Article published In:
Vol. 19:1 (2021) ► pp.83103
Alexieva, B.
1997A typology of interpreter-mediated events. The Translator 3 (2), 153–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Angelelli, C. V.
2004Medical interpreting and cross-cultural communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, M.
1997Non-cognitive constraints and interpreter strategies in political interviews. In K. Simms (Ed.), Translating sensitive texts: Linguistic aspects (pp.111–129). Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2006Translation and conflict: A narrative account. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsky, R. F.
1996The interpreter as intercultural agent in Convention refugee hearings. The Translator 2 (1), 45–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berk-Seligson, S.
1990The bilingual courtroom: Court interpreters in the judicial process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bolden, G.
2000Toward understanding practices of medical interpreting: Interpreters’ involvement in history taking. Discourse Studies 2 (4), 387–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P.
1990The logic of practice (Trans. Richard Nice). London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B.
1991The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 171, 475–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M. B., & Silver, M. D.
2000Group distinctiveness, social identification, and collective mobilization. In S. Stryker, T. J. Owens, & R. W. White (Eds.), Social movements, protest, and contention (pp. 153–171). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C.
1987Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Originally published as Universals in language usage: politeness phenomenon. In E. N. Goody (Ed.) 1978 Questions and politeness: strategies in social interaction (pp. 56–311). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, L.
2008The role of the political interpreter in bilateral relations: An overview. Tampere: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
Brown, R. J.
2000Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 301,745–778. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
French, J. R. P. Jr., & Raven, B.
1959The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Footitt, H., & Kelly, M.
(Eds.) 2012Languages and the military: Alliances, occupation and peace building. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A.
1984The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Grainger, K.
2011‘First order’ and ‘second order’ politeness: Institutional and intercultural contexts. In Linguistic Politeness Research Group (Eds.), Discursive approaches to politeness (pp. 167–188). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, S.
2006Themes and methodological issues in Court Interpreting research. Linguistica Antverpiensia New Series – Themes in Translation Studies, 51, 205–228.Google Scholar
Haugh, M.
2007The discursive challenge to politeness theory: An interactional alternative. Journal of Politeness Research, 3 (2), 295–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Face and interaction. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini, & M. Haugh (Eds.), Face, communication and social interaction (pp. 1–30). London, United Kingdom: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Hu, K. & Tao, Q.
2012Syntactic operational norms of press conference interpreting (Chinese-English). Foreign Language Teaching and Research 44 (5), 738–750.Google Scholar
Inghilleri, M.
Jacobsen, B.
Kádár, D. Z.
2017Politeness in pragmatics. In The Oxford research encyclopedias: Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufert, J. M. & Koolage, W. W.
1984Role conflict among ‘culture brokers’: The experience of native Canadian medical interpreters. Social Science & Medicine, 18 (3), 283–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knapp-Potthoff, A. & Knapp, K.
1986Interweaving two discourses: The difficult task of the non-professional interpreter. In J. House & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds), Interlingual and Intercultural Communication (pp. 151–168). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Leonardelli, G. J., Pickett, C. L., & Brewer, M. B.
2010Optimal distinctiveness theory: A framework for social identity, social cognition, and intergroup relations. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 431, 63–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magnifico, C. & Defrancq, B.
2016Impoliteness in interpreting: A question of gender? Translation & Interpreting 8 (2), 26–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mason, I.
1999aIntroduction. The Translator 5 (2), 147–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mason, I. & Stewart, M.
2001Interactional pragmatics, face and the dialogue interpreter. In I. Mason (Ed.), Triadic exchanges: Studies in dialogue interpreting (pp. 51–70). Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Mason, I.
2009bRole, positioning and discourse in face-to-face interpreting. In R. P. Ricoy, I. Perez & C. Wilson (Eds.), Interpreting and Translating in Public Service Settings: Policy, Practice, Pedagogy (pp. 52–73). Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Mao, L. R.
1994Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(5), 451–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakane, I.
2008Politeness and gender in interpreted police interviews. Monash University Linguistics Papers, 6 (1), 29–40.Google Scholar
O’Driscoll, J.
2007Brown & Levinson’s face: How it can – and can’t – help us to understand interaction across cultures. Intercultural Pragmatics, 41, 463–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ozolins, U.
2004Survey of Interpreting Practitioners. Melbourne: VITS Language Link.Google Scholar
Pan, F.
2020Norms and norm-taking in interpreting for Chinese government press conferences: A case study of hedges. In K. Hu & K. Kim (Eds.), Corpus-based translation and interpreting studies in Chinese contexts (pp. 89–111). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pöchhacker, F.
1992The role of theory in simultaneous interpreting. In C. Dollerup & A. Loddegaard (Eds.), Teaching Translation and Interpreting: Training, Talent and Experience (pp. 211–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011cResearching TV interpreting: Selected studies of US presidential material. The Interpreters’ Newsletter 161, 21–36.Google Scholar
2006Research and methodology in healthcare interpreting. Linguistica Antverpiensia New Series – Themes in Translation Studies, 51, 135–159.Google Scholar
Pöllabauer, S.
Roy, C.
1993/2002The problem with definitions, descriptions and the role metaphors of interpreters. In F. Pöchhacker, & M. Shlesinger (Eds), The Interpreting Studies Reader (pp. 345–353). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Savvalidou, F.
2011Interpreting (im)politeness strategies in a media political setting: A case study from the Greek prime ministerial TV debate as interpreted into Greek Sign Language. In L. Leeson, S. Wurm & M. Vermeerbergen (Eds.), Signed Language Interpreting: Preparation, Practice and Performance (pp. 87–109). Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Shlesinger, M.
1991Interpreter latitude vs. due process: Simultaneous and consecutive interpretation in multilingual trials. In S. Tirkkonen-Condit (Ed.) Empirical Research in Translation and Intercultural Studies (147–155). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Simon, B.
2004Identity in modern society: A social psychology perspective. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stapel, D. A., & Marx, D. M.
2007Distinctiveness is key: How different types of self-other similarity moderate social comparison effects. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 331, 439–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H.
1978aThe achievement of inter-group differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp.77–100). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thiéry, C.
2015Diplomatic interpreting. In F. Pöchhacker (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies (pp. 155–156). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tipton, R.
2008Reflexivity and the social construction of identity in interpreter-mediated asylum interviews. The Translator 14 (1), 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tong, J.
2017The taming of critical journalism in China. Journalism Studies, 181, 1–18.Google Scholar
Wadensjö, C.
1998Interpreting as interaction. Pearson Education ESL.Google Scholar
2002Dialogue interpreting – A new branch of translation studies. In Stromqvist, S. (Ed.), The diversity of languages and language learning: Lund lecutures in languages and literature (pp. 73–81). Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
Wang, B. & Mu, L.
Wang, B.
2012A descriptive study of norms in interpreting: Based on the Chinese-English consecutive interpreting corpus of Chinese Premier press conferences. Meta 57 (1), 198–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar