Chapter published in:
Producing Figurative Expression: Theoretical, experimental and practical perspectives
Edited by John Barnden and Andrew Gargett
[Figurative Thought and Language 10] 2020
► pp. 299330


Anderson, C. C.
(1964) The psychology of the metaphor. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development, 105(1), 53–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, T., & Detweiler-Bedell, B.
(2008) Beauty as an emotion: The exhilarating prospect of mastering a challenging world. Review of General Psychology, 12(4), 305–329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blasko, D. G.
(1999) Only the tip of the iceberg: Who understands what about metaphor? Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1675–1683. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, P. H.
(1995) Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 16–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D.
(2005) The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casakin, H.
(2012) An empirical assessment of metaphor use in the design studio: analysis, reflection and restructuring of architectural design. . International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(3), 329–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chiappe, D. L., & Chiappe, P.
(2007) The role of working memory in metaphor production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 172–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chiappe, D. L., Kennedy, J. M., & Chiappe, P.
(2003) Aptness is more important than comprehensibility in preference for metaphors and similes. Poetics, 31, 51–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, B., & Schunn, C.
(2007) The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: The case of engineering design. Memory & Cognition, 35, 29–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cila, N., Borsboom, F., & Hekkert, P.
(2014) Determinants of product metaphor aesthetics. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 32(2), 183–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cila, N., Hekkert, P., & Visch, V.
(2010) “As light as a leaf ”: Product metaphor generation for experience-driven design. In K. Sato, P. M. A. Desmet, P. Hekkert, G. Ludden, & A. Matthew (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Design & Emotion Conference 2010. Chicago, USA.Google Scholar
(2014a) Source selection in product metaphor generation: The effects of salience and relatedness. International Journal of Design, 8(1), 15–28.Google Scholar
(2014b) Digging for meaning: The effect of a designer’s expertise and intention on depth of product metaphors. Journal of Metaphor & Symbol, 29(4), 257–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clevenger, T., & Edwards, R.
(1988) Semantic distance as a predictor of metaphor selection. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17(3), 211–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crilly, N., Good, D., Matravers, D., & Clarkson, P. J.
(2008) Design as communication: Exploring the validity and utility of relating intention to interpretation. Design Studies, 29, 425–457. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crilly, N., Maier, A., & Clarkson, P. J.
(2008) Representing artefacts as media: Modelling the relationship between designer intent and consumer experience. International Journal of Design, 2(3), 15–27.Google Scholar
Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., & Clarkson, P. J.
(2004) Seeing things: Consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Design Studies, 25(6), 547–577. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cupchik, G. C.
(2003) The ‘interanimation’ of worlds: Creative metaphors in art and design. The Design Journal, 6(2), 14–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Da Silva, O., Crilly, N., & Hekkert, P.
(2016) Maximum effect for minimum means: The aesthetics of efficiency. Design Issues, 32(1), 41–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Djajadiningrat, J. P., Overbeeke, C. J., & Wensveen, S. A. G.
(2000) Augmenting fun and beauty: A pamphlet. Proceedings of DARE 2000 Designing Augmented Reality Environments Conference (pp. 131–134). Helsingor, Denmark.
Do, E. Y., & Gross, M. D.
(1995) Drawing analogies: Finding visual references by sketching. Proceedings, Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, National Conference , Seattle.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(2002) The way we think. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Flor, M., & Hadar, U.
(2005) The production of metaphoric expressions in spontaneous speech: A controlled-setting experiment. Metaphor and Symbol, 20(1), 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C.
(2008) Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 462–482). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C., Hekkert, P., & Tan, E.
(2006) The adaptive value of metaphors. In U. Klein, K. Mellman, & S. Metzger (Eds.), Heuristiken der Literaturwissenschaft: Einladung zu disziplinexternen Perspektiven auf Literatuur (pp. 85–109). Paderborn: Mentis.Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (1979) The interpretation of novel metaphors. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 401–424). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D.
(1989) The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou, & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (pp. 199–241). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Kushner, J. M., & Mills, W. R.
(1991) Authorial intentions and metaphor comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20(1), 11–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Haught, C.
(2006) On the relation between metaphor and simile: When comparison fails. Mind & Language, 21(3), 360–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hassenzahl, M.
(2003) The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product. In M. A. Blythe, A. F. Monk, K. Overbeeke, & P. C. Wright (Eds.), Funology: from usability to enjoyment (pp. 31–42). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hekkert, P.
(2006) Design aesthetics: Principles of pleasure in product design. Psychology Science, 48(2), 157–172.Google Scholar
Hekkert, P., & Cila, N.
(2015) Handle with care! Why and how designers make use of product metaphors. Design Studies, 40(1), 196–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hey, J., Linsey, J., Agogino, A. M., & Wood, K. L.
(2008) Analogies and metaphors in creative design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(2), 283–294.Google Scholar
Hurtienne, J., & Blessing, L.
(2007) Design for intuitive use – Testing image schema theory for user interface design. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Design , ICED’07, Paris, France.
Iacchetti, G.
(2007) St. Peter Squeezer. Retrieved from http://​www​.giulioiacchetti​.com​/?p​=533
Johns, B.
(1984) Visual metaphor: Lost and found. Semiotica, 52(3), 291–333.Google Scholar
Jones, L. L., & Estes, Z.
(2006) Roosters, robins, and alarm clocks: Aptness and conventionality in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 18–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. A., & McCoy, K.
(1992) Transparently-motivated metaphor generation. In R. Dale, E. Hovy, D. Rosner, & O. Stock (Eds.), Aspects of automated natural language generation: Lecture notes in artificial intelligence 587 (pp. 183–198). Berlin: Springer–Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamp, C.
(2016) Anna G corkscrew: the woman who inspired curvaceous design classic. Retrieved from https://​www​.ft​.com​/content​/e40271d6​-1691​-11e6​-b197​-a4af20d5575e​?mhq5j​=e5
Katz, A. N.
(1982) Metaphoric relationships: The role of feature saliency. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11(4), 283–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J. M.
(1982) Metaphor in pictures. Perception, 11, 589–605. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, E. M. W., Hey, J., Sebastian H. J., & Agogino, A. M.
(2008) Meta4acle: Generating compelling metaphors for design. Paper presented at the 20th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (DTM) , New York City, USA.
Kövecses, Z.
(2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K., & Butter, R.
(2008) Meanings and contexts of artifacts. In H. N. J. Schifferstein, & P. Hekkert (Eds.), Product experience (pp. 353–376). Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, P., & Snelders, D.
(2003) What was Philippe Starck thinking of? Design Studies, 24, 237–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, K.
(1950) Studies in animal and human behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I., & Getz, I.
(1997) Emotion, metaphor, and the creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 10(4), 285–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, K.H.
(1994) A guide to metaphorical design. Communications of the ACM, 37(12), 57–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malgady, R. G., & Johnson, M. G.
(1976) Modifiers in metaphors: Effects of constituent phrase similarity on the interpretation of figurative sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5(1), 43–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markussen, T., Özcan, E., & Cila, N.
(2012) Beyond metaphor in product use and interaction. In L.-L. Chen, T. Djajadiningrat, L. Feijs, S. Fraser, S. Kyffin, & D. Steffen (Eds.), Proceedings of the DeSForM 2012: Meaning, Matter, Making Conference (pp. 110–119). Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Montgomery, A.
(2013) Daniel Weil redesigns the baby-feeding bottle [Web 157 blog post]. January 31, 2013. Retrieved from http://​www​.designweek​.co​.uk​/news​/daniel​-weil​-redesigns​-thebaby​-feeding​-bottle​/3035940​.article
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995) The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ortony, A., Vondruska, R. J., Foss, M. A., & Jones, L. E.
(1985) Salience, similes, and the asymmetry of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 569–594. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, R. S., & Chiappe, D. L.
(2009) The roles of aptness, conventionality, and working memory in the production of metaphors and similes. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(1), 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W.
(1999) The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6–7), 15–51.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A.
(1965) The philosophy of rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schön, D.A.
(1979) Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 138–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R.
(1979) Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 83–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E.
(2012) Making creative metaphors: The importance of fluid intelligence for creative thought. Intelligence, 40, 343–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sopory, P., & Dillard, J. P.
(2002) The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 382–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strack, D. C.
(2016) Solving metaphor theory’s binding problem: An examination of “mapping” and its theoretical implications. Metaphor & Symbol, 31(1), 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tourangeau, R., & Sternberg, R. J.
(1981) Aptness in metaphor. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 27–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Rompay, T. J. L.
(2008) Product expression: Bridging the gap between the symbolic and the concrete. In H. N. J. Schifferstein, & P. Hekkert (Eds.), Product experience (pp. 333–352). Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Rompay, T. J. L., Hekkert, P., & Muller, W.
(2005) The bodily basis of product experience. Design Studies, 26, 359–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar