Article published in:
Gesture
Vol. 15:2 (2016) ► pp. 123–155

The coordination of moves in Aikido interaction

| Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3
Relying on the analysis of naturally occurring interaction recordings, this article proposes the moment-by-moment description of a specific type of focused interaction, the interaction of the martial art Aikido. In Aikido encounters, participants exchange moves of attack, defense, avoidance also using a “weapon”. These “Aikido movements”, as I shall call them, are articulated by the whole body and serve as projectable interactional units. Aikido movements appear as highly ordered minimal units of the practitioners’ activity which are coordinated between them in space and time. Central in this account is the description of the interactional space elaborated through the moving transactional segments of the practitioners. I suggest that the description of the visible bodily actions of Aikido opens a range of questions concerning the social and interactional construction of human perception in any activity involving whole body movements. As visible actions, Aikido movement and gesture share the property of becoming units of the social activity they organize.
Keywords: gesture, whole-body-movement, Aikido (martial art), simultaneity, sequence, social interaction
Published online: 19 July 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.15.2.01lef
References
Clayman, Steven E. & Douglas W. Maynard
(1995) Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. In Paul ten Have & George Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp. 1–30). Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Coates, Sally
(1999) Analysing the physical: An ethnomethodological study of boxing. Ethnographic Studies, 41, 14–26.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
(1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold & Harvey Sacks
(1970) On formal structures of practical actions. In John C. McKinney & Edward A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 337–366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold & D. Lawrence Wieder
(1992) Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In Graham Watson & Robert M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 175–206). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
(1963) Behavior in public places. Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
(1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
(1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In George Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
(2000) Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 321, 1489–1522. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie Harness Goodwin
(2004) Participation. In Alessandro Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 222–244). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haddington, Pentti, Lorenza Mondada, & Maurice Nevile
(2013) Being mobile: Interaction on the move. In Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, & Maurice Nevile (Eds.), Interaction and mobility: Language and body in motion (pp. 3–61). Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haddington, Pentti, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, & Maurice Nevile
(2014) Towards multiactivity as a social and interactional phenomenon. In Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, & Maurice Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 3–32). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto
(2004) Projection and grammar: Notes on the ‘action-projecting’ use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 361, 1337–1374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath Christian, Jon Hindmarsh, & Paul Luff
(2010) Video in qualitative research. Analysing social interaction in everyday life. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Heritage, John & J. Maxwell Atkinson
(1984) Introduction. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 1–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herrigel, Eugen
(1953) Zen in the art of archery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam
(1990) Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Augustin
(2011) Approche ethnométhodologique de l’accomplissement d’une figure à deux: spatialité et temporalité dans la pratique de l’aïkido. PhD Thesis, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 31.Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H
(2002) Turn-sharing: the choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. In Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara Fox, & Sandra Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 225–256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel
([1934] 1950) Les techniques du corps. In Marcel Mauss (Ed.), Anthropologie et sociologie (pp. 365–386). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
McNeill, David
(1985) So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review, 92 (3), 350–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2000) Language and gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mead, George Herbert
(1934) Mind, self and society. From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Charles W. Morris (Ed.). Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
(2006a) Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: Projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies, 81 ( Special issue on Discourse, Interaction and Cognition ), 117–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006b) Video recording as the reflexive preservation-configuration of phenomenal features for analysis. In Hubert Knoblauch, Bernt Schnettler, Jürgen Raab, & Hans-Georg Soeffner (Eds.), Video analysis. Methodology and methods. Qualitative audiovisual data analysis (pp. 51–68). Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
(2009) Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics, 411, 1977–1997. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Interactional space and the study of embodied talk-interaction. In Peter Auer, Martin Hilpert, Anja Stukenbrock, & Bernd Szmrecsanyi, (Eds.), Space in language and linguistics: Geographical, interactional and cognitive perspectives (pp. 247–275). Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
(1984) Notes on methodology. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 21–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1992) Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, & Gail Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 501, 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saotome, Mitsugi
(1993) Aikido and the harmony of nature. Boston & London: Shambhala.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A
(1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 701, 1075–1095. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schindler, Larissa
(2009) The production of “vis-ability”: An ethnographic video analysis of a martial arts class. In Ulrike Tikvah Kissmann (Ed.), Video interaction analysis. Methods and methodology (pp. 135–153). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Schütz, Alfred
(1962) Collected papers: The problem of social reality. Maurice Natason (Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen
(2009a) Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Forward-gesturing. Discourse Processes, 46 (2–3), 161–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
ten Have, Paul
(2002) The notion of member is the heart of the matter: On the role of membership knowledge in ethnomethodological inquiry [53 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3 (3), Art. 21, http://​nbn​-resolving​.de​/urn:nbn:de:0114​-fqs0203217Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Filho, Edson & Jean Rettig
2018. Team coordination in high-risk circus acrobatics. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 19:3 ► pp. 499 ff. Crossref logo
Gawne, Lauren, Chelsea Krajcik, Helene N. Andreassen, Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker & Barbara F. Kelly
2019. Data transparency and citation in the journal Gesture . Gesture 18:1 ► pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Muntanyola-Saura, Dafne & Raúl Sánchez-García
2018. Distributed Attention: A Cognitive Ethnography of Instruction in Sport Settings. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 48:4 ► pp. 433 ff. Crossref logo
Råman, Joonas
2019. Budo demonstrations as shared accomplishments: The modalities of guiding in the joint teaching of physical skills. Journal of Pragmatics 150 ► pp. 17 ff. Crossref logo
Råman, Joonas & Pentti Haddington
2018. Demonstrations in Sports Training: Communicating a Technique through Parsing and the Return-Practice in the Budo Class. Multimodal Communication 7:2 Crossref logo
Svinhufvud, Kimmo
2018. Waiting for the customer: Multimodal analysis of waiting in service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics 129 ► pp. 48 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.