Cover not available
Article published In:
Gesture
Vol. 17:2 (2018) ► pp.291–321

Open Hand Prone as a resource in multimodal claims to interruption

Stopping a co-participant’s turn-at-talk

 | University of Oulu
This paper examines the Open Hand Prone ‘vertical palm’ as a resource for participants in conversation for displaying their treatment of a co-participant’s – or their own – turn/action as interruptive. Through this practice participants can manage turn-taking by making it relevant for the co-participant to stop talking. The data for this study consist of video-recorded conversations in English and Finnish from domestic and institutional settings, as well as broadcast talk. Using multimodal conversation analysis, this study shows that the gesture occurs in situations involving overlapping/competitive talk or incompatible embodied activities that somehow affect the progressivity of the ongoing talk. This paper complements previous research on gesture studies and interaction by investigating the function these gestures take in stopping/interrupting a co-participant’s turn-at-talk across multiple settings, and by studying how the gesture functions as a part of a practice which has direct social consequences on the local organization of turn-taking.
Keywords: Open Hand Prone, turn-taking, interrupting, multimodality, interactive gestures, conversation
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • The Open Hand Prone ‘vertical palm’ and gestures in turn-taking
  • Analysis
    • Claiming continued speakership: Interrupting an incipient and emerging turn
    • ‘Legitimate’ interrupting and interruption as a joint action
    • Managing turn-taking in situations with multiactivity
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.17002.kam
References (59)
References
Bilmes, Jack (1997). Being interrupted. Language in Society, 26 (4), 507–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bressem, Jana & Cornelia Müller (2014a). A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, and Jana Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 21, pp. 1558–1574). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
(2014b). The family of Away gestures: Negation, refusal, and negative assessment. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, and Jana Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 21, pp. 1592–1604). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Brookes, Heather (2004). A repertoire of South African quotable gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14 (2), 186–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calbris, Geneviève (1990). The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
(2011). Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven (2015). Broadcast news interviews, In Karen Tracy, Cornelia Ilie, & Todd Sandel (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 1–19). London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven & John Heritage (2002). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craven, Alexandra & Jonathan Potter (2010). Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies, 121, 419–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf (Ed.) (2013a). Special Issue: Conversation analytic studies of multimodal interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 46 (1), 1–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013b). Turn-design at turn-beginnings: Multimodal resources to deal with tasks of turn-construction in German. Journal of Pragmatics, 46 (1), 91–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul (2009). ‘Quit talking while I’m interrupting’: a comparison between positions of overlap onset in conversation. In Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, & Jan Lindström (Eds.), Talk in interaction – comparative dimensions (pp. 70–93). Helsinki: SKS.Google Scholar
Duncan, Starkey (1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23 (2), 283–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in society, 5 (1), 25–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. (2001). At the intersection of turn and sequence: Negation and what comes next. In Margret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Studies in interactional linguistics (pp. 51–79). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, & Sandra A. Thompson (1996). Practices in the construction of turns: The “TCU” revisited. Pragmatics, 6 (3), 427–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
French, Peter & John Local (1983). Turn-competitive incomings. Journal of Pragmatics, 71, 17–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1978). Response cries. Language, 54 (4), 787–815. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haddington, Pentti, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, & Maurice Nevile (Eds.) (2014). Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Simon (2009a). Grammar, gesture, and cognition: The case of negation in English. PhD Thesis. Université Michel de Montaigne, Bourdeaux 3.Google Scholar
(2009b). The expression of negation through grammar and gesture. In Jordan Zlatev, Mats Andrén, Marlene Johansson Falck, & Carita Lundmark (Eds.), Studies in language and cognition (pp. 421–435). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Heritage, John (1985). Analyzing news interviews: aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In Teun A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 31, pp. 95–117) London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail (1984). Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. In Valentina D’Urso & Paolo Leonardi (Eds.), Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric (pp. 11–38). Padua, Italy: Cleup Editore.Google Scholar
(1986). Notes on ‘latency’ in overlap onset. Human Studies, 9 (2/3), 153–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004a). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004b). A sketch of some orderly aspects of overlap in natural conversation. In Gene Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 43–59). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 43–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keisanen, Tiina, Mirkka Rauniomaa, & Pentti Haddington (2014). Suspending a course of action: Managing incompatibility in moments of multiactivity. In Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, & Maurice Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 109–133). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kita, Sotaro, van Gijn, I., van der Hulst, H. (1998). Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures, and their transcription by human coders. In Wachsmuth, I. and Fröhlich, M. (Eds.), Gesture and sign language in human-computer interaction: International gesture workshop Bielefeld, Germany, September 17–19, 1997: Proceedings (pp. 23–35). Berlin & London: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladewig, Silva H. (2014). Recurrent gestures. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, & Jana Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 21, pp. 1558–1574). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Laursen, Lone (2005). Towards an embodied grammar: gesture in tying practices constructing obvious cohesion. In Interacting Bodies: Online Proceedings of the 2nd ISGS Conference (pp. 15–18).Google Scholar
Licoppe, C. & Tuncer, S. (2014). Attending to a summons and putting other activities ‘on hold’: Multiactivity as a recognisable interactional accomplishment. In Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, & Maurice Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 167–190). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
McNeill, David (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza (2007). Multimodal resources for turn-taking: pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9 (2), 194–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). The dynamics of embodied participation and language choice in multilingual meetings. Language in Society, 411, 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Embodied and spatial resources for turn-taking in institutional multi-party interactions: Participatory democracy debates. Journal of Pragmatics, 46 (1), 39–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014a). The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 651, 137–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014b). Conventions for multimodal transcription. [URL] (accessed June 12, 2018).
(2016a). Multimodal resources and the organization of social interaction. Verbal Communication, 31, 329–349.Google Scholar
(2016b). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20 (3), 336–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza & Florence Oloff (2011). Gesture in overlap: the situated establishment of speakership. In Gale Stam & Mika Ishino. Integrating gesture (pp. 321–337). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Cornelia (2017). How recurrent gestures mean. Gesture, 16 (2), 277–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevile, Maurice (2015). The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48 (2), 121–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, & Gail Jefferson (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50 (4), 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentces. In Deborah Tannen (Ed.), Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics (pp. 71–93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(1984). On some gesture’s relation to talk. In John Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 266–298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1996). Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, & Sandra A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998). Body torque. Social Research, 65 (3), 535–596.Google Scholar
(2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29 (1), 1–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). Accounts of conduct in interaction: Interruption, overlap, and turn-taking. In Jonathan H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 287–321). New York: Kluwer Academic & Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
Sikveland, Rein Ove & Richard Ogden (2012). Holding gestures across turns: Moments to generate shared understanding. Gesture, 12 (2), 166–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya (2004). “No no no” and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research, 30 (2), 260–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya & Jeffrey D. Robinson (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35 (3), 367–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen & Ulrike Hartge (1992). Gestures at the transition place. In Peter Auer & Aldo di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 135–157). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutinen, M. (2014). Negotiating favourable conditions for resuming suspended activities. In Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, & Maurice Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 137–165). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Walker, Gareth (2010). The phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice: Rush-throughs in English talk-in-interaction. In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, & Margret Selting (Eds.), Prosody in interaction (pp. 51–72). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weatherall, Ann & David M. Edmonds (2018). Speakers formulating their talk as interruptive. Journal of Pragmatics, 1231, 11–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wehling, Elisabeth (2009). Argument is gesture war: Function, form, and prosody of discourse structuring gestures in political argument. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 35 (2), 54–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Discourse management gestures. Gesture, 16 (2), 245–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Dyrmo, Tomasz
2024. Image schemas in gestural metaphorical scenarios of swearing. Multimodal Communication 13:2 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Corella, Meghan
2023. “Talk to the hand”: handling peer conflict through gestural socialization in an elementary classroom. Frontiers in Communication 8 DOI logo
Satti, Ignacio
2023. When it’s “now or never”. Narrative Inquiry 33:1 ► pp. 222 ff. DOI logo
Kamunen, Antti, Pentti Haddington & Iira Rautiainen
2022. “It seems to be some kind of an accident”: Perception and team decision-making in time critical situations. Journal of Pragmatics 195 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Ferrara, Lindsay
2020. Some interactional functions of finger pointing in signed language conversations. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1 DOI logo
Gawne, Lauren, Chelsea Krajcik, Helene N. Andreassen, Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker & Barbara F. Kelly
2019. Data transparency and citation in the journal Gesture . Gesture 18:1 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.