Article published In:
GestureVol. 21:1 (2022) ► pp.82–114
Managing co-presence with a wave of the hand
Waving as an interactional resource in openings and closings of video-mediated breaks from work
The article examines naturally-occuring video-mediated breaks from work as social activity and focuses on the use
of waving gestures in their openings and closings. Drawing on multimodal conversation analysis as a research method and recorded
virtual breaks of two work communities in Finland as data, the study shows that, contrary to openings and closings in a physical
breakroom at the workplace, waving ‘hello’ or ‘goodbye’ is a prevalent practice in video-mediated break openings and closings. By
waving their hand(s), which is typically accompanied by a verbal greeting or farewell, participants make their own arrival or
departure, or their orientation to the arrival or departure of someone else, visible and explicit. Thus, waving facilitates the
management of co-presence in technology-mediated encounters. Further, by waving in conjunction with other upgraded features of
openings and closings, participants engage in important relationship maintenance work during their encounter.
Keywords: break from work, closing, conversation analysis, co-presence, manual gesture, multimodality, opening, social interaction, video-mediated interaction, waving
Article outline
- Introduction
- Interactional resources for openings and closings
- Data and method
- Analysis and findings
- Waving hello
- Waving when Opening an Encounter
- Waving when Joining an Ongoing Encounter
- Waving goodbye
- Waving when Leaving an Encounter
- Waving when closing an encounter
- Waving hello
- Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (62)
Antaki, C. (2002). “Lovely”:
Turn-initial high-grade assessments in telephone closings. Discourse
Studies,
4
(1), 5–23. 
Arminen, I., Licoppe, C., & Spagnolli, A. (2016). Respecifying
mediated interaction. Research on Language and Social
Interaction,
49
(4), 290–309.
Auer, P. (1990). Rhythm
in telephone closings. Human
Studies,
13
(4), 361–392.
Beach, W. (1995). Conversation
analysis: “Okay” as a clue for understanding
consequentiality. In S. J. Sigman (Ed.), The
consequentiality of
communication (pp. 121–162). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Broth, M., & Mondada, L. (2013). Walking
away: The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction. Journal of
Pragmatics,
47
1, 41–58.
Button, G. (1987). Moving
out of closings. In G. Button (Ed.), Talk
and social
organisation (pp. 101–151). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1996). The
prosody of repetition: On quoting and mimicry. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody
in conversation: Interactional
studies (pp. 366–405). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Stefani, E., & Mondada, L. (2018). Encounters
in public space: How acquainted versus unacquainted persons establish social and spatial
arrangements. Research on Language and Social
Interaction,
51
(3), 248–270.
Due, B. L., & Licoppe, C. (2021). Video-mediated
interaction (VMI): Introduction to a special issue on the multimodal accomplishment of VMI institutional
activities. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human
Sociality,
3
(3).
Fatigante, M., Liberati, V., & Pontecorvo, C. (2010). Transitions
in and out of games: How parents and children bracket game episodes at home. Research on
Language and Social
Interaction,
43
(4), 346–371.
Fayard, A. L. (2006). Interacting
on a video-mediated stage: The collaborative construction of a video-mediated
setting. Information Technology &
People,
19
(2), 152–169.
Firth, R. (1972). Verbal
and bodily rituals of greeting and parting. In J. S. La Fontaine (Ed.), The
interpretation of ritual. Essays in honour of A. I.
Richards (pp. 1–38). London: Routledge.
Ford, C. E., & Fox, B. A. (2010). Multiple
practices for constructing laughables. In D. Barth-Weingarten, E. Reber, & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody
in
interaction (pp. 339–368). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters:
Two studies in the sociology of
interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
(1963). Behavior
in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: The Free Press.
(1981). Forms
of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goodwin, M. H. (2017). Haptic
sociality: The embodied interactive constitution of intimacy through
touch. In C. Mayer, J. Streeck, & J. S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality:
Emerging socialities in
interaction (pp. 73–102). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harper, R., Watson, R., & Licoppe, C. (2017). Interpersonal
video communication as a site of human
sociality. Pragmatics,
27
(3), 301–318.
Harren, I., & Raitaniemi, M. (2008). The
sequential structure of closings in private German phone calls. Gesprächsforschung:
Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen
Interaktion,
9
1, 198–223. [URL]
Heath, C. (1981). The
opening sequence in doctor-patient interaction. In P. Atkinson, & C. Heath (Eds), Medical
work: Realities and
routines (pp. 71–90). Aldershot: Gower.
(1985). The
consultation’s end: the coordination of speech and body movement. International Journal of the
Sociology of
Language,
51
1, 27–42.
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1993). Disembodied
conduct: Interactional asymmetries in video-mediated
communication. In G. Button (Ed.), Technology
in working order: Studies of work, interaction and
technology (pp. 35–54). London: Routledge.
Helisten, M. (2017). Resumptions
as multimodal achievements in conversational (story)tellings. Journal of
Pragmatics,
112
1, 1–19.
Helisten, M., & Siromaa, M. (2022). ‘Right,
already brewing there’: Arriving to the staff breakroom and beginning interaction with a co-present
colleague. Journal of
Pragmatics,
193
1, 139–154.
Hoey, E. M. (2017). Sequence
recompletion: A practice for managing lapses in conversation. Journal of
Pragmatics,
109
1, 47–63.
Ilomäki, S., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2020). From
appearings to disengagements: Openings and closings in video-mediated tele-homecare
encounters. Social Interaction. Video-based Studies of Human
Sociality,
3
(3). [URL].
Jefferson, G. (1979). A
technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday
language: Studies in
ethnomethodology (pp. 79–96). Irvington: Irvington Publishers.
(2004). Glossary
of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation
analysis: Studies from the first
generation (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting
interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kendon, A., & Ferber, A. (1973). A
description of some human greetings. In R. P. Michael, & J. H. Crook (Eds.), Comparative
ecology and behaviour of
primates (pp. 591–668). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
Koivisto, A., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (2021). OKAY
as a response to informings in Finnish. In E. Betz, A. Deppermann, L. Mondada, & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), OKAY
across Languages: Toward a comparative approach to its use in
talk-in-interaction (pp. 206–233). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Laurier, E. (2008). Drinking
up endings: Conversational resources of the café. Language &
Communication,
28
(2), 165–181.
LeBaron, C. D., & Jones, S. E. (2002). Closing
up closings: Showing the relevance of the social and material surround to the completion of an
interaction. Journal of
Communication,
52
(3), 542–565.
Licoppe, C. (2017). Skype
appearances, multiple greetings and ‘coucou’. The sequential organization of video-mediated conversational
openings. Pragmatics,
27
(3), 351–386.
Licoppe, C., & Morel, J. (2012). Video-in-interaction:
“Talking heads” and the multimodal organization of mobile and Skype video calls. Research on
Language and Social
Interaction,
45
(4), 399–429.
Luff, P., Heath, C., Kuzuoka, H., Hindmarsh, J., Yamazaki, K., & Oyama, S. (2003). Fractured
ecologies: Creating environments for collaboration. Human–Computer
Interaction,
18
(1), 51–84.
Mlynář, J., González-Martínez, E., & Lalanne, D. (2018). Situated
organization of video-mediated interaction: A review of ethnomethodological and conversation analytic
studies. Interacting with
Computers,
30
(2), 73–84.
Mondada, L. (2014). The
local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of
Pragmatics,
65
1, 137–156.
(2019). Conventions
for multimodal transcription, version 5.0.1. Available at [URL] (accessed June 3, 2021).
Mondada, L., Bänninger, J., Bouaouina, S. A., Camus, L., Gauthier, G., Hänggi, P., Koda, M., Svensson, H., & Tekin, B. S. (2020). Human
sociality in the times of the Covid-19 pandemic: A systematic examination of change in
greetings. Journal of
Sociolinguistics,
24
(4), 441–468.
Nielsen, M. F. (2013). “Stepping
stones” in opening and closing department meetings. International Journal of Business
Communication,
50
(1), 34–67.
Pillet-Shore, D. (2008). Coming
together: Creating and maintaining social relationships through the openings of face-to-face
interactions. Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.
(2012). Greeting: Displaying
stance through prosodic recipient design. Research on Language and Social
Interaction,
45
(4), 375–398.
(2018). How
to begin. Research on Language and Social
Interaction,
51
(3), 213–231.
Raevaara, L. (1989).
No – vuoronalkuinen partikkeli [
No – turn-initial particle]. In A. Hakulinen (Ed.), Suomalaisen
keskustelun keinoja
I (pp. 147–161). Helsinki: Department of Finnish Language, University of Helsinki.
Rintel, S. (2013a). Tech-tied
or tongue-tied? Technological versus social trouble in relational video calling. Proceedings of
the Forty-Sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
2013, 3433–3352.
(2013b). Video
calling in long-distance relationships: The opportunistic use of audio/video distortions as a relational
resource. The Electronic Journal of Communication / La Revue Electronic de
Communication,
23
(1–2).
Robinson, J. D. (1998). Getting
down to business: talk, gaze, and body orientation during openings of doctor-patient
consultations. Human Communication
Research,
25
(1), 97–123.
Robinson, J. D., & Stivers, T. (2001). Achieving
activity transitions in physician-patient encounters. From history taking to physical
examination. Human Communication
Research,
27
(2), 253–298.
Rossano, F. (2012). Gaze
behavior in face-to-face interaction. Doctoral
dissertation. Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen. [URL]
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing
in conversational openings. American
Anthropologist,
70
(6), 1075–1095.
(1986). The
routine as achievement. Human
Studies,
9
1, 111–151.
(2007). Sequence
organization in interaction. A primer in conversation
analysis. Volume 11. Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening
up
closings. Semiotica,
8
(4), 289–327.
Siitonen, P., & Siromaa, M. (2021). Accounting
for leaving the break room: Work obligations as a resource in transitions from one activity to another at the
workplace. Journal of
Pragmatics,
171
1, 178–199.
Sorjonen, M.-L. (2001). Responding
in conversation. A study of response particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sorjonen, M.-L., & Raevaara, L. (2006). Kuinka päästä alkuun? Asiointikeskustelun aloittamistavoista [How do I get started? About the manners of initiating
conversations]. In M.-L. Sorjonen, & L. Raevaara (Eds.), Arjen
asiointia. Keskusteluja Kelan tiskin
äärellä (pp. 48–85). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Stommel, W., van Goor, H., & Stommel, M. (2019). Other-attentiveness
in video consultation openings: A conversation analysis of video-mediated versus face-to-face
consultations. Journal of Computer-Mediated
Communication,
24
(6), 275–292.
Sutinen, M. (2014). Negotiating
favourable conditions for resuming suspended activities. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity
in social interaction. Beyond
multitasking (pp. 137–165). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Svinhufvud, K., & Vehviläinen, S. (2013). Papers,
documents, and the opening of an academic supervision encounter. Text &
Talk,
33
(1), 139–166.
Tuncer, S. (2015). Walking
away: An embodied resource to close informal encounters in offices. Journal of
Pragmatics,
76
1, 101–116.
Tuncer, S., & Licoppe, C. (2018). Open
door environments as interactional resources to initiate unscheduled encounters in office
organizations. Culture and
Organization,
24
(1), 11–30.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Peteri, Virve, Kirsti Lempiäinen & Merja Kinnunen
2024. A break room as spatial and material order for interaction. Culture and Organization ► pp. 1 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.