Chapter published in:
Irony in Language Use and Communication
Edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou and Herbert L. Colston
[Figurative Thought and Language 1] 2017
► pp. 179200
References

References

Anderson, John R.
(2010) Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
Attardo, S.
(2000) Irony as Relevant Inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 793–826. Crossref link
Barnden, J.
(this volume). Irony, pretence and fictively-elaborating hyperbole. In A. Athanasiadou & H. Colston Eds. Irony in Language Use and Communication. FTL series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Carston, R.
(2002) Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. Crossref link
Clark, H., & Gerrig, R.
(1984) On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 121–126. Crossref link
Colston, H. L., & Gibbs, R. W.
(2002) Are irony and metaphor understood differently. Metaphor and Symbol, 17(1), 57–80. Crossref link
Currie, G.
(2006) Why irony is pretence. In S. Nichols (Ed.), The architecture of the imagination (pp.111–133). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Elleström, L.
(2002) Divine Madness. On interpreting literatures, music, and the visual arts ironically. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.
Gallese, V.
(2003) The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: The quest for a common mechanism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 358: 1231–1240. Crossref link
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G.
(2005) The brain’s concepts’ The role of sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22: 455–479. Crossref link
Gibbs, R. W.
(2006) Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind & Language 21(3), 434–458. Crossref link
(2007) Experimental tests of figurative meaning construction. In G. Radden, K. M. Köpke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (eds.) Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 19–32). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2011) Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Discourse Processes 48(8), 529–562. Crossref link
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L.
(Eds.) (2007) Irony in language and thought. A cognitive science reader. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L.
(2012) Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Grady, J.
(1999) A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: correlation vs. resemblance. In R. W. Gibbs, & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Grice, P. H.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and seman- tics: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic.
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G.
(1998) Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 37–77. Crossref link
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M.
(1995) How about another piece of the pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 3–21. Crossref link
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago. Crossref link
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
Leech, G.
(1967) A Linguistic guide to English poetry. London / New York: Longman.
Littlemore, J.
(2015) Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Martin, R. A.
(2007) The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Panther, K. -U., & Thornburg, L.
(1998) A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 755–769. Crossref link
(Eds.) (2003) Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Panther, K. -U.
(2005) The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza, & S. Peña (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics. Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 353–386). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(2000) The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 109–132). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.
(2014) Mapping concepts. Understanding figurative thought from a cognitive-linguistic perspective. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 27(1), 187–207. Crossref link
(2017) Metaphor and other cognitive operations in interaction: from basicity to complexity. In Beate Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition, and discourse (pp. 138–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F., & Galera, A.
(2014) Cognitive Modeling. A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Pérez, L.
(2001) Metonymy and the grammar: Motivation, constraints, and interaction. Language and Communication, 21, 321–357. Crossref link
(2003) Cognitive operations and pragmatic implication. In K. -U. Panther & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp. 23–49). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Ruiz de Mendoza, F., & Pérez, L.
(2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 161–185. Crossref link
Searle, J.
(1969) Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Crossref link
(1979) Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1995) Relevance. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Veale, T.
(2012) Exploding the creativity myth. The computational foundations of linguistic cre- ativity. London & New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Wilson, N., & Gibbs, R.
(2007) Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31, 721–731. Crossref link
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D.
(2012) Explaining irony. In D. Wilson, & D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and Relevance (pp. 123–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Crossref link
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2020. The role of echoing in meaning construction and interpretation. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1 Crossref logo
Barnden, John A.
2017.  In Irony in Language Use and Communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1],  pp. 145 ff. Crossref logo
Ibáñez, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza & Inés Lozano-Palacio
2019. A Cognitive-Linguistic Approach to Complexity in Irony: Dissecting the Ironic Echo. Metaphor and Symbol 34:2  pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.