Gestures that are used by interlocutors to manage the gist of their ‘discourse interactions’, namely content exchange and floor taking, can have one of two very different pragmatic functions: to signal inclusion and cooperation in friendly conversation, or to establish control in more argumentative conversation. While inclusive-cooperative gestures have been extensively studied (e.g., Bavelas, Chovil, Lavrie, & Wade, 1992; Kendon, 1995; Müller, 2004; Sweetser, 1998), control gestures received little attention (although see Kendon, 1995, 2004) until a recent spark of interest in their form and function (e.g., Calbris, 2011; Müller, 2017; Wehling, 2010, 2012, 2013). However, even though research has detailed important aspects of such discourse managing gestures, to date no comprehensive account of their conceptual foundations and pragmatic functions exists. The present paper fills this gap in the literature. Building on prior analyses of control gestures in argumentative discourse (e.g., Wehling, 2010) and inclusive-cooperative gestures in friendly conversation (e.g., Bavelas et al., 1992; Müller, 2004), it details a typology of discourse management gestures that distinguishes inclusive-cooperative and control gestures as separate pragmatic types and accounts for their forms and functions in terms of their conceptual foundations in primary metaphoric, space-motion schematic, and force dynamic reasoning.
Bavelas, Janet B., Nicole Chovil, Linda Coates, & Lori Roe
(1995) Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 211, 394–405.
Bressem, Jana & Cornelia Müller
(2014) The family of away gestures: Negation, refusal and negative assessment. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, Jana Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Vol. 21 (pp. 1592–1604). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Cacioppo, John, Joseph Priester, & Gary Bernston
(1993) Rudimentary determination of attitudes: II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 651, 5–17.
Calbris, Geneviève
(1990) The semiotics of French gesture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
(2008) Similarity and proximity: When does close in space mean close in mind?Memory and Cognition, 36 (6), 1047–1056.
Casasanto, Daniel & Kyle Jasmin
(2010) Good and bad in the hands of politicians: Spontaneous gestures during positive and negative speech. PLoS ONE, 5 (7): e11805.
Chen, Mark & John Bargh
(1999) Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavior predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 251, 215–224.
Cienki, Alan
(1998) Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphorical expressions. In Jean-Pierre Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 189–204). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
(1997) Motor actions in retrieval of valenced information: A motorcongruence effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 851, 1419–1427.
Förster, Jens & Fritz Strack
(1998) Motor actions in retrieval of valenced information: II: Boundary conditions for motor congruence effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 861, 1423–1426.
Gibbs, Raymond
(1996) Why many concepts are metaphorical. Cognition, 611, 309–319.
Grady, Joseph
(1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Haviland, John
(2003) How to point in Zinacantán. In Sotaro Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 139–170). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
(2003) Interplay of gaze, hand, torso orientation, and language in pointing. In Sotaro Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 307–328). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kwon, Iksoo
(2011) Evidentials and epistemic modals in a causal event structure. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George & Elisabeth Wehling
(2008) Auf leisen Sohlen ins Gehirn: Politische Sprache und ihre heimliche Macht. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer.
Ladewig, Silva
(2011) Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes, 61: [URL].
McNeill, David
(1985) So you think gestures are nonverbal?Psychological Review, 92 (3), 350–371.
McNeill, David
(1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McNeill, David
(2005) Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mittelberg, Irene
(2013) Balancing acts: Image schemas and force dynamics as experiential essence in pictures by Paul Klee and their gestural enactments. In Mike Borkent, Barbara Dancygier, Jennifer Hinnell (Eds.), Language and the creative mind (pp. 325–346). Stanford: CSLI.
Mittelberg, Irene & Linda R. Waugh
(2009) Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive-semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gesture. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 329–356). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2004) The palm-up-open-hand: A case of a gesture family? In Cornelia Müller, Roland Posner (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 233–256). Berlin: Weidler Verlag.
(2006) With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 301, 401–450.
Reddy, Michael
(1979) The conduit metaphor. In Andrew Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Semino, Elena
(2006) A corpus-based study of metaphors for speech activity in British English. In Anatol Stefanowitsch, Stefan Th. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 36–62). Berlin: de Gruyter.
(1987) Metaphorical models of thought and speech: A comparison of historical directions and metaphorical mappings in the two domains. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Sweetser, Eve
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sweetser, Eve
(1992) English metaphors for language: Motivations, conventions, and creativity. Poetics Today, 13 (4): Aspects of Metaphor and Comprehension, 705–724.
Sweetser, Eve
(1998) Regular metaphoricity in gesture: Bodily-based models of speech interaction. Actes du 16e Congrès International des Linguistes. CD-ROM: Elsevier.
Sweetser, Eve & Marisa Sizemore
(2008) Personal and interpersonal gesture spaces: Functional contrasts in language and gesture. In Andrea Tyler, Yiyoung Kim, Mari Takada (Eds.), Language in the context of use: Cognitive and discourse approaches to language and language learning (pp. 25–52). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Talmy, Leonard
(1981) Force dynamics. Paper presented at the Conference on Language and Mental Imagery. University of California, Berkeley.
Talmy, Leonard
(1988) Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 121, 49–100.
Talmy, Leonard
(2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Tom, Gail, Paul Pettersen, Teresa Lau, Trevor Burton, & Jim Cook
(1991) The role of overt headmovement in the formation of affect. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 121, 281–289.
Wehling, Elisabeth
(2010) Argument is gesture war: Function, form and prosody of discourse structuring gestures in political argument. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Wehling, Elisabeth
(2012) When interlocutors get pushy: Communicative force in discourse management gestures. Presented at the 11th Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language Conference, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Wehling, Elisabeth
(2013) Discourse management gestures: Their pragmatic functions, primary metaphors, and force-dynamics. Presented at the Gesture Pragmatics Symposium, University of California, Berkeley.
Wells, Gary & Richard Petty
(1980) The effects of overt head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 219–230.
Wilkins, David
(2003) Why pointing with the index finger is not a universal (in sociocultural and semiotic terms). In Sotaro Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 171–215). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wolff, Phillip
(2003) Models of causation and the semantics of causal verbs. Cognitive Psychology, 47 (3), 276–332.
Cited by
Cited by 16 other publications
Alviar, Camila, Rick Dale & Alexia Galati
2019. Complex Communication Dynamics: Exploring the Structure of an Academic Talk. Cognitive Science 43:3
2018. Gestures as image schemas and force gestalts: A dynamic systems approach augmented with motion-capture data analyses. Cognitive Semiotics 11:1
Mittelberg, Irene
2019. Visuo-Kinetic Signs Are Inherently Metonymic: How Embodied Metonymy Motivates Forms, Functions, and Schematic Patterns in Gesture. Frontiers in Psychology 10
2020. It’s Time to Do News Again. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 68:4 ► pp. 379 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.