Review published In:
Gesture
Vol. 11:3 (2011) ► pp.371382
References
Alač, Morana & Edwin Hutchins
(2004) I see what you are saying: action as cognition in fMRI brain mapping practice, Journal of cognition and culture, 4 (3), 629–661.Google Scholar
Button, Graham
(2008) Against ‘distributed cognition’, Theory, Culture & Society, 25 (2), 87–104.Google Scholar
Coulter, Jeff & Ed Parsons
(1991) The praxiology of perception: visual orientations and practical action, Inquiry, 331, 251–72.Google Scholar
Coulter, Jeff & Wes Sharrock
(2007) Brain, mind and human behavior in contemporary cognitive science. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Doing, Park
(2008) Give me a laboratory and I will raise a discipline: the past, present, and future politics of laboratory studies in STS. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Waycman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 277–295). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter
(1997) Image and logic: a material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
(2002) Ethnomethodology’s program: working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold & Harvey Sacks
(1970) On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: perspectives and developments (pp. 337–366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Greiffenhagen, Christian & Rod Watson
(2009) Visual repairables: analysing the work of repair in human-computer interaction, Visual communication, 8 (1), 65–90.Google Scholar
Hackett, Edward J., Olga Amsterdamska, M. Lynch & J. Waycman
(2008) Introduction. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Waycman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 1–7). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin
(1995) Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam
(2004) Gesture: visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, Anna & Lorenza Mondada
(2009) Assessments in social interaction: introduction to the special issue, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42 (4), 299–308.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael
(1985) Art and artifact in laboratory science: a study of shop work and shop talk. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mody, Cyrus C. M. & David Kaiser
(2008) Scientific training and the creation of scientific knowledge. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Waycman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 377–402). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mol, Annemarie
(2002) The body multiple: ontology in medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Quere, Louis
(2008) Les neurosciences fournissent-elles une explication ‘plus’ scientifique des phenomenes socio-culturels? Le cas de la confiance. In B. Lahire & C. Rosental (Eds.), La cognition au prisme des sciences sociales (pp. 23–54). Paris: Edition des archives contemporaines.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert
(2000 (1949)) The concept of mind. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R.
(2001) Introduction: practice theory. In Th. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Slack, Roger, Mark Hartswood, R. Procter & M. Rouncefield
(2007) Cultures of reading: On professional vision and the lived work of mammography. In S. Hester & D. Francis (Eds.), Orders of ordinary action: respecifying sociological knowledge (pp. 175–193). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Watson, Rod
(1992) The understanding of language use in every day life: Is there a common ground? In G. Watson & R. M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in Context: contributions to the ethnomethodology (pp. 1–19). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Watson, Rod & Jeff Coulter
(2008) The debate over cognitivism, Theory, Culture & Society, 25 (2), 1–17.Google Scholar
Wieder, D. Lawrence
(1980) Behavioristic operationalism and the life-world: chimpanzees and chimpanzee researchers in face-to-face interaction, Sociological Inquiry, 501, 75–103.Google Scholar