Article published In:
FORUM
Vol. 5:2 (2007) ► pp.123
References (17)
Fleiss, J. L.
(1971) “Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters” in Psychological Bulletin, 76(5): 378–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamers, J. & Blanc, M.
(2000) Bilinguality and Bilingualism. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Honnert, A. & Bozan, S.
(2005) Summary frames: language acquisition for special education and ELL students. Science Activities, 42(2): 19–29.Google Scholar
Ilg, G. & Lambert, S.
(1996) Teaching Consecutive Interpreting, Interpreting, 1(1): 69–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalina, S. & Koeln, F.
(2000) Interpreting Competences as a Basis and a Goal for Teaching. The Interpreters’ Newsletter, No.10: 3–32.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R.
(2002) The Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, M.
(2005) From descriptive translation studies to constructivism: researching and teaching interpretation. Journal of the National Institute for Compilation and Translation, 33(4): 42–50.Google Scholar
Newmark, P.
(1993) Paragraphs on Translation. Bristol, PA: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T.C.P.
(1998) Influence de la carte de concepts et du résumé sur la compréhension et la production orales propres à l’interpré tation consécutive chez les étudiants interprétes vietnamiens. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Université de Montréal, Canada.Google Scholar
Poechhacker, F. & Shlesinger, M.
(2002) The Interpreting Studies Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Poechhacker, F.
(2004) Introducing Interpreting Studies. London, England: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pressley, M. & Woloshyn, V.
(1995) Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children’s academic performance. (2nd ed.) Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.Google Scholar
Pressley, M., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A. & Snyder, B. L.
(1995) Reading comprehension strategies. In M. Pressley & V. Woloshyn (Eds.), Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children’s academic performance (2nd ed. pp. 57–100). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.Google Scholar
Shreve, G. M.
(2002) Knowing translation: Cognitive and experiential aspects of translation expertise from the perspective of expertise studies. In A. Riccardi (ed.) Translation Studies: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silliman, E. & Wilkinson L.
(2004) Language and Literacy Learning in School. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Viaggio, S.
(2005) The importance of the metacommunicative purposes of communication. Meta, L, 1: 78–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, J., Hall, K. & Lauer, K.
(2004) Teaching expository text structure to young at-risk learners: building the basics of comprehension instruction. Exceptionality, 12(3): 129–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by 6 other publications

Liu, Yubo & Wei Zhang
2023. Discourse-based recall, language anxiety and achievement motive: revisiting interpreting aptitude testing in the Chinese context. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 17:1  pp. 54 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Yifan & Andrew K. F. Cheung
2022. A corpus-based study of modal verbs in Chinese–English governmental press conference interpreting. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Shang, Xiaoqi & Guixia Xie
2020. Aptitude for interpreting revisited: predictive validity of recall across languages. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 14:3  pp. 344 ff. DOI logo
Shang, Xiaoqi & Guixia Xie
2023. Investigating sight translation as a predictor of interpreting performance. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 17:1  pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Han, Chao
2018. Using rating scales to assess interpretation. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 20:1  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Cheung, Andrew K.F.
2016. Paraphrasing exercises and training for Chinese to English consecutive interpreting. FORUM. Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation 14:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.