Chapter published in:
Irony in Language Use and Communication
Edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou and Herbert L. Colston
[Figurative Thought and Language 1] 2017
► pp. 145178
References

References

Athanasiadou, A.
this volume). Irony has a metonymic basis. In A. Athanasiadou & H. Colston Eds. Irony in Language Use and Communication FTL series Amsterdam John Benjamins Publishing Company
Brdar-Szabó, R. & Brdar, M.
(2010) “Mummy, I love you like a thousand ladybirds”: Reflections on the emergence of hyperbolic effects and the truth of hyperboles. In A. Burkhardt & B. Nerlich (Eds), Tropical Truth(s): The Epistemology of Metaphor and Other Tropes, pp.383–427. Berlin / New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carston, R. & Wearing, C.
(2015) Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 79, pp.79–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L.
(1997) Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism. Discourse Processes, 23(1), pp.25–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007/2000) On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. & H. L. Colston (Eds), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader, pp.97–134. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Reprinted from Pragmatics and Cogni- tion, 8, pp.277–324 (2000).Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. & Gerrig, R. J.
(2007/1984) On the pretense theory of irony. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. & H. L. Colston (Eds), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader, pp.25–33. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Reprinted from J. Experimental Psychology: General, 113, pp.121–126 (1984).Google Scholar
Colston, H. L. & Gibbs, R. W., Jr.
(2002) Are irony and metaphor understood differently? Metaphor and Symbol, 17(1), pp.57–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L., & Keller, S. B.,
(1998) You’ll never believe this: irony and hyperbole in expressing surprise. J. Psycholinguistic Research, 27(4), pp.499–513. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L. & O’Brien, J.
(2000) Contrast of kind versus contrast of magnitude: The pragmatic accomplishments of irony and hyperbole. Discourse Processes 30(2), pp.179–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S.
(2005) Sarcasm and the space structuring model. In S. Coulson & B. Lewandowska- Tomaszczyk (Eds.), The Literal and Nonliteral in Language and Thought, pp. 129–44. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Currie, G.
(2006) Why irony is pretence. In S. Nichols (Ed.), The Architecture of the Imagination, pp.111–133. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Echo et feintise: quelle est la difference et qui a raison? Philosophiques, 35(1): pp.12–23.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G.
(1985) Mental spaces: aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr.
(2007/2000) Irony in talks among friends. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. & H. L. Colston (Eds), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader, pp.339–360. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Reprinted from Metaphor and Symbol, 15, pp.5–27 (2000).Google Scholar
Herrero Ruiz, J.
(2009) Understanding tropes: At the crossroads between pragmatics and cognition. Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kihara, Y.
(2005) The mental space structure of verbal irony. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(3), pp.513–530. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, R. J. & Roberts, R. M.
(1995) Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor & Symbol, 10(1), pp.21–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S. & Brown, M.
(2007/1995) How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of irony. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. & H. L. Colston (Eds), Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader, pp.57–95. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Reprinted from J. Experimental Psychology: General, 124, pp.3–21 (1995).Google Scholar
Lee, C. & Katz, A.
(1998) The differential role of ridicule in sarcasm and irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 13, 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lepore, E. & Stone, M.
(2014) Imagination and Convention: Distinguishing Grammar and Inference in Language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M. & Carter, R.
(2004) ‘‘There’s millions of them’’: hyperbole in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 36 (2), pp.149–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A.
(2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), pp.23–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
this volume). Irony and sarcasm in follow-ups of metaphorical slogans. In A. Athanasiadou & H. Colston Eds. Irony in Language Use and Communication FTL series Amsterdam John Benjamins Publishing Company
Noh, E. -J.
(2000) Metarepresentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peña, M.S. & Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J.
(2017) Construing and constructing hyperbole. In A. Athanasiadou (Ed.), Studies in Figurative Thought and Language, pp. 42–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Popa-Wyatt, M.
(2014) Pretence and echo: Towards an integrated account of verbal irony Interna- tional Review of Pragmatics 6(1), pp.127–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Récanati, F.
(2007) Indexicality, context and pretence: A speech-act theoretic account. In Burton-Roberts, N. (Ed.), Advances in Pragmatics, pp.213–229. Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.
(2014) Mapping concepts. Understanding figurative thought from a cognitive-linguistic perspective. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 27(1), pp.187–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
this volume). Cognitive modeling and irony. In A. Athanasiadou & H. Colston Eds. Irony in Language Use and Communication FTL series Amsterdam John Benjamins Publishing Company
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.
(1995) Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd Edition). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Swift, J.
(1729) A modest proposal for preventing the children of poor people from being a burthen to their parents or the country, and for making them beneficial to the publick. Third Edition. Dublin: S. Harding 1729 (Reprinted as A Modest Proposal, London: Penguin 2015.)Google Scholar
Tobin, V. & Israel, M.
(2012) Irony as a viewpoint phenomenon. In B. Dancygier & E. Sweetser (Eds), Viewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective, pp.25–46. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walton, K. L.
(1990) Mimesis as make-believe: On the foundations of the representational arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D.
(2006) The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua 116, pp.1722–1743. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. & Sperber, D.
(2012) Explaining irony. In D. Wilson & D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and Relevance, pp. 123–145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2019. The multimodal recycling machine: toward a cognitive-pragmatic theory of the text/image production. Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Barnden, John
2021.  In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11],  pp. 139 ff. Crossref logo
Brône, Geert
2021.  In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11],  pp. 109 ff. Crossref logo
Ervas, Francesca
2020.  In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10],  pp. 175 ff. Crossref logo
Geeraerts, Dirk
2021.  In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11],  pp. 19 ff. Crossref logo
Giora, Rachel, Dalia Meytes, Ariela Tamir, Shir Givoni, Vered Heruti & Ofer Fein
2017.  In Irony in Language Use and Communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1],  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo
Popa-Wyatt, Mihaela
2020.  In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10],  pp. 449 ff. Crossref logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2017.  In Irony in Language Use and Communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1],  pp. 179 ff. Crossref logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2020.  In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10],  pp. 469 ff. Crossref logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & Inés Lozano-Palacio
2021.  In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11],  pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.