Previous research on the use of head nods in talk-in-interaction has demonstrated that they can be used for various interactional purposes by speakers and recipients in different sequential positions. In this report, I examine speakers’ uses of nods in “third position”, in the course of “minimal post-expansions” (Schegloff, 2007). I identify three possible distinct types of nods. The first of these can be used to register a prior utterance as news; the second appears to be designed to register receipt of a prior utterance without treating it as news; and the third embodies features of the first two types, and may be designed to register receipt and acknowledgment of “dispreferred” news. These findings are suggestive of rich complexities in the use of head movements in the production of actions-in-interaction, and of the importance of a fine-grained analytic approach for understanding their situated uses.
2021. 2021 International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ► pp. 135 ff.
Koole, Tom & Myrte N. Gosen
2024. Scopes of recipiency: An organization of responses to informings. Journal of Pragmatics 222 ► pp. 25 ff.
Krug, Maximilian
2022. Temporal procedures of mutual alignment and synchronization in collaborative meaning-making activities in a dance rehearsal. Frontiers in Communication 7
Liu, Chen, Kim McDonough, Pavel Trofimovich & Pakize Uludag
2024. Verbal and nonverbal disagreement in an ELF academic discussion task. Applied Linguistics Review 15:1 ► pp. 119 ff.
Maxwell, Madeline M. & Matthew Bruce Ingram
2022. How mediators use reformulation practices to de‐escalate risky moments. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 39:3 ► pp. 221 ff.
Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula, Lena Gialabouki, Angeliki Alvanoudi & Christos Ananiadis
2022. On the recipients’ part: Responding with m/mm (and nods) in Greek conversations. Journal of Pragmatics 199 ► pp. 105 ff.
Schoonjans, Steven
2017. On the relation between (verbal and kinesic) downtoning and illocution type. Yearbook of the Poznan Linguistic Meeting 3:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Sidnell, Jack, N. J. Enfield & Paul Kockelman
2014. Interaction and intersubjectivity. In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 343 ff.
Topal, Pınar & Nur Yiğitoğlu Aptoula
2022. Going beyond the post-observation's interactional agenda: The observers’ references to their practices and pedagogical understandings. Linguistics and Education 69 ► pp. 101016 ff.
2018. Dual feedback in interpreter-mediated interactions: On the role of gaze in the production of listener responses. Journal of Pragmatics 134 ► pp. 15 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.