Cover not available
Part of
Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language
Edited by Annalisa Baicchi
[Figurative Thought and Language 9] 2020
► pp. 129–150

Metaphorical adjective-noun phrases in German journalese

| Université Saint-Louis
The study explores metaphorical adjective-noun phrases (ANPs) and describes the semantics behind the polysemous structure of ANPs. The data for the research have been collected in German newspapers. The whole ANP-construction provides an overall figurative frame and tends to influence the metaphorical use of the adjective in that construction. As the study shows the same syntactic structure can refer to different metaphorical or literal predications. The role of the context is also discussed as well as the nature of the adjective in the ANP.
Keywords: nominal phrase, metaphorical, adjective-noun, journalese, German
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Former research on metaphorical adjective-noun phrases
  • 3.A cognitive linguistics framework for the exploration of ANPs
  • 4.A semantic and conceptual study of metaphorical ANPs
    • 4.1Adjective [literal] + noun [metaphorical]
    • 4.2Adjective [metaphorical] + noun [literal]
    • 4.3Adjective + noun [metaphorical]
    • 4.4Contextual information with pictures
  • 5.The nature of domain adjectives
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.9.06dek
References (33)
References
Aarts, J. M. G. and J. P. Calbert. (1979). Metaphor and Non-Metaphor. The Semantics of Adjective-Noun Combinations. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Admoni, V. (1970). Der deutsche Sprachbau. München: C.H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Bickes, G. (1984). Das Adjektiv im Deutschen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1967. Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication. Lingua 18: 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S. (2006). Semantic Leaps: Frame-shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2003). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in comparison and contrast, 161–206. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
De Knop, S. (2015). Causal constructions with an adjective in German and French: typological and pedagogical considerations. Special issue of Journal of Social Sciences on “Phraseodidactics and Construction Grammar(s)”, edited by M. I. Gonzalez Rey, 11(3): 289–303.Google Scholar
Evans, H. (1974). News Headlines. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. (1996). Blending as a central process of grammar”. In A. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual Structure and Discourse, 113–131. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
. (1998). Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science 22(2): 133–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame Semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Fries, C. C. (1952). The Structure of English. An Introduction to the Construction of English Sentences. London: Longmans, Green and Company.Google Scholar
Gaeta, L. & B. Schlücker. (2012). Das Deutsche als kompositionsfreudige Sprache: Strukturelle Eigenschaften und systembezogene Aspekte. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geckeler, H. (1971). Zur Wortfelddiskussion: Untersuchungen zur Gliederung des Wortfeldes ‘alt-jung-neu’ im heutigen Französisch. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
Grady, J. E. (1997). Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, U. (2004). Vorbemerkungen zum analytischen Sprachtyp in Europa. In Hinrichs, U. & U. Büttner, (Eds.), Die europäischen Sprachen auf dem Wege zum analytischen Sprachtyp, 169–196. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Kalik, A. (1967). L’expression des rapports de déterminé à déterminant (adjectifs de relation). Le Français Moderne 35: 270–285.Google Scholar
Kniffka, H. (1980). Soziolinguistik und empirische Textanalyse: Schlagzeilen- und Leadformulierung in amerikanischen Tageszeitungen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, B. (1988). Métonymies et métaphores adjectivales. Le Français Moderne 3–3: 193–211.Google Scholar
Neubauer, F. (1977). Aspekte der Klassifikation von Adjektiven. In K. Heger and J. S. Petöfi (eds.), Kasustheorie, Klassifikation, semantische Interpretation: Beiträge zur Lexikologie und Semantik, 231–260. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Pérez Sobrino, P. (2015). Expanding the figurative continuum to multimodal settings: Patterns of interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Ph.D. dissertation, Logrono: University of La Rioja.Google Scholar
Primus, B. (1997). Der Wortgruppenaufbau in der Geschichte des Deutschen: Zur Präzisierung von synthetisch vs. analytisch. Sprachwissenschaft 22: 133–159.Google Scholar
Schmid, J. (2012). Metapher. [URL]
Spiegl, F. (1966). What The Papers Didn’t Mean to Say. Liverpool: Scouse Press.Google Scholar
Strohner, H. and G. Stoet. (1999). Cognitive compositionality: An activation and evaluation hypothesis. In M. K. Hiraga, C. Sinha and S. Wilcox (eds.), Cultural, Psychological and Typological Issues in Cognitive Linguistics, 195–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, K. (2013). Frames and Constructions in Metaphoric Language. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E. (1999). Compositionality and blending: semantic composition in a cognitively realistic framework. In T. Janssen & G. Redeker (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope and Methodology, 129–162. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tribushinina, E. (2011). Reference points in adjective-noun conceptual integration networks. In S. Handl and H.-J. Schmid (eds.), Windows to the Mind: Metaphor, Metonymy and Conceptual Blending, 269–290. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warren, Beatrice. (1984). Classifying Adjectives. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Würstle, R. (1992). Überangebot und Defizit in der Wortbildung: eine kontrastive Studie zur Diminutivbildung im Deutschen, Französischen und Englischen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Yergaliyev, K. S., Y. B. Asanbayeva, B. S. Kurakanova & S. Z. Yergaliyeva. (2014). Role and functions of a newspaper headline. Life Science Journal 11(1): 540–543.Google Scholar