The present paper discusses two aspects of
the production of figures of speech. The first one is their
relatedness, which is established on the basis of an analysis of
their cognitive configuration in terms of combinations of cognitive
operations. Such operations are applied to the creation of basic
figures of speech such as metaphor, metonymy, understatement,
overstatement, irony, paradox, and oxymoron. Other traditional
figurative uses of language are then accounted for with reference to
these more basic ones. The second aspect that this paper addresses
is the question of constraints on figurative thinking. In this
respect, it reviews previous proposals on the topic and extends
their application to other cases of figurative language use. The
resulting account links figurative language up with the notion of
embodied cognition.
(2009) A
glossary of literary terms (9th
ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Anderson, J. R.
(2010) Cognitive
psychology and its
implications. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
Ayton, J.
(1998) The
Oxford dictionary of
slang. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barcelona, A.
(2003) On
the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for
conceptual
metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor
and metonymy at the crossroads. A cognitive
perspective (pp. 31–58). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Barnden, J. A.
(2010) Metaphor
and metonymy: Making their connections more
slippery. Cognitive
Linguistics, 21(1), 1–34.
(2007) Metonymy
in grammar. Towards motivating extensions of grammatical
categories and
constructions. Osijek: Faculty of Philosophy, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University.
Carston, R.
(2002) Thoughts
and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit
communication. Malden: Blackwell.
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J.
(1984) On
the pretense theory of
irony. Journal of
Experimental
Psychology, 1, 121–126.
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
(2014) Figurative
language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dirven, R., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(2010) Looking
back at 30 years of Cognitive
Linguistics. In E. Tabakowska, M. Choiński, & Ł. Wiraszka (Eds.), Cognitive
Linguistics in action. From theory to application and
back (pp. 13–70). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(2002) The
way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden
complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Gibbs, R. W.
(1994) The
poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and
understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W.
(1999) Speaking
and thinking with
metonymy. In K.-U. Panther, & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy
in language and
thought (pp. 61–76). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gibbs, R. W.
(2006) Embodiment
and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(2002) Converging
evidence for the notions of subscene and primary
scene. In R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor
and metonymy in comparison and
contrast (pp. 533–553). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jakobson, R.
(1960) Linguistics
and
poetics. In T. Sebeok (Ed.), Style
in
language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
Johnson, M.
(1987) The
body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination,
and
reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, C. R.
(1999) Constructional
grounding: The role of interpretational overlap in
lexical and constructional
acquisition. PhD
dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G.
(1998) Metonymy:
Developing a Cognitive Linguistic
view. Cognitive
Linguistics, 9, 37–77.
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M.
(1995) How
about another piece of the pie: The allusional pretense
theory of discourse
irony. Journal of
Experimental Psychology
General, 124(1), 3–21.
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women,
fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the
mind. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Lakoff, G.
(1990) The
Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on
image-schemas?Cognitive
Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74.
Lakoff, G.
(1993) The
contemporary theory of
metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor
and thought (2nd
ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors
we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1999) Philosophy
in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
Langacker, R. W.
(1999) Grammar
and conceptualization. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, R. W.
(2009) Metonymic
grammar. In K.-U. Panther, L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy
and metaphor in
grammar (pp. 45–71). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Littlemore, J.
(2015) Metonymy.
Hidden shortcuts in language, thought, and
communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miró, I.
(2018) Combining
metaphors: From metaphoric amalgams to binary
systems. Australian Journal
of
Linguistics, 38(1), 81–104.
Norrick, N. R.
(2004) Hyperbole,
extreme case
formulation. Journal of
Pragmatics, 36, 1727–1739.
Panther, K.-U.
(2005) The
role of conceptual metonymy in meaning
construction. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza, & S. Peña (Eds.), Cognitive
Linguistics. Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary
interaction
(pp. 353–386). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L.
(1998) A
cognitive approach to inferencing in
conversation. Journal of
Pragmatics, 30, 755–769.
Peña, S.
(2003) Topology
and cognition. What image-schemas reveal about the
metaphorical language of
emotions. München: Lincom Europa.
Peña, S.
(2008) Dependency
systems for image-schematic patterns in a usage-based
approach to language. Journal
of
Pragmatics, 40(6), 1041–1066.
Peña, S., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(2017) Construing
and constructing
hyperbole. In A. Athanasiadou (Ed.), Studies
in figurative thought and
language (pp. 41–73). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Popa-Wyatt, M.
(2014) Pretence
and echo: Towards and integrated account of verbal
irony. International Review
of
Pragmatics, 6(1), 127–168.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(1998) On
the nature of blending as a cognitive
phenomenon. Journal of
Pragmatics, 30, 259–274.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(2011) Metonymy
and cognitive
operations. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Defining
metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics. Towards a consensus
view (pp. 103–123). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(2014) On
the nature and scope of metonymy in linguistic description
and explanation: towards settling some
controversies. In J. Littlemore, & J. Taylor (Eds.), Bloomsbury
companion to Cognitive
Linguistics (pp. 143–166). London: Bloomsbury.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(2017a) Metaphor
and other cognitive operations in interaction: from basicity
to
complexity. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor:
Embodied cognition, and
discourse (pp. 138–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(2017b) Cognitive
modeling and
irony. In C. Colston, & A. Athanasiadou (Eds.), Irony
in language use and
communication (pp. 179–200). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera, A.
(2014) Cognitive
modeling. A linguistic
perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Gómez, M. A.
(2014) Constructing
discourse and discourse
constructions. In M. A. Gómez, F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza, & F. Gonzálvez (Eds.), Theory
and practice in functional-cognitive
space (pp. 295–314). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Lozano, I.
(2019) Unraveling
irony: From linguistics to literary criticism and
back. Cognitive
Semantics, 5, 147–173. .
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Pérez, L.
(2001) Metonymy
and the grammar: Motivation, constraints, and
interaction. Language and
Communication, 21, 321–357.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Pérez, L.
(2011) The
contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and
challenges. Metaphor and
Symbol, 26, 161–185.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1995) Relevance.
Communication and
cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Talmy, L.
(2000) Toward
a cognitive semantics, Vol. I: Concept structuring
systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Wilson, N., & Gibbs, R.
(2007) Real
and imagined body movement primes metaphor
comprehension. Cognitive
Science, 31, 721–731.
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D.
(2012) Explaining
irony. In D. Wilson, & D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning
and
relevance (pp. 123–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
Cited by 8 other publications
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2023. Paragon and antonomasia: Similar but/and different?. Lingua 288 ► pp. 103522 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.