Article published in:
Vol. 3:2 (2005) ► pp. 115


Ahrens, B.
(2001) Einige Überlegungen zur Didaktik der Notizentechnik. In A.F. Kelletat (ed.), Dolmetschen. Beiträge aus Forschung, Lehre und Praxis. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. 227–241.Google Scholar
(2002) Hieroglyphen auf dem Block – Über den Nutzen der Symbole beim Notieren. TransRelations 3/2002, 3–4.Google Scholar
Allioni, S.
(1989) Towards a Grammar of Consecutive Interpretation. In L. Gran & J. Dodds (eds.), The Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Teaching Conference Interpretation. Proceedings of the Trieste Symposium 1986. Udine: Campanotto. 191–197.Google Scholar
Åslundh, M.
(1992) Gehirngerechtes Notieren für Dolmetscher: Mind Mapping. Diploma thesis at the FASK Germersheim, University of Mainz (unpublished).Google Scholar
Becker, W.
. (s.t.). Notizentechnik. Germersheim: Gesellschaft für moderne Sprachen.
Bowen, D. & Bowen, M.
(1984) Steps to Consecutive Interpreting (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Pen and Booth.Google Scholar
Deiser-Bollinger, U. & Stadelmann, G.
(1994) Symbolschrift des Konsekutivdolmetschens. Deutsch – Englisch – Spanisch (2nd ed.). München: Ákzente Sprachendienst.Google Scholar
Geise, N.
(2001) Content Mapping als Grundlage für individuelle Notation. Diploma thesis at the IÜD, University of Heidelberg (unpulished).Google Scholar
Herbert, J.
(1952) Manuel de l’interprète – Comment on devient interprète de conférence. Genf: Librairie de l’Université Georg.Google Scholar
Ilg, G.
(1980) L’interprétation consécutive – Les fondements. Parallèles, 3, 109–136.Google Scholar
(1982) L’interprétation consécutive – La pratique. Parallèles, 5, 91–109.Google Scholar
Ilg, G. & Lambert, S.
(1996) Teaching Consecutive Interpreting. Interpreting, 1(1), 69–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matyssek, H.
(1989) Handbuch der Notizentechnik für Dolmetscher. 2 volumes. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar
Monacelli, C.
(1999) Messaggi in codice. Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
Norton, L.S.
(1981) Patterned note-taking: An evaluation. Visible Languages, XVI, 67–Google Scholar
Rozan, J.-F.
(1956) La prise de notes en interprétation consécutive. Genf: Librairie de l’Université Georg.Google Scholar
Seleskovitch, D.
(1975) Langage, langue et mémoire – Étude de la prise de notes en interprétation consécutive. Lettres Modernes. Paris: Minard.Google Scholar
Taylor, C.
(1989) Textual Memory and the Teaching of Consecutive Interpretation. In L. Gran & J. Dodds (eds.), The Theoretical Practical Aspects of Teaching Conference Interpretation. Proceedings of the Trieste Symposium 1986. Udine: Campanotto. 177–184.Google Scholar
Willett, R.
(1974) Die Ausbildung zum Konferenzdolmetscher. In V. Kapp (ed.), Übersetzer und Dolmetscher. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer. 87–109.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2016.  In Conference Interpreting – A Complete Course [Benjamins Translation Library, 120], Crossref logo
No author info given
2016.  In Conference Interpreting – A Trainer’s Guide [Benjamins Translation Library, 121], Crossref logo
2006. The Bush Effect: Polarization, Turnout, and Activism in the 2004 Presidential Election. Presidential Studies Quarterly 36:2  pp. 141 ff. Crossref logo
Chen, Sijia
2020. The process of note-taking in consecutive interpreting. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 22:1  pp. 117 ff. Crossref logo
Claassen, Ryan L. & Benjamin Highton
2009. Policy Polarization among Party Elites and the Significance of Political Awareness in the Mass Public. Political Research Quarterly 62:3  pp. 538 ff. Crossref logo
Garand, James C.
2010. Income Inequality, Party Polarization, and Roll-Call Voting in the U.S. Senate. The Journal of Politics 72:4  pp. 1109 ff. Crossref logo
Graber, Mark A.
2008. The Countermajoritarian Difficulty: From Courts to Congress to Constitutional Order. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 4:1  pp. 361 ff. Crossref logo
Lee, Hoon, Nojin Kwak & Scott W. Campbell
2015. Hearing the Other Side Revisited: The Joint Workings of Cross-Cutting Discussion and Strong Tie Homogeneity in Facilitating DeliberativeandParticipatory Democracy. Communication Research 42:4  pp. 569 ff. Crossref logo
Lelkes, Yphtach & Sean J. Westwood
2017. The Limits of Partisan Prejudice. The Journal of Politics 79:2  pp. 485 ff. Crossref logo
Lewis, Andrew R.
2014. Staffing theFrontLines of theCulture War: ConstituencyReligiousEffects onAssignment to theSenateJudiciaryCommittee. Congress & the Presidency 41:2  pp. 167 ff. Crossref logo
Lim, Hyang-Ok
2006. A Post-Mortem of Note-Taking. FORUM 4:2  pp. 89 ff. Crossref logo
Lim, Hyang-Ok
2010. Doing a Double Take on Note-Taking. FORUM 8:1  pp. 161 ff. Crossref logo
Olson, Joel
2008. Whiteness and the Polarization of American Politics. Political Research Quarterly 61:4  pp. 704 ff. Crossref logo
Oyedeji, Tayo A.
2010. The Credible Brand Model: The Effects of Ideological Congruency and Customer-Based Brand Equity on News Credibility. American Behavioral Scientist 54:2  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Schnidman, Evan & Norman Schofield
2013.  In Advances in Political Economy,  pp. 91 ff. Crossref logo
Yancey, George
2018. Has Society Grown More Hostile Towards Conservative Christians? Evidence from ANES Surveys. Review of Religious Research 60:1  pp. 71 ff. Crossref logo
이주은 & 김미라
2014. An Analysis of Themes in Interpreting Notes and Interpreted Texts. The Journal of Translation Studies 15:2  pp. 149 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.