Cover not available
Article published In:
Recurrent Gestures
Edited by Simon Harrison, Silva H. Ladewig and Jana Bressem
[Gesture 20:2] 2021
► pp. 254–284

The feel of a recurrent gesture

Embedding the Vertical Palm within a gift-giving episode in China (aka the ‘seesaw battle’)

| City University of Hong Kong
The inner workings of recurrent gestures can now be distilled from almost three decades’ worth of fine-grained studies into gesture form variants, kinesic organization with speech, core semantic themes, and discourse-interactive functions. Yet several questions about this gesture category have remained in the background. How do such gestures relate to the behavioral activities within which they occur, their wider embodied and intercorporeal context, and the relations between the people performing them? These questions are addressed by adopting an enactive approach to human relating and by analysing how the Vertical Palm gesture form materializes during an episode of gift-giving between two friends in China, where the practice involves elaborate embodied maneuvers resulting in a visibly affective ‘seesaw battle’. Treating gift-giving as a situation for participatory sense-making spun from a complex web of sensorimotor schemes, this seesaw battle provides a natural ecology for exploring understudied dimensions of the Vertical Palm recurrent gesture as embodied, embedded, and enacted during a practice with culturally-specific dimensions.
Keywords: gift giving, China, recurrent gestures, Vertical Palm gesture, the enactive approach, participatory sense-making
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Enaction theory and participatory sense-making
    • 1.2Gift giving in China
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Data transcription and analysis
    • 2.2Data analysis
  • 3.Micro-analysis
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Afterthought
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 May 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.21003.har
References (61)
References
Beaupoil-Hourdel, P. (2015). Multimodal acquisition and expression of negation. Analysis of a videotaped and longitudinal corpus of a French and an English mother-child dyad. Ph.D. Dissertation, Sorbonne Nouvelle University, Paris.
Bressem, J., Ladewig, S., & Müller, C. (2013). Linguistic annotation system for gestures. In C. Müller, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 11, pp. 1098–1124). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bressem, J., Stein, N., & Wegener, C. (2017). Multimodal language use in Savosavo: Refusing, excluding and negating with speech and gesture. Pragmatics, 27 (2), 173–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bressem, J. & Müller, C. (2017). The ‘Negative-Assessment-Construction’: A multimodal pattern based on a recurrent gesture? Linguistics Vanguard, 3 (s1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bressem, J. & Wegener, C. (2021, this issue). Handling talk: A cross-linguistic perspective on discursive functions of gestures in German and Savosavo.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (1990). The semiotics of French gesture. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Candiotto, L. & De Jaegher, H. (2020). Love in-between. The Journal of Ethics, 25 1, 501–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chan, A. (2006). The Chinese concepts of Guanxi, Mianzi, Renqing and Bao: Their interrelationships and implications for international business. In: ANZMAC 2006 Proceedings: Brisbane, Queensland 4–6 December 2006. Advancing Theory, Maintaining Relevance.Google Scholar
Cuffari, E. (2012). Gestural sense-making: Hand gestures as intersubjective linguistic enactments. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11 (4), 599–622. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuffari, E., Di Paolo, E., & De Jaegher, H. (2021). Letting language be: Reflections on enactive method. Filosofia Unisinos – Unisinos Journal of Philosophy, 22 (1), 117–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Jaeger, H. (2019). Loving and knowing: reflections for an engaged epistemology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20 (5), 847–870. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Jaegher, H. & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6 1, 485–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Debras, C. (2017). The shrug: Forms and meanings of a compound enactment. Gesture, 16 (1), 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Paolo, E., Cuffari, E., & De Jaegher, H. (2018). Linguistic bodies: The continuity between life and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Paolo, E. A., Buhrmann, T., & Barandiaran, X. E. (2017). Sensorimotor Life: An enactive proposal. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (2017). How we talk. The inner workings of conversation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2017). Enactivist interventions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2007). Environmentally coupled gestures. In S. Duncan, H. Cassell, & E. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language. Essays in honor of David McNeill (pp. 195–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. (2017). Haptic sociality: The embodied interactive constitution of intimacy through touch. In C. Meyer, J. Streeck, & J. S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction (pp. 73–102). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. (2014). The organization of kinesic ensembles associated with negation. Gesture, 14 (2), 117–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). The impulse to gesture: Where language, bodies, and minds intersect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Through the magical pink walkway: A behavior setting’s invitation to embodied sense-makers. Frontiers in Psychology, 11 1, 1576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Showing as sense-making in oral presentations: The speech-gesture-slide interplay in TED Talks by Professor Brian Cox. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(forthcoming). Gestures associated with negation. In A. Cienki (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of gesture studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harrison, S., Ladewig, S., & Bressem, J. (2021, this issue). The diversity of recurrency: Recurrent gestures across bodies, languages, and cultural practices. Gesture, 20 (2), 143–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horst, D., Boll, F., Schmitt, C., & Müller, C. (2014). Gestures as interactive expressive movement: Inter-affectivity in face-to-face communication. In C. Müller, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 21, pp. 2112–2125). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hua, Z., Wei, L., & Yuan, Q. (2000). The sequential organisation of gift offering and acceptance in Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 32 1, 81–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jensen, T. W. (2014). Emotion in languaging: Languaging as affective, adaptive, and flexible behavior in social interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 , 720, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jonas, H. (1966). The phenomenon of life. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Jungheim, N. O. (2009). Japanese refusals and obligatory contexts for gestures. Eibungaku [English literature], 95 1, 1–18.Google Scholar
Katila, J. & Philipsen, J. S. (2019). The intercorporeality of closing a curtain: Sharing similar past experiences in interaction. Pragmatics & Cognition, 26 (2/3), 167–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture. Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In M. R. Key (Ed.), The relation between verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 207–227). The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladewig, S. H. (2014). Recurrent gestures. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 21, pp. 1558–1574). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ladewig, S. H. & Hotze, L. (2021, this issue). The Slapping movement as an embodied practice of dislike: Inter-affectivity in interactions among children. Gesture, 20 (2), 285–312.Google Scholar
Lapaire, J.-R. (2006). Negation, reification and manipulation in a cognitive grammar of substance. In S. Bonnefille & S. Salbayre (Eds.), La négation (pp. 333–349). Tours: Press Universitaires François-Rabelais. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Grammar, gesture and cognition: Insights from multimodal utterances and applications for gesture analysis. Visnyk of Lviv University, Philology Series, 52 1, 88–103.Google Scholar
Li, X. (2013). Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 67 1, 34–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maclaren, K. (2002). Intercorporeality, intersubjectivity and the problem of ‘letting others be’. Chiasmi International: Trilingual Studies Concerning Merleau-Ponty’s Thought, 4 1, 187–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maturana, H. R. & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston & London: Shambhala.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2018). Recurrent gestures: How the mental reflects the social. Gesture, 17 (2), 229–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible. (A. Lingis, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
(1945/2012). Phenomenology of perception (2nd Ed.). (D. Landes, Trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meyer, C., Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S. (2017). Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L. (2007). Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9 (2), 194–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, C., Bressem, J., and Ladewig, S. (2013). Towards a grammar of gestures: A form-based view. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 11, pp. 707–733). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. & Kappelhoff, H. (2018). Cinematic metaphor: Experience – affectivity – temporality. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2011). The primacy of movement. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, M. P. (2021). The interactive ecology of construal in gesture: A microethnographic analysis of peer learning at an EMI university in China. PhD Dissertation, University of Nottingham Ningbo, China.
Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Self-making man. A day of action, life, and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Gesture research. In Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics: 22nd annual installment (pp. 1–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibault, P. J. (2020). Distributed languaging, affective dynamics, and the human ecology. Vol. 11: The sense-making body. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, M. M.-H. (1994). Gifts, favors and banquets: The art of social relationships in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Yeung, D. Y., Fung, H. H., & Lang, F. R. (2007). Gender differences in social network characteristics and psychological well-being among Hong Kong Chinese: The role of future time perspective and adherence to Renqing. Aging and Mental Health, 11 (1), 45–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhou, X., Shi, G., Liu, M. T., & Bu, H. (2015). The mediating roles of renqing and ganqing in Chinese relationship marketing. Nankai Business Review International, 6 (2), 156–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Cuffari, Elena Clare
2024. Gesture and Intersubjectivity. In The Cambridge Handbook of Gesture Studies, ► pp. 599 ff. DOI logo
Harrison, Simon
2024. On Grammar–Gesture Relations: Gestures Associated with Negation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Gesture Studies, ► pp. 446 ff. DOI logo
Cuffari, Elena, George Fourlas & Maceo Whatley
2022. “Bringing new life in”: Hope as a know-how of not knowing. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Harrison, Simon & Silva H. Ladewig
2021. Recurrent gestures throughout bodies, languages, and cultural practices. Gesture 20:2 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Harrison, Simon, Silva H. Ladewig & Jana Bressem
2021. The diversity of recurrency. Gesture 20:2 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Ladewig, Silva H. & Lena Hotze
2021. The Slapping movement as an embodied practice of dislike. Gesture 20:2 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Ladewig, Silva H. & Lena Hotze
2023. From action to performative gesture: the Slapping movement used by children at the age of four to six. Semiotica 2023:250 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.