Article published in:
Where do nouns come from?
Edited by John B. Haviland
[Gesture 13:3] 2013
► pp. 287308
References
Bank, Richard, Onno Crasborn, & Roeland van Hout
(2011) Variations in mouth actions with manual signs in sign language of the Netherlands (NGT). Sign Language & Linguistics, 14 (2), 248–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyatzis, Chris & Malcolm Watson
(1993) Preschool children’s symbolic representation of objects through gestures. Child Development, 64 (3), 729–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyes-Braem, Penny
(1981) Features of the handshape in American sign language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane, Marie Coppola, Laura Mazzoni, & Susan Goldin-Meadow
(2012) When does a system become phonological? Handshape production in gesturers, signers, and homesigners. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 301, 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Cecil
(1995) Lexical acculturation and ethnobiology: Utilitarianism versus intellectualism. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 5 (1), 51–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, Onno & Han Sloetjes
(2008) Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora. Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.
Crasborn, Onno, Els van der Kooij, Dafydd Waters, Bencie Woll, & Johanna Mesch
(2008) Frequency distribution and spreading behavior of different types of mouth actions in three sign languages. Sign Language & Linguistics, 11 (1), 45–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, Harold & Edith Kaplan
(1963) Disturbance of gesture and pantomime in aphasia. Brain, 86 (4), 703–720. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunsicker, Dea & Susan Goldin-Meadow
(2013) How handshape type can distinguish between nouns and verbs in homesign. Gesture, 13 (3), 354–376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Israel, Assaf & Wendy Sandler
(2012) Phonological category resolution: A study of handshapes in younger and older sign languages. In Rachel Channon & Harry van der Hulst (Eds.), Formational units in sign language (pp. 177–202). Nijmegen & Berlin: Ishara Press & Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi
(1979) The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lane, Harlan
(1984) When the mind hears: A history of the deaf (1st ed.). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Lane, Harlan, Richard Pillard, & Ulf Hedberg
(2011) The people of the eye: Deaf ethnicity and ancestry. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott
(2003) Grammar, gesture and meaning in American sign language. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott & Robert Johnson
(1989) American sign language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies, 641, 197–277.Google Scholar
McDonald, Betsy
(1982) Aspects of the American sign language predicate system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Buffalo.Google Scholar
McKee, Rachel & Graeme Kennedy
(2005) New Zealand sign language. In Allan Bell, Ray Harlow, & Donna Starks (Eds.), Languages of New Zealand (pp. 271–297). Wellington: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar
Meir, Irit
(2010) Iconicity and metaphor: Constraints on metaphorical extension of iconic forms. Language, 86 (4), 865–896. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit, Carol Padden, Mark Aronoff, & Wendy Sandler
(2007) Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics, 431, 531–563. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit, Carol Padden, Wendy Sandler, & Mark Aronoff
(2013) Competing iconicities in the structure of sign languages. Cognitive Linguistics, 24 (2), 309–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit, Wendy Sandler, Carol Padden, & Mark Aronoff
(2010) Emerging sign languages. In Marc Marschark & Patricia Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language and education (Vol. 21, pp. 267–280). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, Anne
(1995) Using representations: Comprehension and production of actions with imagined objects. Child Development, 66 (4), 999–1010. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Overton, Willis & Joseph Jackson
(1973) The representation of imagined objects in action sequences: A developmental study. Child Development, 44 (2), 309–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Padden, Carol, Irit Meir, Mark Aronoff, & Wendy Sandler
(2010) The grammar of space in two new sign languages. In Diane Brentari (Ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey (pp. 570–592). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perniss, Pamela, Robin Thompson, & Gabriella Vigliocco
(2010) Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Doi: Crossref.Google Scholar
Pizzuto, Elena & Virginia Volterra
(2000) Iconicity and transparency in sign languages: A cross-linguistic cross-cultural view. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan Lane (Eds.), Signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp. 261–286). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
(2006) Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Carol Padden, & Mark Aronoff
(2005) The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 102 (7), 2661–2665.
Schembri, Adam, Caroline Jones, & Denis Burnham
(2005) Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: Evidence from Australian sign language, Taiwan sign language, and nonsigners’ gestures without speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 20 (3), 272–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schick, Brenda
(1990) The effects of morphological complexity on simplification in ASL. Sign Language Studies, 661, 25–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Supalla, Ted
(1986) The classifier system in American sign language. In Colette Craig (Ed.), Noun classification and categorization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Supalla, Ted & Elissa Newport
(1978) How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American sign language. In Patricia Siple (Ed.), Understanding language through sign language research. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Taub, Sarah
(2001) Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American sign language. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tkachman, Oksana & Wendy Sandler
in press). The noun-verb distinction in two young sign languages. Gesture, 13 (3), 253–286. Crossref
Zeshan, Ulrike
(2004) Interrogative constructions in sign languages: Crosslinguistic perspectives. Language, 80 (1), 7–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 68 other publications

No author info given
2022.  In Italian Sign Language from a Cognitive and Socio-semiotic Perspective [Gesture Studies, 9], Crossref logo
Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, Roland Pfau & Trude Schermer
2016.  In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, Crossref logo
Bonvillian, John D., Nicole Kissane Lee, Tracy T. Dooley & Filip T. Loncke
2020.  In Simplified Signs, Crossref logo
Braun, Derek C., M. Diane Clark, Amber E. Marchut, Caroline M. Solomon, Megan Majocha, Zachary Davenport, Raja S. Kushalnagar, Jason Listman, Peter C. Hauser, Cara Gormally & Jeff Schinske
2018. Welcoming Deaf Students into STEM: Recommendations for University Science Education. CBE—Life Sciences Education 17:3  pp. es10 ff. Crossref logo
Brentari, Diane, Marie Coppola, Pyeong Whan Cho & Ann Senghas
2017. Handshape complexity as a precursor to phonology: Variation, emergence, and acquisition. Language Acquisition 24:4  pp. 283 ff. Crossref logo
Brentari, Diane, Alessio Di Renzo, Jonathan Keane & Virginia Volterra
2015. Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Sources of a Handshape Distinction Expressing Agentivity. Topics in Cognitive Science 7:1  pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo
Brookes, Heather & Olivier Le Guen
2019. Gesture studies and anthropological perspectives. Gesture 18:2-3  pp. 119 ff. Crossref logo
Börstell, Carl & Ryan Lepic
2014. Commentary on Kita, van Gijn & van der Hulst (1998). Sign Language & Linguistics 17:2  pp. 241 ff. Crossref logo
Cartmill, Erica A., Lilia Rissman, Miriam A. Novack & Susan Goldin-Meadow
2017. The development of iconicity in children’s co-speech gesture and homesign. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 8:1  pp. 42 ff. Crossref logo
Caselli, Naomi K., Zed Sevcikova Sehyr, Ariel M. Cohen-Goldberg & Karen Emmorey
2017. ASL-LEX: A lexical database of American Sign Language. Behavior Research Methods 49:2  pp. 784 ff. Crossref logo
Dachkovsky, Svetlana, Rose Stamp & Wendy Sandler
2018. Constructing Complexity in a Young Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology 9 Crossref logo
DINGEMANSE, MARK, MARCUS PERLMAN & PAMELA PERNISS
2020. Construals of iconicity: experimental approaches to form–meaning resemblances in language. Language and Cognition 12:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Edward, Mary
2020.  In West African languages. Linguistic theory and communication, Crossref logo
England, Megan & Elena Nicoladis
2018. Functional fixedness and body-part-as-object production in pantomime. Acta Psychologica 190  pp. 174 ff. Crossref logo
Evans, Samuel, Cathy J. Price, Jörn Diedrichsen, Eva Gutierrez-Sigut & Mairéad MacSweeney
2019. Sign and Speech Share Partially Overlapping Conceptual Representations. Current Biology 29:21  pp. 3739 ff. Crossref logo
Fuks, Orit
2021. The distribution of handshapes in the established lexicon of Israeli Sign Language (ISL). Semiotica 2021:242  pp. 101 ff. Crossref logo
Gawne, Lauren, Chelsea Krajcik, Helene N. Andreassen, Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker & Barbara F. Kelly
2019. Data transparency and citation in the journal Gesture . Gesture 18:1  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Goldin-Meadow, S., D. Brentari, M. Coppola, L. Horton & A. Senghas
2015. Watching language grow in the manual modality: Nominals, predicates, and handshapes. Cognition 136  pp. 381 ff. Crossref logo
Goldin-Meadow, Susan & Diane Brentari
2017. Gesture and language: Distinct subsystem of an integrated whole. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40 Crossref logo
Green, E. Mara
2017. Performing gesture. Gesture 16:2  pp. 329 ff. Crossref logo
Green, E. Mara
2022. The eye and the other: Language and ethics in deaf Nepal. American Anthropologist 124:1  pp. 21 ff. Crossref logo
Hunsicker, Dea & Susan Goldin-Meadow
2013. How handshape type can distinguish between nouns and verbs in homesign. Gesture 13:3  pp. 354 ff. Crossref logo
Hunsicker, Dea & Susan Goldin-Meadow
2015.  In Where do nouns come from? [Benjamins Current Topics, 70],  pp. 111 ff. Crossref logo
HWANG, SO-ONE, NOZOMI TOMITA, HOPE MORGAN, RABIA ERGIN, DENIZ İLKBAŞARAN, SHARON SEEGERS, RYAN LEPIC & CAROL PADDEN
2017. Of the body and the hands: patterned iconicity for semantic categories. Language and Cognition 9:4  pp. 573 ff. Crossref logo
Lepic, Ryan
2019. A usage-based alternative to “lexicalization” in sign language linguistics. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 Crossref logo
Lepic, Ryan, Carl Börstell, Gal Belsitzman & Wendy Sandler
2016. Taking meaning in hand. Sign Language & Linguistics 19:1  pp. 37 ff. Crossref logo
Lepic, Ryan & Corrine Occhino
2018.  In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4],  pp. 141 ff. Crossref logo
Lutzenberger, Hannah, Connie de Vos, Onno Crasborn & Paula Fikkert
2021. Formal variation in the Kata Kolok lexicon. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1 Crossref logo
Magid, Rachel W. & Jennie E. Pyers
2017. “I use it when I see it”: The role of development and experience in Deaf and hearing children’s understanding of iconic gesture. Cognition 162  pp. 73 ff. Crossref logo
Marentette, Paula, Paola Pettenati, Arianna Bello & Virginia Volterra
2016. Gesture and Symbolic Representation in Italian and English-Speaking Canadian 2-Year-Olds. Child Development 87:3  pp. 944 ff. Crossref logo
McGarry, Meghan E., Natasja Massa, Megan Mott, Katherine J. Midgley, Phillip J. Holcomb & Karen Emmorey
2021. Matching pictures and signs: An ERP study of the effects of iconic structural alignment in American sign language. Neuropsychologia 162  pp. 108051 ff. Crossref logo
McGarry, Meghan E., Megan Mott, Katherine J. Midgley, Phillip J. Holcomb & Karen Emmorey
2021. Picture-naming in American Sign Language: an electrophysiological study of the effects of iconicity and structured alignment. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 36:2  pp. 199 ff. Crossref logo
McKee, Rachel, Josefina Safar & Sara Pivac Alexander
2021. Form, frequency and sociolinguistic variation in depicting signs in New Zealand Sign Language. Language & Communication 79  pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo
MERTZANI, Maria
2018. SOBRE A ICONICIDADE DA FORMA DE MÃO Y. Alfa: Revista de Linguística (São José do Rio Preto) 62:3  pp. 613 ff. Crossref logo
Mesh, Kate & Lynn Hou
2018. Negation in San Juan Quiahije Chatino Sign Language. Gesture 17:3  pp. 330 ff. Crossref logo
Mineiro, Ana, Inmaculada Concepción Báez-Montero, Mara Moita, Isabel Galhano-Rodrigues & Alexandre Castro-Caldas
2021. Disentangling Pantomime From Early Sign in a New Sign Language: Window Into Language Evolution Research. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Motamedi, Yasamin, Marieke Schouwstra, Kenny Smith, Jennifer Culbertson & Simon Kirby
2019. Evolving artificial sign languages in the lab: From improvised gesture to systematic sign. Cognition 192  pp. 103964 ff. Crossref logo
Mudd, Katie, Connie de Vos & Bart de Boer
2022. Shared Context Facilitates Lexical Variation in Sign Language Emergence. Languages 7:1  pp. 31 ff. Crossref logo
Namboodiripad, Savithry, Daniel Lenzen, Ryan Lepic & Tessa Verhoef
2016. Measuring conventionalization in the manual modality. Journal of Language Evolution 1:2  pp. 109 ff. Crossref logo
Nilsson, Anna-Lena
2018. Expressing time through space. Translation and Interpreting Studies 13:1  pp. 6 ff. Crossref logo
Nispen, Karin, W.M.E. Mieke, E. de Sandt‐Koenderman & Emiel Krahmer
2018. The comprehensibility of pantomimes produced by people with aphasia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 53:1  pp. 85 ff. Crossref logo
Nyst, Victoria
2016. The depiction of size and shape in gestures accompanying object descriptions in Anyi (Côte d’Ivoire) and in Dutch (The Netherlands). Gesture 15:2  pp. 156 ff. Crossref logo
Nyst, Victoria
2018. Cross-linguistic variation in space-based distance for size depiction in the lexicons of six sign languages. Sign Language & Linguistics 21:2  pp. 350 ff. Crossref logo
Nyst, Victoria
2019. The impact of cross-linguistic variation in gesture on sign language phonology and morphology. Gesture 18:2-3  pp. 343 ff. Crossref logo
Nyst, Victoria, Marta Morgado, Timothy Mac Hadjah, Marco Nyarko, Mariana Martins, Lisa van der Mark, Evans Burichani, Tano Angoua, Moustapha Magassouba, Dieydi Sylla, Kidane Admasu & Anique Schüller
2021. Object and handling handshapes in 11 sign languages: towards a typology of the iconic use of the hands. Linguistic Typology 0:0 Crossref logo
OCCHINO, CORRINE, BENJAMIN ANIBLE & JILL P. MORFORD
2020. The role of iconicity, construal, and proficiency in the online processing of handshape. Language and Cognition 12:1  pp. 114 ff. Crossref logo
Ortega, Gerardo, Annika Schiefner & Aslı Özyürek
2019. Hearing non-signers use their gestures to predict iconic form-meaning mappings at first exposure to signs. Cognition 191  pp. 103996 ff. Crossref logo
Ortega, Gerardo & Aslı Özyürek
2020. Systematic mappings between semantic categories and types of iconic representations in the manual modality: A normed database of silent gesture. Behavior Research Methods 52:1  pp. 51 ff. Crossref logo
ORTEGA, GERARDO & ASLI ÖZYÜREK
2020. Types of iconicity and combinatorial strategies distinguish semantic categories in silent gesture across cultures. Language and Cognition 12:1  pp. 84 ff. Crossref logo
Padden, Carol, So-One Hwang, Ryan Lepic & Sharon Seegers
2015. Tools for Language: Patterned Iconicity in Sign Language Nouns and Verbs. Topics in Cognitive Science 7:1  pp. 81 ff. Crossref logo
Padden, Carol A.
2015.  In Research Methods in Sign Language Studies,  pp. 141 ff. Crossref logo
Padden, Carol A.
2020.  Review Essay on Sign Language in Papua New Guinea , by Adam Kendon. (John Benjamins, 2020) . Oceania 90:3  pp. 330 ff. Crossref logo
Perlman, Marcus, Hannah Little, Bill Thompson & Robin L. Thompson
2018. Iconicity in Signed and Spoken Vocabulary: A Comparison Between American Sign Language, British Sign Language, English, and Spanish. Frontiers in Psychology 9 Crossref logo
Perry, Lynn K., Marcus Perlman, Gary Lupyan & Johan J Bolhuis
2015. Iconicity in English and Spanish and Its Relation to Lexical Category and Age of Acquisition. PLOS ONE 10:9  pp. e0137147 ff. Crossref logo
Planer, Ronald J. & Lauren W. Reed
2021. Like Hand, Like Mouth: On the Role of Gesture-Linked Mouth Actions in the Evolution of Language. Biological Theory 16:2  pp. 90 ff. Crossref logo
Pouw, Wim, Mark Dingemanse, Yasamin Motamedi & Aslı Özyürek
2021. A Systematic Investigation of Gesture Kinematics in Evolving Manual Languages in the Lab. Cognitive Science 45:7 Crossref logo
Rissman, Lilia & Asifa Majid
2019. Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 26:6  pp. 1850 ff. Crossref logo
Sandler, Wendy
2017. The Challenge of Sign Language Phonology. Annual Review of Linguistics 3:1  pp. 43 ff. Crossref logo
Sandler, Wendy
2018. The Body as Evidence for the Nature of Language. Frontiers in Psychology 9 Crossref logo
Sehyr, Zed Sevcikova & Karen Emmorey
2021. The effects of multiple linguistic variables on picture naming in American Sign Language. Behavior Research Methods Crossref logo
SEVCIKOVA SEHYR, ZED & KAREN EMMOREY
2019. The perceived mapping between form and meaning in American Sign Language depends on linguistic knowledge and task: evidence from iconicity and transparency judgments. Language and Cognition 11:2  pp. 208 ff. Crossref logo
THOMPSON, BILL, MARCUS PERLMAN, GARY LUPYAN, ZED SEVCIKOVA SEHYR & KAREN EMMOREY
2020. A data-driven approach to the semantics of iconicity in American Sign Language and English. Language and Cognition 12:1  pp. 182 ff. Crossref logo
Tomasuolo, Elena, Chiara Bonsignori, Pasquale Rinaldi & Virginia Volterra
2020. The representation of action in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Cognitive Linguistics 31:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
van Nispen, Karin, W. Mieke. E. van de Sandt-Koenderman & Emiel Krahmer
2017. Production and Comprehension of Pantomimes Used to Depict Objects. Frontiers in Psychology 8 Crossref logo
Volterra, Virginia, Olga Capirci, Pasquale Rinaldi & Laura Sparaci
2018. From action to spoken and signed language through gesture. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 19:1-2  pp. 216 ff. Crossref logo
Volterra, Virginia, Olga Capirci, Pasquale Rinaldi & Laura Sparaci
2020.  In How the Brain Got Language – Towards a New Road Map [Benjamins Current Topics, 112],  pp. 216 ff. Crossref logo
Wu, Suwei
2019. The Tool Noun and Tool Verb Alternation in Gesture. Multimodal Communication 8:2 Crossref logo
Östling, Robert, Carl Börstell & Servane Courtaux
2018. Visual Iconicity Across Sign Languages: Large-Scale Automated Video Analysis of Iconic Articulators and Locations. Frontiers in Psychology 9 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.