Chapter published in:
Producing Figurative Expression: Theoretical, experimental and practical perspectives
Edited by John Barnden and Andrew Gargett
[Figurative Thought and Language 10] 2020
► pp. 129174
References

References

Becker, J. A., Kimmel, H. D., & Bevill, M. J.
(1989) The interactive effects of request form and speaker status on judgments of requests. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18(5), 521–531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, D.
(1987) Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. In A. Jaworski, & N. Coupland (Eds.), The discourse reader (pp. 321–335). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carston, R.
(2002) Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. L.
(1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–55). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1979) The flow of thought and the flow of language. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics (pp. 159–181). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1980) The deployment of consciousness in the production of a narrative. In W. L. Chafe (Ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production (pp. 9–50). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F.
(1987) Concealing one’s meaning from overhearers. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(2), 209–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1989) Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 259–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Schunk, D. H.
(1980) Polite responses to polite requests. Cognition, 8(2), 111–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1981) Politeness in requests: A rejoinder to Kemper and Thissen. Cognition, 9(3), 311–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L.
(1979) The semantics of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 64–77). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Colston, H. L.
(1997a) “I’ve never seen anything like it”: Overstatement, understatement and irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(1), 43–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997b) Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism. Discourse Processes, 23, 25–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999a) “Not good” is “bad”, but “not bad” is not “good”: An analysis of three accounts of negation asymmetry. Discourse Processes, 28(3), 237–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999b) The pragmatic functions of rebuttal analogy. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(4), 259–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000a) Comprehending speaker intent in rebuttal analogy use: The role of irony mapping, absurdity comparison and argumentative convention. Language and Speech, 43(4), 337–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000b) “Dewey defeats Truman”: Interpreting ironic restatement. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19(1), 44–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000c) On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension. Pragmatics & Cognition, 8(2), 277–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002a) Contrast and assimilation in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 111–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002b) Pragmatic justifications for nonliteral gratitude acknowledgements: “Oh sure, anytime”. Metaphor and Symbol, 17(3), 205–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Social and cultural influences on figurative and indirect language. In H. L. Colston, & A. N. Katz (Eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2015) Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2019) How language makes meaning: Embodiment and conjoined antonymy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L., & Athanasiadou, A. (2017) Introduction: The irony of irony. In A. Athanasiadou, & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication. Series: Figurative thought and language (Vol. 1) (pp. 1–16). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L., & Demarias, D.
(2002) An account of anomalous conventional gratitude expressions: It’s the least we could do. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association , Chicago, IL.
Colston, H. L., & Gibbs, R. W.
(1998) Analogy and irony: Rebuttal to “Rebuttal Analogy”. Metaphor and Symbol, 13(1), 69–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L., & Keller, S. B.
(1998) You’ll never believe this: Irony and Hyperbole in expressing surprise. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(4), 499–513. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L., & O’Brien, J.
(2000a) Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language: Anything understatement can do, irony can do better. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1557–1583. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000b) Contrast of kind vs. contrast of magnitude: The pragmatic accomplishments of irony and hyperbole. Discourse Processes, 30(2), 179–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corts, D. P.
(2006) Factors characterizing bursts of figurative language and gesture in college lectures. Discourse Studies, 8(2), 211–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, F.
(1981) Conversational routine. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
(1998) Formulaic Language. In J. L. Mey (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of pragmatics (pp. 305–306). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Coupland, J., Coupland, N., & Robinson, J. D.
(1992) ‘How are you?’: Negotiation communion. Language in Society, 21, 207–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dews, S., Kaplan, J., & Winner, E.
(1995) Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. Discourse Processes, 19, 347–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dews, S., & Winner, E.
(1995) Muting the meaning: A social function of irony. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 3–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Obligatory processing of literal and nonliteral meanings in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1579–1599. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dress, M. L., Kreuz, R. J., Link, K. E., & Caucci, G. M.
(2008) Regional variation in the use of sarcasm. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(1), 71–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DuBois, J. W.
(1986) Self-evidence and ritual speech. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 313–336). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Edwards, D.
(2000) Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(4), 347–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eson, M. E.
(1977) Cognitive function and interpretive semantics: Psychological components of psycholinguistics. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 4, 67–76.Google Scholar
Geeraert, K., Newman, J., & Baayen, H. R.
(2017) Idiom variation: Experimental data and a blueprint of a computational model. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(3), 653–669. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Robertson, R. R. W.
(1999) The role of suppression in figurative language comprehension. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1619–1630. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(1981a) Memory for requests in conversation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(6), 630–640. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1981b) Your wish is my command: Convention and context in interpreting indirect requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(4), 431–444. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986) What makes some indirect speech acts conventional? Journal of Memory and Language, 25(2), 181–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1987) Memory for requests in conversation revisited. American Journal of Psychology, 100(2), 179–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1&2), 5–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphor in human life. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & McCarrell, N.
(1990) Why boys will be boys and girls will be girls: Understanding colloquial tautologies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19, 125–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Mueller, R. A.
(1988) Conversational sequences and preference for indirect speech acts. Discourse Processes, 11(1), 101–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givon, T.
(1983) Introduction. In T. Givon (Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study (pp. 1–41). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. T., Dunham, P. J., & Purdy, K.
(2000) Children’s comprehension of critical and complimentary forms of verbal irony. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1(2), 227–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holtgraves, T.
(1986) Language structure in social interaction: Perceptions of direct and indirect speech acts and interactants who use them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 305–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994) Communication in context: Effects of speaker status on the comprehension of indirect requests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20(5), 1205–1218.Google Scholar
(1998) Interpreting indirect replies. Cognitive Psychology, 37(1), 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Comprehending indirect replies: When and how are their conveyed meanings activated? Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 519–540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Honeck, R. P.
(1997) A proverb in mind: The cognitive science of proverbial wit and wisdom. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Katz, A. N.
(1995) Discourse and socialcultural factors in understanding nonliteral language. In H. L. Colston, & A. N. Katz (Eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences (pp. 183–208). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2017) The standard experimental approach to the study of irony: Let’s not be hasty in throwing out the baby with the bathwater. In A. Athanasiadou, & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication. Series: Figurative thought and language (Vol. 1) (pp. 237–254). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kemper, S., & Thissen, D.
(1981) Memory for the dimensions of requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(5), 552–563. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, H.
(2003) Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1387–1411. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, R. J.
(2000) The production and processing of verbal irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1-2), 99–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., & Link, K. E.
(2002) Asymmetries in the use of verbal irony. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(2), 127–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., Long, D. L., & Church, M. B.
(1991) On being ironic: Pragmatic and mnemonic implications. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 6, 149–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moon, R.
(1998) Fixed expressions and idioms in English: A corpus-based approach. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pfaff, K. L., Gibbs, R. W., & Johnson, M. D.
(1997) Metaphor in using and understanding euphemism and dysphemism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18(1), 59–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A.
(1986) Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. M., & Kreuz, R. J.
(1994) Why do people use figurative language? Psychological Science, 5(4), 159–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, K. P.
(1988) Small talk: Analyzing discourse. Marburg: Hitzeroth.Google Scholar
Schwoebel, J., Dews, S., Winner, E., & Srinivas, K.
(2000) Obligatory processing of the literal meaning of ironic utterances: Further evidence. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1&2), 47–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition (1st ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1987) Precis of ‘Relevance: Communication and cognition’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 697–754. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Toplak, M., & Katz, A. N.
(2000) On the uses of sarcastic irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1467–1488. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turcan, A., & Filik, R.
(2017) Investigating sarcasm comprehension using eye-tracking during reading: What are the roles of literality, familiarity, and echoic mention? In A. Athanasiadou, & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication. Series: Figurative thought and language (Vol. 1) (pp. 255–276). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whaley, B. B., & Holloway, R. L.
(1996) “Rebuttal” analogy: A theoretical note. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 11, 161–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D.
(2012) Meaning and relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zegarac, V.
(1998) What is phatic communication? In V. Rouchota, & A. H. Jucker (Eds.), Current issues in relevance theory (pp. 327–361). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zegarac, V., & Clark, B.
(1999) Phatic interpretations and phatic communication. Journal of Linguistics, 321–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar