Chapter published in:
Drawing Attention to Metaphor: Case studies across time periods, cultures and modalities
Edited by Camilla Di Biase-Dyson and Markus Egg
[Figurative Thought and Language 5] 2020
► pp. 129158
References

References

Al-Karaki, B.
(2012) ‘Thinking more’ as a function of metaphors in philosophy. metaphorik.de, 22, 6–22.Google Scholar
Beger, A.
(2011) Deliberate metaphors? An exploration of the choice and functions of metaphors in US-American college lectures. metaphorik.de, 20, 39–60.Google Scholar
Booth, N. B.
(1960) Empedocles’ account of breathing. Journal of Hellenic Studies, 80, 10–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L.
(2003) Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
De Donato Rodrigrez, X. & Arroyo-Santos, A.
(2015) The function of scientific metaphors: An example of the creative power of metaphors in biological theories. The paths of creation: Creativity in nature, science and the arts, 9, 81–96.Google Scholar
Diels, H. & Kranz, W.
(1951) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Griechisch und deutsch von H. Diels. Sechste Auflage herausgegeben von W. Kranz, Vol. 1. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Diller, H.
(1932) οψισ αδηλων ta φαινομενα. Hermes, 67(1), 14–42.Google Scholar
Ferella, C.
(1957) Waking up Sleeping Metaphors: A cognitive approach to Parmenides’ two ways of enquiry. eTopoi. Journal of Ancient Studies, 6, 107–130. Google Scholar
Furley, D. J.
(1957) Empedocles and the clepsydra. Journal of Hellenic Studies, 77, 31–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529–562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C.
(1957) In the beginning: Some Greek views on the origins of life and the early state of man. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Herrmann, J. B.
(2013) Metaphor in academic discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures, communicative functions and cognitive representations. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
(2015) High on Metaphor, Low on Simile? An Examination of Metaphor Type in Sub-registers of Academic Prose. In J. B. Herrmann & T. Berber Sardinha (Eds.), Metaphor in Specialist Discourse. Investigating Metaphor Use in Technical, Scientific and Popularized Discourse Contexts (Metaphors in Language, Cognition and Communication 4), (pp. 163–190). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Inwood, B.
(2001) The poem of Empedocles: A text and translation with an introduction. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Kamtekar, R.
(2009) Knowing by likeness in Empedocles. Phronesis, 54(3), 215–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M.
(1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphors. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laks, A. & Most, G. W.
(2016) Early Greek philosophy (Vol. 5). Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.
(1966) Polarity and analogy: Two types of argumentation in Early Greek thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lonie, I. M.
(1981) The Hippocratic treatises, “On generation”, “On the nature of the child”, “Diseases IV”: A commentary. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. W.
(1965) Gleiches zum Gleichem: ein Prinzip frühgriechischen Denkens (Klassisch-philologische Studien 31). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Needham, N. J. T. M.
(1959) A history of embryology (2nd ed., revised with the assistance of Arthur Hughes). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D.
(1970) Empedocles’ theories of seeing and breathing: The effect of a simile. Journal of Hellenic Studies, 90, 140–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pulaczewska, H.
(1999) Aspects of metaphor in physics: Examples and case studies. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Regenbogen, O.
(1930) Eine Forschungsmethode antiker Naturwissenschaft. Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Mathematik, 1, 130–182 (reprinted in: F. Dirlmeier (Ed.) (1961). Kleine Schriften (pp. 141–194). Munich: Beck.)Google Scholar
Rudolph, K.
(2015) Sight and the Presocratics: Approaches to Visual Perception in Early Greek Philosophy. In M. Squire (Ed.), Sight and the Ancient Senses (pp. 36–53). London: Routledge. Available from https://​www​.routledge​.com​/products​/9781844658664.Google Scholar
Sedley, D.
(1992) Empedocles’ theory of vision and Theophrastus’ De sensibus . In W. Fortenbaugh & D. Gutas (Eds.), Theophrastus: His psychological, doxographical, and scientific writings (Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities 5), (pp. 20–31). New Brunswick & London: Transaction.Google Scholar
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Demmen, J., Koller, V., Payne, S., Hardie, A. & Rayson, P.
(2017) The online use of violence and journey metaphors by patients with cancer, as compared with health professionals. A mixed methods study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 7, 60–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J.
(2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 213–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011a) When is metaphor deliberate? In N. L. Johannesson, D. Minugh & C. Almarvius (Eds.), Selected papers from the 2008 Metaphor Festival, Stockholm (pp. 43–63), prepublication retrieved from http://​vu​-nl​.academia​.edu​/gerardsteen​/papers​/272296​/when​_is​_metaphor​_deliberate, accessed 27.01.2015.Google Scholar
(2011b) What does ‘really deliberate’ really mean? More thoughts on metaphor and consciousness. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 53–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017a) Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017b) Attention to metaphor: Where embodied cognition and social interaction can meet, but may not often do so. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 279–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Timpanaro Cardini, M.
(1957) Respirazione e clessidra (Empedocle, fr. 100). La Parola del Passato, 12, 250–270.Google Scholar
Wright, M. R.
(1995) Empedocles: The extant fragments. edited with introduction, commentary, and concordance. New Haven: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar