Figurative thought and language research in the 21st century
Back to the future
References
Alač, M., & Coulson, S.
(
2004)
The man, the key, or the car: Who or what is parked out back? Cognitive Science Online, 2(1), 21–34.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Athanasiadou, A., & Colston, H. L.
Athanasiadou, A., & Colston, H. L.
(Eds.) (
2020)
The diversity of irony. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Attardo, S.
(
2000)
Irony as relevant inappropriateness.
Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 793–826.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barbe, K.
(
1993)
“Isn’t it ironic that…”: Explicit irony markers.
Journal of Pragmatics, 20(6), 579–590.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barnden, J. A.
(
2021)
Metaphor and irony: Messy when mixed. In
A. Soares da Silva (Ed.),
Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage (
Vol. Figurative Thought and Language 11, pp. 139-174). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brdar, M.
(
2017)
Metonymy and word-formation: Their interactions and complementation. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabo, R.
(
2013)
Some reflections on metonymy and word-formation.
ExELL. Explorations in English Language and Linguistics, 1(1), 40–62.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R.
(
2014a)
Where does metonymy begin? Some comments on Janda (2011).
Cognitive Linguistics, 25(2), 313–340.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R.
(
2014b)
Croatian place suffixations in -ište: Polysemy and metonymy. In
F. Polzenhagen,
Z. Kövecses,
S. Vogelbacher, &
S. Kleinke (Eds.),
Cognitive explorations into metaphor and metonymy (pp. 293–322). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brdar-Szabó, R., & Brdar, M.
Broccias, C.
(
2017)
A radical approach to metonymy.
Textus, 30(1), 185–196.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R. D., & William Pagliuca, D.
(
1994)
The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Canestrari, C., & Bianchi, I.
Colston, H. L., & Carreno, A.
Eckardt, R.
(
2006)
Meaning change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(
1996)
Blending as a central process of grammar. In
A. E. Goldberg (Ed.),
Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 113–130). Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(
2002)
The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J.
(
1977)
Scenes-and-frames semantics. In
A. Zampoli (Ed.),
Linguistic Structures processing (pp. 55–81). Amsterdam/New York: North Holland.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J.
(
1985)
Frames and the semantics of understanding.
Quaderni di Semantica, 6(2), 222-255.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
(
2000)
Irony in talk among friends.
Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), 5–27.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R. W.Jr.
(
2021)
“Holy cow, my irony detector just exploded!” calling out irony during the coronavirus pandemic.
Metaphor and Symbol, 36(1), 45–60.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R. W., Samermit, P., & Karzmark, C. R.
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F.
(
1991)
Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hocker, J. L., & Wilmot, W. W.
(
2017)
Interpersonal conflict. 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C.
(
1993)
Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, M.
(
1987)
The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kwon, I., & Kim, E.
(
2021)
(Meta-)Ground Viewpoint Space and structurally-framed irony: A case study of the mobile game Liyla and the Shadows of War.
Cognitive Linguistics, 32(1), 1–33.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G.
(
1987)
Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G.
(
2014)
Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate: The essential guide for progressives. White River Junction, Vt.: Chelsea Green.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R. W.
(
2002)
Theory, method, and description in cognitive grammar: A case study. In
B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, &
K. Turewicz (Eds.),
Cognitive linguistics today (pp. 13–40). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehmann, C.
(
2021)
About as boring as flossing sharks: Cognitive accounts of irony and the family of approximate comparison constructions in American English.
Cognitive Linguistics, 32(1), 133–158.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matzner, S.
(
2016)
Rethinking metonymy: Literary theory and poetic practice from Pindar to Jakobson. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Muecke, D. C.
(
1978)
Irony markers.
Poetics, 7(4), 363–375.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Panther, K.-U.
(
2005)
The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction. In
F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza, &
S. Peńa Cervel (Eds.),
Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 353–386). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G.
(
2014)
Situational metonymies.
Plenary lecture at The 1st International Symposium on Figurative Thought and Language, Thessaloniki, April 24–26, 2014.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(
1999)
Introducción a la Teoría Cognitiva de la Metonímia. Granada: Método Ediciones.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(
2000)
The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In
A. Barcelona (Ed.),
Metonymy and Metaphor at the Crossroads (pp. 109–132). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Lozano-Palacio, I.
(
2019a)
A cognitive-linguistic approach to complexity in irony: Dissecting the ironic echo.
Metaphor and Symbol, 34(2), 127–138.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Lozano-Palacio, I.
(
2019b)
Unraveling irony: from linguistics to literary criticism and back.
Cognitive Semantics, 5(1), 147–173.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Lozano-Palacio, I.
(
2019)
A cognitive-linguistic approach to complexity in irony: Dissecting the ironic echo.
Metaphor and Symbol, 34(2), 127-138.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sweetser, E.
(
1988)
Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching.
Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 14, 389–405.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sweetser, E. E.
(
1990)
From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B.
(
2002)
Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)