The inner workings of recurrent gestures can now be distilled from almost three decades’ worth of fine-grained
studies into gesture form variants, kinesic organization with speech, core semantic themes, and discourse-interactive functions.
Yet several questions about this gesture category have remained in the background. How do such gestures relate to the behavioral
activities within which they occur, their wider embodied and intercorporeal context, and the relations between the people
performing them? These questions are addressed by adopting an enactive approach to human relating and by analysing how the Vertical
Palm gesture form materializes during an episode of gift-giving between two friends in China, where the practice involves
elaborate embodied maneuvers resulting in a visibly affective ‘seesaw battle’. Treating gift-giving as a situation for
participatory sense-making spun from a complex web of sensorimotor schemes, this seesaw battle provides a natural ecology for
exploring understudied dimensions of the Vertical Palm recurrent gesture as embodied, embedded, and enacted during a practice with
culturally-specific dimensions.
Beaupoil-Hourdel, P. (2015). Multimodal
acquisition and expression of negation. Analysis of a videotaped and longitudinal corpus of a French and an English
mother-child dyad. Ph.D. Dissertation, Sorbonne Nouvelle University, Paris.
Bressem, J., Ladewig, S., & Müller, C. (2013). Linguistic
annotation system for gestures. In C. Müller, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body –
language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human
interaction (Vol. 11, pp. 1098–1124). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bressem, J. & Müller, C. (2017). The
‘Negative-Assessment-Construction’: A multimodal pattern based on a recurrent
gesture?Linguistics
Vanguard, 3 (s1).
Bressem, J. & Wegener, C. (2021, this
issue). Handling talk: A cross-linguistic perspective on discursive functions of gestures in
German and Savosavo.
Calbris, G. (1990). The
semiotics of French gesture. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Candiotto, L. & De Jaegher, H. (2020). Love
in-between. The Journal of
Ethics,
25
1, 501–524.
Chan, A. (2006). The
Chinese concepts of Guanxi, Mianzi, Renqing and Bao: Their interrelationships and implications for international
business. In: ANZMAC 2006 Proceedings: Brisbane, Queensland 4–6
December 2006. Advancing Theory, Maintaining Relevance.
Cuffari, E. (2012). Gestural
sense-making: Hand gestures as intersubjective linguistic enactments. Phenomenology and the
Cognitive
Sciences,
11
(4), 599–622.
Cuffari, E., Di Paolo, E., & De Jaegher, H. (2021). Letting
language be: Reflections on enactive method. Filosofia Unisinos – Unisinos Journal of
Philosophy,
22
(1), 117–124.
De Jaeger, H. (2019). Loving
and knowing: reflections for an engaged epistemology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive
Sciences,
20
(5), 847–870.
De Jaegher, H. & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory
sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive
Sciences,
6
1, 485–507.
Di Paolo, E., Cuffari, E., & De Jaegher, H. (2018). Linguistic bodies: The continuity between life and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Di Paolo, E. A., Buhrmann, T., & Barandiaran, X. E. (2017). Sensorimotor
Life: An enactive proposal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Enfield, N. J. (2017). How we talk. The inner workings of conversation. New York: Basic Books.
Gallagher, S. (2017). Enactivist
interventions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Goodwin, C. (2007). Environmentally
coupled gestures. In S. Duncan, H. Cassell, & E. Levy (Eds.), Gesture
and the dynamic dimension of language. Essays in honor of David
McNeill (pp. 195–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goodwin, M. H. (2017). Haptic
sociality: The embodied interactive constitution of intimacy through
touch. In C. Meyer, J. Streeck, & J. S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality:
Emerging socialities in
interaction (pp. 73–102). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harrison, S. (2018). The
impulse to gesture: Where language, bodies, and minds
intersect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harrison, S. (2020). Through
the magical pink walkway: A behavior setting’s invitation to embodied sense-makers. Frontiers
in Psychology,
11
1, 1576.
Harrison, S. (2021). Showing
as sense-making in oral presentations: The speech-gesture-slide interplay in TED Talks by Professor Brian
Cox. Journal of English for Academic
Purposes, 531.
Harrison, S. (forthcoming). Gestures
associated with negation. In A. Cienki (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of gesture
studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horst, D., Boll, F., Schmitt, C., & Müller, C. (2014). Gestures
as interactive expressive movement: Inter-affectivity in face-to-face
communication. In C. Müller, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body –
language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human
interaction (Vol. 21, pp. 2112–2125). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Hua, Z., Wei, L., & Yuan, Q. (2000). The
sequential organisation of gift offering and acceptance in Chinese. Journal of
Pragmatics,
32
1, 81–103.
Ingold, T. (2011). Being
alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and
description. London: Routledge.
Jensen, T. W. (2014). Emotion
in languaging: Languaging as affective, adaptive, and flexible behavior in social
interaction. Frontiers in
Psychology,
5
, 720, 1–14.
Jonas, H. (1966). The
phenomenon of life. New York: Harper & Row.
Jungheim, N. O. (2009). Japanese
refusals and obligatory contexts for gestures. Eibungaku [English
literature],
95
1, 1–18.
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture.
Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation
and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In M. R. Key (Ed.), The
relation between verbal and nonverbal
communication (pp. 207–227). The Hague: Mouton.
Ladewig, S. H. (2014). Recurrent
gestures. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body –
language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human
interaction (Vol. 21, pp. 1558–1574). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Ladewig, S. H. & Hotze, L. (2021, this issue). The Slapping movement as an embodied practice of dislike: Inter-affectivity in interactions among children. Gesture, 20 (2), 285–312.
Lapaire, J.-R. (2006). Negation, reification and manipulation in a cognitive grammar of substance. In S. Bonnefille & S. Salbayre (Eds.), La négation (pp. 333–349). Tours: Press Universitaires François-Rabelais. [URL].
Lapaire, J.-R. (2011). Grammar,
gesture and cognition: Insights from multimodal utterances and applications for gesture
analysis. Visnyk of Lviv University, Philology
Series,
52
1, 88–103.
Li, X. (2013). Leaning
and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversation. Journal of
Pragmatics,
67
1, 34–60.
Maclaren, K. (2002). Intercorporeality,
intersubjectivity and the problem of ‘letting others be’. Chiasmi International: Trilingual
Studies Concerning Merleau-Ponty’s
Thought,
4
1, 187–210.
Maturana, H. R. & Varela, F. J. (1987). The
tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston & London: Shambhala.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand
and mind: What gestures reveal about
thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Müller, C., Bressem, J., and Ladewig, S. (2013). Towards
a grammar of gestures: A form-based view. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body –
language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human
interaction (Vol. 11, pp. 707–733). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Müller, C. & Kappelhoff, H. (2018). Cinematic
metaphor: Experience – affectivity –
temporality. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2011). The primacy of movement. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Stevens, M. P. (2021). The
interactive ecology of construal in gesture: A microethnographic analysis of peer learning at an EMI university in
China. PhD Dissertation, University of Nottingham Ningbo, China.
Streeck, J. (2017). Self-making
man. A day of action, life, and
language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Streeck, J. (2019). Gesture
research. In Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook
of pragmatics: 22nd annual
installment (pp. 1–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thibault, P. J. (2020). Distributed
languaging, affective dynamics, and the human
ecology. Vol. 11: The sense-making
body. London: Routledge.
Thompson, E. (2007). Mind
in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Yang, M. M.-H. (1994). Gifts,
favors and banquets: The art of social relationships in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Yeung, D. Y., Fung, H. H., & Lang, F. R. (2007). Gender
differences in social network characteristics and psychological well-being among Hong Kong Chinese: The role of future time
perspective and adherence to Renqing. Aging and Mental
Health,
11
(1), 45–56.
Zhou, X., Shi, G., Liu, M. T., & Bu, H. (2015). The
mediating roles of renqing and ganqing in Chinese relationship marketing. Nankai Business
Review
International,
6
(2), 156–176.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Chen, Yaoyao, Svenja Adolphs & Dawn Knight
2024. Towards a speech-gesture profile of discourse markers: The case of ‘I mean’. Lingua 312 ► pp. 103836 ff.
Cienki, Alan
2024. Variable embodiment of stance-taking and footing in simultaneous interpreting. Frontiers in Psychology 15
Cuffari, Elena Clare
2024. Gesture and Intersubjectivity. In The Cambridge Handbook of Gesture Studies, ► pp. 599 ff.
Harrison, Simon
2024. On Grammar–Gesture Relations: Gestures Associated with Negation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Gesture Studies, ► pp. 446 ff.
Cuffari, Elena, George Fourlas & Maceo Whatley
2022. “Bringing new life in”: Hope as a know-how of not knowing. Frontiers in Psychology 13
2023. From action to performative gesture: the Slapping movement used by children at the age of four to six. Semiotica 2023:250 ► pp. 91 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.