Chapter published in:
Figurative Thought and Language in Action
Edited by Mario Brdar and Rita Brdar-Szabó
[Figurative Thought and Language 16] 2022
► pp. 5986
References
Alač, M., & Coulson, S.
(2004) The man, the key, or the car: Who or what is parked out back? Cognitive Science Online, 2(1), 21–34.Google Scholar
Atkinson, P.
(1985) Language, structure and reproduction: An introduction to the sociology of Basil Bernstein. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Barcelona, A.
(2002) On the ubiquity and multiple-level operation of metonymy. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, & K. Turewicz (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics today (pp. 207–224). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2005) The multilevel operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse, with particular attention to metonymic chains. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza, & S. Peńa Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 313–352). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) The role of metonymy in meaning construction at discourse level: A case study. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of Meaning Construction (pp. 51-75). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 7–57). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barnden, J. A.
(2010) Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benczes, R., Barcelona, A., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.
(Eds.) (2011) Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bierwiaczonek, B.
(2013) Metonymy in language, thought and brain. Sheffield/ Bristol: Equinox.Google Scholar
Blanco-Carrión, O., Barcelona, A., & Pannain, R.
(Eds.) (2018) Conceptual Metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brdar, M.
(2007a) Metonymy in grammar: Towards motivating extensions of grammatical categories and constructions. Osijek: Faculty of Philosophy.Google Scholar
(2007b) How to do a couple of things with metonymy. In P. Cap, & J. Nijakowska (Eds.), Current trends in pragmatics (pp. 2–32). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
(2015) Metonymic chains and synonymy. Fluminensia, 27(2), 257–276.Google Scholar
(2017) Metonymy and word-formation: Their interactions and complementation. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
(2019) On the regularity of metonymy across languages (exemplified on some metonymies in medical discourse). ExELL. Explorations in English Language and Linguistics, 7(1), 52–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R.
(2007) When Zidane is not simply Zidane, and Bill Gates is not just Bill Gates: Or, Some thoughts on online construction of metaphtonymic meanings of proper names. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 125–142). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabo, R.
(2013) Some reflections on metonymy and word-formation. ExELL. Explorations in English Language and Linguistics, 1(1), 40–62.Google Scholar
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R.
(2014) Where does metonymy begin? Some comments on Janda (2011). Cognitive Linguistics, 25(2), 313–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brdar-Szabó, R., & Brdar, M.
(2011) What do metonymic chains reveal about the nature of metonymy? In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 217–248). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brdar-Szabó, R. & Brdar, M.
(2021) Metonymic indeterminacy and metalepsis: Getting two (or more) targets for the price of one vehicle. In A. Soares da Silva (Ed.), Figures: Intersubjectivity and usage (pp. 211–247). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(fc.). Metonymy in multimodal discourse, or: How metonymies get piggybacked across modalities by other metonymies and metaphors. In A. Bagasheva Ed. Figurative thought and language Amsterdam John Benjamins
Coulson, S., & Fauconnier, G.
(1999) Fake guns and stone lions: Conceptual blending and privative adjectives. In B. Fox, D. Jurafsky, & L. Michaelis (Eds.), Cognition and function in language (pp. 143–158). Palo Alto: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
(1993) The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 335-370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A.
(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, A.
(2004) Lexical facets and metonymy. Ilha do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies, 47, 73–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A.
(1999) The feeling of what happens. Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. San Diego/New York/London: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Denroche, C.
(2015) Metonymy and language: A new theory of linguistic processing. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fass, D.
(1991) “met*: A method for discriminating metonymy and metaphor by computer. Computational Linguistics, 17, 49–90.Google Scholar
Fass, D. C.
(1997) Processing Metonymy and Metaphor. Greenwich: Ablex.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G.
(1990) Domains and connections. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 15–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(1996) Blending as a central process of grammar. In A. E. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 113–130). Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S.
(1999) Blending and metaphor. In R. W. J. Gibbs, & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hernández-Gomariz, I.
(2018) Analysis of metonymic triggers, metonymic chaining, and patterns of interaction with metaphor and with other metonymies as part of the metonymy database in the Córdoba project. In O. Blanco-Carrión, A. Barcelona, & R. Pannain (Eds.), Conceptual metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues (pp. 75–94). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, M.
(2007) Chained metonymies in lexicon and grammar: A cross-linguistic perspective on body-part terms. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, Th. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 77–98). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ioannou, G.
(2019) Metonymy and frame integration: Interfacing between concepts and discourse. Topics in Linguistics, 20(1), 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janda L. A.
(2010a) Russian word-formation in contrast with Czech and Norwegian. Oslo Studies in Language, 2(2), 243–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janda, L. A.
(2010b) The role of metonymy in Czech word-formation. Slovo a slovesnost, 71, 260–274.Google Scholar
(2011) Metonymy in word-formation. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(2), 359–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2012) Ten lectures on figurative meaning-making: The role of body and context. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G.
(1998) Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
(1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1991) Concept, image, and symbol. The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 1–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker
(2009) Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leach, E. R.
(1976) Culture and communication: The logic by which symbols are connected, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J.
(2015) Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matzner, S.
(2016) Rethinking metonymy: Literary theory and poetic practice from Pindar to Jakobson. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nerlich, B., & Clarke, D. D.
(2001) Serial metonymy: A study of reference-based polysemisation. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 2(2), 245–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U.
(2005) The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza, & S. Peńa Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 353–386). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Metonymy as a usage event. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 146–185). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L.
(2003) Introduction: On the nature of conceptual metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L.
(2009) Introduction. In K.-U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp. 1–44). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paprotté, W., & Dirven, R.
(Eds.) (1985) The ubiquity of metaphor: metaphor in language and thought. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C.
(2004) Where does metonymy stop? Senses, facets, and active zones. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(4), 245–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radden, G.
(2014) Situational metonymies. Plenary lecture at The 1st International Symposium on Figurative Thought and Language, Thessaloniki, April 24–26, 2014.Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z.
(1999) Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther, & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, M. J.
(1979) The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(1999) Introducción a la teoría cognitiva de la metonímia. Granada: Método Ediciones.Google Scholar
(2000) The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metonymy and metaphor at the crossroads (pp. 109–132). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Díez Velasco, O. I.
(2002) Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Mairal Usón, R.
(2007) High-level metaphor and metonymy in meaning construction. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of Meaning Construction (pp. 33-49). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Otal Campo, J. L.
(2002) Metonymy, grammar, and communication. Albolote: Editorial Comares.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F., & Pérez Hernández, L.
(2001) Metonymy and the grammar: motivation, constraints and interaction. Language and Communication, 21(4), 321-357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Pérez Hernández, L.
(2003) Cognitive operations and pragmatic implication. In K.-U. Panther, & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp. 23–49). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. R.
(1989) Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tóth, M.
(2018) Linguistic metonymy: Implicitness and co-activation of mental content. Berlin: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar