Cover not available
Part of
Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language
Edited by Annalisa Baicchi
[Figurative Thought and Language 9] 2020
► pp. 209–222

Metaphorical interplay of words and gestures in the Catholic liturgy

| University of Silesia
This chapter analyzes selected Catholic liturgical rituals as motivated by verbal and gestural metaphors. Lakoff and Johnson (2003/1980) claim that the conceptual systems of religions are of metaphorical nature. The Catholic liturgy contains a number of gestures and movements used in worship, for instance, kneeling, bowing, raising hands, standing up, joining hands together, prostrating, beating oneself in the chest, or washing the hands. These gestures are often accompanied by specific spoken formulas, which express humiliation before God, regret for one’s sins, submission to God, readiness to listen to God’s word, or response to His will. The aim of this Chapter is to show that in line with the claim that metaphor is a multimodal phenomenon (Forceville, 2009), it is possible to interpret the interplay of words and certain liturgical gestures as metaphorical.
Keywords: Catholic liturgy, conceptual metaphor, monomodal metaphor, multimodal metaphor
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Monomodal and multimodal conceptual metaphors
  • 3.Linguistic studies on the Catholic liturgy
  • 4.Gestures in the Catholic liturgy
  • 5.The god is up metaphor in the Catholic liturgy
  • 6.Personifications of god in the Catholic liturgy
  • 7.Metaphors of sin in the Catholic liturgy
  • 8.Metaphors of the christian life in the Catholic liturgy
  • 9.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.9.09kuc
References
(AHD) American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. Fifth edition
(2016) Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Available at [URL]. Accessed 28.10.2017.
Austin, J. L.
(1962) How to Do Things with Words. The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Blachnicki, F.
(2015) Liturgia dialogiem [The liturgy is a dialogue]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Światło-Życie.Google Scholar
(CCC) Catechism of the Catholic Church
(1993) Available at [URL]. Accessed 28.10.2007.
(CED) Collins English Dictionary. Complete and Unabridged. 12th Edition
(2014) Available at [URL]. Accessed 28.10.2017.
Cienki, A.
(2008) Why study metaphor and gesture? In A. Cienki, & C. Müller (Eds.). Metaphor and Gesture (pp. 5–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D.
(1964) A liturgical language in a linguistic perspective. New Blackfriars 1964, 148–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990) A liturgical language in a sociolinguistic perspective. In D. Jasper, & R. C. D. Jasper (Eds.), Language and the Worship of the Church (pp. 120–146). Basingstoke: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Whatever happened to theolinguistics? In P. Chilton, & M. Kopytowska (Eds.). Religious Language, Metaphor, and the Mind (pp. 3–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donghi, A.
(2009) Words and Gestures in the Liturgy. Trans. from Italian by W. McDonough, D. Serra, & T. Bertagni. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
Duffy, M.
(2005) How Language, Ritual and Sacraments Work. According to John Austin, Jürgen Habermas and Louis-Marie Chauvet. Roma: Editrice Pontificia Università Gregoriana.Google Scholar
Forceville, Ch
(2009) Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In Ch. Forceville, & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.). Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 19–44). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forstner, D.
(2001) Świat symboliki chrześcijańskiej. Leksykon [The world of Christian symbols. A lexicon]. Trans. from German by W. Zakrzewska, P. Pachciarek, & R. Turzyński. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy Pax.Google Scholar
Guardini, R.
(1956) Sacred Signs. Trans. from German by G. Branham. St. Louis, MO: Pio Decimo Press.Google Scholar
(1998) The Spirit of the Liturgy. Trans. from German by A. Lane. New York, NY: Crossroad Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2011) The biblical story retold. A cognitive linguistic perspective. In M. Brdar, S. T. Gries, & M. Ž. Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics. Convergence and Expansion (pp. 325–354). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzeszowski, T.
(1997) Angels and Devils in Hell. Elements of Axiology in Semantics. Warszawa: Energeia.Google Scholar
Kuczok, M.
(2009) Metaphor and metonymy as tools for describing God in the Old Testament. Linguistica Silesiana, 30, 151–168.Google Scholar
(2014) The Conceptualisation of the Christian Life in John Henry Newman’s Parochial and Plain Sermons. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(2003/1980) Metaphors We Live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(2008) Metaphoric gesture and cognitive linguistics. In A. Cienki, & C. Müller (Eds.). Metaphor and Gesture (pp. 249–252). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D.
(2005) Gesture and Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. H., Krouse, D. W., & Austin, G.
(2002) Liturgy. In New Catholic Encyclopedia, 2nd edition, vol. 8 (pp. 727–729). New York, NY: Gale.Google Scholar
Müller, C., & Cienki, A.
(2009) Words, gestures, and beyond: Forms of multimodal metaphor in the use of spoken language. In: Ch. Forceville, & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 297–328). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
New American Bible. Revised Edition
(2011) Charlotte, NC: Saint Benedict Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E.
(2000) Blended spaces and performativity. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3/4), 305–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(RM) The Roman Missal
(2011) International Commission on English in the Liturgy Corporation.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kuczok, Marcin
2020. The Interplay of Metaphor and Metonymy in Christian Symbols. Metaphor and Symbol 35:4 ► pp. 236 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.