Chapter published in:
Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language
Edited by Annalisa Baicchi
[Figurative Thought and Language 9] 2020
► pp. 1344
Anaki, D. & Henik, A.
(2017) Bidirectionality in synesthesia and metaphor. Poetics Today, 28(1), pp. 141–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barnden, J. A.
(2001a) Uncertainty and conflict handling in the ATT-Meta context-based system for metaphorical reasoning. In V. Akman, P. Bouquet, R. Thomason & R. A. Young (Eds), Modeling and Using Context: Third International and Interdisciplinary Conference. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2116, pp. 15–29. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001b) Application of the ATT-Meta metaphor-understanding approach to various examples in the ATT-Meta project databank. Technical Report CSRP–01–02, School of Computer Science, The University of Birmingham, U.K.Google Scholar
(2006) Consequences for language learning of an AI approach to metaphor. In J. Salazar, M. Amengual & M. Juan (Eds), Usos Sociales del Lenguaje y Aspectos Psicolingüísticos: Perspectivas Aplicadas, pp. 15–57. Palma, Mallorca: Universitat de les Illes Baleares.Google Scholar
(2009) Metaphor and context: A perspective from artificial intelligence. In A. Musolff & J. Zinken (Eds), Metaphor and Discourse, pp. 79–94. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), pp. 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Open-ended elaborations in creative metaphor. Invited chapter for Besold, T. R., Schorlemmer, M. & Smaill, A. (Eds.) Computational Creativity Re- search: Towards Creative Machines, pp. 217–242. Atlantis Press (Springer). (Series: Atlantis Thinking Machines, Vol. 7.)Google Scholar
(2016a) Mixed metaphor: Its depth, its breadth, and a pretence-based approach. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), Mixing Metaphor, pp. 75–111. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2016b) Communicating flexibly with metaphor: A complex of strength- ening, elaboration, replacement, compounding and unrealism. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 14(2), pp. 442–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016c) Metaphor and simile: Categorizing and comparing categorization and comparison. In Gola, E. & Ervas, F. (Eds), Metaphor and Communication, pp. 25–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barnden, J. A., Glasbey, S. R., Lee, M. G. & Wallington, A. M.
(2004) Varieties and directions of inter-domain influence in metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(1), pp. 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barnden, J. A.
Barnden, J. A. & Lee, M. G.
(2002) An artificial intelligence approach to metaphor understanding. In Tomasz Komendzinski (Ed.), “Metaphor: A Multidisciplinary Approach,” a special issue, Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, 6 (1), pp. 399–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barnden, J. A. & Wallington, A. M.
(2010) Metaphor and its unparalleled meaning and truth. In A. Burkhardt & B. Nerlich (Eds), Tropical Truth(s): The Epistemology of Metaphor and Other Tropes, pp. 85–121. Berlin / New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergen, B.
(2015) Embodiment, simulation and meaning. In N. Riemer (Ed.) The Rout- ledge Handbook of Semantics, pp. 142–157. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L.
(2000) Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, pp. 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, L. & Ramscar, M.
(2002) The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), pp. 185–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowdle, B. F. & Gentner, D.
(2005) The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), pp. 193–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brians, P.
(2003) Common errors in English usage. Franklin, Beedle & Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A. & Steen, G. J.
(2016) Figurative framing: Shaping public dis- course through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony. Communication Theory, 26, pp. 410–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, R. M. J. & Johnson-Laird, P. N.
(1989) Spatial reasoning. J. Memory and Language, 28(5), pp. 564–575. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Camp, E.
(2009) Two varieties of literary imagination: Metaphor, fiction, and thought experiments. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 23, pp. 107–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
forthcoming). Imaginative frames for scientific inquiry: metaphors, telling facts, and just-so stories. In P. Godfrey-Smith & A. Levy Eds The Scientific Imagination Oxford Oxford University Press Crossref
Carston, R. & Wearing, C.
(2011) Metaphor, hyperbole and simile: A pragmatic approach. Language and Cognition, 3(2): pp. 283–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D. & Gijssels, T.
(2015) What makes a metaphor an embodied metaphor? Linguistics Vanguard, 1(1): 327–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chan, K. Q., Tong, E. M. W., Tan, D. H. & Koh, A. H. Q.
(2013) What do love and jealousy taste like? Emotion, 13(6), pp. 1142–1149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cian, L.
(2017) Verticality and conceptual metaphors: A systematic review. J. Association for Consumer Research, 2(4), published online 21 September 2017: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Denke, C., Rotte, M., Heinze, H.-J. & Schaefer, M.
(2016) Lying and the subsequent desire for toothpaste: Activity in the somatosensory cortex predicts embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor. Cerebral Cortex, 26, pp. 477–484.Google Scholar
Desai, R. H., Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., Mano, Q. R. & Seidenberg, M. S.
(2011) The neural career of sensory-motor metaphors. J. Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), pp. 2376–2386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Desai, R. H., Conant, L. L., Binder, J. R., Park, H. & Seidenberg, M. S.
(2013) A piece of the action: Modulation of sensory-motor regions by action idioms and metaphors. NeuroImage, 83, pp. 862–869. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dong, P., Huang, X. & Zhong, C.-B.
(2015) Ray of hope: Hopelessness increases prefer- ences for brighter lighting. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(1), pp. 84–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A.
(2008) Pretense for the complete idiom. Noûs, 42(3), pp. 381–409. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M.
(2008) Rethinking metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, pp. 53–66. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D.
(1983) Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7 (2), pp. 95–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. & Bowdle, B. F.
(2001) Convention, form and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3&4), pp. 223–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. & Gentner, D. R.
(1983) Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds), Mental Models, pp. 99–129. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr.
(2006) Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind and Language, 21(3), pp. 434–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr & Matlock, T.
(2008) Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, pp. 161–176. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr & Santa Cruz, M. J.
(2012) Temporal unfolding of conceptual metaphoric experience. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(4), pp. 299–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S.
(2001) Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goatly, A.
(1997) The language of metaphors. London and New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J. E.
(1997) THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), pp. 267–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hampe, B.
(Ed.) (2017a) Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017b) Embodiment and discourse: dimensions and dynamics of contemporary metaphor theory. In Hampe (2017a), pp. 3–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hannah, S.
(2015) A game for all the family. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Hauser, D. J. & Schwarz, N.
(2015) Elaborative thinking increases the impact of physical weight on importance judgments. Social Cognition, 33(2), pp. 120–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
He, X., Chen, J., Zhang, E., & Li, J.
(2015) Bidirectional associations of power and size in a priming task. J. Cognitive Psychology, 27(3), pp. 290–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y. & Tse, C.-S.
(2015) Re-examining the automaticity and directionality of the activation of the spatial-valence “good is up” metaphoric association. PLoS ONE 10(4): e0123371 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. L. & Estes, Z.
(2005) Metaphor comprehension as attributive categorization. J. Memory and Language, 53, pp. 110–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
(1980/2003) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Second ed. in 2003.)Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Landau, M. J., Meier, B. P. & Keefer, L. A.
(2010) A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), pp. 1045–1067. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landau, M. J., Robinson, M. D. & Meier, B. P.
(Eds) (2014) The power of metaphor: Ex- amining its influence on social life. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langlotz, A.
(2006) Idiom creativity: A cognitive-linguistic model of idiom-representation and idiom-variation in English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. W. S. & Schwarz, N.
(2012) Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. J. Personality and Social Psychology, 103(5), pp. 737–749. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Framing love: When it hurts to think we were made for each other. J. Experimental Social Psychology, 54, pp. 61–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leng, M.
(2010) Mathematics and reality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, S. R.
(1988) Metaphoric worlds. New Haven, CT and London, U.K.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Miles, L., Nind, L. K. & Macrae, C. N.
(2010) Moving through time. Psychological Science OnlineFirst 8 January 2010 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moore, K. E.
(2006) Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), pp. 199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, G. L.
(1996) On metaphoric representation. Cognition, 60, pp. 173–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Reasons to doubt the present evidence for metaphoric representation. Cognition, 62, pp. 99–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rubio Fernaíndez, P.
(2007) Suppression in metaphor interpretation: Differences between meaning selection and meaning construction. J. Semantics, 24, pp. 345–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, I. K., Parzuchowski, M., Wojciszke, B., Schwarz, N. & S. L. Koole
(2015) Weighty data: importance information influences estimated weight of digital information storage devices. Frontiers of Psychology, 5, Article 1536, January 2015 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y. & Porat, R.
(2017) Metaphorical directionality: The role of language. In Hampe (2017a), pp. 62–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J.
(2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Attention to metaphor: where embodied cognition and social interaction can meet, but may not often do so. In Hampe (2017a), pp. 279–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stern, J.
(2000) Metaphor in context. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: Bradford Books, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vervaeke, J. & Kennedy, J. M.
(2004) Conceptual metaphor and abstract thought. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(3), pp. 213–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waggoner, J. E.
(1990) Interaction theories of metaphor: psychological perspectives. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 5 (2), pp. 91–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walton, K.
(2004) Fiction and non-fiction. In E. John & D. M. Lopes (Eds), Philosophy of Literature – Contemporary and Classic Readings: An Anthology, pp. 136–143. Oxford: Blackwell. Excerpted from Mimesis and Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press 1990.Google Scholar
Way, E. C.
(1991) Knowledge representation and metaphor. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, P. & Gentner, D.
(2011) Structure-mapping in metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 35, pp. 1456–1488. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yablo, S.
(2001) Go Figure: A path through fictionalism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 25, pp. 72–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, C.-B. & Liljenquist, K.
(2006) Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, No. 5792 (8 Sep. 2006), pp. 1451–1452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Barnden, John & Andrew Gargett
2020.  In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 october 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.