Cover not available
Article published In:
Gesture
Vol. 16:2 (2017) ► pp.203–244

Embodied frames and scenes

Body-based metonymy and pragmatic inferencing in gesture

| RWTH Aachen University

This paper lays out the foundations of a frame-based account of gesture pragmatics through detailing how frames and metonymy interact not only in motivating gestural sign formation, but also in guiding crossmodal processes of pragmatic inferencing. It is argued that gestures recruiting frame structures tend to profile deeply embodied, routinized aspects of scenes (in the Fillmorian sense of the term), that is, of the motivating context of frames. Two kinds of embodied frame structures situated at different levels of abstraction, schematicity, and entrechment are proposed: (A) Basic physical action and object frames understood as directly experientially grounded frames involving physical action and interaction with the material and social world; (B) Complex, highly abstract frame structures that are more detached from the motivating contexts of experience. It is further suggested that gestures exhibiting a comparably low degree of iconicity and/or indexicality are likely to assume pragmatic rather than referential functions. Finally, potential avenues for further research into the relation of scenes, frames, and (multimodal) constructions are outlined.

Keywords: frames, scenes, metonymy, metaphor, pragmatic inferencing, motivation, indexicality, multifunctionality
Article outline
  • Introduction
    • Frames, scenes, and metonymy: Seizing the pragmatically minded nature of gesture
    • Hands framing New York Harbor from Pier 18
  • Embodied frames and scenes: Theoretical premises and some tendencies in their gestural evocation
    • Basic and more complex frame structures: A first characterization
    • Scenes and their relevance for gesture
  • Towards a frame-based account of gesture pragmatics
    • Basic physical action and object frames
    • Complex, highly abstract frame structures
    • Summary of observations and proposals
  • Body-based metonymy and gesture pragmatics
    • Cognitive/experiential/functional DOMAINS
    • FRAMES and frame metonymy
    • Contiguity relations operationalized in gesture
  • Crossmodal pragmatic inferencing and bodily reference points
    • From reference to pragmatic inferencing in multimodal discourse
    • Muted degrees of iconicity/indexicality and resulting pragmatic functions
  • Conclusion and outlook
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 January 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.03mit
References

References

Andrén, Mats
(2010) Children’s gestures from 18 to 30 months. Lund: Centre for Languages and Literatures, Lund University.Google Scholar
(2014) Multimodal constructions in children: Is the headshake part of language? Gesture, 14 (2), 141–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnheim, Rudolf
(1969) Visual thinking. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Barcelona, Antonio
(2003) The case of a metonymic basis of pragmatic inferencing: Evidence from jokes and funny anecdotes. In Klaus-Uwe Panther & Linda Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp. 81–102). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Motivation of construction meaning and form: The roles of metonymy and inference. In Klaus-Uwe Panther, Linda L. Thornburg, & Antonio Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp. 363–401). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, Janet, Nicole Chovil, Douglas Lawrie, & Allan Wade
(1992) Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 151, 469–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, Janet, Nicole Chovil, Jan L. Coates, & Lori Roe
(1995) Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 211, 394–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benazzo, Sandra & Aliyah Morgenstern
(2014) A bilingual child’s multimodal path into negation. Gesture, 14 (2), 171–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benczes, Reka, Antonio Barcelona, & Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
(Eds.) (2011) Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bressem, Jana
(2012) Repetitions in gesture: Structures, functions, and cognitive aspects. Ph.D. dissertation, European University Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder).Google Scholar
Bressem, Jana & Cornelia Müller
(2014) The family of AWAY-gestures. In: Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, & Jana Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Volume 21 (pp. 1592–1604). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Calbris, Geneviève
(1990) The semiotics of French gestures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, Alan
(1998) Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In John-Pierre Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 189–204). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
(2013a) Cognitive Linguistics: Spoken language and gesture as expressions of conceptualization. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Elan Fricke, Silvia H. Ladewig, David McNeill, & Sedinha Tessendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Volume 11 (pp. 182–201). Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2013b) Mimetic schemas and image schemas in cognitive linguistics and gesture studies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11 (2), 417–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, Alan & Cornelia Müller
(Eds.) (2008) Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
(1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003): Pointing and placing. In Sotaro Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 243–268). Mahwah, N.J. & London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Coulson, Seana
(2001) Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
(1993) The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphor and metonymy. Cognitive Linguistics, 41, 335–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Alan A. Cruse
(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Eve E. Sweetser
(2005) Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Debras, Camille
(2014) L’Expression multimodale du positionnement interactionnel (multimodal stance-taking). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3.Google Scholar
Dirven, René & Ralf Pörings
(Eds.) (2002) Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J.
(2011) Elements of formulation. In Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, & Curtis LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and the body in the material world (pp. 59–66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
(2002) The way we think. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Feyaerts, Kurt
(1999) Metonymic hierarchies. The conceptualization of stupidity in German idiomatic expressions. In: Klaus-Uwe Panther & Günther Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 309–332). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
(1975) An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In Cathy Cogen, Henry Thompson, Graham Thurgood, Kenneth Whistler, & James Wright (Eds.), Proceedings of the first annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 123–131). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
(1977) Scenes-and-frames semantics. In Antonio Zampolli (Ed.), Linguistic structures processing, Volume 41 (pp. 55–81). Amsterdam & New York: North Holland.Google Scholar
(1982) Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
(1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quarderni di Semantica, 61, 222–254.Google Scholar
(1988) The mechanisms of construction grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 141, 35–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. & Collin F. Baker
(2009) A frames approach to semantic analysis. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 313–340). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fricke, Ellen
(2012) Grammatik multimodal: Wie Wörter und Gesten zusammenwirken. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Jr., Raymond W.
(1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Speaking and thinking with metonymy. In Günter Radden & Zoltan Kövecses (Eds.) Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 61–76). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2017). The embodied and discourse view of metaphor: Why these are not so different and how they can be brought closer together. In Beate Hampe Ed. Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse pp. 319 334 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Goldberg, Adele
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
(2007) Environmentally coupled gestures. In Susan Duncan, Justine Cassell, & Elena Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimensions of language (pp. 195–212). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Contextures of action. In Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, & Curtis LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 182–193). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grady, Joe
(1997) Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Grady, Joe & Christopher Johnson
(2002) Converging evidence for the notions of subscene and primary scene. In René Dirven & Ralph Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 533–554). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grandhi, Sukeshini A., Gina Joue, & Irene Mittelberg
(2011) Understanding naturalness and intuitiveness in gesture production: Insights for touchless gestural interfaces. Proceedings of the ACM2011 conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), Vancouver, B.C. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hassemer, Julius
(2016) Towards a theory of Gesture Form Analysis: Imaginary forms as part of gesture conceptualisation with empirical support from motion‐capture data. Doctoral dissertation, RWTH Aachen University.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Sandra Thompson
(1980) Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 561, 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hostetter, Autumn. B., & Martha W. Alibali
(2008) Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15 (3), 495–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
(1956/1990) Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances. In Linda R. Waugh & Monique Monville-Burston (Eds.), Roman Jakobson, On language (pp. 115–133). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1960/1987) Linguistics and poetics. In Krystyna Pomorska & Stephen Rudy (Eds.), Roman Jakobson – Language in literature (pp. 62–94). Cambridge, MA: Belknap of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman & Krystyna Pomorska
(1983) Dialogues. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janzen, Terry & Barbara Shaffer
(2002) Gesture as substrate in the process of ASL grammaticalization. In Richard P. Meier, Kearsy Cormier, & David Quintos-Pozos (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken language (pp. 199–223). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark
(1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) The philosophical significance of image schemas. In Beate Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 15–33). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam
(1995) Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 231, 247–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Some reflections on the relationship between ‘gesture’ and ‘sign’. Gesture, 8 (3), 348–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Pragmatic functions of gestures: Some observations on the history of their study and their nature. Gesture, 16 (2), 157–175 ( this issue ). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
(1972) The transformation of reality in narrative syntax. In William Labov, Language in the inner city (pp. 354–396). Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ladewig, Silva H.
(2014) Recurrent gestures. In: Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, & Jana Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Volume 21 (pp. 1558–1575), Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites, Volume 11. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1993) Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 41, 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Metonymic grammar. In Klaus-Uwe Panther, Linda L. Thornburg, Antonio Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp. 45–71). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, Jeanette
(2015) Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, David
(1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Gesture and thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mittelberg, Irene
(2006) Metaphor and metonymy in language and gesture: Discourse evidence for multimodal models of grammar (Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University). Ann Arbor, MI: UMI.Google Scholar
(2008) Peircean semiotics meets conceptual metaphor: Iconic modes in gestural representations of grammar. In Alan Cienki & Cornelia Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 115–154). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010a) Geometric and image-schematic patterns in gesture space. In Vyvyan Evans & Paul Chilton (Eds.), Language, cognition, and space: The state of the art and new directions (pp. 351–385). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
(2010b) Interne und externe Metonymie: Jakobsonsche Kontiguitäts-beziehungen in redebegleitenden Gesten. Sprache und Literatur, 41 (1), 112–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013a) The exbodied mind: Cognitive-semiotic principles as motivating forces in gesture. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, & Sedinha Tessendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 750–779). Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2013b) Balancing acts: Image schemas and force dynamics as experiential essence in pictures by Paul Klee and their gestural enactments. In Michael Bokrent, Barbara Dancygier, & Jennifer Hinnell (Eds.), Language and the creative mind (pp. 325–346). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
(2014) Gestures and iconicity. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, & Jana Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 1712–1732). Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2017) Multimodal existential constructions in German: Manual actions as experiential substrate for grammatical and gestural patterns. Linguistics Vanguard, 3, s1. DOI logo.
Mittelberg, Irene & Linda R. Waugh
(2009) Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive-semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gesture. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 329–356). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2014) Gestures and metonymy. In: Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, & Jana Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 1747–1766). Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mittelberg, Irene & Gina Joue
(2017) Source actions ground metaphor via metonymy: Toward a frame-based account of gestural action in multimodal discourse. In Beate Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 119–137). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Cornelia
(1998) Redebegleitende Gesten: Kulturgeschichte – Theorie – Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Spitz Verlag.Google Scholar
(2004) Forms and uses of the palm up open hand: A case of a gesture family? In Cornelia Müller & Roland Posner (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gesture: The Berlin conference (pp. 233–256). Berlin: Weidler Verlag.Google Scholar
(2017) How recurrent gestures mean: Conventionalized contexts-of-use and embodied motivation. Gesture, 16 (2), 277–304 ( this issue ). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte & David D. Clarke
(2001) Ambiguities we live by: Towards a pragmatics of polysemy. Journal of Pragmatics, 33 (1), 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Núñez, Rafael E.
(2008) A fresh look at the foundations of mathematics: Gesture and the psychological reality of conceptual metaphor. In Alan Cienki & Cornelia Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 93–114). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Günter Radden
(Eds.) (1999) Metonymy in language and thought. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
(Eds.) (2003) Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction. Metaphorik.de, 061, 91–113.Google Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe, Linda L. Thornburg, & Antonio Barcelona
(Eds.) (2009) Metonymy and metaphor in grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parrill, Fey
(2009) Dual viewpoint in gesture. Gesture, 9 (3), 271–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parrill, Fey & Eve E. Sweetser
(2004) What we mean by meaning: Conceptual integration in gesture analysis and transcription. Gesture, 4 (2), 197–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles S.
(1960) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (1931–1958), Volume I: Principles of philosophy; Volume II: Elements of logic. Charles Hartshorne & Paul Weiss (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: The Belknap of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
(2004) On grammaticalization: Do sign languages follow the well-trodden paths? Proceedings of the 8th Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR 8) Conference, Barcelona.Google Scholar
Peirsman, Yves & Dirk Geeraerts
(2006) Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics, 17 (3), 269–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Priesters, Matthias A.
(2012) Functional patterns in gesture space. Correlating location and function of gestures using 3D motion capture technology. Unpublished M.A. thesis, RWTH Aachen University.Google Scholar
Rizzolazzi, Giacomo & Michael A. Arbib
(1998) Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21 (5), 188–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schank, Robert. C. & Robert Abelson
(1977) Scripts, goals, plans, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schoonjans, Steven
(2014) Modalpartikeln als multimodale Konstruktionen. Eine korpusbasierte Kookkurrenzanalyse von Modalpartikeln und Gestik im Deutschen. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, KU Leuven.Google Scholar
Schoonjans, Steven, Paul Sambre, Geert Brône, & Kurt Feyaerts
(2016) Vers une analyse multimodale du sens. Perspectives constructionnelles sur la gestualité co-grammaticale. Langages, 2011, 33–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan
(1985) Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Dan Slobin (Ed.), A crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Volume 2: Theoretical issues (pp. 1157–1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
(1986/1995) Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd Ed.), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Steen, Francis & Mark Turrier
(2013) Multimodal construction grammar. In Mike Borkent, Barbara Dancygier, & Jennifer Hinnell (Eds.), Language and the creative mind (pp. 255–274), Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen
(2009) Gesturecraft: The Manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Praxeology of gesture, In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silvia H. Ladewig, David McNeill, & Jana Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook of multimodality in human interaction, Volume 11 (pp. 674–688). Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, Charles Goodwin, & Curtis LeBaron
(Eds.) (2011) Embodied interaction: Language and the body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E.
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Regular metaphoricity in gesture: Bodily-based models of speech interaction. Actes du 16e Congrès International des Linguistes (CD-ROM), Elsevier.Google Scholar
(2007) Looking at space to study mental spaces: Co-speech gesture as a crucial data source in cognitive linguistics. In Monica Gonzalez-Marquez, Irene Mittelberg, Seana Coulson, & Michael Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 201–224). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Viewpoint and perspective in language and gesture: From the ground down. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve E. Sweetser (Eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective (pp. 1–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Karen
(2013) Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabacaru, Sabina
(2014) Humorous implications and meanings: A multimodal study of sarcasm in interactional humor. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université Charles de Gaulle – Lille 3.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
(1988) Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 121, 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Gestures as cues to a target. Manuscript of talk presented at the ICLC 12, University of Edmonton, Alberta, June 24 2013.Google Scholar
Waugh, Linda R. & Monique Monville-Burston
(1990) Roman Jakobson: His life, work and influence. Introduction to: Linda R. Waugh & Monique Monville Burston (Eds.), Jakobson on language (pp. 1–45). Cambridge: Belknap of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wehling, Elisabeth
(2010) Argument is gesture war: Function, form and prosody of discourse structuring gestures in political argument. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 54–65). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
(2017) Discourse management gestures. Gesture, 16 (2), 245–276 ( this issue ). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Phyllis P.
(2004) A cognitive key: Metonymic and metaphorical mappings in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics, 15 (2), 197–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziem, Alexander
(2014) Frames of understanding in text and discourse. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zima, Elisabeth
(2014) Gibt es multimodale Konstruktionen? Eine Studie zu [V(motion) in circles] und [all the way from X PREP Y], Gesprächsforschung, 151, 1–48.Google Scholar
Zima, Elisabeth & Alexander Bergs
(Guest Eds.) (2017) Toward a multimodal construction grammar (Special Issue). Linguistics Vanguard, 3, s1.Google Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan
(2005) What’s in a schema? Bodily mimesis and the grounding of language. In Beate Hampe & Joe Grady (Eds.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 313–342). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Fricke, Ellen & Irene Mittelberg
2018. Gesten. In Handbuch Pragmatik, ► pp. 312 ff. DOI logo
Gawne, Lauren, Chelsea Krajcik, Helene N. Andreassen, Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker & Barbara F. Kelly
2019. Data transparency and citation in the journal Gesture . Gesture 18:1 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Lopez-Ozieblo, Renia
2018. Can gestures help clarify the meaning of the Spanish marker ‘se’?. Lingua 208 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Meissl, Katharina, Paul Sambre & Kurt Feyaerts
2022. Mapping musical dynamics in space. A qualitative analysis of conductors' movements in orchestra rehearsals. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Mittelberg, Irene
2018. Gestures as image schemas and force gestalts: A dynamic systems approach augmented with motion-capture data analyses. Cognitive Semiotics 11:1 DOI logo
Mittelberg, Irene
2019. Visuo-Kinetic Signs Are Inherently Metonymic: How Embodied Metonymy Motivates Forms, Functions, and Schematic Patterns in Gesture. Frontiers in Psychology 10 DOI logo
Mittelberg, Irene
2019. Peirce’s universal categories: On their potential for gesture theory and multimodal analysis. Semiotica 2019:228 ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Schmitt, Rudolf
2022. Multimodale Metaphernanalyse. Skizze einer szenischen Erweiterung. In Die Praxis der systematischen Metaphernanalyse, ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.