Ed.) 1978 Questions and politeness: strategies in social interaction (pp. 56–311). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, L.
2008 The role of the political interpreter in bilateral relations: An overview. Tampere: University of Tampere.
Brown, R. J.
2000 Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 301,745–778.
French, J. R. P. Jr., & Raven, B.
1959 The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). University of Michigan.
Footitt, H., & Kelly, M.
(Eds.) 2012 Languages and the military: Alliances, occupation and peace building. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Giddens, A.
1984 The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Grainger, K.
2011 ‘First order’ and ‘second order’ politeness: Institutional and intercultural contexts. In Linguistic Politeness Research Group (Eds.), Discursive approaches to politeness (pp. 167–188). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Hale, S.
2006 Themes and methodological issues in Court Interpreting research. Linguistica Antverpiensia New Series – Themes in Translation Studies, 51, 205–228.
Haugh, M.
2007 The discursive challenge to politeness theory: An interactional alternative. Journal of Politeness Research, 3 (2), 295–317.
2009 Face and interaction. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini, & M. Haugh (Eds.), Face, communication and social interaction (pp. 1–30). London, United Kingdom: Equinox Publishing.
Hu, K. & Tao, Q.
2012 Syntactic operational norms of press conference interpreting (Chinese-English). Foreign Language Teaching and Research 44 (5), 738–750.
Inghilleri, M.
2003 Habitus, field and discourse: Interpreting as a socially situated activity. Target 15 (2), 243–268.
Jacobsen, B.
2008a Interactional pragmatics and court interpreting: An analysis of face. Interpreting 10 (1), 128–158.
Kádár, D. Z.
2017 Politeness in pragmatics. In The Oxford research encyclopedias: Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kaufert, J. M. & Koolage, W. W.
1984 Role conflict among ‘culture brokers’: The experience of native Canadian medical interpreters. Social Science & Medicine, 18 (3), 283–286.
Knapp-Potthoff, A. & Knapp, K.
1986 Interweaving two discourses: The difficult task of the non-professional interpreter. In J. House & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds), Interlingual and Intercultural Communication (pp. 151–168). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Leonardelli, G. J., Pickett, C. L., & Brewer, M. B.
2010 Optimal distinctiveness theory: A framework for social identity, social cognition, and intergroup relations. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 431, 63–113.
Magnifico, C. & Defrancq, B.
2016 Impoliteness in interpreting: A question of gender? Translation & Interpreting 8 (2), 26–45.
Mason, I.
1999a Introduction. The Translator 5 (2), 147–160.
Mason, I. & Stewart, M.
2001 Interactional pragmatics, face and the dialogue interpreter. In I. Mason (Ed.), Triadic exchanges: Studies in dialogue interpreting (pp. 51–70). Manchester: St. Jerome.
Mason, I.
2009b Role, positioning and discourse in face-to-face interpreting. In R. P. Ricoy, I. Perez & C. Wilson (Eds.), Interpreting and Translating in Public Service Settings: Policy, Practice, Pedagogy (pp. 52–73). Manchester: St. Jerome.
Mao, L. R.
1994 Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(5), 451–86.
Nakane, I.
2008 Politeness and gender in interpreted police interviews. Monash University Linguistics Papers, 6 (1), 29–40.
O’Driscoll, J.
2007 Brown & Levinson’s face: How it can – and can’t – help us to understand interaction across cultures. Intercultural Pragmatics, 41, 463–492.
Ozolins, U.
2004 Survey of Interpreting Practitioners. Melbourne: VITS Language Link.
Pan, F.
2020 Norms and norm-taking in interpreting for Chinese government press conferences: A case study of hedges. In K. Hu & K. Kim (Eds.), Corpus-based translation and interpreting studies in Chinese contexts (pp. 89–111). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Pöchhacker, F.
1992 The role of theory in simultaneous interpreting. In C. Dollerup & A. Loddegaard (Eds.), Teaching Translation and Interpreting: Training, Talent and Experience (pp. 211–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2011c Researching TV interpreting: Selected studies of US presidential material. The Interpreters’ Newsletter 161, 21–36.
2006 Research and methodology in healthcare interpreting. Linguistica Antverpiensia New Series – Themes in Translation Studies, 51, 135–159.
Pöllabauer, S.
2004 Interpreting in asylum hearings: Issues of role, responsibility and power. Interpreting 6 (2), 143–180.
Roy, C.
1993/2002 The problem with definitions, descriptions and the role metaphors of interpreters. In F. Pöchhacker, & M. Shlesinger (Eds), The Interpreting Studies Reader (pp. 345–353). London/New York: Routledge.
Savvalidou, F.
2011 Interpreting (im)politeness strategies in a media political setting: A case study from the Greek prime ministerial TV debate as interpreted into Greek Sign Language. In L. Leeson, S. Wurm & M. Vermeerbergen (Eds.), Signed Language Interpreting: Preparation, Practice and Performance (pp. 87–109). Manchester: St. Jerome.
Shlesinger, M.
1991 Interpreter latitude vs. due process: Simultaneous and consecutive interpretation in multilingual trials. In S. Tirkkonen-Condit (Ed.) Empirical Research in Translation and Intercultural Studies (147–155). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Simon, B.
2004 Identity in modern society: A social psychology perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stapel, D. A., & Marx, D. M.
2007 Distinctiveness is key: How different types of self-other similarity moderate social comparison effects. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 331, 439–448.
Tajfel, H.
1978a The achievement of inter-group differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp.77–100). London: Academic Press.
Thiéry, C.
2015 Diplomatic interpreting. In F. Pöchhacker (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies (pp. 155–156). London: Routledge.
Tipton, R.
2008 Reflexivity and the social construction of identity in interpreter-mediated asylum interviews. The Translator 14 (1), 1–19.
Tong, J.
2017 The taming of critical journalism in China. Journalism Studies, 181, 1–18.
Wadensjö, C.
1998 Interpreting as interaction. Pearson Education ESL.
2002 Dialogue interpreting – A new branch of translation studies. In Stromqvist, S. (Ed.), The diversity of languages and language learning: Lund lecutures in languages and literature (pp. 73–81). Lund: Lund University.
Wang, B. & Mu, L.
2009 Interpreter training and research in mainland China: Recent developments. Interpreting 11 (2), 267–283.
Wang, B.
2012 A descriptive study of norms in interpreting: Based on the Chinese-English consecutive interpreting corpus of Chinese Premier press conferences. Meta 57 (1), 198–212.