Cover not available
Review published In:
Gesture
Vol. 1:2 (2002) ► pp.237–259
Book review

David McNeill (Ed.). Language and Gesture
Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press, (2000).

Reviewed by
Published online: 11 July 2002
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.1.2.09swe
References
Armstrong, David F., William C. Stokoe & Sherman E. Wilcox
(1995) Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey W. & R. Aboudan
(1994) Gestures, pauses, and speech: An experimental investigation of the effects of changing social context on their precise temporal relationships. Semiotica 991, 239–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
(1997) Spatial operations in deixis, cognition and culture:Where to orient oneself in Belhare. In Jan Nuyts & Eric Pederson (Eds.), Language and Conceptualization (pp. 46–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, Brian & Geoffrey W. Beattie
(1978) Gesture and silence as indicators of planning in speech. In Robin N. Campbell & Philip T. Smith (Eds.), Recent advances in the psychology of language: Formal and experimental approaches (pp. 347–360). New York: Plenum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, Brian & Uri Hadar
(1989) Gesture, speech and computational stages: A reply to McNeill. Psychological Review 961, 168–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Ruiter, Jan Peter
(1995) Why do people gesture at the telephone? In M. Bieman & M. Woutersen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Center for Language Studies Opening Academic Year 1995–96 (pp. 49–56). Nijmegen: Center for Language Studies.Google Scholar
Duncan, Susan
In press). Perspectives on the co-expressivity of speech and co-speech gestures in three languages. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley CA: The Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Efron, David
(1941/1972) Gesture, race and culture. The Hague: Mouton. (Reprinted from Gesture and Environment. New York: King’s Crown Press.)Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul & Wallace V. Friesen
(1969) The repertoire of non-verbal behavioral catego-ries: Origins, usage and coding. Semiotica 11, 49–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
(1998) Mental spaces, language modalities, and conceptual integration. In Michael Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language (pp. 251–279). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
(1996) Blending as a central process of grammar. In Adele Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language (pp. 113–130). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Freedman, Norbert
(1977) Hands, words and mind: On the structuralization of body movements during discourse and the capacity for verbal representation. In Norbert Freedman & Stanley Grand (Eds.), Communicative structures and psychic structures: A psychoanalytic interpretation of communication (pp. 109–132). New York: Plenum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan
(1993) When does gesture become language? A study of gesture used as a primary communication system by deaf children of hearing parents. In Kathleen R. Gibson & Tim Ingold (Eds.), Tools, Language and Cognition in Human Evolution (pp. 63–85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan & Carolyn Mylander
(1983) Gestural communication in deaf children: The non-effects of parental input on child language development. Science 2211: 372–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Spontaneous sign systems created by deaf children in two cultures. Nature 3911, 279–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanks, William F.
(1990) Referential practice: Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, John B.
(1993) Anchoring, iconicity and orientation in Guugu Yimithirr pointing gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 31, 3–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, Lawrence
(1985) Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 611, 121–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin
(1995) Cognition in the wild. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy & G. Iwata
(1989) Lenguaje de Signos Nicaragüense: A pidgin sheds light on the ‘creole’ ASL. In R. Carlson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Meeting of the Pacific Linguistics Conference (pp. 266–294). Eugene OR: Dept. of Linguistics, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy, Ann Senghas, & Marie E. V. Coppola
(1999) Creation through contact: Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In Michel DeGraff (Ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony and development (pp. 179–237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam
(1980) Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of an utterance. In Mary Ritchie Key (Ed.), The Relationship of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication (pp. 207–228). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
(1990) Signs in the cloister and elsewhere. Semiotica 791, 307–329.Google Scholar
(1995) Gestures as illocutionary and discourse markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 231, 247–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
(1997) Language and cognition: The cognitive consequences of spatial description in Guugu Yimithirr. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 7, 1, 98–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott
(1990) Four functions of a locus: reexamining the structure of space in ASL. In Ceil Lucas (Ed.), Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues (pp. 176–198). Washington, D. C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
(1995) Real, surrogate and token space: grammatical consequences in ASL. In Karen Emmorey & Judy Reilly (Eds.), Language, Gesture and Space (pp. 19–41). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(1998) Grounded blends, gestures, and conceptual shifts. Cognitive Linguistics 9, 3, 283–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayberry, Rachel I., Joselynne Jaques & G. DeDe
(1998) What stuttering reveals about the development of the gesture-speech relationship. In Jana Iverson & Susan Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Nature and Function of Gesture in Children’s Communication (pp. 89–100). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
McNeill, David
(1985) So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review 921, 350–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) A straight path – to where? Reply to Butterworth and Hadar. Psychological Review 961, 175–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992) Hand and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Analogic/analytic representations and cross-linguistic differences in thinking for speaking. Cognitive Linguistics 11, 1/2, 43–60.Google Scholar
McNeill, David, Karl-Erik McCullough & Susan D. Duncan
(2002) An ontogenetic universal and how to explain it. In Cornelia Müller & Roland Posner (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures. Berlin: Weidler.Google Scholar
Mervis, Carolyn & Eleanor Rosch
(1981) Categorization of Natural Objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 321, 89–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
(1977) Human Categorization. In Neil Warren (Ed.), Studies in Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 1–49). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan
(1987) Thinking for speaking. In Jon Aske et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 435–445). Berkeley CA: The Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
(1996) From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In John Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In Susanne Niemeier & René Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for Linguistic Relativity (pp. 107–138). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
(1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) Regular metaphoricity in gesture: Bodily-based models of speech interaction. In CD-ROM Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists, held in Paris in July 1997.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
(1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 56–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1987) The relation of grammar to cognition. In Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics on cognitive linguistics (pp. 165–206). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
(1982) From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Winfried P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (Eds.), Perspectives on Historical Linguistics (pp. 245–271). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 571, 33–65.Google Scholar
(2000) Towards a Cognitive Semantics (21 vols.). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taub, Sarah F.
(2001) Language from the Body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, Mark & Gilles Fauconnier
(1995) Conceptual integration and formal expression. Journal of Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 3, 183–204. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev Semenovitch
(1987) Thinking and speech. In Robert W. Rieber & Aaron S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 1: Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee
(1941/1956) The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language. In John B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (pp. 134–159). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Nuessel, Frank
2007. Gesture and language. Semiotica 2007:166 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.