Chapter 9
Tropes of ill repute
Puns and (often thwarted) expectations of relevance
Puns, a form of figurative language exploiting ambiguity in its many guises, tend to be regarded as
a trope of lesser value. The present article explores this tainted reputation of puns in the light of the
relevance-theoretic model of utterance interpretation and attributes it to the fact that like no other figure
of speech they often thwart our expectations of relevance. Moreover, many of them do so boldly, conspicuously,
thus making us particularly likely to take note of the emotional reactions we experience and to articulate
them. The article identifies six ways in which puns may go against our expectations about verbal inputs and
attempts to specify the possible negative consequences this may have for our perception of puns.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Puns as ‘wayward’ stylistic devices
- 3.Vocalizations that cash in on ambiguity
-
homonymy:
-
polysemy:
-
homophony:
-
imperfect homophony:
-
paronymy:
- 4.Puns as victims of the western flight from ambiguity
- 5.Puns as deviations from linguistic and communicative norms
- 5.1Puns as mistakes or anomalies
- 5.2Puns as violations of gricean maxims of conversation
- 6.Relevance-theoretic model and the perception of puns
- 6.1Reservations about the model’s adequacy for tackling the emotional reactions to puns
- 6.2A tainted concept: Hanging a dog that’s been given a bad name
- 6.3Key properties of punning utterances
- 6.4Language users’ expectations about verbal inputs and the ways they are subverted in puns
- 7.Consequences of puns falling short of expectations of relevance
- 7.1The ‘Necker cube effect’: Unease at being unable to disambiguate
- 7.2Nothing but sound? Irritation at the punster’s sometimes dubious informative intention
- 7.3Offering ‘fool’s gold’: Annoyance at the often problematic cognitive effects
- 7.4‘Here we go again’: Resentment at being made to do the same mental work twice
- 7.5I seem to be missing something: The embarrassment at failing to construct an adequate context
- 7.6The indignation at being made to ponder the inner workings of verbal processing
- 8.Concluding remarks
-
Notes
-
References
References (58)
References
Adamczyk, M. (2006). The
formal composition of puns in Shakespeare’s Love’s Labour’s Lost: A corpus-based
study. Studia Anglica
Posnaniensia, 42, 301–321.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Addison, J. ([1711]). False
wit: Punning. The
Spectator, 10 May 1711, no. 61. [URL]
Alderson, S. J. (1996). The
Augustan attack on the pun. Eighteenth century
life 20(3), 1–19.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alrasheedi, E. S. (2014). The
use of covert communication, irony and puns in print and online English advertising: A
relevance-theoretic account. International Journal of Humanities and
Social
Science, 4(12), 70–79.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic
theories of humor. New York: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Attridge, D. (1988). Upacking the portmanteau; Or who’s afraid of Finnegan’s Wake? In Culler, J. (Ed.), On puns. The foundation of letters. Oxford/New York: Basil Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boswell, J. ([1791]/1980). Life
of Johnson. In R. W. Chapman (Ed.), James
Boswell: Life of Johnson.
Unabridged. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boring, E. G. (1930). A
new ambiguous figure. American Journal of
Psychology, 42, pp. 444–445. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts
and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit
communication. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chovanec, J. (2005). Czeching
out puns and clichés in football
reporting. In J. Chovanec (Ed.), Theory
and practice in English
studies 3 (pp. 61–67). Brno: Masarykova Univerzita.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Christopher. (2017). How
to use a squat toilet. China
Highlights, DOA June 1, 2017. [URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Craig, D. H. (Ed.). (2005). Ben Johnson: A critical heritage. London and New York: Routledge![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dor, D. (2003). On
newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers. Journal of
Pragmatics, 35, 675–721. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dryden, J. (1672/2005). Defence
of the epilogue; or, an essay on the dramatic poetry of the last
age. In D. H. Craig (Ed.) Ben
Johnson: A critical heritage. London and New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dynel, M. (2010). How
do puns bear relevance. In M. Kisielewska-Krysiuk, A. Piskorska, & E. Wałaszewska (Eds.), Relevance
studies In
Poland. Volume 3 (pp. 105–124). Warsaw: University of Warsaw Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Empson, W. (1953). Seven
types of ambiguity. New York: New Directions Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R. W. Jr., & Colston, H. L. (2012). Interpreting
figurative meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giora, R. (2003). On
our mind: Salience, context, and figurative
language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goddard, A. (1998). The
language of
advertising. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic
and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax
and semantics. Volume 3: Speech
acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guthrie, W. 1840. M. T. Cicero De oratore. Or, his three dialogues upon the character and qualifications of an orator. Translated into English with notes historical and explanatory, and an introductory preface. Oxford: Henry Slatter. [URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmes, O. W. Sr. (1858/1955). The
autocrat of the breakfast table. New York: Heritage Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jones, R. F. (1932). Science
and language in England of the mid-seventeenth century. The Journal of
English and Germanic
Philology, 31, 315–331.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaplan, A. (1955). An
experimental study of ambiguity and context. Mechanical
Translation, 2(2), 39–46.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lamb, C. (1838). The
works of Charles Lamb to which are prefixed his letters. New York: Harper and Brothers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, G. N. (1969). A
linguistic guide to English
poetry. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levine, D. N. (1985). The
flight from ambiguity: Essays in social and cultural
theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Necker, L. A. (1832). Observations
on some remarkable optical phenomena seen in Switzerland; and on an optical phenomenon which occurs on
viewing a figure of a crystal or geometrical solid. The London and
Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine and Journal of
Science, 1(5), pp. 329 – 337![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nidditch, P. (Ed.). (1975). An
essay concerning human understanding in four books: Clarendon edition of the works of John
Locke (p. 10). Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mahood, M. M. (1968). Shakespeare’s
wordplay. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mathews, W. (1988). Wit
and humor: Their use and
abuse. Chicago: SC. Griggs and Company.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McArthur, T. (Ed.). (1992). The
Oxford companion to the English
language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McDonald, N. (Ed.) (2006). Medieval
obscenities. York: York Medieval Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norrick, N. R. (1984). Stock
conversational witticisms. Journal of
Pragmatics, 8, 195–209. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1925/1948). The
dehumanization of art and other essays on art, culture and literature [La deshumanización del arte e ideas sobre la
novela]. Princeton: Princeton University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ortony, A. (1975). Why
metaphors are necessary and not just nice. Educational
Theory, 25, 45–53. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Padilla Cruz, M. (2005). On
the phatic interpretation of utterances: A complementary relevance-theoretic
approach. Revista Alicantina de Estudios
Ingleses, 18, 227–246. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Padilla Cruz, M. (2015). On
the role of vigilance in the interpretation of
puns. Humor, 28(3), 469–90.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pollack, J. (2011). The
pun also rises: How the humble pun revolutionized language, changed history, and made wordplay more
than some antics. New York: Gotham Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Read, S. (2007). Puns:
Serious wordplay. In S. Adamson, G. Alexander & K. Ettenhuber (Eds.), Renaissance
Figures of
Speech (pp. 81–94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Redfern, W. (1984). Puns. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sheridan, T. (1719/2010). Ars
Punnica. Farmington Hills, Mich.: Gale Ecco.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sherry, R. (1550/2012).
A
treatise of schemes and tropes very profytable for the better vnderstanding of good
authors. London: Tredition Classics. [URL]
Solska, A. (2012a). Relevance-theoretic
comprehension procedure and processing multiple meanings in paradigmatic
puns. In E. Wałaszewska, & A. Piskorska (Eds.), Relevance
theory: More than
understanding (pp. 167–182). New Castle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Solska, A. (2012b). The
relevance-based model of context in processing puns. Research in
Language, 10(4), 387–404. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Solska, A. (2012c). The
relevance of the juxtaposition of meanings in
puns. In W. Skrzypczak, T. Fojt, & S. Wacewicz (Eds.), Exploring
language through
contrast (pp. 184–200). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Solska, A. (2013). Between politeness and impoliteness: the face-work of punning. Paper presented at the 1st Sosnowiec Symposium on Communication Across Cultures: Face and Interactions, 26–27 April 2013, University of Silesia, Poland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Solska, A. (2017). Degrees
of ‘punniness’? A relevance-theoretic account of puns and pun-like
utterances. In A. Piskorska, & E. Wałaszewska (Eds.), Applications
of relevance theory: From discourse to
morphemes (pp. 198–222). New Castle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Solska, A & Rojczyk. A. (2015). Appreciation
of purposive ambiguity: the relevance of puns in city promotional
slogans. In D. Gabryś-Barker (Ed.), Topics
in applied
psycholinguistics (pp. 61–80). Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Solska, A. & Rojczyk. A. (2016). "Experience Our Sense of Yuma”: puns and humor in city promotional slogans. Paper presented at the Linguistic Approaches to Funniness, Amusement and Laughter (LAFAL) 4th International Symposium: Theoretical Issues in Humour: Building Bridges across Disciplines, 17–18 March 2016, University of Łódź, Poland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, D & Wilson, D. (1986/1995). Relevance:
Communication and cognition, 2nd
ed. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swift, J. (1716/1939).
Modest
defence of punning
. In H. Davis (Ed.), Prose
Works. Volume 4 (pp. 205–210). Oxford Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tanaka, K. (1992). The
pun in
advertising. Lingua, 87, 91–103. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tanaka, K. (1994). Advertising
language: A pragmatic approach to advertisements in Britain and
Japan. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Mulken, M., van Enschot-van Dijk, R., & Hoeken, H. (2005). Puns,
relevance and appreciation in advertisements. Journal of
Pragmatics, 37, 707–721. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, D., & Sperber D. (2004). Relevance
theory. In G. Ward, & L. Horn (Eds.), Handbook
of
pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yus, F. (2003). Humor
and the search for relevance. Journal of
Pragmatics, 35, 1295–1331. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yus, F. (2016). Humor
and relevance. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Solska, Agnieszka
2023.
The interpretative non-prototypicality of puns as a factor in the emergence of humor and in phatic communication.
Intercultural Pragmatics 20:2
► pp. 133 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.