Chapter published in:
How Metaphors Guide, Teach and Popularize Science
Edited by Anke Beger and Thomas H. Smith
[Figurative Thought and Language 6] 2020
► pp. 175–208

Chapter 6
Non-verbal and multimodal metaphors bring biology into the picture

| Universidad de Granada
The relationship between multimodality and cognitive effects has become an important topic of discussion in Cognitive Linguistics. A growing number of studies explore the multimodal manifestations of figurative thought in a wide range of domains. However, little research has been done on visual and auditory metaphor in science. This chapter examines (i) pictures from a corpus of publications covering different biology subdomains and (ii) video clips that feature animals and biological processes. The corpus includes expert material and popular science resources. Empirical evidence is provided that visuals, non-verbal sounds, and words work either separately or together to construe metaphors, which have a major role in building scientific theories in biology and in communicating these theories to laypeople and learners.
Keywords: nonverbal and multimodal metaphor, biology, expert and non-expert communication, resemblance and non-resemblance metaphors, productivity, effectiveness
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Objectives of the study
  • 3.Monomodality
    • 3.1Static images: Pictures
      • 3.1.1Tree metaphors
      • 3.1.2Other pictorial metaphors
      • 3.1.3Summary of contents
    • 3.2Dynamic images: Animal body language
      • 3.2.1The Brazilian wandering spider
      • 3.2.2The Gibb’s sea spider
      • 3.2.3Summary of contents
  • 4.Multimodality
    • 4.1The archerfish
    • 4.2The velvet worm and the harvestman
    • 4.3Summary of contents
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 22 April 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.6.06gom
References
Boyd, R.
(1993) Metaphor and theory change: What is ‘metaphor’ a metaphor for? In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.481–533). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T.
(2003) Making truth: Metaphor in science. Illinois: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Caballero, R.
(2009) Cutting across the senses: Imagery in winespeak and audiovisual promotion. In C. Forceville, & E. Uríos-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor applications of cognitive linguistics (pp.73–94). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cameron, L.
(2003) Metaphor in educational discourse. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. & Müller, C.
(2010) Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dill, L.
(1977) Refraction and the spitting behavior of the archerfish (Toxotes chatareus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2, 169–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, V. & Green, M.
(2006) Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, V.
(2013) Language and time: A cognitive linguistics approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, C.
(2004) Interactions between words and images in lexicography: towards new multimedia dictionaries. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nova Lisboa, LisboaGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C.
(1996) Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London/New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville, & E. Uríos-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor applications of cognitive linguistics (pp.19–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Forceville, C. & Uríos-Aparisi, E.
(2009) Multimodal metaphor applications of cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. & Colston, S.
(2006) The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (pp.239–268). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goldman, K.
(1997) Regulation of body temperature in the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias . Journal of Comparative Physiology, 167, 423–429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J.
(1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
(1999) A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance. In G. Steen, & R. Gibbs (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp.79–100). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, H.
(2005) Darwin’s ‘tree of nature’ and other images of wide scope. In H. Gruber, & K. Bodeker (Eds.), Creativity, psychology and the history of science (pp.241–257). New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hampe, B.
(Ed.) (2005) From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, M. B.
(1974) The structure of scientific inference. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hesse, M.
(1993) Models, metaphors, and truth. In F. R. Ankersmit, & J. J. A. Mooij (Eds.), Knowledge and language (Vol. III: Metaphor and knowledge) (pp.49–66). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, S.
(2003) Scientific metaphors going public. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(8), 1247–1263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koller, V.
(2009) Brand images: Multimodal metaphor in corporate branding messages. In C. Forceville, & E. Uríos-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor applications of cognitive linguistics (pp.45–71). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Larson, B.
(2009) Should scientists advocate? The case of promotional metaphors in environmental science. In N. Brigitte, R. Elliot, & B. Larson, Communicating biological sciences (pp.169–183). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Maran, T., Martinelli, D., & Turovski, A.
(2011) Readings in zoosemiotics. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martinelli, D.
(2010) A critical companion to zoosemiotics. London/New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Let’s get physical! On the zoosemiotics of corporeality. Biosemiotics, 4, 259–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martins, R., & Bertani, R.
(2007) The non-Amazonian species of the Brazilian wandering spiders of the genus Phoneutria Perty, 1833 (Araneae: Ctenidae), with the description of a new species. Zootaxa, 1526(5), 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Medina, E., Jones, G., & Fitzpatrick, D.
(2011) Reconstructing the fungal tree of life using phylogenomics and a preliminary investigation of the distribution of yeast prion-like proteins in the fungal kingdom. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 73, 116–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moore, K.
(2006) Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), 199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nelkin, D.
(1994) Promotional metaphors and their popular appeal. Public Understanding of Science, 3, 25–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, X. & Jackson, R.
(2009) Aggressive use of Batesian mimicry by an ant-like jumping spider. Biology Letters, 5, 755–757. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Núñez, R.
(2008) Conceptual metaphor, human cognition, and the nature of mathematics. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.339–362). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Popova, Y.
(2005) Image schemas and verbal synaesthesia. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp.395–419). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, A., Leube, D., Erb, M., Grodd, W., & Kircher, T.
(2004) Neural correlates metaphor processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 395–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, T. W.
(2005) Your highness: vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Temmerman, R.
(2000) Towards new ways of terminology description. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Sociocultural situatedness of terminology in the life sciences: The history of splicing. In T. Ziemke, J. Zlatev, & R. M. Frank (Eds.), Body, language, and mind (Vol. II) (pp.327–360). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ureña, J. M.
(2011) Metaphor in specialised language: An English-Spanish comparative study in marine biology. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Granada: University of Granada, Spain.Google Scholar
(2014) The role of image schemas and superior psychic faculties in zoosemiosis. Biosemiotics, 7(3), 405–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Refining the understanding of novel metaphor in specialised language discourse. Terminology, 22(1), 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ureña, J. M., & Faber, P.
(2010) Reviewing imagery in resemblance and non-resemblance metaphors. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 123–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ureña, J. M., Faber, P., & Buendía, M.
(2013) Frame blending in specialized language: Harmful algal bloom. Terminology, 19(2), 175–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watson, A., Spyrou, P., & Tall, D.
(2003) The relationship between physical embodiment and mathematical symbolism: The concept of vector. Mediterranean Journal in Mathematics Education, 2, 73–97.Google Scholar
Zbikowski, L.
(2009) Music, language, and multimodal metaphor. In C. Forceville, & E. Uríos-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor applications of cognitive linguistics (pp.359–381). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar