Cover not available
Part of
How Metaphors Guide, Teach and Popularize Science
Edited by Anke Beger and Thomas H. Smith
[Figurative Thought and Language 6] 2020
► pp. 1–37

Chapter 1
Introduction

 | Europa-Universität Flensburg
 | Independent
In this introduction, we start by providing an overview of how metaphor makes science accessible (§ 1). The first part describes the intended readership of this book and introduces them to studies of metaphor in science. We then provide the theoretical foundation for the study of metaphor in science that all of the contributions in this volume are based on: Conceptual Metaphor Theory (§ 2). The third part (§ 3) introduces the three interrelated functions or levels of metaphor that are vital for making science accessible: language, thought, and communication. An overview of contributions to this volume concludes this chapter (§ 4).
Article outline
  • 1.How metaphor makes science accessible
    • 1.1Accessible to whom? Intended readership of this book
    • 1.2An overview of the study of metaphor in science
  • 2.Theoretical foundations for the study of metaphor in science
    • 2.1Main tenets of Conceptual Metaphor Theory
      • 2.1.1Conceptual Metaphor Theory: Main tenets and assumptions
      • 2.1.2Criticism of CMT and alternative approaches
  • 3.Interrelated levels of metaphor in making science accessible: Linguistic, conceptual, and discourse functions
    • 3.1Metaphor in language – the language function
      • 3.1.1Conventionality and novelty
      • 3.1.2Metaphor in a wider sense: Similes and analogies
    • 3.2Metaphor in thought – the conceptual function
      • 3.2.1Embodied metaphors
      • 3.2.2Socio-cultural metaphors
      • 3.2.3Source domain context or background knowledge
      • 3.2.4Target domain context or background knowledge
      • 3.2.5Abstract source domains
      • 3.2.6Metaphors in combination
    • 3.3Metaphor in communication – the discourse function
      • 3.3.1Review of metaphor in communication as implied in theoretical discussions above
      • 3.3.2The concept of ‘deliberate metaphor’
      • 3.3.3Problems with ‘deliberate metaphor’ and alternative concepts
  • 4.Organization of this volume
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 22 April 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.6.01beg
References (110)
References
Ashby, J., Roncero, C., de Almeida, R. G., & Agauas, S. J. (2018). The early processing of metaphors and similes: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Jounrnal of Experimental Psychology, 2(1), 161–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beger, A. (2011). Deliberate metaphors? An exploration of the choice and functions of metaphors in US-American college lectures. metaphorik.de, 20, 39–61.Google Scholar
(2016). Different functions of (deliberate) metaphor in teaching scientific concepts. In O. Jäkel, M. Döring & A. Beger (Eds.), Science and metaphor: A truly interdisciplinary perspective (metaphorik.de , 26, special issue), 61–87.Google Scholar
(2019). The role of (deliberate) metaphor in communicating knowledge in academic discourse: An analysis of college lectures from different disciplines (Doctoral Dissertation). Berlin: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beger, A. & Jäkel, O. (2015). The cognitive role of metaphor in teaching science: Examples from physics, chemistry, biology, psychology and philosophy. Philosophical Inquiries, 3(1), 89–112.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H., & Savage, R. I. (2010). Paradigms for a metaphorology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borghi, A., & Binkofski, F. (2015). Words as social tools: An embodied view on abstract concepts. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Bowdle, B., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braun, M., Fernau, S., & Dabrock, P. (2018). Images of synthetic life: Mapping the use and function of metaphors in the public discourse on synthetic biology. PLOS, Published: June 21, 2018 DOI logo.Google Scholar
Brown, T. L. (2003). Making truth: Metaphor in science. Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Caballero, R. (2003). Metaphor and genre: The presence and role of metaphor in the building review. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 145–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2010a). The discourse dynamics framework for metaphor. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp.77–97). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
(2010b). Metaphors and discourse activity. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp.147–161). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
(2015). Preface. In B. J. Herrmann, & T. Berber-Sardinha (Eds.), Metaphor in specialist discourse (pp.xi–xii). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L., & Low, G. (1999) (Eds). Researching and applying metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, R. (2010). Lexical pragmatics, ad hoc concepts and metaphor: A Relevance Theory perspective. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 153–180.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. New York: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Forensic deliberations on ‘purposeful metaphor’. Metaphor and the Social World, 2(1), 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L. & Gibbs, R. W. (2017). Metaphor processing. In E. Semino, & Z. Demjén (Eds), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp.457–472). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deignan, A. (2012). Figurative language in discourse. In H. Schmidt (Ed.), Cognitive Pragmatics (pp.437–462). Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deignan, A., Littlemore, J., & Semino, E. (2013). Figurative language, genre and register. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drogosz, A. (2016). Darwin’s metaphors: A cognitive semantics analysis of the theory of evolution. Academic Journal of Modern Philology, 5, 31–45.Google Scholar
Ervas, F., Gola, E., & Rossi, M. G. (2017). Metaphor in communication, science and education. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1996). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
(2008). Rethinking metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 53–67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. (2016). Pictorial and multimodal metaphor. In N. Klug, & H. Stöckl (Eds.), Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext (pp. 241–260). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D (1982). Are scientific analogies metaphors? In D. Miall (Ed.), Metaphor: Problems and perspectives. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Harvester Press and Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & B. Bowdle (2001). Convention, form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3&4), 223–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Psychology of metaphor processing. In L. Nadel (Ed.), The encyclopedia of cognitive science. New York: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., Bowdle, B., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C. (2001). Metaphor is like analogy. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp.199–253). Cambridge MA, MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2011). Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Do pragmatic signals affect conventional metaphor understanding? A failed test of deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 77–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) (Ed.). Mixing metaphors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Cameron, L. (2008). The social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Cognitive Systems Research, 9, 64–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Chen, E. (2018). Metaphor and the automatic mind. Metaphor & the Social World, 8(1), 40–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Colston, H. L. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. & Matlock, T. (2008). Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.161–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, T. D. (2008). Motives for metaphor in scientific and technical communication. Amityville, New York: Baywood.Google Scholar
Giora, R. (2008). Is metaphor unique? In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.143–160). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). How metaphors create categories – quickly. In: R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.67–84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & McGlone, M. S. (1993). Conceptual metaphors are not automatically accessed during idiom comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 21(5), 711–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999). When love is not a journey: What metaphors mean. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1541–1558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grady, J. E. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Grassby, R. (2005). Material culture and cultural history. J. Interdisciplinary History, 35(4), 591–603. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hallyn, F. (2000). Metaphor and analogy in the sciences. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, B. J., & Berber-Sardinha, T. (2015). Metaphor in specialist discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holyoak, K. J., & Stamenković, D. (2018). Metaphor comprehension: a critical review of theories and evidence. Psychol Bull, 144(6), 641–671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jamrozik, A., McQuire, M., Cardillo, R. R., & Chatterjee, A. (2016). Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1080–1089. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jäkel, O. (2003). Wie Metaphern Wissen schaffen: Die kognitive Metapherntheorie und ihre Anwendung in Modell-Analysen der Diskursbereiche Geistestätigkeit, Wirtschaft, Wissenschaft und Religion (Philologia: Sprachwissenschaftliche Forschungsergebnisse 59). Hamburg: Dr. Kovac.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, S. (2003). Scientific Metaphors Going Public. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1247–1263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Communicating novel and conventional scientific metaphors: A study of the development of the metaphor of genetic code. Public Understanding of Science, 14(4), 373–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). A mere metaphor? Framings of the concept of metaphor in biological specialist communication. In J. B. Herrmann, & T. B. Sardinha (Eds.), Metaphor in specialist discourse (pp.191–214). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, V. (2003). Metaphor clusters, metaphor chains: analyzing the multifunctionality of metaphor in text. metaphorik.de, 05, 115–133.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kretz, D. R. & Krawczyk, D. C. (2014). Expert analogy use in a naturalistic setting. Frontiers in Psychology. 5, p.1333. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd edition) (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., &. Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lederer, J. (2016). Finding metaphorical triggers through source (not target) domain lexicalization patterns, Proceedings of The Fourth Workshop on Metaphor in NLP, 1–9.Google Scholar
Letzer, R. (2018) Mysterious leptoquarks could bind both types of matter. That is, if they exist. [URL], accessed 25 Jan 2019.Google Scholar
Liu, D (2016). The cell and protoplasm as container, object, and substance, 1835–1861, J Hist Biol, 50(4), 889–925. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Määttänen, P. (2005). Meaning as use: Peirce and Wittgenstein. In F. Stadler, & M. Stöltzner (Eds.), Twenty-eighth international Wittgenstein symposium, ALWS archives, [URL], accessed 16 Jan 2019.Google Scholar
Miller, A. (2000). Metaphor and scientific creativity. In F. Hallyn (Ed.), Metaphor and analogy in the sciences (pp.147–164). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGlone, M. S. (1996). Conceptual metaphors and figurative language interpretation: Food for thought? Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 20–67.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Waking metaphors: Embodied cognition in multimodal discourse. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp.297–317). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nacey, S. (2013). Metaphors in learner English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nerlich, B., Elliott R., & Larson, B. (2009). Communicating biological sciences: Ethical and metaphorical dimensions. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Núñez, R. E. (2000). Conceptual metaphor and the embodied mind: What makes mathematics possible? In F. Hallyn (Ed.), Metaphor and analogy in the sciences (pp 125–145). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oļehnoviča, I., & Liepa, S. (2016). The interplay of literal and metaphorical meanings in printed advertisement. Procedia – Social and behavioral sciences, 231, 25–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortony, A. (1979). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1993). The role of similarities in similes and metaphors. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.342–356). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortony, A., & Fainsilber, L. (1987). The role of metaphors in descriptions of emotions. In Proceedings of the 1987 workshop on theoretical issues in natural language processing, TINLAP 1987 (pp.181–184). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Patterson, K. J. (2017). Lexical priming and metaphor – Evidence of nesting in metaphoric language. In M. Pace-Sigge, & K. J. Patterson (Eds.), Lexical priming: Applications and advances (pp.42–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M. (2015). Deliberate metaphors in political discourse, Metaphor and the Social World, 5(2), 165–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reijnierse, W. G. (2017). The value of deliberate metaphor. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Richland, L. E., Zur, O., & Holyoak, K. J. (2007). Cognitive supports for analogies in the mathematics classroom Science, 316, 1128–1129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schön, D. A. and Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2011). The adaptation of metaphors across genres. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 130–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). A corpus-based study of ‘mixed metaphor’ as a metalinguistic comment. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp.203–223). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Semino, E., Deignan, A., & Littlemore, J. (2013). Metaphor, genre, and recontextualization. Metaphor and Symbol, 28, 41–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., & Demmen, J. (2016). An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse, and practice, with an application to metaphors for cancer. Applied Linguistics (Advance Access), 1–22.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M. A. (1985). Analogies, visualization, and mental processing of science stories. Paper presented to the Information Systems Division of the International Communications Association, Honolulu, HI, May 1985.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2008). A deflationary account of metaphors. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.84–108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. H. (2009). When experts educate, what do their metaphors say? Complex metaphor structure in the professional conflict resolution literature, Ibérica: Journal of the European Association of Languages for Specific Purposes (número monográfico sobre metáfora y lFE, special issue on metaphor and LSP), 17, 175–196.Google Scholar
(2015). Dynamical systems metaphors. In J. B. Herrmann, & T. B. Sardinha (Eds.), Metaphor in specialist discourse (pp.215–244). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 213–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). When is metaphor deliberate? In C. Alm-Arvius, N.-L. Johannesson, & D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected papers from the 2008 Stockholm Metaphor Festival (pp.43–65). Stockholm: University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
(2011a). The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 26–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011b). What does ‘really deliberate’ really mean?: More thoughts on metaphor and consciousness. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 53–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Developing, testing and interpreting deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 67–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017a). Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017b). Attention to metaphor: Where embodied cognition and social interaction can meet, but may not often do so. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp.279–297). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, B. J., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C., & Dewsbury, B. M. (2018). On the problem and promise of metaphor use in science and science communication. J Microbiol Biol Educ., 19(1), 46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, P., Winneg, A., Frantz, C., & Flusberg, S. (2016). The mind is an ecosystem: Systemic metaphors promote systems thinking. Metaphor and the Social World, 6(2), 225–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veale, T. & Keane, M. (1992). Conceptual scaffolding: A spatially founded meaning representation for metaphor comprehension. Computational Intelligence, 8, 494–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veale, T. (2014). Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Metaphor in NLP, pages 52–60, Baltimore, MD, USA, 26 June 2014. c 2014 Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2008). Metaphor from body and culture. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.247–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.