References
Aarts, J. M. G. and J. P. Calbert
(1979) Metaphor and Non-Metaphor. The Semantics of Adjective-Noun Combinations. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Admoni, V.
(1970) Der deutsche Sprachbau. München: C.H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Bickes, G.
(1984) Das Adjektiv im Deutschen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1967Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication. Lingua 18: 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S.
(2006) Semantic Leaps: Frame-shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
(2003) The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in comparison and contrast, 161–206. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
De Knop, S.
(2015) Causal constructions with an adjective in German and French: typological and pedagogical considerations. Special issue of Journal of Social Sciences on “Phraseodidactics and Construction Grammar(s)”, edited by M. I. Gonzalez Rey, 11(3): 289–303.Google Scholar
Evans, H.
(1974) News Headlines. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner
(1996) Blending as a central process of grammar”. In A. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual Structure and Discourse, 113–131. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
(1998) Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science 22(2): 133–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
(1982) Frame Semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Fries, C. C.
(1952) The Structure of English. An Introduction to the Construction of English Sentences. London: Longmans, Green and Company.Google Scholar
Gaeta, L. & B. Schlücker
(2012) Das Deutsche als kompositionsfreudige Sprache: Strukturelle Eigenschaften und systembezogene Aspekte. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geckeler, H.
(1971) Zur Wortfelddiskussion: Untersuchungen zur Gliederung des Wortfeldes ‘alt-jung-neu’ im heutigen Französisch. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
Grady, J. E.
(1997) Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, U.
(2004) Vorbemerkungen zum analytischen Sprachtyp in Europa. In Hinrichs, U. & U. Büttner, (Eds.), Die europäischen Sprachen auf dem Wege zum analytischen Sprachtyp, 169–196. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Kalik, A.
(1967) L’expression des rapports de déterminé à déterminant (adjectifs de relation). Le Français Moderne 35: 270–285.Google Scholar
Kniffka, H.
(1980) Soziolinguistik und empirische Textanalyse: Schlagzeilen- und Leadformulierung in amerikanischen Tageszeitungen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, B.
(1988) Métonymies et métaphores adjectivales. Le Français Moderne 3–3: 193–211.Google Scholar
Neubauer, F.
(1977) Aspekte der Klassifikation von Adjektiven. In K. Heger and J. S. Petöfi (eds.), Kasustheorie, Klassifikation, semantische Interpretation: Beiträge zur Lexikologie und Semantik, 231–260. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Pérez Sobrino, P.
(2015) Expanding the figurative continuum to multimodal settings: Patterns of interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Ph.D. dissertation, Logrono: University of La Rioja.Google Scholar
Primus, B.
(1997) Der Wortgruppenaufbau in der Geschichte des Deutschen: Zur Präzisierung von synthetisch vs. analytisch. Sprachwissenschaft 22: 133–159.Google Scholar
Schmid, J.
(2012) Metapher. [URL]
Spiegl, F.
(1966) What The Papers Didn’t Mean to Say. Liverpool: Scouse Press.Google Scholar
Strohner, H. and G. Stoet
(1999) Cognitive compositionality: An activation and evaluation hypothesis. In M. K. Hiraga, C. Sinha and S. Wilcox (eds.), Cultural, Psychological and Typological Issues in Cognitive Linguistics, 195–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, K.
(2013) Frames and Constructions in Metaphoric Language. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E.
(1999) Compositionality and blending: semantic composition in a cognitively realistic framework. In T. Janssen & G. Redeker (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope and Methodology, 129–162. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tribushinina, E.
(2011) Reference points in adjective-noun conceptual integration networks. In S. Handl and H.-J. Schmid (eds.), Windows to the Mind: Metaphor, Metonymy and Conceptual Blending, 269–290. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warren, Beatrice
(1984) Classifying Adjectives. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Würstle, R.
(1992) Überangebot und Defizit in der Wortbildung: eine kontrastive Studie zur Diminutivbildung im Deutschen, Französischen und Englischen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Yergaliyev, K. S., Y. B. Asanbayeva, B. S. Kurakanova & S. Z. Yergaliyeva
(2014) Role and functions of a newspaper headline. Life Science Journal 11(1): 540–543.Google Scholar