A first generation family homesign system, dubbed “Z”, from the Tzotzil-speaking township of Zinacantán, in Chiapas, Mexico, provides insight into how a new sign language can begin to distinguish formally different “part-of-speech” categories. After describing the small signing community, consisting of 3 deaf sibling and their intermediate hearing sister, plus a younger cousin — the entire set of fluent adult signers — plus the hearing child of the oldest deaf signer, and setting out some of the theoretical issues surrounding the nature of “part-of-speech” in sign languages, the paper considers three sorts of mechanisms the language has developed to help distinguish signs that refer to objects from signs that refer to actions. These include a set of size-shape specifiers that co-occur with presumed nominal signs, an iconic contrast between different sign formational elements that somewhat inconsistently signal a noun/verb distinction, and, perhaps most interestingly, a construction involving a clearly grammaticalized locative or copular element that allows Z signers to make clear that they are referring to (physical) objects rather than actions. The paper concludes by considering the overall effect of these quite different formal strategies on the evolving language structure.
Augustine, SaintBishop of Hippo, (1955). Confessions and enchiridion, newly translated and edited by Albert C. Outler. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.
Augustine, SaintBishop of Hippo, (1992). Confessions, Commentary by James J. O’Donnell. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Brentari, Diane, Marie Coppola, Laura Mazzoni, & Susan Goldin-Meadow (2012). When does a system become phonological? Handshape production in gesturers, signers, and homesigners. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 30 (1), 1–31.
Brown, Penelope. (1994). The INS and ONS of Tzeltal locative expressions: the semantics of static descriptions of location. Linguistics, 32 (4/5), 743–790.
Clark, Herbert H. (1996). Using language. New York & Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Coppola, Marie & Elissa L. Newport (2005). Grammatical subjects in home sign: Abstract linguistic structure in adult primary gesture systems without linguistic input.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
, 102 (52), 19249–19253.
Coppola, Marie & Wing Chee So (2005). Abstract and object-anchored deixis: Pointing and spatial layout in adult homesign systems in Nicaragua. In Alejna Brugos, Manuella R. Clark-Cotton, & Suengwan Ha (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 29th Boston university conference on language development
(pp. 144–155). Boston: Cascadilla Press.
Coppola, Marie & Wing Chee So (2006). The seeds of spatial grammar: Spatial modulation and coreference in homesigning and hearing adults. In David Bamman, Tatiana Magnitskaia, & Colleen Zaller (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 30th Boston university conference on language development
(pp. 119–130). Boston: Cascadilla Press.
Coppola, Marie & Annie Senghas (2010). The emergence of deixis in Nicaraguan signing. In Diane Brentari (Ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey (pp. 543–569). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cormier, Kearsey, Sandra Smith, & Zed Sevcikova (2013). Predicate structures, gesture and simultaneity in the representation of action in British sign language: Evidence from deaf children and adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 18 (3), 370–390.
Cuxac, Christian. (2000). Iconicity of sign language. In Martin M. Taylor, Françoise Néel, & Don Bouwhuis (Eds.), The structure of multimodal dialogue (pp. 321–334). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cuxac, Christian. (2001). Les langues des signes: analyseurs de la faculté de langage. Acquisition Et Interaction En Langue Etrangère, 151, 11–36.
Danziger, Eve. (2008). A person a place or a thing? Whorfian consequences of syntactic bootstrapping in Mopan Maya. In Melissa Bowerman & Penelope Brown (Eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability (pp. 29–48). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Danziger, Eve & Elizabeth Keating (1996). Between anthropology and cognitive science: a reemerging dialogue.
Symposium presented to the Annual Meetings of the American Anthropological Association
, San Francisco, November, 1966.
de Vos, Connie. (2012). Sign-spatiality in Kata Kolok. Doctoral dissertation, Nijmegen, Radboud University.
Du Bois, John W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 641, 805–855.
Frishberg, Nancy. (1975). Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American sign language. Language, 51 (3), 696–719.
Fusellier-Souza, Ivani. (2001). La création gestuelle des individus sourds isolés. Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère, 151, 61–96.
Fusellier-Souza, Ivani. (2004). Sémiogenèse des langues des signes, Étude de langues des signes emergentes (LS ÉMG) pratiquées par des sourds brésiliens. Doctoral dissertation, Sciences du langage, Université Paris81.
Fusellier-Souza, Ivani. (2006). Emergence and development of sign languages: from a semiogenetic point of view. Sign Language Studies, 7 (1), 30–56.
Goldin-Meadow, Susan. (2003). The resilience of language: what gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.
Goldin-Meadow, Susan. (2012). Homesign: gesture to language. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach, & Bencie Woll (Eds.), Sign language: An international handbook (pp. 601–625). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Cynthia Butcher, Carolyn Mylander, & Mark Dodge (1994). Nouns and verbs in a self-styled gesture system: What’s in a name?Cognitive Psychology, 271, 259–319.
Haviland, John B. (2011). Nouns, verbs, and constituents in an emerging ‘Tzotzil’ sign language. In Rodrigo Gutiérrez-Bravo, Line Mikkelsen, & Eric Potsdam (Eds.), Representing language: Essays in honor of Judith Aissen (pp. 151–171). Santa Cruz, CA: California Digital Library eScholarship Repository, Linguistic Research Center, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Heine, Bernd. (1997). Possession: Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Janzen, Terry. (2012). Lexicalization and grammaticalization. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach, & Bencie Woll (Eds.), Sign language: An international handbook (pp. 816–841). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kegl, Judith & Gayla Iwata (1989). Lenguaje de Signos Nicaragüense: A pidgin sheds light on the “Creole?” ASL. In Robert Carlson, Scott DeLancey, Spike Gildea, Doris Payne, & Anju Saxena (Eds.),
Proceedings of the fourth meeting of the Pacific linguistics conference
(pp. 266–294). Eugene, Oregon: Department of Linguistics, University of Oregon.
Kegl, Judith, Annie Senghas, & Maria Coppola (1999). Creation through contact: Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In Michel DeGraff (Ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and development (pp. 179–237). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kendon, Adam. (1980). A description of a deaf-mute sign language from the Enga Province of Papua New Guinea with some comparative discussion, Part II: The semiotic functioning of Enga signs. Semiotica, 321, 81–117.
Kendon, Adam. (1988). Sign languages of Aboriginal Australia: Cultural, semiotic and communicative perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kendon, Adam. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kuschel, Rolf. (1973). The silent inventor: The creation of a sign language by the only deaf-mute on a Polynesian Island. Sign Languages Studies, 2 (3), 1–27.
Langacker, Ron. (1990). Nouns and verbs. Language, 631, 53–94.
Le Guen, Olivier. (2012). An exploration in the domain of time: from Yucatec Maya time gestures to Yucatec Maya Sign Language time signs. In Ulrike Zeshan & Connie de Vos (Eds.), Endangered sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights (pp. 209–250). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter & Ishara Press.
MacLeod, Catriona. (1973). A deaf man’s sign language. Its nature and position relative to spoken languages. Linguistics, 1011, 72–88.
Mandel, Mark. (1977). Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In Lynn A. Friedman (Ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American sign language (pp. 57–107). New York: Academic Press.
Meir, Irit. (2010). Iconicity and metaphor: Constraints on metaphorical extension of iconic forms. Language, 861, 865–896.
Meir, Irit, Carol A. Padden, Mark Aronoff, & Wendy Sandler (2007). Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics, 431, 531–563.
Morford, Jill P. (1996). Insights to language from the study of gesture: a review of research on the gestural communication of nonsigning deaf people. Language and Communication, 16 (2), 165–178.
Morford, Jill P. & Judy A. Kegl (2000). Gestural precursors to linguistic constructs: how input shapes the form of language. In David McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 358–387). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morgan, Gary, Rosalind Herman, & Bencie Woll (2002). The development of complex verb constructions in British Sign Language. Journal of Child Language, 29 (3), 655–675.
Müller, Cornelia. (2010). Wie Gesten bedeuten. Eine kognitiv-linguistische und sequenzanalytische Perspektive. Sprache und Literatur, 411, 37–68 (Sonderheft: Sprache und Geste
).
Müller, Cornelia. (2013a). Gestures as a medium of expression. The linguistic potential of gestures. In Cornelia Müller, Adam Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva Ladewig, & David McNeill (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 202–207). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Müller, Cornelia. (2013b). Towards a grammar of gestures. A form based view. In Cornelia Müller, Adam Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva Ladewig, & David McNeill (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 707–703). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Padden, Carol. (1988). Interaction of morphology and syntax in American sign language. New York: Garland Press.
Padden, Carol. (2010). In search of grammar. Paper presented to theoretical issues in sign language research, 10, Purdue, IN, October 1, 2010.
Padden, Carol, Irit Meir, Wendy Sandler, & Mark Aronoff (2010). Against all expectations: Encoding subjects and objects in a new language. In Donna B. Gerdts, John C. Moore, & Maria Polinsky (Eds.), Hypothesis A / hypothesis B: Linguistic explorations in honor of David M. Perlmutter (pp. 383–400). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Peirce, Charles Sanders. (1894/1992). What is a sign? In Nathan Houser & Christian Kloesel (Eds.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. 21, pp. 4–10). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Perniss, Pamela & Ulrike Zeshan (2008). Possessive and existential constructions in Kata Kolok (Bali). In Ulrike Zeshan & Pamela Perniss (Eds.), Possessive and existential constructions in sign languages (pp. 125–150). Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach (2011). Grammaticalization in sign languages. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 683–695). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Quine, Willard Van Orman. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sacks, Harvey, Emmanuel Schegloff, & Gail Jefferson (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 501, 696–735.
Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Carol Padden, & Mark Aronoff (2005). The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
, 102 (7), 2661–2665
Sapir, Edward. (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
Supalla, Ted & Elissa L. Newport (1978). How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American sign language. In Patricia A. Siple (Ed.), Understanding language through sign language research (pp. 91–132). New York: Academic Press.
Taub, Sarah. (2001). Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American sign language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Washabaugh, William. (1979). Hearing and deaf signers on Providence Island. Sign Language Studies, 241, 191–214.
Washabaugh, William. (1980a). The manu-facturing of a language. Semiotica, 29 (1/2), 1–37.
Washabaugh, William. (1980b). The organization and use of Providence Island sign language. Sign Language Studies, 261, 65–92.
Washabaugh, William. (1986). Five fingers for survival: Deaf sign language in the Caribbean. Ann Arbor: Karoma Press.
2024. Metalinguistic Discourse in an Emerging Sign Language. Languages 9:7 ► pp. 240 ff.
Goico, Sara A. & Laura Horton
2023. Homesign: Contested Issues. Annual Review of Linguistics 9:1 ► pp. 377 ff.
Edwards, Terra
2022. The difference intersubjective grammar makes in protactile DeafBlind communities. Lingua 273 ► pp. 103303 ff.
Ergin, Rabia
2022. Emerging Lexicon for Objects in Central Taurus Sign Language. Languages 7:2 ► pp. 118 ff.
Reed, Lauren W.
2022. Sign networks: Nucleated network sign languages and rural homesign in Papua New Guinea. Language in Society 51:4 ► pp. 627 ff.
Goico, Sara A.
2021. Repeated assemblages in the interactions of deaf youth in Peru. International Journal of Multilingualism 18:2 ► pp. 267 ff.
Pouw, Wim, Mark Dingemanse, Yasamin Motamedi & Aslı Özyürek
2021. A Systematic Investigation of Gesture Kinematics in Evolving Manual Languages in the Lab. Cognitive Science 45:7
Friedner, Michele & Annelies Kusters
2020. Deaf Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 49:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
ORTEGA, GERARDO & ASLI ÖZYÜREK
2020. Types of iconicity and combinatorial strategies distinguish semantic categories in silent gesture across cultures. Language and Cognition 12:1 ► pp. 84 ff.
Motamedi, Yasamin, Marieke Schouwstra, Kenny Smith, Jennifer Culbertson & Simon Kirby
2019. Evolving artificial sign languages in the lab: From improvised gesture to systematic sign. Cognition 192 ► pp. 103964 ff.
Rodríguez, Lydia
2019. “Time is not a line.” Temporal gestures in Chol Mayan. Journal of Pragmatics 151 ► pp. 1 ff.
Nölle, Jonas, Marlene Staib, Riccardo Fusaroli & Kristian Tylén
2018. The emergence of systematicity: How environmental and communicative factors shape a novel communication system. Cognition 181 ► pp. 93 ff.
Abner, Natasha
2017. Syntactic Categorization in Sign Languages * *I am extremely indebted to all of the individuals who have shared their language and their research with me and with the scientific community. I also thank Carlo Geraci and the editors for valuable feedback and suggestions. Any remaining errors are my own.. In Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, ► pp. 549 ff.
Cartmill, Erica A., Lilia Rissman, Miriam A. Novack & Susan Goldin-Meadow
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.