Article published in:
Vol. 14:2 (2014) ► pp. 225253


Publications marked with an asterisk were included in the meta-analysis.)
Aarons, Debra & Ruth Zilla Morgan
(2003) Classifier predicates and the creation of multiple perspectives in South African Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 3 (2), 125–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alibali, Martha W. & Sotaro Kita
(2010) Gesture highlights perceptually present information for speakers. Gesture, 10 (1), 3–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alibali, Martha W., Robert C. Spencer, Lucy Knox, & Sotaro Kita
(2011) Spontaneous gestures influence strategy choices in problem solving. Psychological Science, 22 (9), 1138–1144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alogna, V.K., M.K. Attaya, P. Aucoin, S. Bahnik, S. Birch, A.R. Birt, […] R.A. Zwaan
(2014) Registered replication report: Schooler & Engstler-Schooler (1990). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 556–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
American Psychological Association
(2010) Publication manual, 6th edition (APA Publication manual). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey & Heather Shovelton
(2001) An experimental investigation of the role of different types of iconic gesture in communication: a semantic feature approach.Gesture, 1 (2), 129–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) An experimental investigation of some properties of individual iconic gestures that mediate their communicative power. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 179–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane, Marie Coppola, Laura Mazzoni, & Susan Goldin-Meadow
(2011) When does a system becomephonological?Handshape production in gesturers, signers, and homesigners. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 30, 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Amanda
(2008) Gesture viewpoint in Japanese and English. Gesture, 8 (2), 256–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
(1994) Discourse, consciousness and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cumming, Geoff
(2012) Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confined intervals, and meta-analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Downs, Sarah H. & Nick Black
(1998) The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomized and nonrandomized studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 52, 377–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dudis, Paul
(2004) Body partitioning and real-space blends. Cognitive Linguistics, 15 (2), 223–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Types of depiction in ASL. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from: http://​www​.gallaudet​.edu​/documents​/academic​/drl​-dudis2007​.pdf, August 14 2012.Google Scholar
Earis, Helen & Kearsy Cormier
(2013) Point of view in British Sign Language and spoken English narrative discourse: the example of ‘The Tortoise and the Hare’. Language and Cognition, 5 (4), 314–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C.
(2000) Editorial statement. Language Learning, 50, xi–xiii.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J.
(2013) Doing fieldwork on the body, language, and communication. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, & Sedinha Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Vol. 1 (pp. 974–982). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen & Judy S. Reilly
(1998) The development of quotation and reported action: conveying perspective in ASL. In Eve V. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Child Research Forum (pp. 81–90). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen, Barbara Tversky, & Holly A. Taylor
(2000) Using space to describe space: Perspective in speech, sign, and gesture. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2, 157–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick J., Sotaro Kita, & Jan P. de Ruiter
(2007) Primary and secondary pragmatic functions of pointing gestures. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1722–1741. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. & Jessica Robles
(2010) It’s like mmm: Enactments with it’s like. Discourse Studies, 12, 715–738. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerofsky, Susan
(2010) Mathematical learning and gesture: Character viewpoint and observer viewpoint in students’ gestured graphs of functions. Gesture, 10 (2/3), 321–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Laura D. & William L. Goodwin
(1985) An analysis of statistical techniques used in the Journal of Educational Psychology, 1979–1983. Educational Psychologist, 20, 13–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haviland, John B.
(1996).Projections, transpositions, and relativity. In John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 271–323).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, Steven J. Heine, & Ara Norenzayan
(2010) The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2/3), 61–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hostetter, Autumn B.
(2011) When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137 (2), 297–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, Terry
(2004) Space rotation, perspective shift, and verb morphology in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics, 15 (2), 149–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Two ways of conceptualizing space: Motivating the use of static and rotating vantage point space in ASL discourse. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (Eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective (pp. 156–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam
(1980) Gesture and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In Mary Ritchie Key (Ed.), Nonverbal communication and language (pp. 207–227). The Hague & Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(1994) Do gestures communicate? A review. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27, 175–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kita, Sotaro
(2009) Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gestures: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24 (2), 145–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Larson-Hall, Jenifer & Luke Plonsky
(2015) Reporting and interpreting quantitative research findings: What gets reported, and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 65, Supp. 1, 127–159. Crossref
Lausberg, Hedda & Han Sloetjes
(2009) Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES-ELAN system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 41 (3), 841–849. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. & Melanie Metzger
(1998) Gesture in sign language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30 (6), 657–697. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane
(1995) The point of view predicate in American Sign Language. In Karen Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (Eds.), Language, gesture, and space. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Maury-Rouan, Claire
(2011) Voices and bodies: Investigating nonverbal parameters of the participation framework. In Gale Stam & Mike Ishino (Eds.), Integrating gestures: The interdisciplinary nature of gesture (pp. 309–320). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McClave, Evelyn Z.
(2000) Linguistic functions of head movements in the context of speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 855–878. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCleary, Leland & Evani Viotti
(2009) Sign-gesture symbiosis in Brazilian Sign Language narrative. In Fey Parrill, Vera Tobin, & Mark Turner (Eds.), Conceptual structure, discourse, and language 9 (pp. 181–201). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Merola, Giorgio
(2009) The effects of the gesture viewpoint on the students’ memory of words and stories. Gesture-based human-computer interaction and simulation lecture notes in computer science, 5085, 272–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, Melanie
(1995) Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language. In Ceil Lucas (Ed.), Sociolinguistics in deaf communities (pp. 255–271). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Narayan, Shweta
(2012) Maybe what it means is he actually got the spot: Physical and cognitive viewpoint in a gesture study. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (Eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective (pp. 113–135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuñez, Rafael & Eve Sweetser
(2006) With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30 (3), 401–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor
(1979) Transcription as theory. In Elinor Ochs & Bambi B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43–72). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Sally Jacoby, & Patrick Gonzales
(1994) Interpretive journeys: How physicists talk and travel through graphic space. Configurations, 2 (1), 151–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Orfanidou, Eleni, Bencie Woll, & Gary Morgan
(2014) Research methods in sign language studies: A practical guide. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Özyürek, Aslı, Sotaro Kita, Shanley Allen, Reyhan Furman, & Amanda Brown
(2005) How does linguistic framing of events influence co-speech gestures? Insight from cross-linguistic variations and similarities. Gesture, 5 (1/2), 219–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Özyürek, Aslı & Pamela Perniss
(2011) Event representation in sign language: A crosslinguistic perspective. In Jürgen Bohnemeyer & Eric Pederson (Eds.), Event representation in language: Encoding events at the language-cognition interface (pp. 84–107). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Padden, Carol
(1990) The relation between space and grammar in ASL verb morphology. In Ceil Lucas (Ed.), Sign language research: Theoretical issues (pp. 118–132). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Park, Yujong
(2009) Interaction between grammar and multimodal resources: Quoting different characters in Korean multiparty conversation. Discourse Studies, 11 (79), 79–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parrill, Fey
(2009) Dual viewpoint gestures.Gesture, 9 (3), 271–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010a) The hands are part of the package: Gesture, common ground, and information packaging. In John Newman & Sally Rice (Eds.), Empirical and experimental methods in cognitive/functional research (pp. 285–302). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
(2010b) Viewpoint in speech-gesture integration: Linguistic structure, discourse structure, and event structure.Language and Cognitive Processes, 25 (5), 650–668. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Interactions between discourse status and viewpoint in co-speech gesture. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (Eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective (pp. 97–112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parrill, Fey, Jennifer Bullen, & Huston Hoburg
(2010) Effects of input modality on speech-gesture integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (11), 3130–3137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parrill, Fey & Eve Sweetser
(2004) What we mean by meaning: conceptual integration in gesture analysis and transcription. Gesture, 4 (2), 197–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perniss, Pamela
(2007) Achieving spatial coherence in German Sign Language narratives: The use of classifiers and perspective.Lingua, 117 (7), 1315–1338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perniss, Pamela & Aslı Özyürek
(2008) Representations of action, motion and location in sign space: A comparison of German (DGS) and Turkish (TID) Sign Language narratives. In Josep Quer (Ed.), Signs of the time: Selected papers from TISLR 8 (pp. 353–378). Hamburg: Signum Press.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
(2010) Nonmanuals: Their prosodic and grammatical roles. In Diane Brentari (Ed.), Sign languages (pp. 381–402). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, Luke
(2013) Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 655–687. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Study quality in quantitative L2 research (1990–2010): A methodological synthesis and call for reform. The Modern Language Journal, 98 (1), 450–470. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, Luke & Susan Gass
(2011) Quantitative research methods, study quality, and outcomes: The case of interaction research. Language Learning, 61 (2), 325–366.Google Scholar
Quinto-Pozos, David
(2007) Can constructed action be considered obligatory? Lingua, 117 (7), 1285–1314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rayman, Jennifer
(1999) Storytelling in the visual mode: A comparison of ASL and English. In Elizabeth Winston (Ed.), Storytelling and conversation: Discourse in deaf communities (pp. 59–82). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam, Carloine Jone, & Denis Burnham
(2005) Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: Evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners’ gestures without speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10 (3), 272–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selinker, Larry & Usha Lakshmanan
(2001) How do we know what we know? Why do we believe what we believe? Second Language Research, 17, 323–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seyfeddinipur, Mandana
(2011) Reasons for documenting gestures and suggestions for how to go about it. In Nicholas Thierberger (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic fieldwork (pp. 147–165). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Barbara
(2012) Reported speech as an evidentiality strategy in American Sign Language. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (Eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective (pp. 139–155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack
(2006) Coordinating gesture, talk and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39 (4), 377–409. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stec, Kashmiri
(2012) Meaningful shifts: A review of viewpoint markers in co-speech gesture and sign language. Gesture, 12 (3), 327–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen
(2002) Grammar, words and embodied meanings: On the evolution and uses of so and like . Journal of Communication, 52, 581–596. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valentine, Jeffrey C. & Harris Cooper
(2008) A systematic and transparent approach for assessing the methodological quality of intervention effectiveness research: The study design and implementation assessment device (Study DIAD). Psychological Methods, 13, 130–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Tracey
(2001) Karen in motion: The role of physical enactment in developing an understanding of distance, time, and speed. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20, 145–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Young, Katharine
(2002) The dream body in somatic psychology: The kinaesthetics of gesture. Gesture, 2 (1), 45–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, Rolf & Diane Pecher
(2012) Revisiting mental simulation in language comprehension: Six replication attempts. PLoS ONE, 7 (12), e51382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar