Cover not available
Part of
Irony in Language Use and Communication
Edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou and Herbert L. Colston
[Figurative Thought and Language 1] 2017
► pp. 61–84

Chapter 3
In defense of an ecumenical approach to irony

The term “irony” has such a broad and apparently diverse range of application that it’s difficult for researchers to coordinate on a single, operational concept of their target of investigation, suitable for designing and interpreting experiments aimed at uncovering irony’s nature. Restrictive strategies for addressing this difficulty advocate restricting the target of empirical irony studies to some scientifically tractable subset of the phenomena “irony” picks out in ordinary language. Ecumenical approaches, in contrast, retain the ambition to account for “irony” across its apparently diverse range of usage. In this paper, I highlight the limitations of the best developed restrictivist approaches, throwing into relief the potential value of ecumenical strategies still in early stages of development.
Keywords: ecumenical approach [to irony], restrictive approach [to irony], discursive diversity, the problem of promiscuous application, ethics [of irony], aesthetics [of irony], cognitive mechanisms, irony across media, visual irony
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.The problem of promiscuous application
  • 2.The restrictive-ecumenical continuum
  • 3.The case for restrictivism
  • 4.The inadequacy of restrictivism
    • 4.1What should a good theory of irony accomplish?
    • 4.2The limitations of restrictivism
  • 5.The attractions of an ecumenical approach
  • Conclusion: Is an ecumenical approach viable?
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.1.04wil
References (40)
References
Almond, S. (2016, May 16). Jon Stewart – the enabler of Donald Trump. Boston Globe. Retrieved from [URL]
Aristotle. (2004). Nicomachean Ethics. (F. H. Peters, Trans.). New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Attardo, S. (2007). Irony as Relevant Inappropriateness. In R. W. Gibbs & H. L. Colston (Eds.), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader (1 edition). Routledge.Google Scholar
Barrett, H. C., & Kurzban, R. (2006). Modularity in Cognition: Framing the Debate. Psychological Review, 113(3), 628–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bryant, G. A. (2012). Is Verbal Irony Special? Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(11), 673–685. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camp, E. (2012). Sarcasm, Pretense, and The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Noûs, 46(4), 587–634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 121–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L. (2000). On Necessary Conditions for Verbal Irony Comprehesion. Pragmatics and Cognition, 8(2), 277–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(this volume). Irony performance and perception: What underlies verbal, situational, and other ironies? In A. Athanasiadou & H. L. Colston (Eds.), Irony in Language Use and Communication. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo
Currie, G. (2006). Why Irony is Pretence. In S. Nichols (Ed.), The Architecture of the Imagination: New Essays on Pretence, Possibility, and Fiction (1st ed.). Oxford University Press, USA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). The Irony in Pictures. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 51(2), 149–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filippova, E., & Astington, J. W. (2010). Children’s Understanding of Social-Cognitive and Social-Communicative Aspects of Discourse Irony. Child Development, 81(3), 913–928. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fogelin, R. (2011). Figuratively Speaking: Revised Edition (2 edition). Oxford University Press, USA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, H. W. (2009). A Dictionary of Modern English Usage: The Classic First Edition. (D. Crystal, Ed.) (Reissue). Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2007). Irony in Talk among Friends. In H. L. Colston & R. W. Gibbs (Eds.), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader (1 edition). Routledge.Google Scholar
Glenwright, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2010). Development of children’s ability to distinguish sarcasm and verbal irony*. Journal of Child Language, 37(2), 429–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, P. (1991). Logic and Conversation. In Studies in the Way of Words (pp. 22–40). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haslanger, S. (1999). What Knowledge is and What It Ought to Be: Feminist Values and Normative Epistemology. Philosophical Perspectives, 13(s13), 459–480.Google Scholar
Knox, N. (1961). The Word Irony and Its Context: 1500–1755. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (1995). How about another piece of pie: the allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 124(1), 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lear, J. (2011). A Case for Irony. Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1970). General Semantics. Synthese, 22(1/2), 18–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucariello, J. (1994). Situational irony: A concept of events gone awry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(2), 129–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nersessian, N. J. (2010). Creating Scientific Concepts. Cambridge, Mass.: A Bradford Book.Google Scholar
Plato. (2002). Meno. In G. M. A. Grube (Trans.), Five Dialogues (2 edition). Hackett Pub Co.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice (Revised edition). Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. M., & Kreuz, R. J. (1994). Why Do People Use Figurative Language? Psychological Science, 5(3), 159–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ronagh, M., & Souder, L. (2014). The Ethics of Ironic Science in Its Search for Spoof. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, B. (2004). Picturing irony: The subversive power of photography. Visual Communication, 3(1), 31–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seckman, M. A., & Couch, C. J. (1989). Jocularity, Sarcasm, and Relationships: An Empirical Study. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 18(3), 327–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solso, R. L. (1996). Cognition and the Visual Arts. Cambridge, Mass.: A Bradford Book.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (1984). Verbal irony: Pretense or echoic mention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 130–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 295–318). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1998). Irony and Relevance: A Reply to Seto, Hamamoto and Yamanashi. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance Theory: Applications and implications. Amsterdam ; Philadelphia, Pa: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Utsumi, A. (2000). Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(12), 1777–1806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallace, D. F. (1997). E Unibus Pluram: Television and U.S. Fiction. In A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again: Essays and Arguments (1st edition). Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (2006). The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua, 116(10), 1722–1743. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Irony, Hyperbole, Jokes and Banter. In C. Grisot, J. Blochowiak, S. Durrlemann-Tame, & C. Laenzlinger (Eds.), Papers Dedicated to Jacques Moeschler. Retrieved from [URL]
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2012). Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, J. (2004, August 9). The Digressionist. The New Republic. Retrieved from [URL]
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Barnden, John
2023. Irony, Exaggeration, and Hyperbole: No Embargo on the Cargo!. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 272 ff. DOI logo
Musolff, Andreas
2021. Cultural Conceptualisations of the Nation as a Body or Person: Scenario Analysis of Metaphor Interpretations. In National Conceptualisations of the Body Politic [Cultural Linguistics, ], ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Giora, Rachel, Dalia Meytes, Ariela Tamir, Shir Givoni, Vered Heruti & Ofer Fein
2017. Chapter 10. Defaultness shines while affirmation pales. In Irony in Language Use and Communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1], ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Irony, Affect, and Related Figures. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.