References
Anderson, C. C. (1964). The
psychology of the
metaphor. The Journal of
Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human
Development, 105(1), 53–73. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Armstrong, T., & Detweiler-Bedell, B. (2008). Beauty
as an emotion: The exhilarating prospect of mastering a
challenging world. Review of
General
Psychology, 12(4), 305–329. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blasko, D. G. (1999). Only
the tip of the iceberg: Who understands what about
metaphor? Journal of
Pragmatics, 31, 1675–1683. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloch, P. H. (1995). Seeking
the ideal form: Product design and consumer
response. Journal of
Marketing, 59(3), 16–29. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The
career of
metaphor. Psychological
Review, 112(1), 193–216. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Casakin, H. (2012). An empirical assessment of metaphor use in the design studio: analysis, reflection and restructuring of architectural design. . International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(3), 329–344. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chiappe, D. L., & Chiappe, P. (2007). The
role of working memory in metaphor production and
comprehension. Journal of
Memory and
Language, 56, 172–188. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chiappe, D. L., Kennedy, J. M., & Chiappe, P. (2003). Aptness
is more important than comprehensibility in preference for
metaphors and
similes. Poetics, 31, 51–68. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Christensen, B., & Schunn, C. (2007). The
relationship of analogical distance to analogical function
and preinventive structure: The case of engineering
design. Memory &
Cognition, 35, 29–38. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cila, N., Borsboom, F., & Hekkert, P. (2014). Determinants
of product metaphor
aesthetics. Empirical Studies
of the
Arts, 32(2), 183–203. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cila, N., Hekkert, P., & Visch, V. (2010). “As
light as a leaf ”: Product metaphor generation for
experience-driven
design. In K. Sato, P. M. A. Desmet, P. Hekkert, G. Ludden, & A. Matthew (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 7th International Design & Emotion Conference
2010. Chicago, USA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cila, N., Hekkert, P., & Visch, V. (2014a). Source
selection in product metaphor generation: The effects of
salience and
relatedness. International
Journal of
Design, 8(1), 15–28.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cila, N., Hekkert, P., & Visch, V. (2014b). Digging
for meaning: The effect of a designer’s expertise and
intention on depth of product
metaphors. Journal of
Metaphor &
Symbol, 29(4), 257–277. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clevenger, T., & Edwards, R. (1988). Semantic
distance as a predictor of metaphor
selection. Journal of
Psycholinguistic
Research, 17(3), 211–226. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crilly, N., Good, D., Matravers, D., & Clarkson, P. J. (2008). Design
as communication: Exploring the validity and utility of
relating intention to
interpretation. Design
Studies, 29, 425–457. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crilly, N., Maier, A., & Clarkson, P. J. (2008). Representing
artefacts as media: Modelling the relationship between
designer intent and consumer
experience. International
Journal of
Design, 2(3), 15–27.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., & Clarkson, P. J. (2004). Seeing
things: Consumer response to the visual domain in product
design. Design
Studies, 25(6), 547–577. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cupchik, G. C. (2003). The
‘interanimation’ of worlds: Creative metaphors in art and
design. The Design
Journal, 6(2), 14–28. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Da Silva, O., Crilly, N., & Hekkert, P. (2016). Maximum
effect for minimum means: The aesthetics of
efficiency. Design
Issues, 32(1), 41–51. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Djajadiningrat, J. P., Overbeeke, C. J., & Wensveen, S. A. G. (2000). Augmenting
fun and beauty: A
pamphlet.
Proceedings
of DARE 2000 Designing Augmented Reality Environments
Conference
(pp. 131–134). Helsingor,
Denmark.
Do, E. Y., & Gross, M. D. (1995). Drawing
analogies: Finding visual references by
sketching.
Proceedings,
Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture,
National
Conference
, Seattle.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The
way we think. New York: Basic Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Flor, M., & Hadar, U. (2005). The
production of metaphoric expressions in spontaneous speech:
A controlled-setting
experiment. Metaphor and
Symbol, 20(1), 1–34. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forceville, C. (2008). Metaphor
in pictures and multimodal
representations. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
thought (pp. 462–482). New York: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial
metaphor in
advertising. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forceville, C., Hekkert, P., & Tan, E. (2006). The
adaptive value of
metaphors. In U. Klein, K. Mellman, & S. Metzger (Eds.), Heuristiken
der Literaturwissenschaft: Einladung zu disziplinexternen
Perspektiven auf
Literatuur (pp. 85–109). Paderborn: Mentis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fraser, B. (1979). The
interpretation of novel
metaphors. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor
and
Thought (pp. 401–424). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gentner, D. (1989). The
mechanisms of analogical
learning. In S. Vosniadou, & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity
and Analogical
Reasoning (pp. 199–241). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R. W., Kushner, J. M., & Mills, W. R. (1991). Authorial
intentions and metaphor
comprehension. Journal of
Psycholinguistic
Research, 20(1), 11–30. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glucksberg, S., & Haught, C. (2006). On
the relation between metaphor and simile: When comparison
fails. Mind &
Language, 21(3), 360–378. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hassenzahl, M. (2003). The
thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and
product. In M. A. Blythe, A. F. Monk, K. Overbeeke, & P. C. Wright (Eds.), Funology:
from usability to
enjoyment (pp. 31–42). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hekkert, P. (2006). Design
aesthetics: Principles of pleasure in product
design. Psychology
Science, 48(2), 157–172.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hekkert, P., & Cila, N. (2015). Handle
with care! Why and how designers make use of product
metaphors. Design
Studies, 40(1), 196–217. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hey, J., Linsey, J., Agogino, A. M., & Wood, K. L. (2008). Analogies
and metaphors in creative
design. International Journal
of Engineering
Education, 24(2), 283–294.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hurtienne, J., & Blessing, L. (2007). Design
for intuitive use – Testing image schema theory for user
interface design. Paper
presented at
the
International
Conference on Engineering
Design
, ICED’07,
Paris, France.
Iacchetti, G. (2007). St.
Peter Squeezer. Retrieved
from [URL]
Johns, B. (1984). Visual
metaphor: Lost and
found. Semiotica, 52(3), 291–333.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jones, L. L., & Estes, Z. (2006). Roosters,
robins, and alarm clocks: Aptness and conventionality in
metaphor
comprehension. Journal of
Memory and
Language, 55, 18–32. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jones, M. A., & McCoy, K. (1992). Transparently-motivated
metaphor
generation. In R. Dale, E. Hovy, D. Rosner, & O. Stock (Eds.), Aspects
of automated natural language generation: Lecture notes in
artificial intelligence
587 (pp. 183–198). Berlin: Springer–Verlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kamp, C. (2016). Anna
G corkscrew: the woman who inspired curvaceous design
classic. Retrieved
from [URL]
Katz, A. N. (1982). Metaphoric
relationships: The role of feature
saliency. Journal of
Psycholinguistic
Research, 11(4), 283–296. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kennedy, J. M. (1982). Metaphor
in
pictures. Perception, 11, 589–605. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kolb, E. M. W., Hey, J., Sebastian H. J., & Agogino, A. M. (2008). Meta4acle:
Generating compelling metaphors for
design. Paper presented at
the
20th International
Conference on Design Theory and Methodology
(DTM)
, New York
City, USA.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor:
A practical
introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krippendorff, K., & Butter, R. (2008). Meanings
and contexts of
artifacts. In H. N. J. Schifferstein, & P. Hekkert (Eds.), Product
experience (pp. 353–376). Amsterdam: Elsevier. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G. (1993). The
contemporary theory of
metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor
and thought (2nd
ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors
we live
by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lloyd, P., & Snelders, D. (2003). What
was Philippe Starck thinking
of? Design
Studies, 24, 237–253. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lorenz, K. (1950). Studies
in animal and human
behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lubart, T. I., & Getz, I. (1997). Emotion,
metaphor, and the creative
process. Creativity Research
Journal, 10(4), 285–301. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Madsen, K.H. (1994). A guide to metaphorical design. Communications of the ACM, 37(12), 57–62. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malgady, R. G., & Johnson, M. G. (1976). Modifiers
in metaphors: Effects of constituent phrase similarity on
the interpretation of figurative
sentences. Journal of
Psycholinguistic
Research, 5(1), 43–52. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Markussen, T., Özcan, E., & Cila, N. (2012). Beyond
metaphor in product use and
interaction. In L.-L. Chen, T. Djajadiningrat, L. Feijs, S. Fraser, S. Kyffin, & D. Steffen (Eds.), Proceedings
of the DeSForM 2012: Meaning, Matter, Making
Conference (pp. 110–119). Wellington, New Zealand.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montgomery, A. (2013). Daniel
Weil redesigns the baby-feeding bottle [Web 157 blog
post]. January 31, 2013.
Retrieved from [URL]
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The
knowledge-creating
company. New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ortony, A., Vondruska, R. J., Foss, M. A., & Jones, L. E. (1985). Salience,
similes, and the asymmetry of
similarity. Journal of Memory
and
Language, 24, 569–594. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pierce, R. S., & Chiappe, D. L. (2009). The
roles of aptness, conventionality, and working memory in the
production of metaphors and
similes. Metaphor and
Symbol, 24(1), 1–19. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The
science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic
experience. Journal of
Consciousness
Studies, 6(6–7), 15–51.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richards, I. A. (1965). The
philosophy of rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schön, D.A. (1979). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 138–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, J. R. (1979). Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor
and
thought (pp. 83–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2012). Making
creative metaphors: The importance of fluid intelligence for
creative
thought. Intelligence, 40, 343–351. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sopory, P., & Dillard, J. P. (2002). The
persuasive effects of metaphor: A
meta-analysis. Human
Communication
Research, 28(3), 382–419. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strack, D. C. (2016). Solving
metaphor theory’s binding problem: An examination of
“mapping” and its theoretical
implications. Metaphor &
Symbol, 31(1), 1–10. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tourangeau, R., & Sternberg, R. J. (1981). Aptness
in metaphor. Cognitive
Psychology, 13, 27–55. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Rompay, T. J. L. (2008). Product
expression: Bridging the gap between the symbolic and the
concrete. In H. N. J. Schifferstein, & P. Hekkert (Eds.), Product
experience (pp. 333–352). Amsterdam: Elsevier. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Rompay, T. J. L., Hekkert, P., & Muller, W. (2005). The
bodily basis of product
experience. Design
Studies, 26, 359–377. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)