Chapter published in:
Relevance Theory, Figuration, and Continuity in Pragmatics
Edited by Agnieszka Piskorska
[Figurative Thought and Language 8] 2020
► pp. 122
References
Athanasiadou, A.
(2017) Introduction. Figurative thought, figurative language, figurative grammar? In A. Athanasiadou (Ed.), Studies in figurative thought and language (pp. 1–14). John Benjamins, Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L.
(1983) Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition, 11(3), 211–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, D.
(1987) Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2008) Apposition and affective communication. Language and Literature, 17(1), 37–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carston, R.
(2002) Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Metaphor: Ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental images. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 110 (3), 297–323.Google Scholar
(2012) Metaphor and the literal/nonliteral distinction. In K. Allan, & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 469–92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) The heterogeneity of procedural meaning. Lingua, 175–176, 154–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carston, R., & Wearing, C.
(2015) Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 79, 79–92. . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, B.
(1996) Stylistic analysis and relevance theory. Language and Literature, 5, 163–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Salient inferences: Pragmatics and the inheritors. Language and Literature, 18, 173–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L.
(2015) Using figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Pragmatic effects in blended figures. The case of metaphtonymy. In A. Athanasiadou (Ed.), Studies in figurative thought and language (pp. 273–294). John Benjamins, Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L., & O’Brien, J.
(2000) Contrast of kind versus contrast of magnitude: The pragmatic accomplishment of irony and hyperbole. Discourse Processes, 30 (2), 179–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Falkum, I.
(2011) The semantics and pragmatics of polysemy: A relevance-theoretic account. PhD Thesis. London: UCL.Google Scholar
Falkum, I. L.
(2019) Metaphor and metonymy in acquisition. A relevance-theoretic perspective. In K. Scott, R. Carston, & B. Clark (Eds.), Relevance: Pragmatics and interpretation (pp. 205–217). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gutt, E.-A.
(2000) Translation and relevance. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Hall, A.
(2017) Lexical pragmatics, explicature and ad hoc concepts. In I. Depraetere & R. Salkie (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics: Drawing a line (pp. 85–100). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ifantidou, E.
(2001) Evidentials and relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jodłowiec, M.
(2015) The challenges of explicit and implicit communication. A relevance-theoretic approach. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jodłowiec, M., & Piskorska, A.
(2015) Metonymy revisited: Towards a new relevance-theoretic account. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12 (2), 161–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherern, K., & Frijda, N. H.
(2013) Appraisal Theories of Emotion: State of the Art and Future Development. Emotion Review, 5(2), 119–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Padilla Cruz, M.
(2015) On the role of vigilance in the interpretation of puns. Humor, 28(3), 469–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A.
(1996) On metonymy. Lingua, 99, 169–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piskorska, A.
(2017) Editorial: relevance theory and intercultural communication problems. Research in Language, 15(1), 1–9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Popa, M.
(2010) Ironic metaphor: A case for metaphor’s contribution to truth-conditions In E. Wałaszewska, M. Kisielewska-Krysiuk & A. Piskorska (Eds.) In the mind and across minds: A relevance-theoretic perspective on communication and translation (pp. 224–245). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Scott, K.
(2017) Prosody, procedures and pragmatics. In I. Depraetere & R. Salkie (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics: Drawing a line (pp. 323–341). Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D.
(2002) In defense of massive modularity. In E. Dupoux (Ed.), Language, brain and cognitive development: essays in honor of Jacques Mehler (pp. 47–57). Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Modularity and relevance: How can a massively modular mind be flexible and context-sensitive? In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind: structure and content (pp. 53–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition (1st ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1995) Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.) Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1998a) Irony and relevance: A reply to Seto, Hamamoto and Yamanashi. In R. Carston, & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance theory. Applications and implications (pp. 283–293). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998b) The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. In P. Carruthers, & J. Boucher (Eds.), Thought and language (pp. 184–200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) A Deflationary account of metaphors. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 84–105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D.
(2010) Epistemic Vigilance. Mind & Language, 25/4, 359–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uchida, S.
(1998) Text and relevance. In R. Carston, & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance theory. Applications and implications (pp. 161–178). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Unger, C.
(2011) Exploring the borderline between procedural encoding and pragmatic inference. In V. Escandell-Vidal, M. Leonetti & A. Ahern (Eds.), Procedural meaning: Problems and perspectives (pp. 103–127). Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Wharton, T.
(2009) Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Prosody and meaning: Theory and practice. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Pragmatics and prosody in English language teaching (pp. 97–116). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, T., & Strey, C.
(2019) Slave of the passions. Making emotions relevant. In K. Scott, R. Carston, & B. Clark (Eds.), Relevance: Pragmatics and interpretation (pp. 253–266). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.Google Scholar
Wilson, D.
(2000) Metarepresentation in linguistic communication. In D. Sperber (Ed.), Metarepresentations (pp. 411–448). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua, 116, 1722–1743. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011a) Parallels and differences in the treatment of metaphor in relevance theory and cognitive linguistics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(2), 177–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011b) Relevance theory and the interpretation of literary works. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 23, 47–68.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
(2011c) The conceptual-procedural distinction: Past, present and future. In V. Escandell-Vidal, M. Leonetti & A. Ahern (Eds.), Procedural meaning: Problems and perspectives (pp. 3–31). Emerald Group Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D.
(2013) Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 59(A): 40–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Explaining metonymy. Paper delivered at Relevance Round Table Meeting 4. Institute of English Studies, Jagiellonian University in Kraków.Google Scholar
(2016) Reassessing the conceptual-procedural distinction. Lingua, 175–176, 5–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Relevance theory and literary interpretation. In T. Cave, & D. Wilson (Eds.), Reading beyond the code: Literature and relevance theory (pp. 185–204). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D., & Carston, R.
(2007) A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In N. Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 230–259). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D.
(1993) Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua, 90, 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Explaining Irony. In Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. Relevance and meaning (pp. 123–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D., & Wharton, T.
(2006) Relevance and prosody. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(10), 1559–1579. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yus, F.
(2003) Humor and the search for relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1295–1331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar